36:
that no relief can be granted unless there is irreparable injury. This requirement, commonly called the "irreparable injury rule", has been the subject of sustained academic criticism, especially by remedies scholar
41:, who has argued at length that the rule does not actually explain the decisions of courts in the United States. Nevertheless, the irreparable injury rule was reaffirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court in
456:
47:, 547 U.S. 388 (2006), a case in which the Court announced a test for injunctive relief that required, among other things, that the plaintiff prove "that it has suffered an irreparable injury".
453:
425:
380:
489:
329:
280:
397:
292:
316:
179:
472:
204:
174:
269:
494:
422:
24:, "the type of harm which no monetary compensation can cure or put conditions back the way they were."
377:
43:
499:
441:
55:
The general idea that there are irreparable injuries has been recognized in various jurisdictions.
148:
109:
91:
460:
429:
384:
353:
333:
152:
38:
144:
64:
483:
401:
83:
296:
216:
Douglas
Laycock, The Death of the Irreparable Injury Rule (Oxford Univ. Press 1991).
164:
98:
33:
21:
257:
140:
185:
169:
113:
87:
68:
125:
94:
124:
The East Africa Court of
Justice has noted the concept in enjoining an
71:
241:
129:
102:
365:
226:
51:
The concept of irreparable injury in various jurisdictions
67:
Staff Rules recognize the concept for the purpose of
454:- National Commission on Indigenous Peoples web page
116:
as being to "prevent irreparable damage or injury".
8:
423:Philippines Supreme Court official web site
32:It has traditionally been a requirement of
281:S.D. Public Service Commission web site
197:
7:
258:Private law firm's web site glossary
293:"Attorney General of Utah web site"
14:
442:Philippine Jurisprudence web site
242:U.N. Joint Appeals Board web site
112:takes note of the purpose of an
108:In addition to state law, the
1:
86:recognizes the concept under
490:Common law legal terminology
330:"N.D.Tex. official web site"
180:Temporary restraining order
28:The irreparable injury rule
516:
244:, citing, Law Dictionary,
317:D.Ariz. official web site
227:"Serious Injury Attorney"
473:Sen. Pimental's web site
354:DOJ Web site, Kid's page
147:, in a report regarding
143:law notes the phrase in
175:Preliminary injunction
231:Friday, 16 April 2021
90:or equity, including
452:See an Order on the
398:"DOLE FAQs: Details"
44:eBay v. MercExchange
459:2007-09-28 at the
428:2007-09-29 at the
383:2007-09-28 at the
149:indigenous peoples
110:Federal government
18:irreparable injury
368:, 17 January 2023
507:
475:
470:
464:
450:
444:
439:
433:
419:
413:
412:
410:
409:
400:. Archived from
394:
388:
375:
369:
363:
357:
351:
345:
344:
342:
341:
332:. Archived from
326:
320:
314:
308:
307:
305:
304:
295:. Archived from
289:
283:
278:
272:
267:
261:
255:
249:
238:
232:
230:
223:
217:
214:
208:
202:
151:, as well as in
82:Virtually every
515:
514:
510:
509:
508:
506:
505:
504:
480:
479:
478:
471:
467:
461:Wayback Machine
451:
447:
440:
436:
430:Wayback Machine
420:
416:
407:
405:
396:
395:
391:
385:Wayback Machine
376:
372:
364:
360:
352:
348:
339:
337:
328:
327:
323:
315:
311:
302:
300:
291:
290:
286:
279:
275:
268:
264:
256:
252:
239:
235:
225:
224:
220:
215:
211:
203:
199:
195:
161:
153:agrarian reform
138:
122:
80:
61:
53:
39:Douglas Laycock
30:
12:
11:
5:
513:
511:
503:
502:
497:
492:
482:
481:
477:
476:
465:
445:
434:
414:
389:
370:
358:
346:
321:
309:
284:
273:
262:
250:
233:
218:
209:
205:Law Dictionary
196:
194:
191:
190:
189:
182:
177:
172:
167:
160:
157:
145:employment law
137:
134:
121:
118:
79:
76:
65:United Nations
60:
59:United Nations
57:
52:
49:
29:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
512:
501:
498:
496:
493:
491:
488:
487:
485:
474:
469:
466:
462:
458:
455:
449:
446:
443:
438:
435:
431:
427:
424:
418:
415:
404:on 2007-09-30
403:
399:
393:
390:
386:
382:
379:
374:
371:
367:
362:
359:
355:
350:
347:
336:on 2007-07-08
335:
331:
325:
322:
318:
313:
310:
299:on 2007-04-02
298:
294:
288:
285:
282:
277:
274:
271:
270:Oklahoma case
266:
263:
259:
254:
251:
247:
243:
237:
234:
228:
222:
219:
213:
210:
206:
201:
198:
192:
188:
187:
183:
181:
178:
176:
173:
171:
168:
166:
163:
162:
158:
156:
154:
150:
146:
142:
135:
133:
131:
127:
119:
117:
115:
111:
106:
104:
100:
96:
93:
89:
85:
78:United States
77:
75:
73:
70:
66:
58:
56:
50:
48:
46:
45:
40:
35:
27:
25:
23:
19:
495:Equity (law)
468:
448:
437:
421:See case on
417:
406:. Retrieved
402:the original
392:
378:EAC web page
373:
361:
349:
338:. Retrieved
334:the original
324:
312:
301:. Retrieved
297:the original
287:
276:
265:
253:
245:
236:
221:
212:
200:
184:
165:Equity (law)
139:
123:
107:
99:South Dakota
81:
62:
54:
42:
31:
17:
15:
366:e5quire Law
141:Philippines
136:Philippines
500:Common law
484:Categories
408:2007-06-20
340:2007-06-20
303:2007-06-20
193:References
186:Quia timet
170:Injunction
114:injunction
88:common law
69:employment
457:Archived
426:Archived
381:Archived
159:See also
126:election
95:Oklahoma
92:New York
72:appeals
20:is, in
120:Africa
101:, and
34:equity
22:equity
246:supra
130:Kenya
84:state
240:See
103:Utah
63:The
128:in
16:An
486::
155:.
132:.
105:.
97:,
74:.
463:.
432:.
411:.
387:.
356:.
343:.
319:.
306:.
260:.
248:.
229:.
207:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.