117:. The burglary involved a woman illegally obtaining a key and stealing $ 2,200; the swindle involved a woman manipulating a man to invest $ 2,200 in a nonexistent corporation. The results showed that when the offense was not related to attractiveness (as in the burglary) the unattractive defendant was punished more severely than the attractive one. However, when the offense was related to attractiveness (the swindle), the attractive defendant was punished more severely than the unattractive one. The study imputes that the usual leniency given to the attractive woman (as a result of the halo effect) was negated or reversed when the nature of the crime involved her looks.
31:
that causes one's perception of another to be unduly influenced by a single negative trait. An example of the horn effect may be that an observer is more likely to assume a physically unattractive person is morally inferior to an attractive person, despite the lack of relationship between morality
90:
The horn effect occurs when "individuals believe that negative traits are connected to each other." It is a phenomenon in which an observer's judgment of a person is adversely affected by the presence of (for the observer) an unfavorable aspect of this person.
55:
In a 1920 study published by
Thorndike that focused on the halo effect, it was noted that "ratings were apparently affected by a marked tendency to think of the person in general as rather good or rather interior
1078:
1053:
1083:
413:
480:
1073:
883:
1002:
256:
888:
542:
104:: "Some leaders can become so demonised that it's impossible to assess their achievements and failures in a balanced way."
537:
109:
The relation of crime to attractiveness is also subject to the halo effect. A study presented two hypothetical crimes: a
49:
660:
996:
522:
628:
201:
1176:
1126:
850:
650:
1155:
1150:
1063:
945:
710:
690:
586:
283:
1136:
820:
800:
581:
559:
127:
433:"Beautiful but Dangerous: Effects of Offender Attractiveness and Nature of the Crime on Juridic Judgment"
230:
915:
830:
805:
750:
868:
720:
596:
473:
1023:
940:
840:
775:
715:
705:
700:
564:
920:
905:
665:
655:
638:
316:
1033:
970:
955:
878:
860:
795:
591:
507:
41:
1100:
960:
900:
825:
810:
670:
623:
532:
527:
512:
444:
371:
306:
298:
114:
1068:
1058:
835:
815:
730:
633:
608:
603:
576:
554:
466:
1110:
1105:
1095:
1018:
935:
895:
845:
790:
780:
765:
760:
725:
680:
645:
549:
498:
28:
1170:
1048:
1028:
991:
965:
950:
930:
910:
873:
785:
745:
740:
735:
613:
517:
432:
388:
320:
176:
1008:
770:
755:
96:
925:
695:
675:
571:
101:
45:
24:
302:
1043:
1038:
1013:
1131:
618:
62:] and to color the judgments of the qualities by this general feeling".
334:
1090:
975:
311:
110:
448:
375:
359:
284:"The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments"
489:
462:
58:
257:"The Halo Effect: Definition, Advantages & Disadvantages"
40:
The term is derived from the word "horn" and refers to the
389:"Halo Effect: Definition and Examples | Simply Psychology"
458:
155:
Although not popularizing the actual term Horn effect.
202:"The Halo and Horns Effects [Rating Errors]"
1119:
984:
859:
496:
297:(4). American Psychological Association: 250–56.
44:. This is in contrast to the word halo and the
282:Nisbett, Richard E; Wilson, Timothy D (1977).
474:
8:
437:Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
291:Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
231:"Mental Model: Horns Effect and Halo Effect"
224:
222:
360:"A constant error in psychological ratings"
195:
193:
1137:Heuristics in judgment and decision-making
481:
467:
459:
310:
100:wrote of the devil effect in relation to
431:Ostrove, Nancy; Sigall, Harold (1975).
168:
139:
177:"Halo Effect: Definition and Examples"
7:
414:"Hugo Chávez's reverse-halo effect"
229:Kennon, Joshua (12 November 2011).
335:"halo | History, Art, & Facts"
14:
261:Psychology 104: Social Psychology
200:Belludi, Nagesh (30 April 2013).
412:Glennie, Jonathan (3 May 2011).
1:
364:Journal of Applied Psychology
48:, based on the concept of a
1003:DĂ©formation professionnelle
70:It is sometimes called the
1193:
997:Basking in reflected glory
303:10.1037/0022-3514.35.4.250
1145:
1127:Cognitive bias mitigation
32:and physical appearance.
23:, closely related to the
711:Illusion of transparency
393:www.simplypsychology.org
339:Encyclopedia Britannica
358:Thorndike, EL (1920),
128:Splitting (psychology)
16:Form of cognitive bias
1079:Arab–Israeli conflict
806:Social influence bias
751:Out-group homogeneity
66:Alternate terminology
721:Mere-exposure effect
651:Extrinsic incentives
597:Selective perception
255:Long-Crowell, Erin.
235:www.joshuakennon.com
946:Social desirability
841:von Restorff effect
716:Mean world syndrome
691:Hostile attribution
179:. Simply Psychology
76:reverse-halo effect
861:Statistical biases
639:Curse of knowledge
1164:
1163:
801:Social comparison
582:Choice-supportive
134:Explanatory notes
1184:
1177:Cognitive biases
961:Systematic error
916:Omitted-variable
831:Trait ascription
671:Frog pond effect
499:Cognitive biases
483:
476:
469:
460:
453:
452:
449:10.1037/h0076472
428:
422:
421:
409:
403:
402:
400:
399:
385:
379:
378:
376:10.1037/h0071663
355:
349:
348:
346:
345:
331:
325:
324:
314:
288:
279:
273:
272:
270:
268:
252:
246:
245:
243:
241:
226:
217:
216:
214:
212:
197:
188:
187:
185:
184:
173:
156:
153:
147:
144:
1192:
1191:
1187:
1186:
1185:
1183:
1182:
1181:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1160:
1141:
1115:
980:
855:
836:Turkey illusion
604:Compassion fade
501:
492:
487:
457:
456:
430:
429:
425:
411:
410:
406:
397:
395:
387:
386:
382:
357:
356:
352:
343:
341:
333:
332:
328:
286:
281:
280:
276:
266:
264:
254:
253:
249:
239:
237:
228:
227:
220:
210:
208:
206:Right Attitudes
199:
198:
191:
182:
180:
175:
174:
170:
165:
160:
159:
154:
150:
145:
141:
136:
124:
88:
68:
38:
27:, is a form of
17:
12:
11:
5:
1190:
1188:
1180:
1179:
1169:
1168:
1162:
1161:
1159:
1158:
1153:
1146:
1143:
1142:
1140:
1139:
1134:
1129:
1123:
1121:
1120:Bias reduction
1117:
1116:
1114:
1113:
1108:
1103:
1098:
1096:Political bias
1093:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1081:
1076:
1071:
1066:
1061:
1056:
1051:
1041:
1036:
1031:
1026:
1024:Infrastructure
1021:
1016:
1011:
1006:
999:
994:
988:
986:
982:
981:
979:
978:
973:
968:
963:
958:
953:
948:
943:
941:Self-selection
938:
933:
928:
923:
918:
913:
908:
903:
898:
893:
892:
891:
881:
876:
871:
865:
863:
857:
856:
854:
853:
848:
843:
838:
833:
828:
823:
818:
813:
808:
803:
798:
793:
788:
783:
778:
776:Pro-innovation
773:
768:
763:
761:Overton window
758:
753:
748:
743:
738:
733:
728:
723:
718:
713:
708:
703:
698:
693:
688:
683:
678:
673:
668:
663:
658:
653:
648:
643:
642:
641:
631:
629:Dunning–Kruger
626:
621:
616:
611:
606:
601:
600:
599:
589:
584:
579:
574:
569:
568:
567:
557:
552:
547:
546:
545:
543:Correspondence
540:
538:Actor–observer
530:
525:
520:
515:
510:
504:
502:
497:
494:
493:
488:
486:
485:
478:
471:
463:
455:
454:
423:
404:
380:
350:
326:
274:
247:
218:
189:
167:
166:
164:
161:
158:
157:
148:
138:
137:
135:
132:
131:
130:
123:
120:
119:
118:
106:
105:
87:
86:Bias in action
84:
67:
64:
37:
34:
29:cognitive bias
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1189:
1178:
1175:
1174:
1172:
1157:
1154:
1152:
1148:
1147:
1144:
1138:
1135:
1133:
1130:
1128:
1125:
1124:
1122:
1118:
1112:
1109:
1107:
1104:
1102:
1099:
1097:
1094:
1092:
1089:
1085:
1082:
1080:
1077:
1075:
1074:United States
1072:
1070:
1067:
1065:
1062:
1060:
1057:
1055:
1052:
1050:
1049:False balance
1047:
1046:
1045:
1042:
1040:
1037:
1035:
1032:
1030:
1027:
1025:
1022:
1020:
1017:
1015:
1012:
1010:
1007:
1005:
1004:
1000:
998:
995:
993:
990:
989:
987:
983:
977:
974:
972:
969:
967:
964:
962:
959:
957:
954:
952:
949:
947:
944:
942:
939:
937:
934:
932:
929:
927:
924:
922:
921:Participation
919:
917:
914:
912:
909:
907:
904:
902:
899:
897:
894:
890:
889:Psychological
887:
886:
885:
882:
880:
877:
875:
872:
870:
867:
866:
864:
862:
858:
852:
849:
847:
844:
842:
839:
837:
834:
832:
829:
827:
824:
822:
819:
817:
814:
812:
809:
807:
804:
802:
799:
797:
794:
792:
789:
787:
784:
782:
779:
777:
774:
772:
769:
767:
764:
762:
759:
757:
754:
752:
749:
747:
744:
742:
739:
737:
734:
732:
729:
727:
724:
722:
719:
717:
714:
712:
709:
707:
704:
702:
699:
697:
694:
692:
689:
687:
684:
682:
679:
677:
674:
672:
669:
667:
664:
662:
659:
657:
656:Fading affect
654:
652:
649:
647:
644:
640:
637:
636:
635:
632:
630:
627:
625:
622:
620:
617:
615:
612:
610:
607:
605:
602:
598:
595:
594:
593:
590:
588:
585:
583:
580:
578:
575:
573:
570:
566:
563:
562:
561:
558:
556:
553:
551:
548:
544:
541:
539:
536:
535:
534:
531:
529:
526:
524:
521:
519:
516:
514:
511:
509:
506:
505:
503:
500:
495:
491:
484:
479:
477:
472:
470:
465:
464:
461:
450:
446:
443:(3): 410–14.
442:
438:
434:
427:
424:
419:
415:
408:
405:
394:
390:
384:
381:
377:
373:
369:
365:
361:
354:
351:
340:
336:
330:
327:
322:
318:
313:
312:2027.42/92158
308:
304:
300:
296:
292:
285:
278:
275:
267:September 30,
262:
258:
251:
248:
236:
232:
225:
223:
219:
207:
203:
196:
194:
190:
178:
172:
169:
162:
152:
149:
143:
140:
133:
129:
126:
125:
121:
116:
112:
108:
107:
103:
99:
98:
94:
93:
92:
85:
83:
81:
77:
73:
65:
63:
61:
60:
53:
51:
47:
43:
42:devil's horns
35:
33:
30:
26:
22:
1034:In education
1001:
985:Other biases
971:Verification
956:Survivorship
906:Non-response
879:Healthy user
821:Substitution
796:Self-serving
685:
592:Confirmation
560:Availability
508:Acquiescence
440:
436:
426:
418:The Guardian
417:
407:
396:. Retrieved
392:
383:
370:(1): 25–29,
367:
363:
353:
342:. Retrieved
338:
329:
294:
290:
277:
265:. Retrieved
260:
250:
238:. Retrieved
234:
209:. Retrieved
205:
181:. Retrieved
171:
151:
142:
97:The Guardian
95:
89:
80:devil effect
79:
75:
72:horns effect
71:
69:
57:
54:
50:saint's halo
39:
20:
18:
1101:Publication
1054:Vietnam War
901:Length time
884:Information
826:Time-saving
686:Horn effect
676:Halo effect
624:Distinction
533:Attribution
528:Attentional
263:. study.com
102:Hugo Chavez
46:halo effect
25:halo effect
21:horn effect
1064:South Asia
1039:Liking gap
851:In animals
816:Status quo
731:Negativity
634:Egocentric
609:Congruence
587:Commitment
577:Blind spot
565:Mean world
555:Automation
398:2022-02-11
344:2019-02-03
183:2022-02-11
163:References
146:"inferior"
56: [
1132:Debiasing
1111:White hat
1106:Reporting
1019:Inductive
936:Selection
896:Lead time
869:Estimator
846:Zero-risk
811:Spotlight
791:Restraint
781:Proximity
766:Precision
726:Narrative
681:Hindsight
666:Frequency
646:Emotional
619:Declinism
550:Authority
523:Anchoring
513:Ambiguity
240:15 August
211:15 August
36:Etymology
1171:Category
1029:Inherent
992:Academic
966:Systemic
951:Spectrum
931:Sampling
911:Observer
874:Forecast
786:Response
746:Optimism
741:Omission
736:Normalcy
706:In-group
701:Implicit
614:Cultural
518:Affinity
321:17867385
122:See also
111:burglary
1151:General
1149:Lists:
1084:Ukraine
1009:Funding
771:Present
756:Outcome
661:Framing
115:swindle
1156:Memory
1069:Sweden
1059:Norway
926:Recall
696:Impact
572:Belief
490:Biases
319:
113:and a
1044:Media
1014:FUTON
317:S2CID
287:(PDF)
78:, or
269:2015
242:2017
213:2017
19:The
1091:Net
976:Wet
445:doi
372:doi
307:hdl
299:doi
59:sic
1173::
441:31
439:.
435:.
416:.
391:.
366:,
362:,
337:.
315:.
305:.
295:35
293:.
289:.
259:.
233:.
221:^
204:.
192:^
82:.
74:,
52:.
482:e
475:t
468:v
451:.
447::
420:.
401:.
374::
368:4
347:.
323:.
309::
301::
271:.
244:.
215:.
186:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.