866:", those blue links in an article that lead to some other related article. To make a wikilink, surround the term you want to link with doubled square brackets. A reasonable criterion for when to wikilink is: is this something that a reader of this article might want to learn more about? Something between one wikilink per paragraph and one or two wikilinks per sentence is a good idea. But don't link the basic words that everyone already understands, and don't link the same phrase more than once in close succession: we don't want the articles to be a sea of blue. Wikilinks are not a good substitute for having enough context within the actual text of an article: you'd think that, if someone doesn't understand a linked phrase, they'll go to the link to find out about it, but what happens more often is that they just give up. So it may be a good idea, when you wikilink a phrase, to also include a short description of the meaning of the phrase next to it.
1057:
1075:
265:
28:
493:. The main grounds for inclusion of a topic in Knowledge (XXG) are that the topic is the subject of multiple published works that are independent of each other. By providing published sources about the topic, you can convince other Knowledge (XXG) editors that it's an important enough topic to include in the encyclopedia, and forestall them from trying to delete your content.
122:. When you write about a topic, you learn about it yourself; you may well find the topics you write about useful later in your own research. Also, when you carefully survey a topic, you are likely to find out about what is not known as well as what is known, and this could help you find future research projects.
821:
does not have a title and should provide a useful summary of the whole article for someone who doesn't read any more than just that one section. Everything that's in the first section should be described in more detail in a later section. That is, the first section is closer to being an abstract than
854:
Articles should be as non-technical as possible. That doesn't mean making things incorrect or leaving out important technical details. What it does mean is avoiding technical language when it is not necessary, providing brief nontechnical definitions for the technical terms you do use, spelling out
559:
Survey/review articles and textbooks usually make the best sources. Journal articles, research monographs, and edited volumes are also pretty good sources, but it is not safe to rely on a single journal article on a controversial topic (because the author may be on one side). Articles in newspapers
577:
If you have a choice between citing something to a textbook and to the original research paper it was published in, cite both: the research paper is an important part of the history of the subject, but the textbook will be better at convincing other editors that the subject is important, better at
546:
For articles about living people, the rules for citing are much stricter: articles without citations and controversial unsourced statements within an article are both subject to deletion. The threshold for how significant an academic should be to warrant having a
Knowledge (XXG) article about them
497:
Knowledge (XXG) articles therefore tend to have a higher citation density than research articles and survey articles. In a research article, much of the content is likely to be original and unsourced, and even in a survey article, you would probably feel free to make up small unsourced derivations
968:
Several academic journals now provide a dual-publishing model where suitable academic review articles are published as a stable, indexed version of record, and also copied as a
Knowledge (XXG) page. These generate a citeable version of the article for the author as well as providing peer-reviewed
136:
has started to take "broader impacts" more seriously on grant applications, and if you can make a convincing case that your
Knowledge (XXG) editing activity is significant enough to count as a broader impact then that will probably improve your chances of getting funding. And getting more funding
850:
use as much lowercase as possible: only the first word of the title, and proper names within the title, should be capitalized. The same is true for references to other concepts within the text of an article: write "minimum spanning tree", not "Minimum
Spanning Tree", and "Wagner's theorem", not
835:
The first sentence of an article should provide some context and provide a very brief definition of the article's subject. The title of the article should appear within that sentence, in boldface (surround it by tripled single-quote characters). A standard formula for a first sentence is "In ,
347:
The discussion pages for these projects are a good place to ask about the details of formatting articles for that discipline, for finding other editors to help fix problems you've found, and to find out about articles in need of work. For longer lists of projects that might be relevant to your
79:
If you are a professional researcher, engineer, mathematician, scholar, graduate student, or other academic, you are very likely already familiar with writing survey articles and survey sections of research articles. Writing a
Knowledge (XXG) article is almost the same, but there are a few
143:. This may or may not be a good reason, depending on what your advisor asked you to edit. Articles about a general subject area that you're starting to learn about in your own research, as a way of making a public contribution while helping you learn: good. Articles about your advisor (
910:
Don't feel compelled to include proofs of every mathematical statement. Knowledge (XXG) relies on sources a lot more than it relies on proofs. Some proofs can be included, but only when they are useful for helping readers understand the subject rather than merely to verify that it's
612:
Knowledge (XXG) is not as fussy about citation formats as an academic journal. Any functional format can be used. The main thing is just to make sure that everything has a source, and that the citation to the source is complete enough that others can figure out what it is.
475:
are crucial in
Knowledge (XXG) writing. In other kinds of academic writing, citations are used mainly to give proper credit for the origin of an idea. In Knowledge (XXG), citations can be used for this purpose, but more often they serve two other purposes:
110:. You've probably already found some important topics that you know about from your research that are missing from Knowledge (XXG), or worse, described incorrectly. Who better than someone who knows about these topics professionally to repair the damage?
513:– external publications that confirm what you've written. In very short articles, you may be able to get away with leaving all the sources for a separate reference section at the end; for longer articles, the text of the article should have inline
116:. To write well on Knowledge (XXG), you have to pay more attention to matters of readability than you might when writing for your peers. Practicing your writing ability in this way is likely to cause your professional writing to improve.
915:
902:
Mathematical formula formatting is, frankly, a big weak point of
Knowledge (XXG) (and the internet), and one that it would take a long time to explain in detail. Fortunately, it's already been done elsewhere: see
1249:
Azzam, Amin; Bresler, David; Leon, Armando; Maggio, Lauren; Whitaker, Evans; Heilman, James; Orlowitz, Jake; Swisher, Valerie; Rasberry, Lane; Otoide, Kingsley; Trotter, Fred; Ross, Will; McCue, Jack D. (2016),
485:. A reader with some level of lay knowledge (e.g., scientific literacy) but without your specialized training should be able to tell whether what you wrote is true by comparing it against the sources you cite.
1119:
746:
of all the editors who are interested in the subject (and by some complicated bureaucracy if that fails). So in particular, some of the changes you make are likely to be undone by other people, who may well
104:. As a researcher you are benefiting from a vast collection of survey articles written by the Knowledge (XXG) community. Why not reciprocate and help improve the existing articles by sharing your knowledge?
1366:
560:
and magazines about scientific results can also be good sources, but are better for establishing notability than for verifiability (the popular press often gets the science wrong). Try to avoid using
786:
782:
591:
386:, and your level of knowledge will be apparent in your edits and discussions. Other editors will tend to respect your knowledge and writing skills more than your formal qualifications.
1655:
91:
You already have other avenues for publishing your writing professionally, and plenty of demands on your time. Why should you take the extra time to write for
Knowledge (XXG) as well?
731:
by the door. Telling other editors that you have a Ph.D. in the subject isn't going to help. To win a dispute over the content of an article, you need to back up your opinion with
452:. However, licenses prohibiting commercial use or derivative works are not compatible with Knowledge (XXG) (Knowledge (XXG) is used commercially, and is itself a derivative work).
1155:
899:
at the bottom. If you create a new article, it should have categories too. Find articles on as closely related topics as you can find, and copy the category formatting from them.
132:). And in most cases the fact that you've contributed to an article is invisible to most readers, so it's also not going to do much for making you more famous. But recently the
418:
595:
692:
856:
802:
517:
that refer to the list of references at the end. The trustworthiness of a
Knowledge (XXG) article is based on the authority of the sources, not the authority of the author.
98:. Part of being an academic is communicating to the public, and Knowledge (XXG) is a great way of writing about research in a way that can be found and read by the public.
1109:
17:
918:, pseudocode is better than code. And if an article has one (code or pseudocode) implementation, that's enough; don't add a second one in your favorite other language.
1461:
855:
phrases rather than using acronyms, and providing plenty of context. Start slow and put the more technical parts off to as late as possible within the article. See
241:. Click the "Edit" tab, top right; if you are not logged in to an account, a popup will offer the choice. If you have logged in, you can set your editing mode at
1141:
1135:
283:
1222:
Masukume, G.; Kipersztok, L.; Das, D.; Shafee, T.; Laurent, M.; Heilman, J. (November 2016), "Medical journals and
Knowledge (XXG): a global health matter",
817:(marked by putting the section title on a line by itself, with doubled equal signs on both sides of it) and sometimes subsections (tripled equal signs). The
1125:
1027:
453:
430:
529:
904:
805:. These Knowledge (XXG)-internal best practices are a careful balance of compromises, and they generally do not match in every detail what is preferred
541:
341:
873:
plural ("we") is very popular in academic writing. It's not popular here. Fortunately it's almost always possible to reword your writing to avoid it.
521:
325:
1251:
932:
928:
822:
it is to being an introduction. There should be a "References" section at the end, containing the references from the article (usually using the
767:
684:
1565:
806:
155:
Do not go into Knowledge (XXG) for the purpose of boosting its coverage of you as a person or of your research publications. It can be OK to
16:
This is a guide for subject experts who have worked as a researcher, scholar, or academic. Experts without an academic background may prefer
587:
1486:
Tsueng, Ginger; Good, Benjamin M.; Ping, Peipei; Golemis, Erica; Hanukoglu, Israel; Wijnen, Andre J. van; Su, Andrew I. (5 November 2016).
758:
The peer review on Knowledge (XXG) can be harsh. Your edits may be reverted by automated tools designed to rapidly remove large volumes of
882:
649:
329:
203:
44:
449:
376:
578:
making the subject verifiable, and probably better at helping novices learn more about the subject. For more on selecting sources, see
565:
548:
349:
321:
1035:
770:. Seek more constructive review from other editors. Remember that removed content can be put back with almost no effort (but avoid
461:
406:
333:
202:
If you intend to edit Knowledge (XXG) more than once or twice, and especially if you ever intend to create new articles, there are
180:
337:
272:
936:
664:
426:
778:
shows that, sadly, a lot of good would-be contributors disengage rather than discuss when their contributions are rejected.
36:
1208:
579:
1650:
1114:
798:
133:
1344:
1098:
896:
843:
763:
748:
607:
525:
211:
1321:
775:
524:) should have at least one footnote or other source, and in many cases every sentence will have its own source. The
1407:
1160:
985:
1598:
1401:
Wodak, Shoshana J.; Mietchen, Daniel; Collings, Andrew M.; Russell, Robert B.; Bourne, Philip E. (29 March 2012).
561:
481:
129:
641:
712:
425:
may be ok (but usually you are required to state the source of the copied text in the edit summary). Copying or
317:
295:
735:, published material in journals, books, theses, newspapers, etc., that says what you want the article to say.
645:
1092:
372:
364:
353:
164:
128:. Actually, I don't think any tenure committee is going to care about your Knowledge (XXG) contributions (but
1018:
962:
719:
the conflict is to discuss it on the article's discussion page. Knowledge (XXG) stringently adheres to the
489:
410:
83:
Welcome to Knowledge (XXG); we greatly appreciate your desire to help build and maintain the encyclopedia!
163:, and it is almost never OK to create or edit an article about yourself. If you develop a reputation as a
759:
742:
of an article and vet changes by others. Instead, disputes over the content of an article are handled by
414:
306:
291:
48:
1008:
708:
631:
547:
is, very roughly, at the level one would expect of a full professor at a major research university; see
946:
889:
771:
287:
215:
187:
156:
58:
1013:
1416:
1169:
1103:
276:
1056:
716:
160:
1074:
583:
242:
1536:
1293:
Bond, Alexander L. (2011), "Why ornithologists should embrace and contribute to Knowledge (XXG)",
814:
316:
One way to stay connected to the greater Knowledge (XXG) community is through discipline-specific
302:
1627:
1462:"Continuing to Bridge the Journal-Knowledge (XXG) Gap: Introducing Topic Pages for PLOS Genetics"
1310:
168:
1488:"Gene Wiki Reviews—Raising the quality and accessibility of information about the human genome"
1620:
1518:
1443:
1283:
1239:
1196:
707:
You don't need permission to add or remove content from Knowledge (XXG); Knowledge (XXG) uses
680:
617:
394:
268:
253:
950:
818:
499:
472:
191:
172:
148:
1610:
1577:
1544:
1509:
1499:
1434:
1424:
1381:
1302:
1274:
1266:
1231:
1187:
1177:
1154:
Logan, Darren W.; Sandal, Massimo; Gardner, Paul P.; Manske, Magnus; Bateman, Alex (2010), "
1034:: they do not charge any fees. The peer reviewers are volunteers, and the costs paid by the
863:
826:
720:
958:
954:
752:
743:
739:
728:
724:
433:, if they appear in a publication that you don't own the copyright of, may not be allowed.
422:
383:
264:
176:
144:
888:
Examples are good, but don't work them out step-by-step in the manner of a textbook — see
870:
249:
43:
It explains concepts or processes used by the Knowledge (XXG) community. It is not one of
809:. Here are some issues that are a little different from other kinds of academic writing.
732:
514:
510:
503:
1564:
Shafee, Thomas; Das, Diptanshu; Masukume, Gwinyai; Häggström, Mikael (15 January 2017).
1420:
1173:
1513:
1487:
1438:
1402:
1278:
1191:
995:
390:
368:
1235:
1644:
1630:
1306:
990:
878:
621:
238:
226:
1313:
1213:
942:
502:
but that are not important enough to write up as separate research articles. Don't
1429:
1270:
1182:
789:
and intelligent accommodation can avoid and resolve communications difficulties.
640:
It is rarely necessary to type in the full citation information. Entering only a
225:
word processor, such as Microsoft Word, you may be more comfortable with the new
1566:"WikiJournal of Medicine, the first Knowledge (XXG)-integrated academic journal"
1386:
1031:
1000:
625:
437:
1504:
310:
1623:
1615:
1582:
1549:
1521:
1446:
1286:
1242:
1199:
738:
Unlike some other sites, Knowledge (XXG) does not permit any one editor to
624:, citation information is always entered by pressing the "Cite" button; in
389:
When you create or make significant changes to an article, you may want to
1367:"Knowledge (XXG)-integrated publishing: a comparison of successful models"
687:
directly from Zotero into Knowledge (XXG), no typing required. If you use
360:
207:
847:
457:
445:
294:. You can even find an experienced Knowledge (XXG) editor to act as your
1122:– an editor's guide to research on the subject of Knowledge (XXG) itself
1120:
Knowledge (XXG):What are these researchers doing in my Knowledge (XXG)?
874:
762:. The editors using these tools may not be willing to take the time to
696:
688:
672:
657:
448:
is allowed, even if they are not your own work. See, for instance, the
286:
from established members of the community. You can ask for help at the
230:
222:
520:
Ideally, every paragraph of a Knowledge (XXG) article (outside of the
949:
with "a summary of accepted knowledge regarding its subject", from a
676:
668:
628:, citation information may additionally be entered manually, between
80:
differences that it might be helpful to know about before you start.
1345:"Wikimania (Knowledge (XXG)) has changed my life | petermr's blog"
1026:
Knowledge (XXG) articles can be submitted to WikiJournals via the
441:
263:
234:
1403:"Topic Pages: PLoS Computational Biology Meets Knowledge (XXG)"
832:
template to render inline references made in the article body).
1323:
Three Reasons Why Earth Scientists Should Edit Knowledge (XXG)
22:
797:
The general style of Knowledge (XXG) articles is laid out in
751:. You need to be prepared for this, and avoid getting into a
660:
can tidy your citations, as long as they are comprehensible.
564:
lecture notes and web pages as sources (but do use them in
532:
give more guidance on what does and doesn't need a source.
221:
There are two ways to edit. If you generally write using a
715:. If you disagree with someone's edits, the proper way to
1209:"Knowledge (XXG) wants more contributions from academics"
66:
857:
Knowledge (XXG):Make technical articles understandable
803:
Knowledge (XXG):Make technical articles understandable
409:. As an academic you will probably find little new in
309:. There is a global annual academic conference called
1110:
Help:Knowledge (XXG) editing for non-academic experts
18:
Help:Knowledge (XXG) editing for non-academic experts
1252:"Why Medical Schools Should Embrace Knowledge (XXG)"
653:
783:
editors with high-functioning autism and Asperger's
1656:Knowledge (XXG) essays about experts and expertise
953:. While Knowledge (XXG) is not a place to publish
509:Everything in Knowledge (XXG) should ideally have
1095:Finding expert help or people needing expert help
648:to the publication will usually be enough to let
214:also allows pseudonymous accounts, which you may
1142:Help:Knowledge (XXG) editing for medical experts
1136:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Medicine/How to edit
363:, you can make it easier for fellow editors who
1126:Knowledge (XXG):WikiJournal article nominations
1038:, the same charity that funds Knowledge (XXG).
1599:"The aims and scope of WikiJournal of Science"
697:make a markup citation from a doi or some URLs
656:complete your citation. Failing that, another
271:, academic and Knowledge (XXG) editor, giving
905:Knowledge (XXG):Manual of Style (mathematics)
542:Knowledge (XXG):Biographies of living persons
342:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Academic Journals
8:
1156:Ten simple rules for editing Knowledge (XXG)
963:do this on Knowledge (XXG)'s sister projects
326:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Computer Science
450:Commons:User:Open Access Media Importer Bot
972:
723:principle, so you will need to leave your
1614:
1581:
1548:
1512:
1503:
1437:
1428:
1385:
1277:
1190:
1181:
937:Wikiversity:Go unto Wikimedia, academics!
923:Knowledge (XXG)-integrated scholarly work
382:There is no formal way to verify account
340:, and more specialized projects such as
1106:– Tutorials for Visual Editor and Markup
862:Knowledge (XXG) makes extensive use of "
711:. All editors must avoid back-and-forth
588:Knowledge (XXG):Reliable source examples
190:, but they are expected to write from a
45:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines
1336:
1138:is specifically for medical researchers
693:Knowledge (XXG) BibDesk Export Template
468:Sourcing, verifiability, and notability
411:Knowledge (XXG)'s concept of plagiarism
330:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Mathematics
1537:"Publish in Knowledge (XXG) or perish"
549:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (academics)
188:no opinions in their area of expertise
781:Knowledge (XXG) has a fair number of
417:are often grounded in the need for a
322:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Chemistry
7:
959:synthesis of the research literature
749:know less than you about the subject
699:, which can be used in any browser.
419:Knowledge (XXG)-compatible copyright
334:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Medicine
171:as an editor and your contributions
47:, and may reflect varying levels of
1535:Butler, Declan (16 December 2008).
1365:Shafee, Thomas (24 November 2017).
945:— each article is meant to provide
629:
423:from other Knowledge (XXG) articles
377:Category:Wikipedian anthropologists
338:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Physics
233:environment such as LaTeX, or know
137:really does look good on your vita.
296:Knowledge (XXG)-editing supervisor
14:
618:two short "Referencing" tutorials
186:Experts are not expected to have
167:, you are likely to get yourself
1307:10.1111/j.1474-919X.2011.01135.x
1073:
1055:
580:Knowledge (XXG):Reliable sources
436:Copying (with attribution) from
26:
1597:Editorial Board (1 June 2018).
1115:Knowledge (XXG):Manual of Style
969:content for the encyclopedia.
799:Knowledge (XXG):Manual of Style
683:, you can change a setting and
667:hold citation information in a
1099:Knowledge (XXG):Expert editors
933:WP:Journal to wiki publication
929:WP:Wiki to journal publication
608:Knowledge (XXG):Citing sources
530:scientific citation guidelines
456:of copyright materials may be
301:Many cities have face-to-face
237:markup, you may prefer to use
216:prefer to using your real name
1:
1236:10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30254-6
1207:Corbyn, Zoe (29 March 2011),
885:third-person pronoun, though.
248:For markup, there is a quick
1430:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002446
1271:10.1097/ACM.0000000000001381
1183:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000941
1032:diamond/platinum open-access
895:Every article has a list of
807:in any particular discipline
709:post-publication peer review
551:for more detailed guidance.
298:while you learn the basics.
1387:10.13140/rg.2.2.27470.77129
1320:Goldstein, Evan B. (2017),
1093:Knowledge (XXG):Expert help
801:. A more specific guide is
598:topics are also available.
526:general citation guidelines
252:. There are also extensive
250:cheatsheet of common markup
159:in certain situations, but
1672:
1505:10.1016/j.gene.2016.04.053
1460:Luk, Ann (12 April 2017).
1408:PLOS Computational Biology
1161:PLOS Computational Biology
986:PLOS Computational Biology
926:
695:. There is also a tool to
605:
539:
504:do this in Knowledge (XXG)
413:. Knowledge (XXG)'s other
320:. Larger projects include
282:As in academia, newcomers
212:Wikimedia's privacy policy
198:How to get started editing
126:It looks good on your vita
56:
15:
1019:WikiJournal of Humanities
916:articles about algorithms
813:Articles are broken into
620:. In summary, when using
522:initial summary paragraph
464:is available to editors.
147:) or their own research:
141:Your advisor asked you to
1224:The Lancet Global Health
1080:A short presentation on
1062:A short presentation on
721:"evidence, not eminence"
616:You can take one of the
440:articles licensed under
288:Knowledge (XXG):Teahouse
1570:WikiJournal of Medicine
1030:. The WikiJournals are
1009:WikiJournal of Medicine
685:drag-and-drop citations
454:Attributed short quotes
367:to find you, by adding
303:Knowledge (XXG) meetups
292:variety of other places
1651:Knowledge (XXG) how-to
1603:WikiJournal of Science
1550:10.1038/news.2008.1312
1014:WikiJournal of Science
941:Knowledge (XXG) is an
776:study of editor trends
766:in your edit, as they
691:, you can install the
590:. Specific guides for
421:. Copying and pasting
348:interests, browse the
279:
157:cite your own writings
120:Broaden your knowledge
1616:10.15347/wjs/2018.001
1583:10.15347/wjm/2017.001
1084:editing for academics
1066:editing for academics
951:neutral point of view
498:that are more than a
350:Wikiproject directory
267:
192:neutral point of view
181:conflicts of interest
1131:For medical topics:
1104:Help:Introduction to
1036:Wikimedia Foundation
793:Style and formatting
462:Copyright assistance
427:closely paraphrasing
415:rules around copying
373:expertise categories
277:Wikimania Conference
254:tutorials on editing
35:This help page is a
1421:2012PLSCB...8E2446W
1174:2010PLSCB...6E0941L
881:is acceptable as a
851:"Wagner's Theorem".
768:ideally ought to do
602:Citation formatting
500:trivial calculation
365:need your expertise
361:register a username
243:Special:Preferences
1005:The WikiJournals:
957:, nor an original
848:titles of sections
844:Titles of articles
665:citation templates
280:
260:Social connections
229:. If you prefer a
183:must be declared.
179:. As in academia,
1259:Academic Medicine
1043:
1042:
977:Examples include:
955:original research
755:when it happens.
681:reference manager
407:violate copyright
269:Peter Murray-Rust
208:create an account
77:
76:
1663:
1635:
1634:
1618:
1594:
1588:
1587:
1585:
1561:
1555:
1554:
1552:
1532:
1526:
1525:
1516:
1507:
1483:
1477:
1476:
1474:
1472:
1457:
1451:
1450:
1441:
1432:
1398:
1392:
1391:
1389:
1371:
1362:
1356:
1355:
1353:
1351:
1341:
1326:
1316:
1289:
1281:
1256:
1245:
1217:
1202:
1194:
1185:
1077:
1059:
1028:nominations page
973:
877:is discouraged.
831:
825:
787:bit of knowledge
733:reliable sources
663:In wiki markup,
636:
635:...</ref: -->
555:Choosing sources
69:
30:
29:
23:
1671:
1670:
1666:
1665:
1664:
1662:
1661:
1660:
1641:
1640:
1639:
1638:
1596:
1595:
1591:
1563:
1562:
1558:
1534:
1533:
1529:
1485:
1484:
1480:
1470:
1468:
1459:
1458:
1454:
1415:(3): e1002446.
1400:
1399:
1395:
1369:
1364:
1363:
1359:
1349:
1347:
1343:
1342:
1338:
1333:
1319:
1292:
1254:
1248:
1221:
1206:
1168:(9), e1000941,
1153:
1150:
1148:Further reading
1089:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1085:
1078:
1069:
1068:
1067:
1064:Knowledge (XXG)
1060:
1049:
1044:
978:
939:
925:
879:Singular "they"
829:
823:
795:
705:
610:
604:
567:Further reading
557:
544:
538:
470:
403:
284:may expect help
262:
200:
108:Righting wrongs
89:
73:
72:
65:
61:
53:
52:
27:
21:
12:
11:
5:
1669:
1667:
1659:
1658:
1653:
1643:
1642:
1637:
1636:
1589:
1556:
1527:
1498:(2): 235–238.
1478:
1452:
1393:
1357:
1335:
1334:
1332:
1329:
1328:
1327:
1317:
1301:(3): 640–641,
1290:
1265:(2): 194–200,
1246:
1219:
1204:
1149:
1146:
1145:
1144:
1139:
1129:
1128:
1123:
1117:
1112:
1107:
1101:
1096:
1079:
1072:
1071:
1070:
1061:
1054:
1053:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1048:
1045:
1041:
1040:
1024:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1016:
1011:
1003:
998:
993:
988:
980:
979:
976:
971:
924:
921:
920:
919:
912:
908:
900:
893:
886:
883:gender-neutral
867:
860:
852:
841:
833:
794:
791:
704:
701:
603:
600:
582:, and for an
571:External links
562:self-published
556:
553:
537:
534:
495:
494:
486:
469:
466:
402:
399:
395:your watchlist
261:
258:
199:
196:
161:only sparingly
153:
152:
138:
123:
117:
111:
105:
99:
96:Public service
88:
85:
75:
74:
71:
70:
62:
57:
54:
42:
41:
33:
31:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1668:
1657:
1654:
1652:
1649:
1648:
1646:
1632:
1629:
1625:
1622:
1617:
1612:
1608:
1604:
1600:
1593:
1590:
1584:
1579:
1575:
1571:
1567:
1560:
1557:
1551:
1546:
1542:
1538:
1531:
1528:
1523:
1520:
1515:
1511:
1506:
1501:
1497:
1493:
1489:
1482:
1479:
1467:
1466:PLOS Biologue
1463:
1456:
1453:
1448:
1445:
1440:
1436:
1431:
1426:
1422:
1418:
1414:
1410:
1409:
1404:
1397:
1394:
1388:
1383:
1379:
1375:
1374:Health Inform
1368:
1361:
1358:
1346:
1340:
1337:
1330:
1325:
1324:
1318:
1315:
1312:
1308:
1304:
1300:
1296:
1291:
1288:
1285:
1280:
1276:
1272:
1268:
1264:
1260:
1253:
1247:
1244:
1241:
1237:
1233:
1229:
1225:
1220:
1216:
1215:
1210:
1205:
1201:
1198:
1193:
1189:
1184:
1179:
1175:
1171:
1167:
1163:
1162:
1157:
1152:
1151:
1147:
1143:
1140:
1137:
1134:
1133:
1132:
1127:
1124:
1121:
1118:
1116:
1113:
1111:
1108:
1105:
1102:
1100:
1097:
1094:
1091:
1090:
1083:
1076:
1065:
1058:
1046:
1039:
1037:
1033:
1029:
1020:
1017:
1015:
1012:
1010:
1007:
1006:
1004:
1002:
999:
997:
994:
992:
991:PLOS Genetics
989:
987:
984:
983:
982:
981:
975:
974:
970:
966:
964:
960:
956:
952:
948:
944:
938:
934:
930:
922:
917:
913:
909:
906:
901:
898:
894:
891:
887:
884:
880:
876:
875:Second person
872:
868:
865:
861:
858:
853:
849:
845:
842:
839:
834:
828:
820:
819:first section
816:
812:
811:
810:
808:
804:
800:
792:
790:
788:
784:
779:
777:
773:
769:
765:
761:
756:
754:
750:
745:
741:
736:
734:
730:
726:
722:
718:
714:
710:
702:
700:
698:
694:
690:
686:
682:
678:
674:
670:
666:
661:
659:
655:
651:
650:Visual Editor
647:
643:
638:
633:
627:
623:
622:Visual Editor
619:
614:
609:
601:
599:
597:
593:
589:
585:
581:
575:
573:
572:
568:
563:
554:
552:
550:
543:
536:Living people
535:
533:
531:
527:
523:
518:
516:
512:
507:
505:
501:
492:
491:
487:
484:
483:
482:Verifiability
479:
478:
477:
474:
467:
465:
463:
459:
455:
451:
447:
443:
439:
434:
432:
428:
424:
420:
416:
412:
408:
400:
398:
396:
392:
387:
385:
380:
378:
374:
370:
369:your userpage
366:
362:
357:
355:
351:
345:
343:
339:
335:
331:
327:
323:
319:
314:
312:
308:
304:
299:
297:
293:
289:
285:
278:
274:
270:
266:
259:
257:
255:
251:
246:
244:
240:
236:
232:
228:
227:Visual Editor
224:
219:
217:
213:
209:
205:
197:
195:
193:
189:
184:
182:
178:
174:
170:
166:
165:self-promoter
162:
158:
150:
146:
142:
139:
135:
131:
127:
124:
121:
118:
115:
112:
109:
106:
103:
102:Give and take
100:
97:
94:
93:
92:
86:
84:
81:
68:
67:Help:Academic
64:
63:
60:
55:
50:
46:
40:
38:
32:
25:
24:
19:
1606:
1602:
1592:
1573:
1569:
1559:
1540:
1530:
1495:
1491:
1481:
1469:. Retrieved
1465:
1455:
1412:
1406:
1396:
1377:
1373:
1360:
1348:. Retrieved
1339:
1322:
1298:
1294:
1262:
1258:
1230:(11): e791,
1227:
1223:
1214:The Guardian
1212:
1165:
1159:
1130:
1081:
1063:
1025:
967:
943:encyclopedia
940:
927:Main pages:
897:"Categories"
871:first person
837:
796:
780:
772:edit warring
764:fix problems
757:
740:take control
737:
713:edit warring
706:
662:
658:human editor
639:
615:
611:
576:
570:
566:
558:
545:
519:
508:
496:
488:
480:
471:
435:
404:
388:
381:
358:
346:
318:Wikiprojects
315:
307:Edit-a-thons
300:
281:
275:at the 2014
247:
220:
204:good reasons
201:
185:
154:
140:
125:
119:
113:
107:
101:
95:
90:
82:
78:
37:how-to guide
34:
1541:Nature News
1001:RNA Biology
947:its readers
890:WP:NOTHOWTO
729:credentials
703:Peer review
626:wiki markup
606:Main page:
540:Main page:
438:open access
384:credentials
239:wiki markup
149:not so good
1645:Categories
961:, you may
673:structured
592:scientific
586:approach,
490:Notability
375:, such as
1631:189736287
1624:2470-6345
864:wikilinks
760:vandalism
744:consensus
584:inductive
515:footnotes
473:Citations
431:own words
311:Wikimania
49:consensus
1609:(1): 1.
1576:(1): 1.
1522:27150585
1471:21 March
1447:22479174
1314:83787883
1287:27627633
1243:27765289
1200:20941386
1082:Wikidata
1047:See also
815:sections
679:is your
675:way. If
458:fair use
446:CC BY-SA
114:Practice
59:Shortcut
1514:5944608
1439:3315447
1417:Bibcode
1350:19 July
1279:5265689
1192:2947980
1170:Bibcode
838:subject
827:reflist
717:resolve
689:Bibdesk
637:tags.
596:medical
511:sources
401:Copying
359:If you
231:WYSIWYM
223:WYSIWYG
177:deleted
169:blocked
145:example
935:; and
840:is..."
677:Zotero
671:-like
669:BibTeX
405:Don't
391:put it
354:search
290:and a
273:a talk
173:undone
1628:S2CID
1380:(2).
1370:(PDF)
1331:Notes
1311:S2CID
1255:(PDF)
911:true.
774:). A
753:fight
654:robot
652:or a
634:: -->
442:CC BY
429:your
352:, or
1621:ISSN
1519:PMID
1492:Gene
1473:2018
1444:PMID
1352:2024
1295:Ibis
1284:PMID
1240:PMID
1197:PMID
996:Gene
914:For
869:The
846:and
785:. A
727:and
630:<
594:and
574:).
569:and
528:and
444:and
305:and
235:HTML
87:Why?
1611:doi
1578:doi
1545:doi
1510:PMC
1500:doi
1496:592
1435:PMC
1425:doi
1382:doi
1303:doi
1299:153
1275:PMC
1267:doi
1232:doi
1188:PMC
1178:doi
1158:",
965:.
725:ego
646:URL
644:or
642:doi
632:ref
506:.
393:on
371:to
344:.
324:,
256:.
218:.
206:to
175:or
134:NSF
130:see
1647::
1626:.
1619:.
1605:.
1601:.
1572:.
1568:.
1543:.
1539:.
1517:.
1508:.
1494:.
1490:.
1464:.
1442:.
1433:.
1423:.
1411:.
1405:.
1378:26
1376:.
1372:.
1309:,
1297:,
1282:,
1273:,
1263:92
1261:,
1257:,
1238:,
1226:,
1211:,
1195:,
1186:,
1176:,
1164:,
931:;
830:}}
824:{{
460:.
397:.
379:.
356:.
336:,
332:,
328:,
313:.
245:.
210:.
194:.
1633:.
1613::
1607:1
1586:.
1580::
1574:4
1553:.
1547::
1524:.
1502::
1475:.
1449:.
1427::
1419::
1413:8
1390:.
1384::
1354:.
1305::
1269::
1234::
1228:4
1218:.
1203:.
1180::
1172::
1166:6
907:.
892:.
859:.
151:.
51:.
39:.
20:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.