Knowledge (XXG)

Idiot defense

Source 📝

198:
Scrushy was found not guilty of all charges on June 28, 2005. But the idiot defense was not believed to have been the reason he was acquitted; instead, the prosecution apparently lacked enough courtroom-admissible evidence to make its case against him. He was later convicted by a Federal court on 30
104:
to provide him warning of any possible abuse. In his closing statements, Rigas's lawyer asked "Does have a right to believe that things would be done properly, that adequate and appropriate disclosures were made, that the lawyers and the accountants and the personal accountants would make sure of
75:
No major instances of the idiot defense being successful in criminal proceedings have been reported in American jurisprudence to date. Instead, all such uses are widely believed to have resulted in the defendants employing idiot defenses being found guilty on at least some, if not all, counts.
169:, and other subordinates without Ebbers's knowledge. During his criminal trial, Ebbers testified, "I was shocked. I couldn't believe it, I never thought anything like that would have gone on. I put those people in place. I trusted them. I had no idea they would do anything like this." 131:. During his trial, Forbes testified to working on "the strategy vision part, talking to key clients ...." He also claimed he was "much more valuable to shareholders doing that than being in day-to-day operations." Forbes's attorney, 40:
by virtue of having been ignorant of facts of which the defendant would normally be expected to be aware. Other terms used for this tactic include "dumb CEO defense", "dummy defense", "ostrich defense",
230:
interview before his trial, Lay said, "I don't think I'm a fool. But I think I sure was fooled." He added, "But I can't take responsibility for the criminal conduct of someone inside the company."
72:
accounting practices they claimed that they would have needed. However, in many cases the defendants' subordinates testified that the defendants ordered them to falsify the accounts.
64:
defendants claiming that all wrongdoing was performed by others, without the defendant's knowledge or consent. Attorneys for these defendants claimed that their skill was in
138:
The jury in the case against Forbes returned on January 4, 2005. While they did convict another defendant, they failed to reach a verdict on the charges against Forbes.
208: 417: 452: 93: 430: 195:, asked during the trial, "That's what y'all did and how you planned it, so (Scrushy) wouldn't know what the whole picture was?" 336: 321: 127:, was charged with 16 counts in relation to inflated earnings statements from CUC before it merged with HFC Inc. to form 96:, was charged with conspiracy, bank fraud, and securities fraud. Rigas's defense asserted that he expected the Adelphia 447: 172:
The prosecutor referred to this as the "aw shucks defense." Ebbers was convicted of all charges on March 15, 2005.
132: 252:
use, and claim that he was unaware of any steroids at the time, have also been described as an idiot defense.
142: 271: 220:
on charges of securities fraud, wire fraud, and making false and misleading statements in relation to the
377: 409: 390: 65: 61: 188: 180: 97: 50: 49:
defense". The first known instance of the idiot defense was by John Henry Stafford, a lawyer in
367: 166: 124: 46: 350: 249: 234: 266: 307: 261: 292: 441: 154: 116: 141:
Forbes was found guilty of conspiracy to commit securities fraud and two counts of
53:
who was also known as Yankee John. He used it in the defense of Marlin Heady, a
245: 192: 184: 101: 226: 135:, summarized: "The defense of Walter Forbes is that he didn't know about it." 89: 54: 37: 26: 60:
The term was popularized as a result of a number of high-profile corporate
322:"'I was shocked,' Ebbers says of being told about WorldCom irregularities" 217: 158: 33: 213: 161:
CEO, claimed that $ 11 billion in fraud was committed by the company's
128: 42: 221: 69: 30: 371: 68:
and deal-making, and that they lacked the training to recognize
397:
Southern Division, Case No. CR-03-BE-0530-S. (29 October 2003)
394: 384: 162: 120: 372:
United States District Court Southern District of New York
395:
United States District Court Northern District of Alabama
293:"'Dumb CEO Defense' Spares Cendant Chairman From Prison" 187:, became the first CEO to be charged with violating the 387:
Houston Division, Cr. No. H-04-25 (S-2). (7 July 2004)
385:
United States District Court Southern District of Texas
391:United States of America vs. Richard M. Scrushy 378:United States of America vs. Kenneth L. Lay, 368:United States of America vs. Bernard J Ebbers 57:. The charges were all, allegedly, dropped. 8: 337:"Scrushy Defense: Fraud Hidden From Ex-CEO" 431:"'Embattled CEOs wise up to dummy defense" 351:"Enron's Lay says he was duped, not dumb" 209:Trial of Kenneth Lay and Jeffrey Skilling 306:Christoffersen, John (31 October 2006). 324:. The Clarion-Ledger. 28 February 2005. 308:"Jury Finds Ex-Cendant Chairman Guilty" 283: 237:were convicted on many of the charges. 145:at a third trial on October 31, 2006. 108:Rigas was convicted on July 8, 2004. 7: 353:. Houston Chronicle. 14 March 2005. 14: 429:Harrigan, Susan (16 March 2005). 374:, Indictment S3 02 Cr. 1144 (BSJ) 16:Satirical term for legal strategy 408:Syre, Steven (18 January 2005). 291:O'Brien, Tim (19 January 2005). 1: 335:Reeves, Jay (9 March 2005). 191:. Scrushy's defense lawyer, 183:, founder and former CEO of 469: 453:Informal legal terminology 206: 155:Bernard J. "Bernie" Ebbers 295:. New Jersey Law Journal. 36:where a defendant claims 248:' admission of possible 100:, lawyers, and external 143:making false statements 272:Ignorance is no excuse 410:"The 'idiot' defense" 199:additional charges. 133:Brendan Sullivan Jr. 418:"The Idiot Defense" 412:. The Boston Globe. 339:. Associated Press. 310:. Associated Press. 189:Sarbanes-Oxley Act 181:Richard M. Scrushy 176:Richard M. Scrushy 62:accounting scandal 51:Jackson, Tennessee 448:Criminal defenses 422:Los Angeles Times 167:Scott D. Sullivan 149:Bernard J. Ebbers 125:CUC International 92:, the founder of 460: 434: 425: 413: 355: 354: 347: 341: 340: 332: 326: 325: 318: 312: 311: 303: 297: 296: 288: 235:Jeffrey Skilling 112:Walter A. Forbes 47:Sergeant Schultz 468: 467: 463: 462: 461: 459: 458: 457: 438: 437: 428: 424:. 6 March 2005. 416: 407: 404: 364: 362:Court documents 359: 358: 349: 348: 344: 334: 333: 329: 320: 319: 315: 305: 304: 300: 290: 289: 285: 280: 267:Twinkie defense 258: 243: 224:collapse. In a 211: 205: 178: 151: 114: 87: 82: 45:defense", and " 17: 12: 11: 5: 466: 464: 456: 455: 450: 440: 439: 436: 435: 426: 414: 403: 400: 399: 398: 388: 375: 363: 360: 357: 356: 342: 327: 313: 298: 282: 281: 279: 276: 275: 274: 269: 264: 262:Shaggy defense 257: 254: 242: 239: 214:Kenneth L. Lay 207:Main article: 204: 203:Kenneth L. Lay 201: 177: 174: 153:In this case, 150: 147: 113: 110: 86: 83: 81: 78: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 465: 454: 451: 449: 446: 445: 443: 432: 427: 423: 419: 415: 411: 406: 405: 401: 396: 392: 389: 386: 382: 381: 376: 373: 369: 366: 365: 361: 352: 346: 343: 338: 331: 328: 323: 317: 314: 309: 302: 299: 294: 287: 284: 277: 273: 270: 268: 265: 263: 260: 259: 255: 253: 251: 247: 240: 238: 236: 231: 229: 228: 223: 219: 215: 210: 202: 200: 196: 194: 190: 186: 182: 175: 173: 170: 168: 164: 160: 156: 148: 146: 144: 139: 136: 134: 130: 126: 122: 118: 117:Walter Forbes 111: 109: 106: 103: 99: 95: 91: 90:John J. Rigas 85:John J. Rigas 84: 79: 77: 73: 71: 67: 63: 58: 56: 52: 48: 44: 39: 35: 32: 28: 24: 23:idiot defense 19: 421: 379: 345: 330: 316: 301: 286: 244: 232: 225: 212: 197: 179: 171: 152: 140: 137: 115: 107: 88: 74: 59: 22: 20: 18: 246:Barry Bonds 193:Jim Parkman 185:HealthSouth 102:accountants 29:term for a 442:Categories 433:. Newsday. 402:Editorials 278:References 241:Other uses 227:60 Minutes 70:fraudulent 55:moonshiner 157:, former 119:, former 66:valuation 38:innocence 27:satirical 256:See also 233:Lay and 218:indicted 159:WorldCom 94:Adelphia 80:Examples 34:strategy 250:steroid 129:Cendant 105:that?" 43:Ken Lay 25:" is a 380:et al. 222:Enron 98:board 31:legal 21:"The 216:was 163:CFO 123:of 121:CEO 444:: 420:. 393:, 383:, 370:, 165:, 41:"

Index

satirical
legal
strategy
innocence
Ken Lay
Sergeant Schultz
Jackson, Tennessee
moonshiner
accounting scandal
valuation
fraudulent
John J. Rigas
Adelphia
board
accountants
Walter Forbes
CEO
CUC International
Cendant
Brendan Sullivan Jr.
making false statements
Bernard J. "Bernie" Ebbers
WorldCom
CFO
Scott D. Sullivan
Richard M. Scrushy
HealthSouth
Sarbanes-Oxley Act
Jim Parkman
Trial of Kenneth Lay and Jeffrey Skilling

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.