30:
101:
372:
The deletion process is really a discussion. Knowledge (XXG) has particular standards for deletion and editors explain why they believe certain rules apply. These comments often link to relevant policies and guidelines, which will often be presented as shortcuts (all-caps links prefixed with 'WP:',
490:
Some articles undergo speedy deletion when they fail to fit criteria that
Knowledge (XXG) editors have already agreed regarding similar articles. One such type of page is an article that libels a living person who is not a public figure. Another type of page that often gets speedily deleted is an
486:
Some article subjects don't meet encyclopedic standards yet. An independent film that hasn't appeared in a film festival, a magazine in its first issue, and an unknown musical band might become encyclopedic later on. First get regular press coverage and meet
Knowledge (XXG)'s requirements for the
397:. Administrators can tell how many previous edits a user has made and discount these "votes". The effort may draw negative responses from other editors who dislike these methods of trying to influence the outcome. Also, making multiple accounts to all vote for a certain position is
595:
434:
Other editors may work on the article too, standardizing the format or copy-editing or adding content. This is a normal part of
Knowledge (XXG) editing. Most changes are helpful. For an example of when working on an article saved it, see
176:
Maybe your initial reaction was feeling hurt, or even angry. Know that plenty of established users have had articles nominated for deletion. People will (or at least will try to) argue objectively about whether or not the article is
181:, so try not to take the deletion discussion personally. Listen to the reasons given in the nomination. If something is unclear, ask for clarification. Address/refute the reasons given as best you can (preferably backed with
704:
461:
Read up on
Knowledge (XXG) policies to be sure your article meets acceptable standards. If you think you've met those standards but the improvements took place after most people finished discussion, one final option is
572:. Do not use deletion review merely because you disagree with the deletion, but only if there was a procedural error in deleting the page (e.g. lack of consensus). Remember that deletion discussions are
185:), and try to improve the article accordingly. Others will be more likely to listen to you if you stay calm and explain why you think the article is relevant/encyclopedic than if you act upset.
381:). Any editor can comment several times, but they only get to state one opinion about whether the article stays or goes. Editors who change their opinion indicate the change by striking out (
689:
699:
410:
605:
If anything about these processes remains unclear, or need help improving the article before a re-submission, you may ask about how you can improve the article the next time around at the
194:. No one wants to delete your article out of spite; people want to do what is best for Knowledge (XXG). If you feel others are making the deletion personal, you can request that they stay
598:
can provide you the content of the deleted page upon request. Articles deleted for copyright violations will not be provided. You can also try using web archival services such as the
458:
sources as you can find. If you, the author of the article, cannot find such sources, then this is a good indication that the subject is not yet ready for a
Knowledge (XXG) article.
526:
site. Your favorite recipe, your advice on how to modify a tube amp, and your suggestions on how to improve your car's mileage could fit in at
Knowledge (XXG)'s sister project
334:
It's also possible that the content is not felt worthy of its own article, but would instead be better incorporated in another article. Editors (including you) may suggest a
694:
557:
551:
393:
Users sometimes try to sway the discussion by trying to vote several times or by getting friends or other users to vote with them. This usually backfires and violates
576:, and opinions are weighed according to Knowledge (XXG) policies and guidelines. A numerical majority for a certain outcome does not necessarily imply consensus.
436:
684:
169:
just yet. Deletion isn't automatic; it's a process. This happens when someone feels that your article is at odds with
Knowledge (XXG) norms. While articles
729:
53:; rather, its purpose is to explain certain aspects of Knowledge (XXG)'s norms, customs, technicalities, or practices. It may reflect differing levels of
724:
361:
348:
142:
394:
50:
510:. A local slang term which is not very notable from a worldwide view (or which is not covered in popular culture) is a candidate for the
428:
268:
734:
173:
routinely get deleted, many will get to stay in
Knowledge (XXG), either as standalone articles, or as part of a more relevant article.
487:
subject. Save the existing draft before the article gets deleted, then recreate it later once it becomes encyclopedic and verifiable.
423:
are often the main issues. For example, an article about an independent film may get nominated for deletion because it isn't in the
709:
46:
202:. Likewise, attacking those who think the article shouldn't be on Knowledge (XXG) is a bad idea and can even result in you being
507:
610:
221:
The editor nominates the article for deletion, with an explanation of why they think it is inappropriate for
Knowledge (XXG).
580:
38:
17:
569:
463:
583:("prod"), any administrator should normally restore it on your request. In such cases, you can make your request at
353:
278:
416:
564:
If you disagree with the outcome, contact the administrator who deleted the page. If you are still not satisfied
398:
111:
427:. Other editors might choose to keep it if the article cites Canadian newspapers to prove it won awards at the
293:
After a discussion period (usually 7 days), an administrator evaluates the response and takes action as needed.
617:
378:
442:
Most of the time an article will be deleted because the sourcing is not good enough. On
Knowledge (XXG), the
424:
420:
606:
119:
58:
54:
471:
342:
303:
68:
284:
template), or disagree (by removing these templates). If you disagree, indicate why you object in the
626:
hosts original research, details about a minor character in a fictional universe may be suitable at
573:
154:
123:
415:
Most editors are reasonable people. Be polite and address their concerns by improving the article.
584:
467:
447:
591:
506:, whether a paper-based one or an online one like Knowledge (XXG), and instead are suitable for
336:
253:
247:
203:
195:
642:. Keep in mind those outlets have their own policies for what is or isn't appropriate for them.
496:
261:
511:
666:
503:
492:
443:
241:
228:
199:
132:
599:
451:
285:
182:
538:
page. If you want to memorialize a deceased friend or relative, you could do so on your
518:
entry, not for Knowledge (XXG). A photo album of your trip to Cuba is better off as a
374:
178:
718:
622:
454:. The best way to prevent an article from being deleted is to provide as many good
357:
446:
is whether the subject is notable enough for at least two people to have written
639:
531:
327:
The article improves to encyclopedic standards while the discussion is underway.
552:
Knowledge (XXG):Why was the page I created deleted? § What you can do about it
519:
515:
190:
161:. This may feel very discouraging. All your hard work gone in virtual smoke!
631:
627:
527:
450:(more than just a mention) about that subject that has been published in a
218:
An editor sees an article and thinks it does not belong in Knowledge (XXG).
705:
Knowledge (XXG):What to do if your article gets tagged for speedy deletion
556:
If an article was deleted, there are a few things you can do depending on
590:
If you would like to be able to access the text (e.g. to work on it as a
539:
231:(AFD) process, editors (including you) may agree (usually indicated with
635:
535:
523:
690:
Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) is not for things made up one day
659:"Your" article, in the sense that the article is the result of
352:
does not have its own article, but it makes a fine addition to
320:
Articles may survive the deletion process for several reasons:
560:, even if you did not participate in the deletion discussion.
431:. Mention the changes and improvements in the AfD discussion.
95:
24:
700:
Knowledge (XXG):How to save an article nominated for deletion
411:
Knowledge (XXG):How to save an article nominated for deletion
360:
does not have its own article, but is instead mentioned in a
346:
as an alternative to deletion. For instance, the publication
264:(PROD) process, editors (including you) may agree (by adding
568:
discussing it with the deleting admin, you may then start a
478:
notable, but will likely become notable in the near future.
153:
It takes a lot of work to create an article. You decided to
616:
If the article is unsuitable for Knowledge (XXG), consider
324:
A consensus of editors believe the article is encyclopedic.
311:
83:
76:
330:
No consensus emerges, in which case the article stays.
695:
Knowledge (XXG):Why was the page I created deleted?
390:tags) the previous statement and adding a new one.
474:, especially in the case of subjects that are not
634:, and information about a new band can be put at
437:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Bonny Hicks
191:address the arguments, not the person making them
143:Address the arguments, not the person making them
685:Knowledge (XXG):Introduction to deletion process
534:which plays at the local pub could have its own
491:article about a little-known musical group. See
8:
594:before re-submitting an improved version),
579:If an article was deleted as a result of a
214:Most deletion nominations work as follows:
159:you've now encountered the deletion process
466:. You can also request the article to be
51:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines
652:
368:A discussion for consensus, not a vote
730:Knowledge (XXG) essays about deletion
482:Some articles will get deleted anyway
349:Nepal Mathematical Society Newsletter
7:
710:Knowledge (XXG):Ownership of content
504:just don't belong in an encyclopedia
235:), disagree (usually indicated with
558:the reason why the page was deleted
429:Toronto International Film Festival
179:worthy of being in Knowledge (XXG)
14:
725:Knowledge (XXG) information pages
618:an alternative to Knowledge (XXG)
18:Knowledge (XXG):Guide to deletion
99:
28:
22:Knowledge (XXG) information page
546:What you can do after deletion?
464:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion review
133:Alternatives to deletion exist
1:
735:Knowledge (XXG) how-to essays
210:How deletion nominations work
444:general inclusion threshold
114:. Deletion discussions are
751:
549:
408:
354:Nepal Mathematical Society
301:
269:Proposed deletion endorsed
239:), or suggest one of many
66:
15:
630:or a dedicated wiki like
607:Knowledge (XXG):Help desk
298:Deletion is not automatic
663:, not in the sense that
611:Knowledge (XXG):Teahouse
514:, or possibly part of a
356:. Likewise the asteroid
242:alternatives to deletion
107:This page in a nutshell:
425:Internet Movie Database
405:How to save the article
224:Other editors respond.
200:making personal attacks
395:Knowledge (XXG) policy
448:something substantive
401:and violates policy.
362:list of minor planets
229:Articles for Deletion
163:Aaahhhh! What to do?!
16:Further information:
468:moved into userspace
139:, can suggest those!
47:encyclopedic article
596:some administrators
508:alternative outlets
257:to another article.
118:which aim to find
581:proposed deletion
279:Proposed deletion
262:Proposed Deletion
198:and refrain from
151:
150:
94:
93:
742:
672:
657:
620:. For instance,
585:this noticeboard
512:Urban Dictionary
399:sockpuppeteering
389:
314:
283:
277:
273:
267:
183:reliable sources
103:
102:
96:
86:
79:
39:information page
32:
31:
25:
750:
749:
745:
744:
743:
741:
740:
739:
715:
714:
681:
676:
675:
658:
654:
649:
600:Wayback Machine
570:deletion review
554:
548:
530:. Your amateur
484:
472:into draftspace
452:reliable source
413:
407:
386:
370:
318:
317:
310:
306:
300:
281:
275:
271:
265:
212:
100:
90:
89:
82:
75:
71:
63:
62:
29:
23:
20:
12:
11:
5:
748:
746:
738:
737:
732:
727:
717:
716:
713:
712:
707:
702:
697:
692:
687:
680:
677:
674:
673:
651:
650:
648:
645:
644:
643:
614:
603:
588:
577:
547:
544:
502:Some articles
483:
480:
406:
403:
388:...</s: -->
379:WP:CRYSTALBALL
369:
366:
332:
331:
328:
325:
316:
315:
307:
302:
299:
296:
295:
294:
291:
290:
289:
258:
222:
219:
211:
208:
149:
148:
147:
146:
140:
130:
104:
92:
91:
88:
87:
80:
72:
67:
64:
44:
43:
35:
33:
21:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
747:
736:
733:
731:
728:
726:
723:
722:
720:
711:
708:
706:
703:
701:
698:
696:
693:
691:
688:
686:
683:
682:
678:
670:
668:
662:
656:
653:
646:
641:
637:
633:
629:
625:
624:
619:
615:
612:
608:
604:
601:
597:
593:
589:
586:
582:
578:
575:
571:
567:
563:
562:
561:
559:
553:
545:
543:
541:
537:
533:
529:
525:
521:
517:
513:
509:
505:
500:
498:
494:
488:
481:
479:
477:
473:
469:
465:
459:
457:
453:
449:
445:
440:
438:
432:
430:
426:
422:
418:
417:Verifiability
412:
404:
402:
400:
396:
391:
384:
380:
376:
367:
365:
363:
359:
355:
351:
350:
345:
344:
339:
338:
329:
326:
323:
322:
321:
313:
309:
308:
305:
297:
292:
287:
280:
270:
263:
259:
256:
255:
250:
249:
244:
243:
238:
234:
230:
226:
225:
223:
220:
217:
216:
215:
209:
207:
205:
201:
197:
193:
192:
186:
184:
180:
174:
172:
168:
164:
160:
156:
144:
141:
138:
137:including you
134:
131:
128:
127:
121:
117:
113:
110:
109:
108:
105:
98:
97:
85:
81:
78:
74:
73:
70:
65:
60:
56:
52:
49:, nor one of
48:
45:It is not an
42:
40:
34:
27:
26:
19:
664:
660:
655:
623:Scholarpedia
621:
565:
555:
501:
489:
485:
475:
460:
455:
441:
433:
414:
392:
382:
371:
358:57658 Nilrem
347:
341:
335:
333:
319:
286:edit summary
252:
246:
240:
236:
232:
213:
189:
187:
175:
170:
166:
162:
158:
152:
136:
125:
115:
106:
36:
669:the article
640:MusicBrainz
609:(or at the
550:Main page:
532:garage band
409:Main page:
254:redirecting
167:don't panic
124:not simply
112:Don't panic
37:This is an
719:Categories
516:Wiktionary
421:notability
387:<s: -->
274:below the
245:, such as
188:Remember,
135:. Anyone,
84:WP:HELPAFD
661:your work
632:Lostpedia
628:TV Tropes
574:not votes
528:Wikibooks
383:like this
120:consensus
116:processes
69:Shortcuts
55:consensus
679:See also
540:Facebook
456:in-depth
373:such as
343:redirect
304:Shortcut
77:HELP:AFD
636:Discogs
536:Myspace
497:WP:BAND
419:and/or
385:, with
260:In the
248:merging
227:In the
204:blocked
155:be bold
59:vetting
542:page.
524:Flickr
520:Tripod
493:WP:BIO
312:WP:DNA
233:Delete
165:Well,
157:, and
647:Notes
592:draft
566:after
340:or a
337:merge
196:civil
126:votes
665:you
495:and
375:WP:N
237:Keep
57:and
667:own
638:or
522:or
476:yet
470:or
439:.
377:or
251:or
721::
613:).
499:.
364:.
282:}}
276:{{
272:}}
266:{{
206:.
171:do
122:,
671:.
602:.
587:.
288:.
145:.
129:.
61:.
41:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.