Knowledge (XXG)

Help: editing for non-academic experts - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

250:. A Wikiproject is a community of editors interested in a single topic area. The discussion pages for these projects are a good place to ask about the details of writing articles for that topic area, for finding other editors to help fix problems you've found, and to find out about articles in need of work. For longer lists of WikiProjects that might be relevant to your interests, see the 28: 309:. A topic generally cannot be included in Knowledge (XXG) unless the topic is the subject of multiple published works that are independent of each other. By providing published sources about the topic, you can convince other Knowledge (XXG) editors that it's an important enough topic to include in the encyclopedia, and forestall them from trying to delete your content. 118:. If you've written excellent Knowledge (XXG) content in your field, it attests to your expertise. In most cases the fact that you've contributed to an article is invisible to most readers, so it's not going to do much for making you more famous, or win you custom, but it may earn you respect in your field. 106:. When you write about a topic, you learn about it yourself; you may well find this knowledge useful in your off-wiki work. Also, when you carefully survey a topic, you are likely to find out about what is not known as well as what is known, and this could help you get to know your field even better. 355:
You may find that there is a lack of reliable sources for your field. Some valuable human knowledge, which really ought to be included in Knowledge (XXG), may not have the sources to meet the notability and verifiability requirements. There are several ways to remedy this.
277:
You may be accustomed to learning from your own experience, or from more experienced experts in your own field. Sadly, "X, who is the world's leading authority on Y, told me so, in person" is not sufficient backing for including a statement in Knowledge (XXG). Nor can you
317:, an external publication that says the same thing as what you've written. In very short articles, you may be able to get away with leaving all the sources for a separate reference section at the end; for longer articles, the text of the article should have inline 90:. You've probably already found some important topics that you know about are missing from Knowledge (XXG), or worse, described incorrectly. Since people who have an academic education are more likely to edit Knowledge (XXG), there are 529:
is allowed, even if they are not your own work. However, licenses prohibiting commercial use or derivative works are not compatible with Knowledge (XXG) (Knowledge (XXG) is used commercially, and is itself a derivative work).
446:
Citations must provide enough information that others can figure out what source was used, and look it up to read it themselves. Knowledge (XXG) is not too fussy about citation formats. Any functional format can be used.
612:
Communication on Knowledge (XXG) is by text only. It's easy for editors to mistake one another's meaning, and even easier to hear a friendly comment as hostile; tone of voice is invisible. To avoid needless conflict,
392:
just put something up on your blog and cite that. If you have already published on the subject, and are widely acknowledged by reliable publications to be an expert in the field, others may be able to cite your blog;
122:
Do not go into Knowledge (XXG) for the purpose of boosting its coverage of your business, or yourself as a person. It is almost never OK to create or edit an article about yourself. If you develop a reputation as a
84:. As a Knowledge (XXG) reader, you are benefiting from a vast collection of articles written by the Knowledge (XXG) community. Why not reciprocate and help improve the existing articles by sharing your knowledge? 324:
Ideally, every paragraph of a Knowledge (XXG) article (outside of the initial summary paragraph) should have at least one footnote or other source, and in many cases every sentence will have its own source. See
100:. To write well on Knowledge (XXG), you have to learn some extremely useful general skills, such as expressing yourself clearly to non-experts. These skills may help you in your professional and personal life. 17: 577:
of all the editors who are interested in the subject (and by some complicated bureaucracy if that fails). So in particular, some of the changes you make are likely to be undone by other people, who may well
112:. You can work with other editors from around the world who share your interests. Even in the unlikely even that you learn nothing from one another, you may find working together on Knowledge (XXG) pleasant. 622: 618: 359:
First, you can encourage third-party publications like trade, hobby, and specialist magazines to publish articles containing the information. You might even write something for them yourself.
374:; Knowledge (XXG) tries to exclude advertising). You can also interview publication-acknowledged experts in your field, and write up or publish the interviews on third-party-reviewed sites. 301:. A reader with some level of layman's knowledge but without your specialized training should be able to tell whether what you wrote is true by comparing it against the sources you cite. 566:, published material in magazines, books, newspapers, etc., that says what you want the article to say. Knowing a lot about the topic will help you find sources and convince others. 59:
Subject experts have a lot to contribute to Knowledge (XXG). Experts include people skilled in a trade, people who've worked in a field for decades, and passionate hobbyists and
340:, the rules for citing are much stricter: articles without citations and controversial unsourced statements within an article will both be quickly deleted, to avoid the risk of 499: 562:
superior knowledge. Telling other editors that you are an expert isn't going to help. To win a dispute over the content of an article, you need to back up your opinion with
366:
is allowed. You can always post about your publications on the talk page of the article, and ask other editors to judge if they should be used as sources in the article
78:. You may wish that people understood your field better. Knowledge (XXG) is a great way of writing about your field in a way that can be found and read by the public. 189:). Click the "Edit" tab, top right; if you are not logged in to an account, a popup will offer the choice. If you have logged in, you can set your editing mode at 213: 531: 382: 337: 330: 598: 625:
and find social interactions difficult to understand. Conscientious effort to communicate without ambiguity helps prevent misunderstandings.
494:
Knowledge (XXG) has rules around when and how you can copy information. Some of them are based on giving credit where credit is due; these are
589:
The review process on Knowledge (XXG) can be harsh. Your edits may be reverted by automated tools designed to rapidly remove large volumes of
640: 475: 163: 44: 63:. Editing Knowledge (XXG) is itself a skilled job, and while you can just learn as you go, a bit of training might help you get started. 409: 16:
This is a guide for subject experts who have never worked as an academic or researcher. Experts with an academic background may prefer
251: 601:. Seek more constructive reviews from other editors. Remember that removed content can be put back with almost no effort (but avoid 539: 432:
based on your own knowledge and experience, without the need for citations, although you cannot cite your book on Knowledge (XXG).
162:
If you intend to edit Knowledge (XXG) more than once or twice, and especially if you ever intend to create new articles, there are
140: 425:
so they can be used to illustrate articles. Good technical photos of objects, techniques, methods, and processes are very useful.
326: 378: 614: 609:
shows that, sadly, a lot of good would-be contributors disengage rather than discuss when their contributions are rejected.
36: 666: 645: 201: 594: 579: 441: 405: 297: 91: 247: 225: 471: 385:, if they were published elsewhere and you no longer own the copyright, may not be allowed. Ask the publisher. 650: 389: 255: 124: 495: 305: 590: 573:
of an article and vet changes by others. Instead, disputes over the content of an article are handled by
503: 398: 371: 236: 221: 48: 558:, and thus does not give higher status or authority to anyone claiming them; you have to win respect by 602: 394: 363: 347:
Citing offline sources, such as print handbooks, professional guidelines, and manuals, is entirely OK.
217: 147: 554:
the conflict is to discuss it on the article's discussion page. Knowledge (XXG) cannot check editors'
634: 551: 507: 190: 421:
If you can take photographs or draw diagrams to convey your expert knowledge, please do, and then
232: 128: 246:
One way to stay connected to the greater Knowledge (XXG) community is through subject-specific
451: 266: 239:. These are club meetings for local editors. There is a global annual editor's meeting called 197: 289: 151: 132: 583: 574: 570: 555: 511: 136: 367: 186: 43:
It explains concepts or processes used by the Knowledge (XXG) community. It is not one of
621:, who are often very helpful with getting details (like reference formatting) right, but 563: 318: 314: 283: 279: 617:, and make your friendly intentions unmistakable. Knowledge (XXG) has a fair number of 262: 94:
in Knowledge (XXG)'s content. Experts from other backgrounds can help fill these gaps.
71:
Why should you use your valuable time and hard-won expertise to edit Knowledge (XXG)?
660: 455: 174: 514:
may be ok (but you should state where you've copied it from in the edit summary).
470:
It is rarely necessary to type in the full citation information. Entering only the
518: 459: 178: 422: 240: 60: 606: 429: 569:
Unlike some other sites, Knowledge (XXG) does not permit any one editor to
261:
When you create or make significant changes to an article, you may want to
167: 535: 526: 593:. The editors using these tools may not be willing to take the time to 483: 216:
from established members of the community. You can ask for help at the
18:
Help:Knowledge (XXG) editing for researchers, scholars, and academics
458:, citation information is entered by pressing the "Cite" button; in 479: 522: 341: 292:
are crucial in Knowledge (XXG) writing. Citations are used for:
182: 200:. The general style of Knowledge (XXG) articles is laid out in 329:
for more guidance on what does and doesn't need a source, and
22: 582:. You need to be prepared for this, and avoid getting into a 486:
can tidy your citations, as long as they are comprehensible.
550:
If you disagree with someone's edits, the proper way to
619:
editors with high-functioning autism and Asperger's
653:Finding expert help or people needing expert help 474:to the publication will usually be enough to let 418:sections, even if you can't use them as sources. 321:that refer to the list of references at the end. 482:complete your citation. Failing that, another 282:, no matter how extensive. You need to cite a 8: 331:Knowledge (XXG):Identifying reliable sources 313:Everything in Knowledge (XXG) should have a 286:. This prevents he-said-she-said arguments. 226:apprentice yourself to an experienced user 641:Knowledge (XXG):Reliable source examples 637:- Tutorials for Visual Editor and Markup 150:, but they are expected to write from a 45:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines 498:. Others are based on a legal need for 273:Sourcing, verifiability, and notability 462:, citation information is put between 148:no opinions in their area of expertise 7: 580:know less than you about the subject 500:Knowledge (XXG)-compatible copyright 173:There are two ways to edit: the new 141:Knowledge (XXG):Conflict of interest 131:as an editor and your contributions 47:, and may reflect varying levels of 512:from other Knowledge (XXG) articles 463: 327:Knowledge (XXG):Citation guidelines 517:Copying (with accreditation) from 496:Knowledge (XXG)'s plagiarism rules 14: 452:two short "Referencing" tutorials 146:Experts are not expected to have 127:, you are likely to get yourself 26: 646:Knowledge (XXG):Manual of Style 333:for more on selecting sources. 202:Knowledge (XXG):Manual of Style 623:may communicate very literally 534:of copyright materials may be 442:Knowledge (XXG):Citing sources 231:Many cities have face-to-face 139:. For more on this topic, see 1: 370:(this avoids accusations of 364:citation of things you wrote 338:articles about living people 177:(like writing a letter) and 651:Knowledge (XXG):Expert help 546:Giving and getting feedback 187:cheatsheet of common markup 683: 439: 158:How to get started editing 116:It looks good on your vita 15: 542:is available to editors. 454:. In summary, when using 196:There are also extensive 450:You can take one of the 280:cite your own experience 218:Knowledge (XXG):Teahouse 532:Attributed short quotes 408:notes and web pages in 404:You may be able to use 233:Knowledge (XXG) meetups 222:variety of other places 667:Knowledge (XXG) how-to 607:Study of editor trends 597:in your edit, as they 510:. Copying and pasting 502:. Violations of these 423:upload them to Commons 351:Hard-to-source content 104:Broaden your knowledge 521:texts licensed under 252:Wikiproject directory 152:neutral point of view 635:Help:Introduction to 615:WP:Assume good faith 540:Copyright assistance 379:closely paraphrasing 198:tutorials on editing 98:Free skills training 35:This help page is a 599:ideally ought to do 436:Citation formatting 377:Beware; copying or 191:Special:Preferences 208:Social connections 586:when it happens. 168:create an account 57: 56: 674: 564:reliable sources 466: 465:...</ref: --> 428:You can write a 390:won't be able to 30: 29: 23: 682: 681: 677: 676: 675: 673: 672: 671: 657: 656: 631: 548: 492: 444: 438: 411:Further reading 353: 284:reliable source 275: 224:. You can even 214:may expect help 210: 185:for a website: 160: 92:systematic gaps 88:Righting wrongs 69: 53: 52: 27: 21: 12: 11: 5: 680: 678: 670: 669: 659: 658: 655: 654: 648: 643: 638: 630: 627: 547: 544: 491: 488: 437: 434: 415:External links 406:self-published 401:still apply. 372:self-promotion 352: 349: 311: 310: 302: 274: 271: 267:your watchlist 209: 206: 181:(like writing 159: 156: 120: 119: 113: 107: 101: 95: 85: 79: 76:Public service 68: 65: 55: 54: 42: 41: 33: 31: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 679: 668: 665: 664: 662: 652: 649: 647: 644: 642: 639: 636: 633: 632: 628: 626: 624: 620: 616: 610: 608: 604: 600: 596: 592: 587: 585: 581: 576: 572: 567: 565: 561: 560:demonstrating 557: 553: 545: 543: 541: 537: 533: 528: 524: 520: 515: 513: 509: 505: 504:copying rules 501: 497: 489: 487: 485: 481: 477: 476:Visual Editor 473: 468: 461: 457: 456:Visual Editor 453: 448: 443: 435: 433: 431: 426: 424: 419: 417: 416: 412: 407: 402: 400: 396: 391: 388:You probably 386: 384: 380: 375: 373: 369: 365: 362: 357: 350: 348: 345: 343: 339: 334: 332: 328: 322: 320: 316: 308: 307: 303: 300: 299: 298:Verifiability 295: 294: 293: 291: 287: 285: 281: 272: 270: 268: 264: 259: 257: 253: 249: 244: 242: 238: 234: 229: 227: 223: 219: 215: 207: 205: 203: 199: 194: 192: 188: 184: 180: 176: 175:Visual Editor 171: 169: 165: 157: 155: 153: 149: 144: 142: 138: 134: 130: 126: 125:self-promoter 117: 114: 111: 108: 105: 102: 99: 96: 93: 89: 86: 83: 82:Give and take 80: 77: 74: 73: 72: 66: 64: 62: 50: 46: 40: 38: 32: 25: 24: 19: 611: 603:edit warring 595:fix problems 588: 571:take control 568: 559: 549: 516: 493: 484:human editor 469: 464:<ref: --> 449: 445: 427: 420: 414: 410: 403: 399:WP:SELFPROMO 387: 376: 360: 358: 354: 346: 335: 323: 312: 304: 296: 288: 276: 260: 248:Wikiprojects 245: 237:Edit-a-thons 230: 211: 195: 172: 164:good reasons 161: 145: 121: 115: 109: 103: 97: 87: 81: 75: 70: 58: 37:how-to guide 34: 556:credentials 519:open access 506:are called 460:wiki markup 395:WP:SELFCITE 179:wiki markup 61:autodidacts 440:See also: 306:Notability 212:Newcomers 591:vandalism 575:consensus 383:own words 368:talk page 319:footnotes 290:Citations 241:Wikimania 110:Community 49:consensus 661:Category 629:See also 536:fair use 527:CC BY-SA 430:Wikibook 552:resolve 508:copyvio 490:Copying 467:tags. 361:Limited 137:deleted 129:blocked 315:source 263:put it 256:search 220:and a 133:undone 584:fight 523:CC BY 480:robot 478:or a 381:your 342:libel 254:, or 525:and 413:and 397:and 336:For 235:and 183:html 67:Why? 605:). 472:URL 344:. 265:on 166:to 135:or 663:: 538:. 269:. 258:. 243:. 228:. 204:. 193:. 170:. 154:. 143:. 51:. 39:. 20:.

Index

Help:Knowledge (XXG) editing for researchers, scholars, and academics
how-to guide
Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines
consensus
autodidacts
systematic gaps
self-promoter
blocked
undone
deleted
Knowledge (XXG):Conflict of interest
no opinions in their area of expertise
neutral point of view
good reasons
create an account
Visual Editor
wiki markup
html
cheatsheet of common markup
Special:Preferences
tutorials on editing
Knowledge (XXG):Manual of Style
may expect help
Knowledge (XXG):Teahouse
variety of other places
apprentice yourself to an experienced user
Knowledge (XXG) meetups
Edit-a-thons
Wikimania
Wikiprojects

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.