Help talk:Edit summary/Archive 2

1578:

water and sands and is cloudy with smooth edges. This is never referred to as ‘sea glass’ because it has been in the waters of the Great Lakes for many years and is referred to as ‘beach glass’. I can assure you it is naturally tumbled in the water. There are documented incidences of freighters and smaller vessels sinking 50-100 years ago. All of the glass items from those vessels have been tumbling in the lake waters for all of those years and are eventually thrown into the beaches as ‘genuine beach glass’. I have found pieces of finished glass with wire embedded inside that came from factories, etc. and have thousands of ‘genuine’ beach glass that never was inside a tumbler. For a writer to make a blanket statement that glass not found on ocean beaches becomes frosted and smooth only from a tumbler or acid is a very uninformed statement. Please correct your mistake.

2610:'s comments and a dispute I've been dealing with this weekend, we apparently need a training program that tells people that we're trying to build an encyclopedia, not a collection of edit summaries. You should not try to revert edit summaries, full stop. Reverting a good edit with a bad edit summary is (a) irrelevant, because they're not part of the encyclopedia, and (b) stupid, because it doesn't affect the other person's edit summary at all. The edit summary will remain in exactly the same invisible-to-99-percent-of-readers state whether you revert the good content edit or not. Truly bad edit summaries qualify for oversighting or admin-only deletion. The rest should be ignored. I've just taken a first pass at re-organizing the first section to be clearer on that point, as well as to put related reasons into separate paragraphs. 2614:

mainspace edits. I think there might be good reasons to encourage those. I can think of a case involving a copy-paste copyvio from an HIV denialism website in which everyone would have been much happier if the website had been linked in the edit summary. Pasting a URL into the edit summary when you add an item to ==External links== is not a bad idea. It's not unusual for a newbie to have no idea how to make a ref, and to paste a URL to a reliable source into the edit summary out of desperation – obviously better than giving us no idea where the information came from, even though less than perfect.

2727:(iv) In this case, it would seem sensible to me to permit only the original editor who made the article edit to make **deletions** from the edit summary (as well, of course, as insertions and changes to the minor edit attribute), whereas other (perhaps only privileged) editors could be allowed to make additions/insertions (only) into the edit summary and changes to the minor edit attribute. This, of course, would allow other editors to make the necessary changes to otherwise empty edit summaries, but prohibit them from removing any, perhaps inadequate, description by the edit author. 953: 545: 151: 454: 3345:

processor. There are a small set of operations that I find useful, likely others would have a different set, so, while a global solution seems nice, it isn't really needed. As noted, I also sometimes get underscores in my links, which doesn't bother me, but if there was a system for easily removing them, I might do it. There are also some transformations for talk page text that could also be useful, but again, user specific. I do wonder, though, am I the only one to have these come up?

1446:

the converted. (2) Pasting the text of your edit into the summary space is just annoying in many cases. It's quite pointless on a discussion page because you have to read the thread to understand the context. (3) Many attempts to explain edits are incomprehensible without looking at the edit itself. I'm not saying that people shouldn't provide edit summaries, but I think the insistence on them is over the top and counterproductive in some cases.--

31: 2876:, which has seen abysmal edit summary usage, the incentive structure seems to be the opposite: using a detailed summary draws attention that can lead to reversions, whereas not using one just adds your edit to the pile that's moving too fast for adequate scrutiny. We've added an edit notice pleading for better edit summary usage, but I'm not sure what can be done to change the fundamental incentives. Thoughts welcome. 1495:

get to "know" them. If they tend to leave informative edit summaries, you may find that when you come across edits of theirs in a page history, the summary (or lack thereof) is often enough to tell you whether you want to review the edit. Plus, when you encounter an editor who is new to you, you can often tell from a quick look at the edit summaries on their contributions page what kind of work the person does here.

3461: 905: 820: 735: 490: 406: 316: 193: 84: 3405:}} is different from the last template of the list, except for what the info says when read out. Furthermore, that template deviates from the usual standard as it’s size is larger and causes formatting issues when grouping templates on a userpage, whereas my version doesn’t. Wikipedians are free to choose one template over the other, as I’m not removing either from the list. 2941:, where there is no practical way to search for names similar to those which are in the current reported set; however, names being considered often appear in the edit summaries, and searching in a regex-supported text editor like Notepad++ could provide a practical way to hunt for previous discussions of similar names. Thanks for your thoughts. --User:Ceyockey ( 3864: 3506: 869: 784: 246: 2520:. I was refuting an unsourced change to an article, by providing a source to show that the supposed staff change was not going to happen for six months.. There was no source in the article that deal this particular event, so proving the edit was incorrect via the summary was much better than just undoing it as an unsourced change. 2665:

First, I have noted the contents of discussion, "Enter key should be disabled", above and I'm looking at the various scripts linked there to determine which if any might help me. And indeed, it was precisely a couple of incidents of my miskeying with the Enter key that led to me starting this topic.

2613:

As for the general case, a glance at the block log or drama-associated pages ought to show that there are a number of good uses of external links, e.g., by ArbCom clerks providing permalinks to decisions, so presumably this proposed rule is meant to be about using external links in edit summaries for

2126:

Some don't even write one, but it is nice to give other editors an idea. Sometimes one word is enough, sometimes I run to the limit, then remove enough words for it to fit. I think I usually write them in the present, as it is while I am still editing. (It isn't past until you hit SAVE.) But past

3344:

I would probably do it with sed, or some similar program. But mostly, not that I am trying to be a lazy edit summarist, but that is more steps than I am likely to take to get one done. Thinking more about this, what would be useful would be a user specific, that is, user configurable, edit summary

3270:

Yes, it seems that what I was asking about would be edit summary pre-processing, before it goes into actual processing. It could even be done on my computer, if it knew how to do that. I also noticed that I put links in edit summaries with the underscores still in them. (Never in articles, though,

3216:

Yes the later suggestion was to transform before saving, which I don't know if is at all possible. I suppose it would be nice to have a keyboard editor so that I could do it at the same time as pasting into the edit summary. Note also that section names are automatically added to edit summaries (at

2497:

I think this is a poor idea both because URLs are appropriate for copyvio instances but there are also other valid instances, such as edit summaries which says 'adding www.foo as a reference for X, Y and Z', or 'updating this reference to www.foo which is more recent'. There's nothing wrong at all

1978:

So many people are watching that I thought an admin would show up if interested. This seems to not fit ANI -- it is too small if it can be handled by those who follow this page. And I didn't ping u because I just sent people to your talkpage, which you said you were ok with -- I did not ask them to

1494:

In the big picture, the habit of leaving an edit summary is always useful to others. At the basic level, it tells others that you acknowledge that Knowledge is collaborative. And it saves other editors' time. After you've been editing for a while, you will come across certain editors repeatedly and

1445:

I don't think edit summaries are necessarily helpful. (1) If you are watching the page, you probably should check the edit itself. Otherwise there is no way of determining if the summary is misleading or not. As this page says, editors should not give misleading summaries, but this is preaching to

3199:

work locally. It would require an unlikely MediaWiki change. Expansion of all templates in edit summaries is a non-starter. In theory there could be a customizable feature allowing a wiki to make certain restricted transformations in edit summaries but I don't see it happening. To work permanently

2424:

External links to material directly relevant to the intended objective of an edit summary - i.e. an explanation as to why the edit was made - may on occasion be justified. Per the discussion at WP:ANI, external links serving other purposes almost certainly shouldn't be. I would have hoped this was

582:

Hi: I have tried to add my own edit summaries to a couple of articles but am only really allowed to pick from a drop down menu (including some of the ones I usually use); has something changed? I looked at my preferences page but nothing seemed wrong... any help appreciated. Maybe I should log out

3752:

that is precisely the circumstance that motivated me to request this facility (while typing the edit summary, make a typo, reach for the backspace key to delete and retype it, only to hit the enter key instead - resulting in publication with an incoherent edit note). Skynxnex's code does the job.

2673:

1. Is there any overriding Knowledge policy or other reason why Edit Summaries cannot themselves be edited subsequent to publication of an article edit?. I can understand why it would be just too much of a headache to keep track of what on Earth were going on if article edits themselves could be

2466:

I don't think it is necessary either. Knowledge already has multiple policies and guidelines which apply to off-topic linkspam, and there is no need to add specific instructions for each possible instance where such violations might occur. The general rules apply, so we don't need to restate them

1479:

I think of it the other way: with the appropriate edit summary I will look at a change that I otherwise might not. If you are seriously watching a page, I suppose you should always look, but I have many pages that I am not that serious about. If I made one change to them, I put them on the watch

3583:

to do so. If you make a mistake in an edit summary and you feel that you have to correct it, there is no need to revert the whole edit; instead, edit the section again and make an inconsequential change - such as adding a space at the end of any line except the first and last - then type in your

2439:

I don't see this as necessary (and particularly just as a reaction to that debatably intentioned Youtube incident). It is frequently useful to include an external link in an edit summary when the edit is concerned with adding/modifying references; saves watchers the need to wade into the code to

1705:

at the end of my summary, and I suspect there would be many others who do too. Any disabling of this behaviour, in my opinion, would therefore need to be by way of a user preference, gadget or script that could be used in personal javascript, as "opt-in", so that default behaviour was unchanged.

1577:

The last writer states that ‘artificial’ glass is only made by using acid or a rock tumbler to produce the appearance of shards of glass tumbled in the water for many years. For many years, people walking the beaches of Lake Michigan have found glass that has been tumbled for many years in the

2932:

Searching not supported on principle? Hello, I wonder if there's some kind of policy reason for not allowing searching of edit summaries, or is it just that nobody has bothered to implement it yet. If the latter, is there a place to propose/discuss/help with adding it? Thanks! -- 92.229.120.251

3546:

I noticed View history showed I'd typed in the summary that it was an addition to External links. After clicking undo and deleting what was in the summary box I typed the correct summary and clicked Publish. Not seeing any change in View history I deleted my addition and started to type in the

1788:

Yeah - fair point about "minor edit" and "watch". I guess if you don't want the edit summary to trigger then you don't want those fields to either. I never edit logged out, but do edit from more than one device, so I prefer wiki .js - but I can see how a browser script could suit you better.

1762:

Thanks for testing it. Less-specific is probably better to stop any other text, radio, or checkbox inputs from triggering publication. If I restricted it to the summary box, pressing Enter when the focus is on one of the "This is a minor edit" or "Watch this page" inputs would still trigger

661:

Thank you both for your questions: I generally use Google Chrome but sometimes use Firefox. I edit on a desktop computer. I will look at the village pump links you mentioned; also I tried a complete reboot to see if that would make a difference; it didn't.--FeanorStar7 23:24, 17 June 2015

3547:

summary box but before I'd finished the page reacted as if I'd clicked Publish and the summary appeared with ddition instead of Addition, and I had to delete and start again. This time everything went OK but it would have been preferable if I'd been able to correct my original mistake.

1406:

There is another that I have noticed for some time, maybe also in edit summaries. Some text, maybe only italic, but maybe others, when followed by a closing paren, has the paren too far to the left, overwriting the last character. Maybe related, though I didn't think about it before.

1513:

I agree with Eric. I leave an edit summary for almost every edit I make to an article (except for reverting vandalism). Sometimes this is only a single word such as "clarification" or "conciseness" but this helps the discussion progress if another editor disagrees with my edits.

3712:

For me, I always activate the thing which will alert me when I leave the edit summary blank. But for the case of writing the edit summary half way and accidentally pressed the enter key & publish it, I also face that problem once in a while and haven't found the solution yet.

1763:

publication. The advantage of a browser user script over a wiki user script is that it still works when not logged-in. (I do most of my edits as an IP address — reversion notifications are too depressing.) But when I get a chance I'll convert it to a wiki script and add it to

2832:

I don't know where else to say it, so I am asking here. It seems that in Watchlist listings, maybe elsewhere where edit summaries come out, there is no space between the page name and the date. This makes it hard to read, especially in page names ending with numbers.

1344:

dir="auto" tells the browser to choose between ltr (left-to-right) and rtl (right-to-left). This is probably done because some users use right-to-left languages in edit summaries. Maybe your browser chooses right-to-left for the space and link. Do you see a space right

2767:

I can't seem to be able to find how to edit or add a summary after submission. I believe, like me, most of the times editors are focused on the quality of submission and just forget to add summary. Should the recent submission be "undone" and then re-submitted with a

228:

page so that points 'This biographical article needs additional citations for verification. (February 2011)' & 'This article appears to be written like an advertisement. (February 2011)' go away. Please delete any information for which references cannot be found.

3246:

One problem is that edit summaries cannot be altered - in a normal edit, if you use the wrong template, or it does something that you didn't intend, you can go back and fix it. You can't do that with an edit summary, all you can do is ask an admin to apply

673:

I just noticed this problem on Google Chrome today too. Not a problem on Safari. I think it has something to do with the way Chrome handles Javascript. It's also been noted that Chrome sometimes has a hard time handling local clipboards, for example.

3575:? Don't worry about it. Whilst edit summaries are recommended, they are not mandatory; and nor are they required to accurately describe what you did. Once you've clicked "Publish", an edit summary is set in stone, it cannot be amended - even by 460:

it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. You have probably posted in the wrong place, as there is no external links section on this page. Please tell us the name of the

1071:

Which page is for discussing the processing done to edit summaries? If you look at the edit summary for this post, such as in your Watchlist, there is no space between the y of summary and the H of Help_talk. Or maybe it is a browser bug?

3195:. It is not a MediaWiki feature but a template made here at the English Knowledge. MediaWiki is used by thousands of other wikis. Template calls are not expanded in edit summaries and shouldn't be for many reasons. We cannot make 3271:

sometimes in talk.) I assume that editors won't be bothered by that, but some might like an automated removal of those. Otherwise, I will probably keep putting them in with the tl, and hope other editors know what I meant.

1195:

tag, and seem to get lost, but only, as far as I know, in edit summaries, when Safari displays it. It might be an HTML error, (that is, undefined in HTML), or a Safari bug. I have Safari 8.0.8 on OS X. Thanks for the help.

3802:

I expect many directs to this page are via warnings, admonitions, and advice to use an edit summary. I suspect a vast majority of those directions were meant to address a lack of reason given for edits. What say you all?

1685:

Often I prematurely submit edits when I accidentally hit the Enter key when entering Edit Summaries, especially when typing quote characters. I think JavaScript should be added to disable form submission by the Enter key.

3401:, please educate me whether and how having two similar userboxes listed on a page is an issue? I can’t see how it’s a "straight duplicate" or a "non-constructive" addition. I’d like to point out that every parameter of {{ 1193:

Yes, I see spaces in all of those. It only seems to happen in the edit summary, either in Watchlist, or in Show preview before Save Changes. Looking at the HTML, all the space that I put in are right before an <a:

3034:

This post to a random help talk page is the only edit by your account so we have no idea which page or what content you refer to. Maybe something COVID-19 related but we have thousands of pages and sources about that.

2440:

check up on what was done. The paucity of reported problems in this regard should indicate that this is not an issue that needs prescriptive solving, and that there's no need to take away the option from GF editors. --

1050:. The arrow "→‎" to the left of the section name is a link to the section. If you want another edit summary then you have to use an edit link and create the section by manually writing the section heading inside 1829:

How did you find that script? It's not in the list. It should work fine for just the summary box, because the use of the JQuery "which" function should cover all the conditions in the code from which I drew.

1054:. I don't understand what you say about spaces. Spaces are not removed before a link but multiple spaces everywhere may be displayed as a single space like in normal wikitext and html. Your edit summary in 2264:

I suppose I was wrong about the no-redirect links and meant the diff links instead. I don’t know why Knowledge doesn’t have a Special page that allows you to use no-redirect links without the use of the

1480:

list. I have Manual of Style on my watch list after asking some questions in its talk page. Most things I don't follow, though. Edit summaries are useful, but maybe not so useful as one might hope.

2090:

Should edit summary be in past tense or present tense? I know that with the git / github version control system the present with imperative mood is used due to the non-linearity of the the editing.

991:

The space(s) before a link in an edit summary get removed, unlike in articles. If you put them inside the link, they work. Is it supposed to be that way? And why no edit summer for a new section?

3428:

Honestly, in this case I'll do what I generally avoid and just go "whatever". Arguing about whether your personal vanity project is sufficiently different from others' is not on my agenda. Out. --

1596:

Welcome to Knowledge and thank you for your interest. Unfortunately I can't tell from the above which particular Knowledge article you are concerned about. Would you please make your point at the

2718:(iii) any editor who found an edit without an edit summary - should they take the time to determine what the edit was all about - could add their own summary of the edit to correct the situation. 2105:

I don’t understand: "Edit summary" is not an imperative or a full-sentence statement including a verb in any tense, but a title, meaning "a summary of edits", "A summary of the edits that I did".

1980: 1934: 1920: 1915:

The editor said that what he did was fine. And supporting that view he pointed out that this page is not one of Knowledge's policies or guidelines. He said he was open to me bringing in an admin

1818:

Anomie's is short and neat, but looks like it would only work for the "summary" field itself unless amended, and Majesty prefers to include the "minor edit" and "watch" checkboxes etc. too. --

2589: 1919:

to discuss whether it is fine for him to use tools like this, without an explaining edit summary, when reverting another editor (in this case as I say it was also including a misstatement).

2686:(a) Notwithstanding the repeated and good advice to FIES (fill in the edit summary), it is clearly something that editors repeatedly fail to do. Were it possible to edit an Edit Summary, 3231:

The edit summary processing is part of the MediaWiki software, and is nothing that we at English Knowledge have any control over. To get its behaviour changed would require a request at

3200:

including in tools which examine edit summaries and at other wikis which may import a page with page history, the transformed version would have to be saved as the final edit summary.

1912:

And to the fact that because he is using tools, he has a special responsibility to use them properly. I also pointed out that he had made a revert that led to inclusion of an error.

3003:

The license is not acceptable. It doesn't give room for change besides the fact that biometrics can now read our retina so in essence all policies are rendered null and void.

2617:

I'm also not convinced that we have a serious, ongoing problem with refspam via URLs in edit summaries. Almost nobody sees those edit summaries, so what would be the point?

2141:

I slip sometimes, but I mostly use past tense. I guess it’s because Knowledge itself uses past tense for automatic summaries such as the undo summary (where it says “undid”).

1909:

I spoke to an editor who is using tools to revert other editors, without leaving an edit summary that explains why. I told him that this wasn't right. Pointing to this page.

1600:

of that article? It will carry more weight, however, if you can make reference to any published work confirming what you say, as we aim to ensure that everything in Knowledge

3243:

expand templates in edit summaries - and that caused a lot of trouble, such that the template-expansion feature was removed very quickly. They're not likely to bring it back.

2517:

Agreed. It's better to leave it as is than to make a blanket ban and attempt to list all of the exceptions. Here's a recent example where I needed to use a link in a summary

1844: 2498:

with those, I've seen them done plenty of times, and to roll those kinds of edit back because of some dumb "no URLs in edit summaries rule" would be counter-productive.

1984: 1924: 3798:

up the edit to find out what it's all about, and (c) providing information about the edit on diff pages and lists of changes (such as page histories and watchlists)."

2679:

However, it does seem to me that there is a persuasive case for being able to edit the article-edit meta-data, including the Edit Summary and "minor edit" attribute.

967:. If possible, please make your request at the talk page for the article concerned. If you cannot edit the article's talk page, you can instead make your request at 2938: 1378:

I see a space right before the link in all four. The first three look identical. In the fourth I see no space before "OK" but instead a space right after the link.

701: 637: 633: 1086:

It seems to be a Safari feature. With Firefox, I get one space, even if I put in more. Safari shows it with no space, but cut and paste sees them all. Strange.

2704:(ii) it would be possible for an auto script to send a reminder e-mail to editors encouraging them to go back and write a summary if they had failed to do so. 3151:

in the text in a talk page, and just copy/paste it into the edit summary. Not knowing how edit summary processing works, how hard would it be to convert the

2937:

I'm interested in whether a FULL set of edit summaries can be exported for a long-history page so that it can be searched. I'm brought to this question by

2898:Πρώτην Ελλάδος διεθνής έχει παίξει στο παρελθόν για τον Α.Ο.ΙΑΣΩΝ ΙΛΙΟΥ ,Α.Ε.ΠΟΣΕΙΔΩΝΑΣ ΓΛΥΦΑΔΑ, Α.Ο.ΠΗΓΑΣΟΣ ΠΑΤΗΣΙΩΝ ΠΑΝΑΘΛΗΤΙΚΟΣ ΟΜΙΛΟΣ ΚΩΦΩΝ στην Ελλάδα 1941:

me when discussing my edits on another page. Next, seeing how few people watch and edit this page you might find it more helpful to bring up the issue at

2331:

People often use exlinks in edit summaries to say where they are getting their information, where a copyvio is pasted from, etc. This is not a bad thing.

2108:(Note that this title has been changed to simply "Summary" where it's actually used, i.e. on the page that you see when you edit, at the end, before the 3683: 2736:(v) It seems to me that it would be unnecessary to keep a visible record of the edit summary changes or to provide any kind of reversion mechanism. 3653:- To remove duplicate info is ok but at least "otherwise, people may question your motives for the edit." should be included as per present texts. 3121:}} in an edit summary. I sometimes do it when I'm adding a template to several pages and can copy-paste the edit summary. Otherwise I just write 968: 1701:

The same thing has occasionally happened to me (and caused me to swear). However, in general, I do like to be able to submit edits by hitting

1461:

I agree that edit summaries are not necessarily helpful, but that is not an argument against using them. Do you have a specific suggestion?

1293:

OK, here is a somewhat minimal set of HTML that does it. I can put this in a file with .html extension, and load it with file:/// .... .html

3787:

for the edit, and (c) providing information about the edit on diff pages and lists of changes (such as page histories and watchlists).", to

2872:

For some articles, using a minimal or non-existent edit summary is a red flag, but for others, particularly recently the extremely flooded

1115:

but it sounds like a minor issue for some Safari users. I wonder whether your Safari has problems with italics. I see a space in all these:

111:

I am John White & I am trying to make edits to my bio that is posted on Knowledge. I ask for your assistance in making these edits.

3489: 2404:) to support my changes when I think there might be a question and/or to help me keep straight where I got my information from, such as 2849: 2541:

Thanks for all the great comments. "External links" is clearly too broad. My thinking now is to make it specifically about link spam:

2476: 2426: 2325:

While a link to a Knowledge article or discussion may be very helpful to include in an edit summary, external links should be avoided.

1664: 1632: 1551: 1108: 937: 438: 281: 3684:

Knowledge:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1165#When writing an edit summary, is there a way to stop the enter key generating a "Publish"?

1718: 599: 347: 3675:

How to stop premature publication due to inadvertently touching the 'enter' key instead of 'backspace' when writing an edit summary

2873: 1835: 1772: 1726: 1691: 59: 3846:- reason should prevail for the summary. of course the reason has to be followed with any related MoS which contains such rule. 1949:

if you want to get an admin's immediate attention. If you don't necessarily want an admins help, just another experienced user,

3758: 3702: 2812: 2549:

While external links can be helpful to include in an edit summary, avoid including external links that could be interpreted as

2239: 2231: 3728: 2389: 2070:

adds to the summary. One should probably be sure that the important points come early, so it can be understood if truncated.

1801: 3488:

Under the section 'Notes for expeirenced users' make the following changes: Change stand for Adminship to run for adminship

3308: 3440: 2452: 1744: 2751: 1044: 254: 2588:

While this may not be a common problem, it's a serious one. Given how huge a problem COI-editing and spamming are, how

3349: 2895:

O Kristian skempis (γεννημένος στις 3 Φεβρουαρίου 1995 ) είναι Ελλάδος επαγγελματίας ποδοσφαίρου και πρώτην παίχτης.

1859: 1831: 1768: 1764: 1722: 1687: 1508: 1047:. The new section tab makes an automatic edit summary with the name of the section and the text "new section" like in 3579:. An admin may erase an edit summary (or reinstate one that was previously erased), but will only do so if there are 3352:

has many edit summary scripts but not for this. User scripts require the user to have JavaScript but most users do.

2674:

published and then subsequently changed - especially if this were possible with edits that were not the latest edit!

679: 3754: 3698: 2807:

Is there no guidance on eg. what grammatical voice is best used for edit summaries? It's common for projects using

2349:

I think it's bad form for indicating a ref, which I believe what "where they are getting their information" means.

2044:

What to do with the example? I've removed it for now because I couldn't think of an actual example that uses a ZWJ.

1039:. Many talk pages have low activity and some posts get no comments. You can ask questions about using Knowledge at 526: 38: 3775:

Looking for consensus to switch the order of the a) and b) parts in the description at the beginning, i.e. change

3736: 3104: 2506: 1879: 1809: 1654: 1466: 936:

CORRECTION: Story appears in Forensic Files Season 1 Episode 11 (not Season 11 Episode 40, which doesn't exist)

2903: 3876: 3640: 3543: 2792: 2651: 2639: 2401: 2117: 2095: 1540: 675: 234: 538: 522: 2913:

Hello Kristian- Please communicate in English here. Many of us will not be able to understand you otherwise.

2711:

Failing that, if the facility were made available to editors other than the editor who made the article edit:

2574:

Do we have to tell people to not use edit summaries for spam, when they are already told not to spam at all?

437:

the web-address in "external links" is to some bull-shit business that has nothing to do with the wiki page

3829:- "provide a reason" is the primary benefit (the other two follow from that), so it should be listed first. 3610: 3493: 3467: 3286: 941: 911: 826: 741: 496: 442: 412: 322: 289: 199: 90: 3063:

I understand that wikilinks are allowed in edit summaries, but not other things. It would be nice to have

2899: 2037:

some stuff about the longer edit summaries that are now possible, but I'm not quite sure about some stuff:

3513:. Article uses "summarize" that hints at American English. The word "adminship" shouldn't be capitalized. 3402: 3398: 2622: 2480: 2430: 2056: 1748: 1668: 1636: 1236: 47: 17: 2358:

I'm thinking of restoring the edit, identifying copyvio work as an exception, and linking WP:LINKSPAM. --

230: 3357: 3205: 3130: 3040: 2985: 2857: 2255: 2223: 1962: 1451: 1383: 1270: 1164: 1107:

I see a space in both Firefox and Safari 5.1.7 on Windows Vista. Technical problems can be discussed at

1062: 709: 616: 595: 351: 1751:

for all wiki sites. With it active I couldn't save this by hitting Enter in the edit summary field. --

3834: 3732: 3660: 3100: 2739: 2607: 2500: 2269: 2247: 2197: 2181: 2170: 2146: 2142: 1875: 1850: 1805: 1650: 1593: 1583: 1579: 1462: 587: 144: 132: 128: 119: 115: 3872: 3851: 3816: 3718: 3706: 3636: 3596: 3526: 3333: 3259: 3029: 3004: 2818: 2788: 2647: 2579: 2227: 2113: 2091: 1747:) with or without that change, so you could add it to your common.js or vector.js if you like - or 1562: 1536: 1040: 648: 567: 173: 253:

This is not the page to repeat questions that have already been asked and answered three times at

3606: 3564: 3548: 3008: 2964: 2944: 2773: 2413: 2386: 2343: 1950: 1783: 976: 285: 277: 3073:

for the same reason as wikilinks, so we could mention uses, and possibly changes, to templates.

3348:

It would be possible to make a user script which can transform the edit summary before saving.

3436: 2784: 2640:

Knowledge talk:Reverting#"Do not revert good edits with poor edit summaries or bad usernames."

2618: 2448: 2305: 2291: 2243: 2052: 1611: 1244: 1144: 1132: 1036: 964: 915: 885: 877: 856: 830: 800: 792: 771: 745: 556: 500: 470: 416: 326: 262: 203: 162: 3552: 3353: 3311:(you can leave the other entry items alone). This produces another box "Result", containing 3248: 3201: 3126: 3122: 3118: 3036: 2853: 2747: 2525: 2251: 1958: 1820: 1791: 1753: 1708: 1447: 1379: 1266: 1160: 1058: 705: 627: 612: 591: 386: 2352:

Yes, external links are regularly used in edit summaries when dealing with copyvio issues.

3830: 3654: 3576: 3418: 3251:

which erases the whole thing, they can't substitute it with the "correct" edit summary. --

3125:, or unlinked {{Example}} which just displays what you wrote, also if you add parameters. 2007:

If you are undoing an edit that is not vandalism, explain the reason in the edit summary.

3605:

I wonder if it would be possible in the future for an editor to edit their edit summary.

999:) 06:45, 4 November 2016 (UTC) This edit has an edit summary with space before its link. 3880: 3855: 3838: 3820: 3762: 3740: 3722: 3668: 3644: 3614: 3600: 3556: 3531: 3497: 3445: 3422: 3361: 3337: 3280: 3263: 3226: 3209: 3174: 3134: 3108: 3082: 3044: 3022: 3012: 2992: 2970: 2950: 2917: 2907: 2885: 2861: 2842: 2822: 2811:, for example, to instruct contributors to write commit messages in a particular tense: 2796: 2777: 2755: 2655: 2626: 2601: 2583: 2566: 2557:

I'm not happy with the wording, but it at least gets the point across for discussion. --

2529: 2512: 2484: 2457: 2434: 2417: 2393: 2367: 2308: 2277: 2259: 2189: 2150: 2136: 2121: 2099: 2079: 2060: 2018: 1988: 1973: 1928: 1883: 1839: 1824: 1813: 1795: 1776: 1757: 1730: 1712: 1695: 1672: 1658: 1640: 1616: 1587: 1566: 1544: 1518: 1501: 1489: 1470: 1455: 1430: 1416: 1401: 1387: 1331: 1288: 1274: 1205: 1168: 1095: 1081: 1066: 1023: 1008: 980: 945: 889: 860: 804: 775: 713: 683: 652: 620: 605: 571: 530: 474: 446: 390: 371: 355: 293: 266: 238: 177: 136: 123: 3847: 3812: 3747: 3714: 3589: 3514: 3326: 3276: 3252: 3236: 3235:- but you won't get consensus for it; most likely, it'll be rejected immediately. When 3222: 3170: 3078: 2881: 2838: 2814: 2597: 2575: 2562: 2550: 2363: 2335: 2132: 2075: 2014: 1968: 1938: 1628: 1597: 1555: 1499: 1485: 1426: 1412: 1397: 1327: 1284: 1201: 1112: 1091: 1077: 1019: 1004: 996: 641: 560: 378: 365: 166: 2471:

be useful is to add to the "What to avoid in edit summaries" section wording such as "

3691: 3580: 2977: 2769: 2409: 2380: 2203: 2174: 1946: 1871: 1421:

OK, I updated Safari to 10.0.1 and it seems to have fixed the problem. Thanks all.

972: 969:

Knowledge:Requests for page protection#Current requests for edits to a protected page

876:

as you are still in the wrong place, as this page is only to discuss improvements to

2210:

syntax) can be placed in edit summaries, including all such links to special pages.

3585: 3430: 3392: 2981: 2933:(talk) 9:33 am, 7 September 2009, Monday (10 years, 8 months, 29 days ago) (UTC−4) 2442: 2211: 1954: 1942: 1605: 960: 881: 852: 796: 767: 552: 466: 258: 158: 3192: 3162: 3155: 3145: 3096: 3067: 3054: 2743: 2521: 1601: 382: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

2400:

I occasionally use external links in edit summaries when I'm correcting typos (

2047:

Should there be a warning somewhere about not using overly long edit summaries?

791:

as you are in the wrong place, as this page is only to discuss improvements to

3406: 3674: 3272: 3218: 3183: 3166: 3090: 3074: 3019: 2957: 2914: 2877: 2834: 2593: 2558: 2359: 2215: 2128: 2071: 2010: 1496: 1481: 1422: 1408: 1393: 1339: 1323: 1280: 1212: 1197: 1102: 1087: 1073: 1030: 1015: 1000: 992: 3141:

I suppose so. But usually when I feel like it, I have already written the

851:

Added more reliable, neutral info about Earth's history from the talk page

2009:

That seems to suggest that if it is vandalism, no edit summary is needed.

1916: 2235: 1743:

just to be more specific. It seems to work in my local .js (tested using

1316:

OK, <a href="/Help_talk:Edit_summary": -->

559:. Please make your request at the talk page for the article concerned. -- 165:. Please make your request at the talk page for the article concerned. -- 3099:, in an edit summary is already possible using a standard wikilink. -- 1552:

Knowledge:Village pump (technical)#Save changes buttons - accessibility

1535:

The screenshots on the page do not match what is currently displayed.

1279:

Yes, I see the space, too. Mimic doesn't work, only real ones work.

381:, you may be interested in the user's other edits, all now reverted. 3232: 2695:(i) miskeying errors like mine described above would be no big deal. 2850:

Knowledge:Village pump (technical)#Bad separators on multiple pages

2373:

I don't know what's best here, but a couple examples, not copyvio:

1392:

Yes, that is what my Safari (8.0.8) does, and also Firefox 45.4.0.

1014:

No comments on this yet? Is that the way it is supposed to work?

1631:

refer to? I assume the “ES” is for “edit summary,” but the rest? —

305: 280:

section of the No personal attacks policy page. The discussion is

3217:

least when you edit a section). Maybe this only happens to me.

2669:

However, the point of this post is to ask a couple of questions:

2304:

This is obviously incorrect and needs to be addressed. Thanks -

465:

where the spam link appears, and we will be happy to remove it.

3679:

Filing this here to make it more accessible to future editors.

2173:

links to be placed in edit summaries. Also, I’ve seen links to

638:

Knowledge:Village pump (technical)/Archive 138#HTTPS by default

225: 3455: 2808: 1604:

and so can't be based solely on someone's personal observation

899: 814: 729: 521:

Change the neelima(Shurithi) details, cause the info is wrong

484: 400: 310: 187: 78: 25: 702:

Knowledge:Village pump (technical)/Archive 139#Edit summaries

1866: 2169:) being used in edit summaries before. One of them allowed 634:

Knowledge:Village pump (technical)/Archive 137#Forced HTTPS

1243:OK, now I get an edit summary 2041:

Should we be using the word "codepoint" as much as I did?

3635:

Does anyone have a substantive objection to the change?

1035:

This talk page is for discussing changes to the text of

3628: 3571: 3325:

which may be copied and pasted into an edit summary. --

2643: 2518: 2405: 2376: 2374: 2299:

This is considered an important guideline in Knowledge.

2234:

which is a link to the latest revision of the redirect

2034: 1646: 1217:

I see a space in this attempt to mimic an edit summary:

1055: 1048: 2928:

In the archives this appears from about 10 years ago:

2066:

Very rarely I ran into the old limit. Partly because

1554:

it might not yet be stable. Let's wait until it is. --

2329:

which was subsequently removed with the edit summary

276:

There is a proposal to add a short paragraph to the

2112:button; or for the Visual Editor, in the save box) 2592:dragged out, I think it deserves consideration. -- 2342:It's a "bad thing" because of all the problems of 3584:correct edit summary, and then publish. See also 1739:instead of (or even in (&&) addition to) 3633:Need discussion - to gain consensus for changes. 3542:After publishing my addition of a See also link 2475:." I'm not sure that needs further explanation. 1804:. I'm not qualified to tell which is better. -- 896:Semi-protected edit request on 18 September 2015 282:Proposed addition to "Avoiding personal attacks" 272:Proposed addition to "Avoiding personal attacks" 2961:10,000 rather than 500 pages? --User:Ceyockey ( 2939:Knowledge:Usernames for administrator attention 2924:Export full set of edit summaries and-or search 1138:OK, now I get an edit summary Help:Edit_summary 1128:OK, now I get an edit summary Help:Edit_summary 811:Semi-protected edit request on 9 September 2015 726:Semi-protected edit request on 9 September 2015 299:Semi-protected edit request on 19 December 2014 2984:, as I don't think this page is well watched. 3783:up the edit to find out what it's all about, 1370:OK, <a href="/Help_talk:Edit_summary": --> 1365:OK, <a href="/Help_talk:Edit_summary": --> 1360:OK, <a href="/Help_talk:Edit_summary": --> 1355:OK, <a href="/Help_talk:Edit_summary": --> 1241:Spaces get lost for links in edit summaries: 766:Changed text to be more neutral and unbiased 8: 2868:Incentive structure for using edit summaries 2230:) could be used to link to a revision, e.g. 1649:suggests it means "fill in edit summary" -- 611:What browser/app/device do you use to edit? 75:Semi-protected edit request on 14 April 2014 3113:If you want to be fancy then you can write 987:Spaces get lost for links in edit summaries 481:Semi-protected edit request on 29 June 2015 2737: 2127:is fine, too, if it feels right that way. 1853:comment added 09:11, 15 January 2018 (UTC) 1848: 397:Semi-protected edit request on 17 May 2015 184:Semi-protected edit request on 12 May 2014 3289:, and in the "Input wikitext" box, enter 2246:mentions many special pages but not all, 700:Chrome issues are currently discussed at 632:Do you use Internet Explorer? If so, see 2425:self-evident, but it appears not to be. 2218:. I haven't heard of a special page for 963:for discussing improvements to the page 555:for discussing improvements to the page 161:for discussing improvements to the page 3191:in wikitext is just a template call of 2960:, but for articles? With a limit : --> 2355:Are there any other common situations? 2242:would still link to the same revision. 2029:Going from 255 bytes to 1000 codepoints 578:Can no longer add my own edit summaries 3694:, who provided the solution. It works! 2330: 2298: 2238:. But if the page gets new edits then 1981:2604:2000:E016:A700:9018:747C:BF0D:FD9 1935:2604:2000:E016:A700:B4D2:B929:113C:49D 1921:2604:2000:E016:A700:B4D2:B929:113C:49D 1870:'s user page and is mentioned in some 1740: 1736: 1573:‘Genuine vs artificial sea/beach glass 1349:the link? I tried this in a html file: 226:https://en.wikipedia.org/Kranti_Kanade 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 3239:was first launched in early 2014, it 7: 3771:Switch order of initial description? 2661:A Case for modifiable Edit Summaries 2180:Is there a guide for this anywhere? 1864:I don't remember! It's linked from 1057:does have a space before the link. 1874:archives where I participated. -- 1109:Knowledge:Village pump (technical) 880:, please do not post here again - 24: 3790:"Summaries help other editors by 3779:"Summaries help other editors by 3544:Elections_in_New_Zealand#See_also 1371:Help_talk:Edit_summary</a: --> 1366:Help_talk:Edit_summary</a: --> 1361:Help_talk:Edit_summary</a: --> 1356:Help_talk:Edit_summary</a: --> 1317:Help_talk:Edit_summary</a: --> 284:. Your participation is welcome. 3862: 3504: 3459: 2314:External links in edit summaries 951: 903: 867: 818: 782: 733: 543: 488: 452: 404: 314: 244: 191: 149: 82: 29: 3095:Mentioning a template, such as 2240:Special:PermanentLink/803533110 2232:Special:PermanentLink/803533110 2161:Special links in edit summaries 3729:User:Anomie/nosubmitsummary.js 2980:you might have better luck at 2783:The situation is explained at 2551:promoting a website or product 1802:User:Anomie/nosubmitsummary.js 1627:What does the abbreviation in 1143:OK, now I get an edit summary 1131:OK, now I get an edit summary 981:03:49, 18 September 2015 (UTC) 946:00:49, 18 September 2015 (UTC) 583:and log back in? FeanorStar7 1: 3669:23:17, 25 February 2022 (UTC) 3645:23:09, 25 February 2022 (UTC) 3615:23:35, 19 November 2021 (UTC) 2250:links to many special pages. 1906:Hello. Can some admin help? 1745:Knowledge:User script sandbox 1741:e.target.nodeName === 'INPUT' 1617:13:58, 30 November 2017 (UTC) 1588:13:46, 30 November 2017 (UTC) 1519:17:43, 24 November 2016 (UTC) 1502:14:12, 24 November 2016 (UTC) 1431:04:43, 10 November 2016 (UTC) 1417:01:38, 10 November 2016 (UTC) 1402:01:38, 10 November 2016 (UTC) 890:17:32, 9 September 2015 (UTC) 861:17:28, 9 September 2015 (UTC) 805:17:31, 9 September 2015 (UTC) 776:17:21, 9 September 2015 (UTC) 714:15:42, 4 September 2015 (UTC) 684:12:51, 4 September 2015 (UTC) 391:18:12, 19 December 2014 (UTC) 372:18:11, 19 December 2014 (UTC) 356:17:47, 19 December 2014 (UTC) 294:00:15, 9 September 2014 (UTC) 3881:15:24, 7 December 2022 (UTC) 3856:01:21, 7 December 2022 (UTC) 3763:11:14, 6 December 2022 (UTC) 3741:08:02, 6 December 2022 (UTC) 3723:06:59, 6 December 2022 (UTC) 3601:23:12, 6 November 2020 (UTC) 3557:16:29, 6 November 2020 (UTC) 2874:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic 2862:04:00, 8 November 2019 (UTC) 2843:01:42, 8 November 2019 (UTC) 2823:19:57, 25 October 2019 (UTC) 2756:20:05, 15 January 2019 (UTC) 2656:23:50, 29 January 2019 (UTC) 2627:18:34, 28 January 2019 (UTC) 2602:20:34, 23 January 2019 (UTC) 2584:20:15, 23 January 2019 (UTC) 2567:20:13, 23 January 2019 (UTC) 2530:06:15, 21 January 2019 (UTC) 2513:10:09, 18 January 2019 (UTC) 2485:08:09, 18 January 2019 (UTC) 2458:07:31, 18 January 2019 (UTC) 2435:22:14, 17 January 2019 (UTC) 2418:19:58, 17 January 2019 (UTC) 2394:19:52, 17 January 2019 (UTC) 2368:19:33, 17 January 2019 (UTC) 2268:Thanks for the information! 1884:09:14, 15 January 2018 (UTC) 1840:09:05, 15 January 2018 (UTC) 1825:08:55, 15 January 2018 (UTC) 1814:08:48, 15 January 2018 (UTC) 1796:08:51, 15 January 2018 (UTC) 1777:08:22, 15 January 2018 (UTC) 1758:05:37, 15 January 2018 (UTC) 1731:05:09, 15 January 2018 (UTC) 1713:03:25, 15 January 2018 (UTC) 1696:03:11, 15 January 2018 (UTC) 1681:Enter key should be disabled 1490:06:29, 5 November 2016 (UTC) 1388:21:59, 9 November 2016 (UTC) 1332:21:08, 9 November 2016 (UTC) 1289:20:32, 9 November 2016 (UTC) 1275:20:17, 9 November 2016 (UTC) 1206:19:03, 9 November 2016 (UTC) 1169:18:56, 9 November 2016 (UTC) 1096:18:40, 9 November 2016 (UTC) 1082:18:36, 9 November 2016 (UTC) 1067:18:18, 9 November 2016 (UTC) 1045:Knowledge:Teahouse/Questions 1024:17:51, 9 November 2016 (UTC) 1009:06:47, 4 November 2016 (UTC) 255:Knowledge:Teahouse/Questions 3839:03:23, 25 August 2022 (UTC) 3821:03:01, 25 August 2022 (UTC) 3796:(b) saving the time to open 3781:(a) saving the time to open 3707:13:19, 3 October 2022 (UTC) 3532:01:54, 7 October 2021 (UTC) 3498:23:47, 6 October 2021 (UTC) 3482:to reactivate your request. 3470:has been answered. Set the 3446:14:30, 22 August 2020 (UTC) 3423:14:21, 22 August 2020 (UTC) 3350:Knowledge:User scripts/List 2467:here. The only action that 1800:There's an older script at 1737:e.target.id === 'wpSummary' 1673:15:54, 9 January 2018 (UTC) 1663:That makes sense. Thanks! — 1659:15:48, 9 January 2018 (UTC) 1641:15:28, 9 January 2018 (UTC) 1471:00:47, 4 October 2016 (UTC) 1456:19:53, 3 October 2016 (UTC) 930:to reactivate your request. 918:has been answered. Set the 845:to reactivate your request. 833:has been answered. Set the 760:to reactivate your request. 748:has been answered. Set the 515:to reactivate your request. 503:has been answered. Set the 431:to reactivate your request. 419:has been answered. Set the 341:to reactivate your request. 329:has been answered. Set the 278:"Avoiding personal attacks" 218:to reactivate your request. 206:has been answered. Set the 105:to reactivate your request. 93:has been answered. Set the 3896: 2886:19:39, 30 March 2020 (UTC) 2797:11:01, 27 April 2019 (UTC) 2778:10:13, 27 April 2019 (UTC) 2080:17:27, 23 March 2018 (UTC) 2061:10:41, 23 March 2018 (UTC) 2019:17:23, 23 March 2018 (UTC) 1989:04:45, 23 March 2018 (UTC) 1974:22:58, 22 March 2018 (UTC) 1967:If you reply here, please 1929:21:45, 22 March 2018 (UTC) 1239: 361:Not done. Null request. -- 178:15:23, 14 April 2014 (UTC) 137:14:34, 14 April 2014 (UTC) 124:14:34, 14 April 2014 (UTC) 3362:16:34, 18 July 2020 (UTC) 3338:12:49, 18 July 2020 (UTC) 3281:00:20, 18 July 2020 (UTC) 3264:18:34, 17 July 2020 (UTC) 3227:18:30, 17 July 2020 (UTC) 3210:11:24, 17 July 2020 (UTC) 3175:09:02, 17 July 2020 (UTC) 3135:06:53, 17 July 2020 (UTC) 3109:06:13, 17 July 2020 (UTC) 3083:02:13, 17 July 2020 (UTC) 2590:the recent ANI discussion 2309:14:25, 17 July 2018 (UTC) 2165:I’ve seen special links ( 2137:01:51, 20 July 2017 (UTC) 2122:23:07, 19 July 2017 (UTC) 2100:18:26, 18 July 2017 (UTC) 2051:Thanks for your input :) 1567:08:58, 20 July 2017 (UTC) 1545:22:58, 19 July 2017 (UTC) 1359:(<span dir="auto": --> 1315:(<span dir="auto": --> 653:13:28, 17 June 2015 (UTC) 621:13:19, 17 June 2015 (UTC) 606:11:41, 17 June 2015 (UTC) 572:12:17, 29 June 2015 (UTC) 531:09:36, 29 June 2015 (UTC) 3312: 3290: 3045:13:25, 3 July 2020 (UTC) 3023:12:20, 3 July 2020 (UTC) 3013:10:11, 3 July 2020 (UTC) 2993:02:45, 3 June 2020 (UTC) 2971:02:41, 3 June 2020 (UTC) 2951:02:16, 3 June 2020 (UTC) 2785:Help:Edit summary#Fixing 2642:. A permalink for it is 2402:Knowledge:Typo_Team/moss 2278:20:56, 9 June 2018 (UTC) 2260:20:29, 9 June 2018 (UTC) 2216:Help:Diff#Internal links 2190:14:02, 9 June 2018 (UTC) 2151:00:29, 24 May 2018 (UTC) 1369:(<span dir="rtl": --> 1364:(<span dir="ltr": --> 475:05:33, 17 May 2015 (UTC) 447:05:20, 17 May 2015 (UTC) 267:14:04, 12 May 2014 (UTC) 239:13:17, 12 May 2014 (UTC) 3287:Special:ExpandTemplates 2918:02:28, 4 May 2020 (UTC) 2908:00:40, 4 May 2020 (UTC) 2765:Summary Edit Mechanism: 1957:could be of use. Best, 1735:I'd probably have used 1441:Not Necessarily Helpful 3792:(a) providing a reason 3785:(b) providing a reason 3403:User:Idell/editsummary 3237:structured Discussions 2935: 1860:Majesty of the Commons 1832:Majesty of the Commons 1769:Majesty of the Commons 1723:Majesty of the Commons 1688:Majesty of the Commons 1550:Judging by threads at 18:Help talk:Edit summary 3690:With thanks again to 3627:The edit summary for 2956:Maybe something like 2930: 2473:Avoid going off-topic 2323:Avoid external links. 2224:Special:PermanentLink 42:of past discussions. 3538:Correcting summaries 3321:}} 3315:{{ 2290:Recently noted that 2248:Special:SpecialPages 1719:created a userscript 2228:Help:Permanent link 2177:in edit summaries. 1531:Page needs updating 1041:Knowledge:Help desk 539:SasihariKarthikeyan 523:SasihariKarthikeyan 3871:October 4, 2022 - 2891:Ο κριστιαν σκεμπις 2005:you get the note: 3811: 3623:Revert of 2/25/22 3530: 3486: 3485: 3444: 2968: 2948: 2758: 2742:comment added by 2456: 2292:Template:Summary2 2244:Help:Special page 1979:discuss it here. 1854: 1787: 1509:talk page stalker 1373:) end<br/: --> 1368:) end<br/: --> 1363:) end<br/: --> 1358:) end<br/: --> 1245:Help:Edit_summary 1145:Help:Edit_summary 1133:Help:Edit_summary 1037:Help:Edit summary 965:Help:Edit summary 934: 933: 916:Help:Edit summary 878:Help:Edit summary 849: 848: 831:Help:Edit summary 793:Help:Edit summary 764: 763: 746:Help:Edit summary 604: 590:comment added by 557:Help:Edit summary 519: 518: 501:Help:Edit summary 435: 434: 417:Help:Edit summary 345: 344: 327:Help:Edit summary 222: 221: 204:Help:Edit summary 163:Help:Edit summary 109: 108: 72: 71: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3887: 3870: 3866: 3865: 3804: 3751: 3667: 3665: 3592: 3574: 3568: 3524: 3517: 3512: 3508: 3507: 3477: 3473: 3463: 3462: 3456: 3434: 3433: 3415: 3414: 3396: 3329: 3322: 3319: 3316: 3304: 3300: 3297: 3294: 3255: 3198: 3190: 3187: 3160: 3154: 3150: 3144: 3123:Template:Example 3116: 3094: 3072: 3066: 3059: 3053: 3033: 2999:Pandemic license 2962: 2942: 2900:Kristian skempis 2547:Avoid link spam. 2446: 2445: 2392: 2339: 2275: 2221: 2214:is mentioned at 2209: 2201: 2187: 1972: 1917:to his page here 1869: 1863: 1823: 1794: 1781: 1756: 1711: 1647:This old version 1614: 1558: 1517: 1512: 1343: 1320: 1319:) </html: --> 1249: 1247: 1242: 1216: 1106: 1053: 1034: 955: 954: 925: 921: 907: 906: 900: 875: 871: 870: 840: 836: 822: 821: 815: 790: 786: 785: 755: 751: 737: 736: 730: 644: 631: 603: 584: 563: 547: 546: 542: 510: 506: 492: 491: 485: 456: 455: 426: 422: 408: 407: 401: 370: 336: 332: 318: 317: 311: 252: 248: 247: 213: 209: 195: 194: 188: 169: 153: 152: 148: 100: 96: 86: 85: 79: 68: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3895: 3894: 3890: 3889: 3888: 3886: 3885: 3884: 3863: 3861: 3810: 3773: 3745: 3733:John of Reading 3677: 3661: 3659: 3625: 3590: 3581:genuine reasons 3570: 3562: 3540: 3515: 3505: 3503: 3475: 3471: 3460: 3454: 3429: 3408: 3407: 3390: 3388: 3327: 3324: 3323: 3320: 3317: 3314: 3310: 3306: 3305: 3302: 3298: 3295: 3292: 3253: 3196: 3188: 3181: 3158: 3152: 3148: 3142: 3114: 3101:John of Reading 3088: 3070: 3064: 3061: 3057: 3051: 3027: 3001: 2926: 2893: 2870: 2830: 2805: 2663: 2608:Fish and karate 2441: 2385: 2333: 2316: 2288: 2286:Template notice 2271: 2219: 2207: 2195: 2183: 2163: 2088: 2031: 1966: 1904: 1876:John of Reading 1865: 1857: 1819: 1806:John of Reading 1790: 1752: 1707: 1683: 1651:John of Reading 1625: 1612: 1602:can be verified 1575: 1556: 1533: 1515: 1506: 1463:Robert McClenon 1443: 1375: 1337: 1313: 1240: 1234: 1210: 1100: 1051: 1028: 989: 952: 923: 919: 904: 898: 868: 866: 838: 834: 819: 813: 783: 781: 753: 749: 734: 728: 642: 625: 585: 580: 561: 544: 536: 508: 504: 489: 483: 453: 424: 420: 405: 399: 362: 334: 330: 315: 301: 274: 245: 243: 211: 207: 192: 186: 167: 150: 142: 98: 94: 83: 77: 64: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3893: 3891: 3873:Butwhatdoiknow 3859: 3858: 3841: 3805: 3800: 3799: 3794:for the edit, 3788: 3772: 3769: 3768: 3767: 3766: 3765: 3725: 3696: 3695: 3687: 3686: 3676: 3673: 3672: 3671: 3637:Butwhatdoiknow 3624: 3621: 3620: 3619: 3618: 3617: 3539: 3536: 3535: 3534: 3484: 3483: 3464: 3453: 3450: 3449: 3448: 3387: 3384: 3383: 3382: 3381: 3380: 3379: 3378: 3377: 3376: 3375: 3374: 3373: 3372: 3371: 3370: 3369: 3368: 3367: 3366: 3365: 3364: 3342: 3313: 3291: 3268: 3244: 3214: 3197:{{tl|Example}} 3189:{{tl|Example}} 3179: 3139: 3060: 3049: 3048: 3047: 3025: 3000: 2997: 2996: 2995: 2974: 2973: 2925: 2922: 2921: 2920: 2892: 2889: 2869: 2866: 2865: 2864: 2829: 2826: 2804: 2801: 2800: 2799: 2789:David Biddulph 2762: 2761: 2760: 2759: 2731: 2730: 2729: 2728: 2722: 2721: 2720: 2719: 2713: 2712: 2708: 2707: 2706: 2705: 2699: 2698: 2697: 2696: 2690: 2689: 2688: 2687: 2681: 2680: 2676: 2675: 2662: 2659: 2648:Flyer22 Reborn 2636: 2635: 2634: 2633: 2632: 2631: 2630: 2629: 2615: 2611: 2555: 2554: 2539: 2538: 2537: 2536: 2535: 2534: 2533: 2532: 2490: 2489: 2488: 2487: 2461: 2460: 2437: 2421: 2420: 2397: 2396: 2327: 2326: 2315: 2312: 2302: 2301: 2287: 2284: 2283: 2282: 2281: 2280: 2266: 2162: 2159: 2158: 2157: 2156: 2155: 2154: 2153: 2114:Spel-Punc-Gram 2106: 2092:KhoikhoiPossum 2087: 2084: 2083: 2082: 2049: 2048: 2045: 2042: 2030: 2027: 2026: 2025: 2024: 2023: 2022: 2021: 1994: 1993: 1992: 1991: 1903: 1900: 1899: 1898: 1897: 1896: 1895: 1894: 1893: 1892: 1891: 1890: 1889: 1888: 1887: 1886: 1842: 1827: 1798: 1682: 1679: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1624: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1574: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1537:Spel-Punc-Gram 1532: 1529: 1528: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1523: 1522: 1521: 1474: 1473: 1442: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1404: 1374:</html: --> 1372:</span: --> 1367:</span: --> 1362:</span: --> 1357:</span: --> 1354:(<span: --> 1352: 1351: 1350: 1318:</span: --> 1311: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1251: 1250: 1231: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1149: 1148: 1140: 1135: 1129: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1116: 988: 985: 984: 983: 932: 931: 908: 897: 894: 893: 892: 847: 846: 823: 812: 809: 808: 807: 762: 761: 738: 727: 724: 723: 722: 721: 720: 719: 718: 717: 716: 691: 690: 689: 688: 687: 686: 666: 665: 664: 663: 656: 655: 623: 579: 576: 575: 574: 517: 516: 493: 482: 479: 478: 477: 433: 432: 409: 398: 395: 394: 393: 375: 374: 343: 342: 319: 309: 308: 300: 297: 273: 270: 231:Gautam.rayakar 220: 219: 196: 185: 182: 181: 180: 107: 106: 87: 76: 73: 70: 69: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3892: 3883: 3882: 3878: 3874: 3869: 3857: 3853: 3849: 3845: 3842: 3840: 3836: 3832: 3828: 3825: 3824: 3823: 3822: 3818: 3814: 3808: 3797: 3793: 3789: 3786: 3782: 3778: 3777: 3776: 3770: 3764: 3760: 3756: 3749: 3744: 3743: 3742: 3738: 3734: 3730: 3727:There's also 3726: 3724: 3720: 3716: 3711: 3710: 3709: 3708: 3704: 3700: 3693: 3692:User:Skynxnex 3689: 3688: 3685: 3682: 3681: 3680: 3670: 3666: 3664: 3658: 3657: 3652: 3649: 3648: 3647: 3646: 3642: 3638: 3634: 3630: 3622: 3616: 3612: 3608: 3607:Aiming Guides 3604: 3603: 3602: 3598: 3594: 3587: 3582: 3578: 3573: 3566: 3561: 3560: 3559: 3558: 3554: 3550: 3545: 3537: 3533: 3528: 3523: 3522: 3521: 3511: 3502: 3501: 3500: 3499: 3495: 3491: 3490:139.64.171.63 3481: 3478:parameter to 3469: 3465: 3458: 3457: 3451: 3447: 3442: 3438: 3432: 3427: 3426: 3425: 3424: 3420: 3416: 3413: 3412: 3404: 3400: 3394: 3385: 3363: 3359: 3355: 3351: 3347: 3346: 3343: 3341: 3340: 3339: 3335: 3331: 3288: 3284: 3283: 3282: 3278: 3274: 3269: 3267: 3266: 3265: 3261: 3257: 3250: 3245: 3242: 3238: 3234: 3230: 3229: 3228: 3224: 3220: 3215: 3213: 3212: 3211: 3207: 3203: 3194: 3185: 3180: 3178: 3177: 3176: 3172: 3168: 3164: 3157: 3147: 3140: 3138: 3137: 3136: 3132: 3128: 3124: 3120: 3117:to produce {{ 3112: 3111: 3110: 3106: 3102: 3098: 3092: 3087: 3086: 3085: 3084: 3080: 3076: 3069: 3056: 3050: 3046: 3042: 3038: 3031: 3026: 3024: 3021: 3017: 3016: 3015: 3014: 3010: 3006: 2998: 2994: 2991: 2989: 2983: 2982:the help desk 2979: 2976: 2975: 2972: 2967: 2966: 2959: 2955: 2954: 2953: 2952: 2947: 2946: 2940: 2934: 2929: 2923: 2919: 2916: 2912: 2911: 2910: 2909: 2905: 2901: 2896: 2890: 2888: 2887: 2883: 2879: 2875: 2867: 2863: 2859: 2855: 2851: 2848:Discussed at 2847: 2846: 2845: 2844: 2840: 2836: 2827: 2825: 2824: 2820: 2816: 2813: 2810: 2802: 2798: 2794: 2790: 2786: 2782: 2781: 2780: 2779: 2775: 2771: 2766: 2757: 2753: 2749: 2745: 2741: 2735: 2734: 2733: 2732: 2726: 2725: 2724: 2723: 2717: 2716: 2715: 2714: 2710: 2709: 2703: 2702: 2701: 2700: 2694: 2693: 2692: 2691: 2685: 2684: 2683: 2682: 2678: 2677: 2672: 2671: 2670: 2667: 2660: 2658: 2657: 2653: 2649: 2645: 2641: 2628: 2624: 2620: 2616: 2612: 2609: 2605: 2604: 2603: 2599: 2595: 2591: 2587: 2586: 2585: 2581: 2577: 2573: 2572: 2571: 2570: 2569: 2568: 2564: 2560: 2552: 2548: 2544: 2543: 2542: 2531: 2527: 2523: 2519: 2516: 2515: 2514: 2511: 2510: 2509: 2504: 2503: 2496: 2495: 2494: 2493: 2492: 2491: 2486: 2482: 2478: 2474: 2470: 2465: 2464: 2463: 2462: 2459: 2454: 2450: 2444: 2438: 2436: 2432: 2428: 2423: 2422: 2419: 2415: 2411: 2407: 2403: 2399: 2398: 2395: 2391: 2388: 2384: 2383: 2382: 2377: 2375: 2372: 2371: 2370: 2369: 2365: 2361: 2356: 2353: 2350: 2347: 2345: 2340: 2337: 2332: 2324: 2321: 2320: 2319: 2313: 2311: 2310: 2307: 2300: 2297: 2296: 2295: 2293: 2285: 2279: 2276: 2274: 2267: 2263: 2262: 2261: 2257: 2253: 2249: 2245: 2241: 2237: 2233: 2229: 2225: 2217: 2213: 2206:(links using 2205: 2199: 2194: 2193: 2192: 2191: 2188: 2186: 2178: 2176: 2172: 2168: 2160: 2152: 2148: 2144: 2140: 2139: 2138: 2134: 2130: 2125: 2124: 2123: 2119: 2115: 2111: 2107: 2104: 2103: 2102: 2101: 2097: 2093: 2086:Summary Tense 2085: 2081: 2077: 2073: 2069: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2058: 2054: 2046: 2043: 2040: 2039: 2038: 2036: 2028: 2020: 2016: 2012: 2008: 2004: 2000: 1999: 1998: 1997: 1996: 1995: 1990: 1986: 1982: 1977: 1976: 1975: 1970: 1964: 1960: 1956: 1952: 1948: 1944: 1940: 1936: 1933: 1932: 1931: 1930: 1926: 1922: 1918: 1913: 1910: 1907: 1901: 1885: 1881: 1877: 1873: 1868: 1861: 1856: 1855: 1852: 1846: 1843: 1841: 1837: 1833: 1828: 1826: 1822: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1811: 1807: 1803: 1799: 1797: 1793: 1785: 1784:edit conflict 1780: 1779: 1778: 1774: 1770: 1766: 1761: 1760: 1759: 1755: 1750: 1746: 1742: 1738: 1734: 1733: 1732: 1728: 1724: 1720: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1710: 1704: 1700: 1699: 1698: 1697: 1693: 1689: 1680: 1674: 1670: 1666: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1656: 1652: 1648: 1645: 1644: 1643: 1642: 1638: 1634: 1630: 1622: 1618: 1615: 1610: 1609: 1603: 1599: 1595: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1585: 1581: 1572: 1568: 1564: 1560: 1553: 1549: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1542: 1538: 1530: 1520: 1510: 1505: 1504: 1503: 1500: 1498: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1487: 1483: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1472: 1468: 1464: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1457: 1453: 1449: 1440: 1432: 1428: 1424: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1414: 1410: 1405: 1403: 1399: 1395: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1385: 1381: 1377: 1376: 1353:<html: --> 1348: 1341: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1333: 1329: 1325: 1321: 1314:<html: --> 1292: 1291: 1290: 1286: 1282: 1278: 1277: 1276: 1272: 1268: 1265: 1264: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1246: 1238: 1233: 1232: 1214: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1203: 1199: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1170: 1166: 1162: 1159: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1147: 1146: 1141: 1139: 1136: 1134: 1130: 1127: 1126: 1114: 1110: 1104: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1093: 1089: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1079: 1075: 1070: 1069: 1068: 1064: 1060: 1056: 1049: 1046: 1042: 1038: 1032: 1027: 1026: 1025: 1021: 1017: 1013: 1012: 1011: 1010: 1006: 1002: 998: 994: 986: 982: 978: 974: 970: 966: 962: 958: 950: 949: 948: 947: 943: 939: 929: 926:parameter to 917: 913: 909: 902: 901: 895: 891: 887: 883: 879: 874: 865: 864: 863: 862: 858: 854: 844: 841:parameter to 832: 828: 824: 817: 816: 810: 806: 802: 798: 794: 789: 780: 779: 778: 777: 773: 769: 759: 756:parameter to 747: 743: 739: 732: 731: 725: 715: 711: 707: 703: 699: 698: 697: 696: 695: 694: 693: 692: 685: 681: 677: 672: 671: 670: 669: 668: 667: 660: 659: 658: 657: 654: 650: 646: 639: 635: 629: 624: 622: 618: 614: 610: 609: 608: 607: 601: 597: 593: 589: 577: 573: 569: 565: 558: 554: 550: 540: 535: 534: 533: 532: 528: 524: 514: 511:parameter to 502: 498: 494: 487: 486: 480: 476: 472: 468: 464: 459: 451: 450: 449: 448: 444: 440: 430: 427:parameter to 418: 414: 410: 403: 402: 396: 392: 388: 384: 380: 377: 376: 373: 369: 368: 367: 360: 359: 358: 357: 353: 349: 340: 337:parameter to 328: 324: 320: 313: 312: 307: 303: 302: 298: 296: 295: 291: 287: 286:Lightbreather 283: 279: 271: 269: 268: 264: 260: 256: 251: 241: 240: 236: 232: 227: 217: 214:parameter to 205: 201: 197: 190: 189: 183: 179: 175: 171: 164: 160: 156: 146: 141: 140: 139: 138: 134: 130: 126: 125: 121: 117: 112: 104: 101:parameter to 92: 88: 81: 80: 74: 67: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3867: 3860: 3843: 3826: 3806: 3801: 3795: 3791: 3784: 3780: 3774: 3697: 3678: 3662: 3655: 3650: 3632: 3626: 3586:WP:ES#Fixing 3569:Do you mean 3541: 3519: 3518: 3509: 3487: 3479: 3468:edit request 3452:Edit request 3410: 3409: 3389: 3240: 3062: 3002: 2987: 2963: 2943: 2936: 2931: 2927: 2897: 2894: 2871: 2831: 2806: 2803:Style guide? 2764: 2763: 2738:— Preceding 2668: 2664: 2637: 2619:WhatamIdoing 2556: 2546: 2540: 2507: 2501: 2499: 2477:86.147.97.26 2472: 2468: 2427:86.147.97.26 2379: 2378: 2357: 2354: 2351: 2348: 2341: 2328: 2322: 2318:I had added 2317: 2303: 2289: 2272: 2212:Special:Diff 2184: 2179: 2167:Special:____ 2166: 2164: 2109: 2089: 2067: 2053:rchard2scout 2050: 2032: 2006: 2002: 1914: 1911: 1908: 1905: 1847:my script. 1721:to do this. 1702: 1684: 1665:67.14.236.50 1633:67.14.236.50 1626: 1607: 1576: 1534: 1444: 1346: 1322: 1312: 1142: 1137: 990: 959:this is the 956: 938:70.50.60.207 935: 927: 912:edit request 872: 850: 842: 827:edit request 787: 765: 757: 742:edit request 586:— Preceding 581: 551:this is the 548: 520: 512: 497:edit request 462: 457: 439:74.44.226.91 436: 428: 413:edit request 364: 363: 346: 338: 323:edit request 275: 249: 242: 224:Please edit 223: 215: 200:edit request 157:this is the 154: 127: 113: 110: 102: 91:edit request 65: 43: 37: 3520:Ganbaruby! 3354:PrimeHunter 3202:PrimeHunter 3193:Template:Tl 3127:PrimeHunter 3097:Template:tl 3037:PrimeHunter 2854:PrimeHunter 2606:Based upon 2406:this change 2344:WP:LINKSPAM 2252:PrimeHunter 2220:redirect=no 2171:no-redirect 1959:Classicwiki 1951:WP:Teahouse 1937:, at least 1849:—Preceding 1448:Jack Upland 1380:PrimeHunter 1267:PrimeHunter 1161:PrimeHunter 1113:Phabricator 1059:PrimeHunter 706:PrimeHunter 628:FeanorStar7 613:PrimeHunter 592:FeanorStar7 348:90.0.133.65 114:John White 36:This is an 3831:Mitch Ames 3656:Cassiopeia 3472:|answered= 3397:Regarding 3307:and click 2965:talk to me 2945:talk to me 2198:Interqwark 2143:Interqwark 1594:AdriSimone 1580:AdriSimone 920:|answered= 835:|answered= 750:|answered= 505:|answered= 421:|answered= 331:|answered= 208:|answered= 145:LaBelieves 129:LaBelieves 116:LaBelieves 95:|answered= 3848:Chongkian 3813:Willondon 3748:Chongkian 3715:Chongkian 3629:this edit 3572:this edit 3399:your edit 3249:WP:REVDEL 2958:this page 2815:Walkersam 2638:Also see 2576:Natureium 2336:Natureium 2294:states: 2265:template. 2204:wikilinks 2001:When you 1749:global.js 1717:OK, I've 1598:talk page 1516:DrChrissy 1052:== ... == 961:talk page 957:Not done: 553:talk page 549:Not done: 458:Not done: 379:Gadget850 366:Gadget850 304:REDIRECT 159:talk page 155:Not done: 66:Archive 2 60:Archive 1 3441:contribs 3030:Wicole23 3005:Wicole23 2978:Ceyockey 2770:Moughera 2768:summary? 2752:contribs 2740:unsigned 2453:contribs 2410:Schazjmd 2381:Levivich 2236:Examples 1765:the list 973:Gparyani 873:Not done 788:Not done 600:contribs 588:unsigned 250:Not done 3844:Support 3827:Support 3651:Oppose 3631:reads: 3431:Elmidae 3393:Elmidae 3386:Userbox 3301:Example 3161:into {{ 3119:Example 2986:Adrian 2443:Elmidae 2035:updated 1969:ping me 1939:WP:PING 1851:undated 1629:WP:FIES 1613:(talk), 1608:Noyster 882:Arjayay 853:Cicirao 797:Arjayay 768:Cicirao 467:Altamel 463:article 259:Arjayay 39:archive 3807:signed 3755:𝕁𝕄𝔽 3699:𝕁𝕄𝔽 3593:rose64 3577:admins 3565:Mcljlm 3549:Mcljlm 3330:rose64 3285:Go to 3256:rose64 2990:Hunter 2744:Hedles 2522:Meters 2508:Karate 1947:WP:ANI 1872:WP:VPT 1867:Anomie 1845:Here's 1821:Begoon 1792:Begoon 1754:Begoon 1709:Begoon 1559:rose64 645:rose64 564:rose64 383:Drmies 170:rose64 3476:|ans= 3466:This 3411:Idell 3233:phab: 3115:{{]}} 2828:space 2469:might 2273:qwark 2270:Inter 2226:(see 2185:qwark 2182:Inter 2175:diffs 2033:I've 1955:WP:HD 1943:WP:AN 1902:Help? 1703:Enter 1623:FIES? 1347:after 924:|ans= 910:This 839:|ans= 825:This 754:|ans= 740:This 662:(UTC) 509:|ans= 495:This 425:|ans= 411:This 335:|ans= 321:This 306:Birdo 212:|ans= 198:This 99:|ans= 89:This 16:< 3877:talk 3868:Done 3852:talk 3835:talk 3817:talk 3759:talk 3737:talk 3719:talk 3703:talk 3663:talk 3641:talk 3611:talk 3597:talk 3595:🌹 ( 3588:. -- 3553:talk 3527:talk 3510:Done 3494:talk 3437:talk 3419:talk 3358:talk 3334:talk 3332:🌹 ( 3277:talk 3273:Gah4 3260:talk 3258:🌹 ( 3223:talk 3219:Gah4 3206:talk 3184:Gah4 3171:talk 3167:Gah4 3165:}}? 3131:talk 3105:talk 3091:Gah4 3079:talk 3075:Gah4 3041:talk 3020:Eric 3018:??? 3009:talk 2915:Eric 2904:talk 2882:talk 2878:Sdkb 2858:talk 2839:talk 2835:Gah4 2819:talk 2793:talk 2787:. -- 2774:talk 2748:talk 2652:talk 2644:here 2623:talk 2598:talk 2594:Ronz 2580:talk 2563:talk 2559:Ronz 2526:talk 2502:Fish 2481:talk 2449:talk 2431:talk 2414:talk 2364:talk 2360:Ronz 2306:wolf 2256:talk 2202:All 2147:talk 2133:talk 2129:Gah4 2118:talk 2110:Save 2096:talk 2076:talk 2072:Gah4 2068:undo 2057:talk 2015:talk 2011:Gah4 2003:undo 1985:talk 1963:talk 1925:talk 1880:talk 1836:talk 1810:talk 1773:talk 1767:. — 1727:talk 1692:talk 1669:talk 1655:talk 1637:talk 1584:talk 1563:talk 1561:🌹 ( 1541:talk 1497:Eric 1486:talk 1482:Gah4 1467:talk 1452:talk 1427:talk 1423:Gah4 1413:talk 1409:Gah4 1398:talk 1394:Gah4 1384:talk 1340:Gah4 1328:talk 1324:Gah4 1285:talk 1281:Gah4 1271:talk 1213:Gah4 1202:talk 1198:Gah4 1165:talk 1103:Gah4 1092:talk 1088:Gah4 1078:talk 1074:Gah4 1063:talk 1031:Gah4 1020:talk 1016:Gah4 1005:talk 1001:Gah4 997:talk 993:Gah4 977:talk 942:talk 886:talk 857:talk 801:talk 772:talk 710:talk 680:talk 649:talk 640:. -- 636:and 617:talk 596:talk 568:talk 527:talk 471:talk 443:talk 387:talk 352:talk 290:talk 263:talk 235:talk 174:talk 133:talk 120:talk 3819:) 3731:-- 3591:Red 3474:or 3328:Red 3254:Red 3241:did 2809:Git 1953:or 1945:or 1557:Red 1194:--> 1111:or 1043:or 922:or 914:to 837:or 829:to 752:or 744:to 676:jps 643:Red 562:Red 507:or 499:to 423:or 415:to 333:or 325:to 210:or 202:to 168:Red 97:or 3879:) 3854:) 3837:) 3809:, 3761:) 3753:-- 3739:) 3721:) 3705:) 3643:) 3613:) 3599:) 3555:) 3496:) 3480:no 3439:· 3421:) 3360:) 3336:) 3309:OK 3303:}} 3296:tl 3293:{{ 3279:) 3262:) 3225:) 3208:) 3173:) 3163:tl 3159:}} 3156:tl 3153:{{ 3149:}} 3146:tl 3143:{{ 3133:) 3107:) 3081:) 3071:}} 3068:tl 3065:{{ 3058:}} 3055:tl 3052:{{ 3043:) 3011:) 2988:J. 2969:) 2949:) 2906:) 2884:) 2860:) 2852:. 2841:) 2821:) 2795:) 2776:) 2754:) 2750:• 2654:) 2646:. 2625:) 2600:) 2582:) 2565:) 2553:." 2528:) 2483:) 2451:· 2433:) 2416:) 2408:. 2366:) 2346:. 2258:) 2222:. 2149:) 2135:) 2120:) 2098:) 2078:) 2059:) 2017:) 1987:) 1927:) 1882:) 1838:) 1812:) 1789:-- 1775:) 1729:) 1706:-- 1694:) 1671:) 1657:) 1639:) 1606:: 1586:) 1565:) 1543:) 1488:) 1469:) 1454:) 1429:) 1415:) 1400:) 1386:) 1330:) 1287:) 1273:) 1204:) 1167:) 1094:) 1080:) 1065:) 1022:) 1007:) 979:) 971:. 944:) 928:no 888:) 859:) 843:no 803:) 795:- 774:) 758:no 712:) 704:. 682:) 651:) 619:) 602:) 598:• 570:) 529:) 513:no 473:) 445:) 429:no 389:) 354:) 339:no 292:) 265:) 257:. 237:) 216:no 176:) 135:) 122:) 103:no 3875:( 3850:( 3833:( 3815:( 3757:( 3750:: 3746:@ 3735:( 3717:( 3701:( 3639:( 3609:( 3567:: 3563:@ 3551:( 3529:) 3525:( 3516:◢ 3492:( 3443:) 3435:( 3417:( 3395:: 3391:@ 3356:( 3318:] 3299:| 3275:( 3221:( 3204:( 3186:: 3182:@ 3169:( 3129:( 3103:( 3093:: 3089:@ 3077:( 3039:( 3032:: 3028:@ 3007:( 2902:( 2880:( 2856:( 2837:( 2817:( 2791:( 2772:( 2746:( 2650:( 2621:( 2596:( 2578:( 2561:( 2545:" 2524:( 2505:+ 2479:( 2455:) 2447:( 2429:( 2412:( 2390:! 2387:? 2362:( 2338:: 2334:@ 2254:( 2208:] 2200:: 2196:@ 2145:( 2131:( 2116:( 2094:( 2074:( 2055:( 2013:( 1983:( 1971:. 1965:) 1961:( 1923:( 1878:( 1862:: 1858:@ 1834:( 1808:( 1786:) 1782:( 1771:( 1725:( 1690:( 1667:( 1653:( 1635:( 1582:( 1539:( 1511:) 1507:( 1484:( 1465:( 1450:( 1425:( 1411:( 1396:( 1382:( 1342:: 1338:@ 1326:( 1283:( 1269:( 1248:) 1237:→ 1235:( 1215:: 1211:@ 1200:( 1163:( 1105:: 1101:@ 1090:( 1076:( 1061:( 1033:: 1029:@ 1018:( 1003:( 995:( 975:( 940:( 884:( 855:( 799:( 770:( 708:( 678:( 647:( 630:: 626:@ 615:( 594:( 566:( 541:: 537:@ 525:( 469:( 441:( 385:( 350:( 288:( 261:( 233:( 172:( 147:: 143:@ 131:( 118:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index