Knowledge (XXG)

In re B (A Child) (2009 ruling)

Source 📝

35: 208:. The Court unanimously overruled the decisions of the High Court and Court of Appeal and affirmed the original decision of the Family Court. Lord Kerr gave the leading judgment, holding that the Court of Appeal had made significant errors in its interpretation of Re G, which when viewed as a whole, did not introduce any general principle about the consideration to be given to biological relationships. 181:
The case concerned a child whose parents had separated shortly before birth. The child had been raised from birth by his grandmother, with fortnightly visits to each parent. Shortly after the child's third birthday, an application by his father was heard in the Family Proceedings Court. The father
196:
who agreed with the High Court, asserting that the Family Court had over-emphasised the importance of the status quo and should have given consideration to the general assumption that it is in a child's best interests to reside with their biological parents (a principle which was stated to have
182:
sought a residence order for the child, and he was supported by the child's mother in this application. The Family Court dismissed this application, on the advice of a social care manager, holding that there were no 'compelling reasons to disrupt continuity of care'.
189:
who overturned the decision, describing the previous court as having been 'distracted' by the continuity of the boy's grandmothers care for him, which was ultimately not of paramount importance.
217: 163: 178:
and the correct weighting of factors to be considered by a Family Court in making a residence order. The case was the first substantive appeal to be heard in the new Supreme Court.
260: 238: 265: 205: 45: 34: 167: 118: 236: 81: 198: 242: 193: 122: 17: 254: 171: 125:
erred by trying to derive a general principle regarding birth parents from Re G.
186: 175: 148: 138:
Lord Kerr (Lords Hope, Collins & Clarke & Lady Hale concurring)
121:
had not exceeded its discretion in finding for the reasons it did, the
218:
2009 Judgments of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom
142: 134: 129: 108: 100: 95: 87: 77: 69: 61: 51: 41: 27: 8: 33: 24: 261:Supreme Court of the United Kingdom cases 229: 192:The grandmother then appealed to the 7: 46:Supreme Court of the United Kingdom 204:The case was then appealed to the 14: 266:2009 in United Kingdom case law 1: 185:The parents appealed to the 168:United Kingdom Supreme Court 282: 15: 147: 113: 91:1 WLR 2496, 1 All ER 223 56:In re B (A Child) (2009) 32: 16:For the 2016 ruling, see 241:8 April 2014 at the 151:, Residence Orders 159:In re B (A Child) 155: 154: 273: 245: 234: 170:case concerning 78:Neutral citation 73:19 November 2009 37: 25: 281: 280: 276: 275: 274: 272: 271: 270: 251: 250: 249: 248: 243:Wayback Machine 235: 231: 226: 214: 194:Court of Appeal 123:Court of Appeal 65:14 October 2009 21: 12: 11: 5: 279: 277: 269: 268: 263: 253: 252: 247: 246: 228: 227: 225: 222: 221: 220: 213: 210: 199:Re G (a child) 166:ruling by the 153: 152: 145: 144: 140: 139: 136: 132: 131: 127: 126: 115:Appeal allowed 111: 110: 106: 105: 102: 98: 97: 93: 92: 89: 85: 84: 79: 75: 74: 71: 67: 66: 63: 59: 58: 53: 52:Full case name 49: 48: 43: 39: 38: 30: 29: 28:Re B (a child) 18:Re B (A Child) 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 278: 267: 264: 262: 259: 258: 256: 244: 240: 237: 233: 230: 223: 219: 216: 215: 211: 209: 207: 206:Supreme Court 202: 200: 197:derived from 195: 190: 188: 183: 179: 177: 173: 172:child welfare 169: 165: 162:UKSC 5 was a 161: 160: 150: 146: 141: 137: 133: 130:Case opinions 128: 124: 120: 116: 112: 107: 103: 101:Prior history 99: 94: 90: 86: 83: 80: 76: 72: 68: 64: 60: 57: 54: 50: 47: 44: 40: 36: 31: 26: 23: 19: 232: 203: 191: 184: 180: 158: 157: 156: 119:Family Court 114: 104:EWCA Civ 545 96:Case history 55: 22: 143:Area of law 88:Reported at 255:Categories 224:References 201:UKHL 43). 187:High Court 176:family law 149:Family Law 239:Archived 212:See also 135:Majority 109:Holding 70:Decided 82:UKSC 5 62:Argued 42:Court 164:2009 117:The 257:: 174:, 20:.

Index

Re B (A Child)

Supreme Court of the United Kingdom
UKSC 5
Family Court
Court of Appeal
Family Law
2009
United Kingdom Supreme Court
child welfare
family law
High Court
Court of Appeal
Re G (a child)
Supreme Court
2009 Judgments of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom

Archived
Wayback Machine
Categories
Supreme Court of the United Kingdom cases
2009 in United Kingdom case law

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.