31:
Essentially, each action carried out by a member of a group has the ability to elicit predictable actions from other group members. For example, individuals who display evidence of positive behavior (e.g., smiling, behaving cooperatively) tend to trigger positively valenced behaviors from others. In
19:
asserts that individuals often behave in ways that evoke complementary or reciprocal behavior from others. More specifically, this hypothesis predicts that positive behaviors evoke positive behaviors, negative behaviors evoke negative behaviors,
51:
present in groups. These studies highlight the increased comfort experienced by individuals when the power or status behavior of others complement that of their own (e.g., a "leader" preferring a "follower").
150:
Strong, S. R., Hills, H. I., Kilmartin, C. T., DeVries, H., Lanier, K., Nelson, B. N., et al. (1988). The dynamic relations among interpersonal behaviors: A test of complementarity and anticomplementarity.
32:
much the same way, group members who behave in a docile or submissive fashion tend to elicit complementary, dominant behaviors from other members of the group. This behavioral
111:
Sadler, P., & Woody, E. (2003). Is who you are who you’re talking to? Interpersonal style and complementarity in mixed-sex interactions.
176:
99:
137:
Tiedens, L. Z., & Fragale, A. R. (2003). Power moves: Complementarity in submissive and dominant nonverbal behavior.
61:
71:
37:
25:
21:
48:
171:
95:
165:
33:
66:
45:
41:
44:, has been illustrated in several studies assessing
153:Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54
139:Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84
113:Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84
94:, 5th Edition. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
8:
17:Interpersonal complementarity hypothesis
83:
7:
126:Interaction concepts of personality.
14:
1:
177:Interpersonal relationships
62:Interpersonal compatibility
193:
72:Obedience (human behavior)
124:Carson, R. C. (1969).
90:Forsyth, D.R. (2010).
26:submissive behaviors
36:, as it applies to
28:, and vice versa.
22:dominant behaviors
184:
156:
148:
142:
135:
129:
128:Chicago: Aldine.
122:
116:
109:
103:
88:
192:
191:
187:
186:
185:
183:
182:
181:
162:
161:
160:
159:
149:
145:
136:
132:
123:
119:
110:
106:
89:
85:
80:
58:
12:
11:
5:
190:
188:
180:
179:
174:
164:
163:
158:
157:
143:
130:
117:
104:
92:Group Dynamics
82:
81:
79:
76:
75:
74:
69:
64:
57:
54:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
189:
178:
175:
173:
170:
169:
167:
154:
147:
144:
140:
134:
131:
127:
121:
118:
114:
108:
105:
101:
100:0-534-36822-0
97:
93:
87:
84:
77:
73:
70:
68:
65:
63:
60:
59:
55:
53:
50:
47:
43:
39:
35:
29:
27:
23:
18:
152:
146:
138:
133:
125:
120:
112:
107:
91:
86:
30:
16:
15:
49:hierarchies
166:Categories
155:, 798–810.
141:, 558-568.
78:References
34:congruency
67:Authority
42:authority
38:obedience
172:Behavior
115:, 80-96.
56:See also
98:
24:evoke
46:power
96:ISBN
40:and
168::
102:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.