514:
report reads, "The Army Deputy Chief of Staff … inappropriately approved and validated the requirements document used to support the establishment of the individual carbine program. As a result, the Army wasted about $ 14 million on a competition to identify a source to supply new carbines it does not need." It would have cost $ 2.52 billion for the 501,289 carbines the Army planned to buy over a 20-year cycle. The Army's own analysis suggested the procurement could be delayed for another 10 years with no impact on readiness. The Army will recoup $ 382 million it can “put to better use,” of which $ 375 million was programmed procurement funding. The other $ 7 million was set aside for research, development, testing, and evaluation. Another $ 2.14 billion in expenditures will be avoided through 2018 as a result of the termination. Research and development funding set aside in the FY 2013 budget was put into operation and maintenance accounts, while procurement funding allocated in fiscal years 2015 to 2018 are under review to be funneled to other Army priorities. The review of the
Individual Carbine competition was part of an overall ongoing small arms weapons strategy development, to include assessment and analysis of current individual weapons, optics, and training to determine if additional capabilities in range and lethality will be needed against future adversaries.
453:. Ultimately, the Army decided not to pursue a new carbine because of consideration of operational requirements in the context of available small arms technology, the constrained fiscal environment, and the capability of their current carbines. One reliability requirement that was not reached by the vendors was firing 3,592 mean rounds without malfunctioning. In 1990, the M4 was required to fire 600 mean rounds between stoppages, while the current M4A1 fires 1,691 mean rounds between stoppages using M855A1 ammunition. PEO Soldier said that the new carbine had to be a superior improvement, not a small improvement. The Army has not released how close the competitors came to reaching the mean rounds between stoppages requirement, or how they performed compared to the M4A1. That information is seen as proprietary, and may be up to the manufacturers to release data. Analysis has not yet been done to determine if any exact event cause per vendor led to performance failures.
487:
each vendor to fire 10,000 M855A1s at a private range. Westrom said ammunition and caliber conflicts had little to do with it, as neither those factors nor the rifle designs would fundamentally change the battlefield capabilities of a soldier or small unit, while previous weapon transitions advanced combat shooting doctrines and shooting tactics. ArmaLite did not participate in the competition because
Westrom determined their designs weren't a revolutionary improvement over the M4 weapon system, and because the published Army requirements "set the bar so low" that the outcome that no one would win a contract was "predetermined."
482:, said the competition was "destined to fail" because the requirements did not represent a significant advance in fighting ability. The Army admitted each entrant offered marginal improvements over the M4 Carbine, but that none would substantially increase a soldier's battlefield capability. Westrom said the carbines offered incremental improvements, not any that offered a tactically superior advance to justify replacing the entire inventory. There were also complaints about the ammunition used in testing. The competition began while the M855 round was in use. In June 2010, the
25:
466:, said he knew nothing of what the Army was planning just weeks before cancellation. Other companies expressed concern that they had learned the program may be cancelled through media reports rather than being informed directly. Army officials said they were surprised that none of the rifles submitted passed muster and maintained that there was transparency throughout the three-year competition.
437:(Program Executive Office Soldier), a group responsible for rapid prototyping, procurement, and fielding of equipment for soldiers, had scheduled a roundtable for reporters on May 23 which would include project managers and officials. The PEO Soldier press conference was postponed to an unknown date because senior leaders had not made any decisions on the competition or other equipment programs.
260:(RfP) was issued in late 2010 followed by an industry day. The finalized RfP was issued in second quarter FY 2011 to which industry had a month to respond. A 12–18-month testing phase commenced and over 1 million rounds were to be fired. Testers looked at the consistency in accuracy of the carbines as they aged. Costs were also to be considered. The
987:
284:
support troops to replace their M16s. On
November 17, 2011, the US Marine Corps announced they will not participate or adopt any new weapon which may or may not come out of the competition. The USMC said they will continue to use standard M4s and M16A4s. They did mention they are considering upgrading the M16A4. However,
424:
acquisition process was launched to re-evaluate the $ 1.8 billion program. Program experts and Army officials asserted that the testimony misunderstood the carbine replacement initiative. The
Individual Carbine competition was to find a commercially available rifle design superior to the M4A1, while the
428:
worked on improving the current M4 design if the competition didn't yield major improvements. The
Inspector General questioned why the Army was pursuing a new rifle when the structure of their total force will be reduced. In the next two months a draft report was to be released elaborating concerns
410:
Limited User
Evaluation - Tests were to use co-ed teams of 16 soldiers to determine each weapon's probability and quality of hit, time of first trigger pull, and mobility and portability in an operational environment. They were to engage targets at short and long range, as well as in close-quarters.
148:
industry by the end of that year. The competition was open to all manufacturers. However, Phase II testing reduced the field down to six rifles. The competition was intended to provide an evaluation of the full range of weapons available. Presolicitation notice W15QKN-11-R-F003 was posted
January 31,
486:
was fielded, and the competition began using the EPR in August. Army analysis found that the M855A1 may have contributed to lower than expected reliability performance. Even so, the Army insists they made industry aware of the ammo change, giving them time to adjust their designs and arranging for
448:
On June 13, 2013, the U.S. Army formally cancelled the
Individual Carbine competition. The Army said none of the carbines evaluated during testing met the minimum scoring requirement needed to continue to the next phase of the evaluation. Letters were sent to gunmakers involved to inform them that
444:
passed an amendment to the 2014 budget that would prevent the Army from cancelling the IC program before user evaluations. Committee members voted unanimously for the amendment that would require user evaluations, a business case analysis, and reports back to congressional defense committees before
400:
Secondary
Development Tests - Weapons must score hits with as few shots as possible. Sustained rates of fire and cook-off were tested, along with the weapon's ability to operate in extreme temperatures and environments. "Weapons will be beat up, dropped, submerged in water and fired while lacking
346:
In May 2012, the Army selected the companies and rifles that passed phase I of the competition and moved on to phase II. While phase I eliminated companies that would not have had the production capacity to manufacture sufficient numbers of their rifle, phase II included actual test firings of the
283:
brigade combat teams (IBCT), and the existing and improved M4s given to support troops to replace their M16s. If the improved M4 turned out to be the winner and the new carbine program scrapped, then the IBCTs will likely be fitted with the improved M4s, and the existing M4s would again be given to
513:
The
Pentagon Inspector General audit of the Individual Carbine competition continued despite the program's termination. On September 16, 2013, the Inspector General published a report on the audit's findings. The analysis said the Army wasted $ 14 million to find new rifles it did not need. The
501:
expressing his disappointment in the decision to cancel the program without giving soldiers an opportunity to field test the weapons to determine if they were improvements over the current M4. Senator Coburn's efforts in 2008 led the Army to look if industry had anything to offer that was better
268:
was spent on testing. The winner of the competition had to be a "measurable improvement" over the M4 carbine to replace it; otherwise, the program would instead convert all M4 carbines to the enhanced version. The winner of the competition would sell the rights to their weapon to the military and
509:
announced it would not protest the Army's decision to terminate the program, and would focus on delivering BEAR rifles to commercial customers. Adcor Chairman and CEO Jimmy Stavrakis said though they were "disappointed that the Army chose to discontinue a competition that could have provided
321:
rifle from the competition. This was because the winner is required to turn over technical data rights to the Army, who would distribute the blueprints to two other companies that would each produce one-third of the weapons purchased, and Colt did not want to reveal its trade secrets. Other
474:, said the Army simply did not find the capability it was after with the rifles submitted. None of the weapons met minimum requirements. The competition was a binary pass-or-fail venue, rather than a test-fix-test venue to improve the weapons following test results. Mark Westrom, owner of
432:
On May 2, 2013, the Army announced it was considering cancelling the Individual Carbine competition. Phase II of testing had been completed, but not soldier evaluation or contract awards as part of Phase III. With M4A1 Carbines being purchased through 2018, the Army was rethinking carbine
423:
On March 19, 2013, the Defense Department released a testimony as part of their efforts to improve spending efficiency and reduce overall waste. Part of the testimony was the Pentagon Inspector General's reconsideration of the Individual Carbine program to replace the M4. An audit of the
316:
Phase I of the competition commenced following the familiarization shoot. It included the weapon's ability to mount accessories, such as optics and suppressors, the company's ability to produce 2,000-4,200 carbines per month, and production costs. In November 2011, Colt pulled its
396:
Development Tests - A detailed evaluation of accuracy and dispersion at distances of 100, 300, and 600 meters using 90 rounds at each range. Another 21,600 rounds were used to test reliability, durability, and barrel life to determine performance over the weapon's entire life
461:
The Army clarified that it was not cancelling the IC competition, but that it was in a position to conclude it. Industry participants said the competition was plagued by miscommunication from the Army. Gabriele de Plano, vice president of military marketing and sales for
449:
no future contract awards would be made for the soldier evaluation phase. PEO Soldier reported that no competitor demonstrated a significant improvement in weapon reliability to justify buying a new carbine. Weapons tested also had low reliability performance using
195:
had the burden of test ammunition and extra costs placed on the competitor. The draft asked for a non-developmental weapon. Rather than working with the Army to develop a new weapon, competitors were to bring forward designs they already had available.
502:
than the M4, which lead to the IC competition. Coburn wanted to know where money from the cancelled program would go and why near-term small arms strategies did not include an assessment of a medium-caliber round for increased battlefield capability.
510:
soldiers with significant improvements in accuracy and reliability," they accepted the decision. Test results made available to the company said the Army found the B.E.A.R. provided “outstanding” accuracy, even after firing thousands of rounds.
991:
445:
a final decision is made. If passed into law, it would not take effect until October 1, 2013, which gave the Army four months to decide the fate of the program without violating a congressional directive.
926:
407:
Government Purpose Rights - The Army will contract three manufacturers to produce a maximum of 178,890 carbines each to keep costs down and ensure delivery even if one cannot meet production goals.
296:
The first round of tests were carried out from January to May 2011. Rifles chambered in 5.56Ă—45mm NATO participated in a "familiarization shoot" at ranges of 25 and 300 yards firing the M855A1
1050:
404:
Cost - The Army will not purchase an overpriced carbine, but the RfP stated, "when all evaluation factors other than price are combined, they are significantly more important than price."
581:
756:
338:. Stag Arms then bid for the contract to produce one-third of the winning weapon order quantity, while Knight's Armament submitted components for the upgraded M4A1.
899:
610:
54:
1040:
923:
911:
773:
875:
541:
969:
110:
559:
887:
624:
638:
740:
1045:
305:
141:
821:
261:
217:
836:
547:
523:
94:
611:
https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&mode=form&id=6c5d041f27e35c74731a827d42c51859&tab=core&tabmode=list&=
288:
said on April 16, 2013, that the Marines were watching the Army program and whether or not they would join was "yet to be seen."
852:
753:
689:
589:
70:
383:
245:
1010:
441:
372:
809:
954:
386:
335:
229:
863:
300:. Rifle contenders were also allowed to participate in the "compatibility check" which consisted of the firing of the
264:
monitored tests and the evaluation and there was congressional oversight to ensure the competition was full and open.
46:
137:
50:
297:
955:
ADCOR Defense Declines to Protest Army Individual Carbine Decision, Will Focus on Satisfying Commercial Demand
966:
176:
715:
942:
272:
As for fielding a possible winner, the Army has over 1.1 million armed personnel, approximately half are
35:
535:
495:
365:
301:
209:
205:
39:
1035:
257:
165:
140:
and other branches chose to stay with current weapons in service. The proposal was passed before the
59:
794:
651:
276:
63:
995:
585:
126:
109:
164:
The Individual Carbine was to provide accurate and reliable firepower. It had to be capable of
467:
450:
355:
323:
253:
192:
188:
169:
74:
833:
973:
930:
840:
760:
347:
weapons to assess accuracy, reliability, and durability. The phase II contenders were the
152:
Complete results of the competition and selection of a new carbine were expected before
553:
498:
362:
225:
221:
173:
1029:
506:
369:
285:
180:
415:
Phase II was to last 12–18 months and narrow the field of contenders down to three.
1003:
646:
471:
434:
153:
693:
491:
425:
348:
318:
273:
241:
237:
145:
122:
967:
Army Wasted Millions Seeking Rifles It Did Not Need, Pentagon Watchdog Finds
529:
483:
479:
327:
279:. If a new carbine was selected, the Army would see 500,000 purchased for
187:
for any new weapon was open for the competition, any contributions not of
774:"Individual Carbine M855A1 Familiarization Shoot and Compatibility Check"
475:
280:
463:
379:
376:
351:
233:
213:
184:
133:
675:
411:
Targets were to be stationary, mobile, and exposed for various times.
358:
249:
108:
924:
Carbine Competition Fails to Find Improvement Over Current Weapon
144:
in August 2010, and the Army was to solicit submissions from the
331:
322:
companies backed out for similar financial reasons, including
136:
to replace the M4. This competition was for the Army only—the
18:
269:
choose two other competing suppliers to help manufacture it.
1004:"The Army's M-4 Carbine: Background and Issues for Congress"
392:
Phase II test scoring, in order of priority, depended upon:
888:
Army Carbine Competition Faces Delay, Possible Cancellation
156:
2013. However, the competition was cancelled in June 2013.
121:
was a competition to select the planned successor to the
57:
and tools are available to assist in formatting, such as
676:
Individual Carbine competition concludes with no winner
795:
HP White Familiarization Shoot and Compatibility Check
429:
and giving recommendations to the Defense Department.
637:
Fuller, Peter N.; Douglas A. Tamilio (May 18, 2010).
292:
M855A1 Familiarization Shoot and Compatibility Check
639:"Project Manager Soldier Weapons Briefing for NDIA"
132:The U.S. Army conducted an open competition for a
976:- Nationaldefensemagazine.org, September 16, 2013
912:Army: Gun Makers Didn't Meet Reliability Standard
690:"Tough test for companies in carbine competition"
1051:Abandoned military projects of the United States
810:Colt, S&W among those out of carbine bidding
805:
803:
900:House Blocks Cancelation of Carbine Competition
716:"Army wants soldiers to have improved carbine"
620:
618:
876:Army Set to Kill Improved Carbine Competition
8:
38:, which are uninformative and vulnerable to
16:US Army assault rifle procurement plan, 2011
890:- Nationaldefensemagazine.com, May 22, 2013
864:Budget Cuts Restrict M4 Carbine Replacement
53:and maintains a consistent citation style.
933:- Nationaldefensemagazine.org, August 2013
542:Objective Individual Combat Weapon program
943:Senator Questions Army’s Carbine Decision
548:Advanced Individual Combat Weapon Program
95:Learn how and when to remove this message
451:M855A1 Enhanced Performance Rounds (EPR)
401:lubrication and covered by ice and mud."
212:, an off-the-shelf or derivative of the
572:
560:XM17 Modular Handgun System competition
582:"Corps to pass on Army upgrades to M4"
172:fire. Integrated rails were to accept
1041:Proposed weapons of the United States
866:- Armedforces-Int.com, March 20, 2013
7:
650:. United States Army. Archived from
625:Army Kills Competition to Replace M4
306:M26 Modular Accessory Shotgun System
142:Joint Requirements Oversight Council
945:- Kitup.military.com, June 20, 2013
843:- Cheaperthandirt.com, May 19, 2012
812:- Army Times.com, November 25, 2011
763:- Militarytimes.com, April 29, 2013
714:Bacon, Lance M. (August 30, 2010).
688:Bacon, Lance M. (August 25, 2010).
45:Please consider converting them to
994:from websites or documents of the
957:- Fortmilltimes.com, July 17, 2013
834:The Army’s Next Generation Carbine
262:Office of the Secretary of Defense
14:
1002:Feickert, Andrew (June 8, 2010).
524:Special Purpose Individual Weapon
484:M855A1 Enhanced Performance Round
990: This article incorporates
985:
308:underbarrel attachment systems.
23:
204:Weapons submitted included the
1011:Congressional Research Service
824:- SoldierGeek.com, May 4, 2012
822:Phase II of Individual Carbine
754:Corps exploring rifle upgrades
442:House Armed Services Committee
426:M4 Product Improvement Program
49:to ensure the article remains
1:
914:- Military.com, June 14, 2013
627:- Military.com, June 13, 2013
902:- Military.com, June 6, 2013
478:which designed the original
361:, a modified variant of the
246:Colt's Manufacturing Company
1046:Rifles of the United States
878:- Military.com, May 2, 2013
470:Paul A. Ostrowski, head of
1067:
972:December 19, 2013, at the
839:December 13, 2013, at the
490:On June 17, 2013, Senator
298:Enhanced Performance Round
138:United States Marine Corps
929:October 18, 2015, at the
797:- HP White, March 3, 2011
678:- Army.mil, June 17, 2013
336:Knight's Armament Company
230:Knight's Armament Company
177:rail-mounted accessories
113:Carbine Competition logo
532:—Germany, United States
992:public domain material
326:with their M&P 4,
174:MIL-STD-1913 Picatinny
114:
741:"Military Daily News"
592:on September 25, 2010
536:Advanced Combat Rifle
496:Secretary of the Army
440:On June 6, 2013, the
302:M320 grenade launcher
210:Robinson Armament Co.
179:. It had to be fully
112:
759:May 1, 2013, at the
657:on November 14, 2011
258:request for proposal
776:. November 24, 2010
160:Design requirements
996:United States Army
586:Marine Corps Times
505:On July 17, 2013,
356:Heckler & Koch
324:Smith & Wesson
254:Heckler & Koch
127:United States Army
119:Individual Carbine
115:
494:sent a letter to
468:Brigadier General
105:
104:
97:
55:Several templates
1058:
1021:
1019:
1017:
1008:
989:
988:
977:
964:
958:
952:
946:
940:
934:
921:
915:
909:
903:
897:
891:
885:
879:
873:
867:
861:
855:
850:
844:
831:
825:
819:
813:
807:
798:
792:
786:
785:
783:
781:
770:
764:
751:
745:
744:
737:
731:
730:
728:
726:
711:
705:
704:
702:
700:
685:
679:
673:
667:
666:
664:
662:
656:
643:
634:
628:
622:
613:
608:
602:
601:
599:
597:
588:. Archived from
577:
286:General Jim Amos
267:
100:
93:
89:
86:
80:
78:
67:
27:
26:
19:
1066:
1065:
1061:
1060:
1059:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1015:
1013:
1006:
1001:
986:
981:
980:
974:Wayback Machine
965:
961:
953:
949:
941:
937:
931:Wayback Machine
922:
918:
910:
906:
898:
894:
886:
882:
874:
870:
862:
858:
851:
847:
841:Wayback Machine
832:
828:
820:
816:
808:
801:
793:
789:
779:
777:
772:
771:
767:
761:Wayback Machine
752:
748:
739:
738:
734:
724:
722:
713:
712:
708:
698:
696:
687:
686:
682:
674:
670:
660:
658:
654:
641:
636:
635:
631:
623:
616:
609:
605:
595:
593:
579:
578:
574:
569:
520:
459:
421:
344:
314:
294:
277:combat brigades
265:
228:, the SR-16 by
202:
162:
101:
90:
84:
81:
69:
58:
44:
28:
24:
17:
12:
11:
5:
1064:
1062:
1054:
1053:
1048:
1043:
1038:
1028:
1027:
1023:
1022:
999:
982:
979:
978:
959:
947:
935:
916:
904:
892:
880:
868:
856:
845:
826:
814:
799:
787:
765:
746:
732:
706:
680:
668:
629:
614:
603:
580:Lamothe, Dan.
571:
570:
568:
565:
564:
563:
562:—United States
557:
554:Project Abakan
551:
545:
544:—United States
539:
538:—United States
533:
527:
526:—United States
519:
516:
499:John M. McHugh
458:
455:
433:acquisition.
420:
417:
413:
412:
408:
405:
402:
398:
343:
340:
313:
310:
293:
290:
266:US$ 30 million
201:
198:
193:7.62Ă—51mm NATO
189:5.56Ă—45mm NATO
170:full-automatic
166:semi-automatic
161:
158:
103:
102:
85:September 2022
47:full citations
31:
29:
22:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1063:
1052:
1049:
1047:
1044:
1042:
1039:
1037:
1034:
1033:
1031:
1012:
1005:
1000:
997:
993:
984:
983:
975:
971:
968:
963:
960:
956:
951:
948:
944:
939:
936:
932:
928:
925:
920:
917:
913:
908:
905:
901:
896:
893:
889:
884:
881:
877:
872:
869:
865:
860:
857:
854:
849:
846:
842:
838:
835:
830:
827:
823:
818:
815:
811:
806:
804:
800:
796:
791:
788:
775:
769:
766:
762:
758:
755:
750:
747:
742:
736:
733:
725:September 25,
721:
717:
710:
707:
699:September 25,
695:
691:
684:
681:
677:
672:
669:
653:
649:
648:
640:
633:
630:
626:
621:
619:
615:
612:
607:
604:
596:September 13,
591:
587:
583:
576:
573:
566:
561:
558:
555:
552:
549:
546:
543:
540:
537:
534:
531:
528:
525:
522:
521:
517:
515:
511:
508:
507:Adcor Defense
503:
500:
497:
493:
488:
485:
481:
477:
473:
469:
465:
456:
454:
452:
446:
443:
438:
436:
430:
427:
418:
416:
409:
406:
403:
399:
395:
394:
393:
390:
388:
385:
381:
378:
374:
371:
370:Adcor Defense
367:
364:
360:
357:
353:
350:
341:
339:
337:
333:
329:
325:
320:
311:
309:
307:
303:
299:
291:
289:
287:
282:
278:
275:
270:
263:
259:
255:
251:
247:
243:
239:
235:
231:
227:
223:
219:
215:
211:
207:
199:
197:
194:
190:
186:
182:
178:
175:
171:
167:
159:
157:
155:
150:
147:
143:
139:
135:
130:
128:
124:
120:
111:
107:
99:
96:
88:
76:
75:documentation
72:
65:
64:documentation
61:
56:
52:
48:
43:
41:
37:
32:This article
30:
21:
20:
1014:. Retrieved
962:
950:
938:
919:
907:
895:
883:
871:
859:
848:
829:
817:
790:
778:. Retrieved
768:
749:
735:
723:. Retrieved
719:
709:
697:. Retrieved
683:
671:
659:. Retrieved
652:the original
645:
632:
606:
594:. Retrieved
590:the original
575:
512:
504:
489:
460:
447:
439:
431:
422:
419:Cancellation
414:
391:
345:
315:
295:
271:
203:
183:. While the
181:ambidextrous
163:
151:
131:
118:
116:
106:
91:
82:
71:Citation bot
33:
1036:PEO Soldier
1016:October 28,
780:December 8,
661:October 28,
647:PEO Soldier
472:PEO Soldier
435:PEO Soldier
387:Enhanced M4
1030:Categories
853:Page title
720:Army Times
694:Army Times
567:References
550:—Australia
492:Tom Coburn
382:, and the
373:BEAR Elite
274:front-line
256:. A draft
248:, and the
238:FN Herstal
146:small arms
123:M4 carbine
51:verifiable
530:XM8 rifle
480:M16 rifle
457:Responses
363:Remington
328:Stag Arms
226:Remington
36:bare URLs
970:Archived
927:Archived
837:Archived
757:Archived
518:See also
476:ArmaLite
342:Phase II
281:infantry
40:link rot
556:—Russia
464:Beretta
380:ARX-160
377:Beretta
359:HK416A5
312:Phase I
234:FN SCAR
200:Testing
191:and/or
185:caliber
134:carbine
125:in the
397:cycle.
375:, the
368:, the
354:, the
334:, and
240:, the
232:, the
220:, the
149:2011.
60:reFill
1007:(PDF)
655:(PDF)
642:(PDF)
319:CM901
250:HK416
242:CM901
34:uses
1018:2010
782:2010
727:2010
701:2010
663:2010
598:2010
384:Colt
352:FNAC
332:LWRC
304:and
218:LWRC
214:M6A4
168:and
117:The
68:and
366:ACR
252:by
244:by
236:by
224:by
222:ACR
216:by
208:by
206:XCR
1032::
1009:.
802:^
718:.
692:.
644:.
617:^
584:.
389:.
349:FN
330:,
154:FY
129:.
1020:.
998:.
784:.
743:.
729:.
703:.
665:.
600:.
98:)
92:(
87:)
83:(
79:.
77:)
73:(
66:)
62:(
42:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
