Knowledge (XXG)

Estelle v. Gamble

Source ๐Ÿ“

42: 472: 288:
The Court found for the defendant because it viewed his failure to receive proper medical care as "inadvertent". The case nevertheless established the principle that the deliberate failure of prison authorities to address the medical needs of an inmate constitutes "cruel and unusual punishment". It
311:
wrote for a 7โˆ’2 majority of the Court that McKinney's claim that prison officials "have, with deliberate indifference, exposed him to levels of ETS that pose an unreasonable risk of serious damage to his future health" raised a valid claim under the Eighth Amendment. He wrote that McKinney would
247:. Specifically, the Court held that a prisoner must allege acts or omissions sufficiently harmful to evidence deliberate indifference to serious medical needs. Though the Court credited Gamble's complaint that doctors had failed to provide appropriate care, it held that 307:, the Court considered the case of a Nevada prisoner, "the cellmate of a five-pack-a-day smoker," who sought to be housed in an environment free of second-hand smoke. McKinney suffered from no ailment and sought no medical treatment. Justice 316:
unwillingly to such a risk. In other words, the prisoner must show that the risk of which he complains is not one that today's society chooses to tolerate." He would also have to prove that prison officials acted with
271:
assignment loading and unloading cotton bales from a truck. On November 9, 1973, he injured his back when a cotton bale fell on him. Over the next three months, he complained of back and chest pains, was subject to
1272: 330: 312:
have to prove both the scientific facts of the dangers of exposure to second-hand smoke and prove that community standards supported him, that "it violates contemporary standards of decency to expose
1340: 1350: 487: 83: 289:
held that "deliberate indifference to serious medical needs of prisoners constitutes the 'unnecessary and wanton infliction of pain'...proscribed by the Eighth Amendment."
573: 240: 113: 1365: 1335: 564: 1345: 1360: 719: 116:
rights, a prisoner must allege acts or omissions sufficiently harmful to evidence deliberate indifference to serious medical needs, and that
264: 244: 383: 236: 46: 451: 410: 268: 1199: 299:
The Supreme Court in 1993 extended the requirement that inmates receive required medical care beyond what it established in
557: 336: 252: 121: 1288: 350: 1355: 1151: 823: 1304: 1251: 815: 1280: 676: 550: 318: 525: 1263: 1127: 727: 612: 604: 147: 1234: 1031: 975: 855: 491: 75: 991: 887: 879: 863: 847: 692: 636: 273: 476: 1092: 1047: 783: 684: 644: 507: 375:
Individual Rights and Liberties Under the U.S. Constitution: The Case Law of the U.S. Supreme Court
248: 179: 117: 1159: 1084: 1039: 911: 903: 831: 807: 775: 743: 652: 425: 1175: 1068: 959: 927: 895: 791: 735: 711: 668: 660: 620: 447: 441: 406: 379: 373: 343: 191: 183: 167: 400: 1296: 1191: 1076: 1015: 1007: 935: 871: 839: 799: 759: 751: 139: 1135: 999: 967: 951: 943: 919: 767: 542: 239:
established the standard of what a prisoner must plead in order to claim a violation of
1243: 1183: 1119: 1100: 1023: 498: 171: 155: 516: 1329: 628: 983: 109: 17: 78: 308: 159: 471: 94: 276:
for refusing to work, and ultimately was treated for an irregular heartbeat.
402:
Constitutional Remedies: A Reference Guide to the United States Constitution
90: 534: 208:
Marshall, joined by Burger, Brennan, Stewart, White, Powell, Rehnquist
281: 1273:
Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc.
446:. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning. pp. 297โ€“9. 331:
List of United States Supreme Court cases involving mental health
1222: 585: 546: 41: 440:
Cripe, Clair A.; Pearlman, Michael G.; Kosiak, Daryl (2013).
1341:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Burger Court
65:
Estelle, Corrections Director, et al. v. J. W. Gamble
443:
Legal Aspects of Corrections Management, 3rd edition
1262: 1233: 1111: 1058: 703: 596: 279:On February 11, 1974, Gamble initiated his lawsuit 220: 212: 204: 199: 128: 102: 70: 60: 53: 34: 235:, 429 U.S. 97 (1976), was a case in which the 558: 263:J. W. Gamble was a state prisoner within the 8: 1351:Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause case law 399:Wells, Michael L.; Eaton, Thomas A. (2002). 255:" simply because the victim is a prisoner. 124:" simply because the victim was a prisoner. 1230: 1219: 593: 582: 565: 551: 543: 378:. Leiden: Koninklijke Brill. p. 312. 31: 1167: 405:. Westport, CT: Praeger. pp. 84โ€“5. 364: 285:by submitting a handwritten document. 720:Louisiana ex rel. Francis v. Resweber 29:1976 United States Supreme Court case 7: 372:Dimitrakopoulos, Ioannis G. (2007). 237:Supreme Court of the United States 47:Supreme Court of the United States 25: 1366:Penal system in the United States 1336:United States Supreme Court cases 494:97 (1976) is available from: 470: 40: 265:Texas Department of Corrections 108:In order to state a cognizable 1346:1976 in United States case law 1200:City of Grants Pass v. Johnson 574:United States Eighth Amendment 251:did not rise to the level of " 120:did not rise to the level of " 1: 1361:Medical malpractice case law 587:Cruel and unusual punishment 337:DeShaney v. Winnebago County 253:cruel and unusual punishment 122:cruel and unusual punishment 1289:United States v. Bajakajian 1382: 535:Oyez (oral argument audio) 351:Davis v. City of Las Vegas 274:administrative segregation 216:Blackmun (in the judgment) 1229: 1218: 1152:South Carolina v. Gathers 824:Skipper v. South Carolina 592: 581: 133: 112:claim for a violation of 107: 56:Decided November 30, 1976 39: 1305:Tyler v. Hennepin County 1252:United States v. Salerno 1224:Excessive bail and fines 1281:Austin v. United States 816:Caldwell v. Mississippi 677:Montgomery v. Louisiana 319:deliberate indifference 1264:Excessive Fines Clause 1128:Robinson v. California 744:California v. Anderson 728:McGautha v. California 613:Robinson v. California 605:Weems v. United States 148:William J. Brennan Jr. 54:Argued October 5, 1976 1235:Excessive Bail Clause 976:Panetti v. Quarterman 856:Maynard v. Cartwright 992:Kennedy v. Louisiana 888:Whitmore v. Arkansas 880:Stanford v. Kentucky 864:Thompson v. Oklahoma 848:Lowenfield v. Phelps 693:Jones v. Mississippi 637:Harmelin v. Michigan 429:, 509 U.S. 25 (1993) 1168:Helling v. McKinney 1093:Hudson v. McMillian 1059:Corporal punishment 1048:Bucklew v. Precythe 784:Spaziano v. Florida 685:Virginia v. LeBlanc 645:Ewing v. California 526:Library of Congress 427:Helling v. McKinney 305:Helling v. McKinney 294:Helling v. McKinney 249:medical malpractice 180:Lewis F. Powell Jr. 118:medical malpractice 18:Helling v. McKinney 1160:Payne v. Tennessee 1085:Ingraham v. Wright 1040:Madison v. Alabama 912:Atkins v. Virginia 904:Herrera v. Collins 832:Ford v. Wainwright 808:Glass v. Louisiana 776:Godfrey v. Georgia 653:Lockyer v. Andrade 144:Associate Justices 89:97 S. Ct. 285; 50 1323: 1322: 1319: 1318: 1315: 1314: 1214: 1213: 1210: 1209: 1176:Farmer v. Brennan 1144:Estelle v. Gamble 1069:Jackson v. Bishop 960:Hill v. McDonough 928:Tennard v. Dretke 896:Walton v. Arizona 792:Enmund v. Florida 736:Furman v. Georgia 712:Wilkerson v. Utah 669:Miller v. Alabama 661:Graham v. Florida 621:Rummel v. Estelle 484:Estelle v. Gamble 477:Estelle v. Gamble 475:Works related to 344:Farmer v. Brennan 232:Estelle v. Gamble 228: 227: 184:William Rehnquist 168:Thurgood Marshall 35:Estelle v. Gamble 16:(Redirected from 1373: 1356:Medical lawsuits 1297:Timbs v. Indiana 1231: 1220: 1192:Kahler v. Kansas 1077:Gates v. Collier 1016:Hurst v. Florida 1008:Glossip v. Gross 936:Roper v. Simmons 872:Penry v. Lynaugh 840:Tison v. Arizona 800:Pulley v. Harris 760:Coker v. Georgia 752:Gregg v. Georgia 594: 583: 567: 560: 553: 544: 539: 533: 530: 524: 521: 515: 512: 506: 503: 497: 474: 458: 457: 437: 431: 423: 417: 416: 396: 390: 389: 369: 267:who was given a 245:42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 241:Eighth Amendment 140:Warren E. Burger 129:Court membership 114:Eighth Amendment 44: 43: 32: 21: 1381: 1380: 1376: 1375: 1374: 1372: 1371: 1370: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1311: 1258: 1225: 1206: 1136:Powell v. Texas 1107: 1080:(5th Cir. 1974) 1072:(8th Cir. 1968) 1060: 1054: 1000:Hall v. Florida 968:Kansas v. Marsh 952:Oregon v. Guzek 947:(5th Cir. 2005) 944:Bigby v. Dretke 920:Ring v. Arizona 768:Lockett v. Ohio 699: 588: 577: 571: 537: 531: 528: 522: 519: 513: 510: 504: 501: 495: 467: 462: 461: 454: 439: 438: 434: 424: 420: 413: 398: 397: 393: 386: 371: 370: 366: 361: 354:(9th Cir. 2007) 327: 297: 261: 192:John P. Stevens 182: 170: 158: 98: 55: 49: 30: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 1379: 1377: 1369: 1368: 1363: 1358: 1353: 1348: 1343: 1338: 1328: 1327: 1321: 1320: 1317: 1316: 1313: 1312: 1310: 1309: 1301: 1293: 1285: 1277: 1268: 1266: 1260: 1259: 1257: 1256: 1248: 1244:Stack v. Boyle 1239: 1237: 1227: 1226: 1223: 1216: 1215: 1212: 1211: 1208: 1207: 1205: 1204: 1196: 1188: 1184:Brown v. Plata 1180: 1172: 1164: 1156: 1148: 1140: 1132: 1124: 1120:Trop v. Dulles 1115: 1113: 1109: 1108: 1106: 1105: 1101:Hope v. Pelzer 1097: 1089: 1081: 1073: 1064: 1062: 1056: 1055: 1053: 1052: 1044: 1036: 1032:Moore v. Texas 1028: 1024:Kansas v. Carr 1020: 1012: 1004: 996: 988: 980: 972: 964: 956: 948: 940: 932: 924: 916: 908: 900: 892: 884: 876: 868: 860: 852: 844: 836: 828: 820: 812: 804: 796: 788: 780: 772: 764: 756: 748: 740: 732: 724: 716: 707: 705: 701: 700: 698: 697: 689: 681: 673: 665: 657: 649: 641: 633: 625: 617: 609: 600: 598: 590: 589: 586: 579: 578: 572: 570: 569: 562: 555: 547: 541: 540: 508:Google Scholar 480: 466: 465:External links 463: 460: 459: 452: 432: 418: 411: 391: 385:978-9004157910 384: 363: 362: 360: 357: 356: 355: 347: 340: 333: 326: 323: 296: 291: 260: 257: 226: 225: 222: 218: 217: 214: 210: 209: 206: 202: 201: 197: 196: 195: 194: 172:Harry Blackmun 156:Potter Stewart 145: 142: 137: 131: 130: 126: 125: 105: 104: 100: 99: 88: 72: 68: 67: 62: 61:Full case name 58: 57: 51: 50: 45: 37: 36: 28: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1378: 1367: 1364: 1362: 1359: 1357: 1354: 1352: 1349: 1347: 1344: 1342: 1339: 1337: 1334: 1333: 1331: 1307: 1306: 1302: 1299: 1298: 1294: 1291: 1290: 1286: 1283: 1282: 1278: 1275: 1274: 1270: 1269: 1267: 1265: 1261: 1254: 1253: 1249: 1246: 1245: 1241: 1240: 1238: 1236: 1232: 1228: 1221: 1217: 1202: 1201: 1197: 1194: 1193: 1189: 1186: 1185: 1181: 1178: 1177: 1173: 1170: 1169: 1165: 1162: 1161: 1157: 1154: 1153: 1149: 1146: 1145: 1141: 1138: 1137: 1133: 1130: 1129: 1125: 1122: 1121: 1117: 1116: 1114: 1110: 1103: 1102: 1098: 1095: 1094: 1090: 1087: 1086: 1082: 1079: 1078: 1074: 1071: 1070: 1066: 1065: 1063: 1057: 1050: 1049: 1045: 1042: 1041: 1037: 1034: 1033: 1029: 1026: 1025: 1021: 1018: 1017: 1013: 1010: 1009: 1005: 1002: 1001: 997: 994: 993: 989: 986: 985: 981: 978: 977: 973: 970: 969: 965: 962: 961: 957: 954: 953: 949: 946: 945: 941: 938: 937: 933: 930: 929: 925: 922: 921: 917: 914: 913: 909: 906: 905: 901: 898: 897: 893: 890: 889: 885: 882: 881: 877: 874: 873: 869: 866: 865: 861: 858: 857: 853: 850: 849: 845: 842: 841: 837: 834: 833: 829: 826: 825: 821: 818: 817: 813: 810: 809: 805: 802: 801: 797: 794: 793: 789: 786: 785: 781: 778: 777: 773: 770: 769: 765: 762: 761: 757: 754: 753: 749: 746: 745: 741: 738: 737: 733: 730: 729: 725: 722: 721: 717: 714: 713: 709: 708: 706: 704:Death penalty 702: 695: 694: 690: 687: 686: 682: 679: 678: 674: 671: 670: 666: 663: 662: 658: 655: 654: 650: 647: 646: 642: 639: 638: 634: 631: 630: 629:Solem v. Helm 626: 623: 622: 618: 615: 614: 610: 607: 606: 602: 601: 599: 597:Incarceration 595: 591: 584: 580: 575: 568: 563: 561: 556: 554: 549: 548: 545: 536: 527: 518: 509: 500: 493: 489: 485: 481: 479:at Wikisource 478: 473: 469: 468: 464: 455: 453:9781449639402 449: 445: 444: 436: 433: 430: 428: 422: 419: 414: 412:9780313314490 408: 404: 403: 395: 392: 387: 381: 377: 376: 368: 365: 358: 353: 352: 348: 346: 345: 341: 339: 338: 334: 332: 329: 328: 324: 322: 320: 315: 310: 306: 302: 295: 292: 290: 286: 284: 283: 277: 275: 270: 266: 258: 256: 254: 250: 246: 243:rights under 242: 238: 234: 233: 223: 219: 215: 211: 207: 203: 200:Case opinions 198: 193: 189: 185: 181: 177: 173: 169: 165: 161: 157: 153: 149: 146: 143: 141: 138: 136:Chief Justice 135: 134: 132: 127: 123: 119: 115: 111: 106: 101: 96: 92: 86: 85: 80: 77: 73: 69: 66: 63: 59: 52: 48: 38: 33: 27: 19: 1303: 1295: 1287: 1279: 1271: 1250: 1242: 1198: 1190: 1182: 1174: 1166: 1158: 1150: 1143: 1142: 1134: 1126: 1118: 1099: 1091: 1083: 1075: 1067: 1046: 1038: 1030: 1022: 1014: 1006: 998: 990: 984:Baze v. Rees 982: 974: 966: 958: 950: 942: 934: 926: 918: 910: 902: 894: 886: 878: 870: 862: 854: 846: 838: 830: 822: 814: 806: 798: 790: 787:(1981, 1984) 782: 774: 766: 758: 750: 742: 734: 726: 718: 710: 691: 683: 675: 667: 659: 651: 643: 635: 627: 619: 611: 603: 483: 442: 435: 426: 421: 401: 394: 374: 367: 349: 342: 335: 313: 304: 300: 298: 293: 287: 280: 278: 269:prison labor 262: 231: 230: 229: 187: 175: 163: 151: 110:Section 1983 82: 64: 26: 1061:or injuries 747:(Cal. 1972) 309:Byron White 213:Concurrence 160:Byron White 1330:Categories 95:U.S. LEXIS 93:251; 1976 91:L. Ed. 2d 71:Citations 576:case law 482:Text of 325:See also 205:Majority 499:Cornell 301:Estelle 259:History 224:Stevens 221:Dissent 103:Holding 1308:(2023) 1300:(2019) 1292:(1998) 1284:(1993) 1276:(1989) 1255:(1987) 1247:(1951) 1203:(2024) 1195:(2020) 1187:(2011) 1179:(1994) 1171:(1993) 1163:(1991) 1155:(1989) 1147:(1976) 1139:(1968) 1131:(1962) 1123:(1958) 1104:(2002) 1096:(1992) 1088:(1977) 1051:(2019) 1043:(2019) 1035:(2017) 1027:(2016) 1019:(2016) 1011:(2015) 1003:(2014) 995:(2008) 987:(2008) 979:(2007) 971:(2006) 963:(2006) 955:(2006) 939:(2005) 931:(2004) 923:(2002) 915:(2002) 907:(1993) 899:(1990) 891:(1990) 883:(1989) 875:(1989) 867:(1988) 859:(1988) 851:(1988) 843:(1987) 835:(1986) 827:(1986) 819:(1985) 811:(1985) 803:(1984) 795:(1982) 779:(1980) 771:(1978) 763:(1977) 755:(1976) 739:(1972) 731:(1971) 723:(1947) 715:(1879) 696:(2021) 688:(2017) 680:(2016) 672:(2012) 664:(2010) 656:(2003) 648:(2003) 640:(1991) 632:(1983) 624:(1980) 616:(1962) 608:(1910) 538:  532:  529:  523:  520:  517:Justia 514:  511:  505:  502:  496:  450:  409:  382:  314:anyone 282:pro se 190: 188:· 186:  178: 176:· 174:  166: 164:· 162:  154: 152:· 150:  1112:Other 490: 359:Notes 303:. In 492:U.S. 448:ISBN 407:ISBN 380:ISBN 84:more 76:U.S. 74:429 488:429 97:175 1332:: 486:, 321:. 79:97 566:e 559:t 552:v 456:. 415:. 388:. 87:) 81:( 20:)

Index

Helling v. McKinney
Supreme Court of the United States
U.S.
97
more
L. Ed. 2d
U.S. LEXIS
Section 1983
Eighth Amendment
medical malpractice
cruel and unusual punishment
Warren E. Burger
William J. Brennan Jr.
Potter Stewart
Byron White
Thurgood Marshall
Harry Blackmun
Lewis F. Powell Jr.
William Rehnquist
John P. Stevens
Supreme Court of the United States
Eighth Amendment
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
medical malpractice
cruel and unusual punishment
Texas Department of Corrections
prison labor
administrative segregation
pro se
Byron White

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

โ†‘