162:
not let the children sleep in it. So for the first three days they had all the family in one room. The two children were put into one of the single beds and the two adults in the other single bed. After the first three days they were moved into what was said to be one of the best suites in the hotel. Even then, they had to put the children in to sleep in the sitting room and the parents in the bedroom. There was dirty linen upon the bed. There was no private bath but only a shower; no mini-golf course; no swimming pool, no beauty saloon, no hairdressers' saloon. Worst of all was the cooking. There was no choice of dishes. On some occasions, however, curry was served as an alternative to the main dish. They found the food very distasteful. It appeared to be cooked in coconut oil. There was a pervasive taste because of its manner of cooking. They were so uncomfortable at Brown's Hotel, that after a fortnight they moved to the
Pegasus Reef Hotel.
185:
principals.’ Or trust, and the truth was that he was making a contract for their benefit. He quoted Lush LJ in Lloyd’s v Harper (1880) 16 ChD 290, 321 and said that although there were suggestions that he meant you can sue for a disappointed benefit to a third party if you are a trustee, he ‘did not think so… I think they should be accepted as correct, at any rate so long as the law forbids the third persons themselves from suing for damages. It is the only way in which a just result can be achieved.’ ‘is no one to recover from them except the one who made the contract for their benefit? He should be able to recover the expense to which he has been put, and pay it over to them. Once recovered it will money had and received to their use.
28:
161:
they were greatly disappointed. Their room had not got a connecting door with the room for the children at all. The room for the children was mildewed - black with mildew, at the bottom. There was fungus growing on the walls. The toilet was stained. The shower was dirty. There was no bath. They could
189:
Lord
Denning MR also held that the family might even, if desired, be joined as plaintiffs, that the initial award of £1100 was ‘about right’, and opined that other instances where a good claim may exist include a vicar contracting for a coach trip for the choir and a host booking a restaurant dinner
184:
It would be a fiction to say that the contract was made by all the family… and that he was only an agent for them. Take this very case. It would be absurd to say that the twins of three years old were parties to the contract or that the father was making the contract on their behalf as if they were
383:
303:
133:
400:
277:
492:
370:
180:
Lord
Denning MR held that Mr Jackson could recover damages of £600 for defective performance and £500 for disappointment or ‘mental distress’ for himself and his family.
172:
and awarded damages of £1100 for distress. The defendant appealed against the damages awarded to Mr
Jackson's wife and children, who were not parties to the contract.
426:
414:
128:
157:) for himself and his family. He paid £1200. When they arrived, the facilities were substandard, and not at all as promised. As Lord Denning MR recounted,
497:
222:
315:
38:
487:
131:
section 1(1)(b), allowing a third party to claim independently. Some of the reasoning of Lord
Denning MR was disapproved in
89:
502:
215:
344:
168:
443:
208:
124:
106:
291:
239:
454:
120:
93:
146:
262:
137:, which held that the decision is limited to a confined category of cases involving consumers.
329:
250:
193:
James LJ and Orr LJ concurred with
Denning LJ's judgement, without adding further comments.
433:
27:
267:
73:
374:
360:
481:
390:
405:
334:
319:
145:
Mr
Jackson got a holiday through Horizon Holidays Ltd to the Brown Beach Hotel,
200:
154:
150:
204:
385:
Woodar
Investment Development Ltd v Wimpey Construction UK Ltd
134:
Woodar
Investment Development Ltd v Wimpey Construction UK Ltd
100:
85:
80:
69:
54:
44:
34:
20:
182:
159:
127:. The case would now be partly resolved by the
428:Nisshin Shipping Co Ltd v Cleaves & Co Ltd
279:Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre v Selfridge & Co Ltd
216:
8:
416:Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999
129:Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999
223:
209:
201:
26:
17:
493:Court of Appeal (England and Wales) cases
465:
49:Anthony Jackson v Horizon Holidays Ltd
401:Linden Gardens Trust v Lenesta Sludge
316:Scruttons Ltd v Midland Silicones Ltd
7:
39:Court of Appeal of England and Wales
434:[2003] EWHC 2602 (Comm)
14:
123:case, concerning the doctrine of
268:[1861] EWHC J57 (QB)
498:1974 in United Kingdom case law
357:Jackson v Horizon Holidays Ltd
304:Smith and Snipes Hall Farm Ltd
116:Jackson v Horizon Holidays Ltd
21:Jackson v Horizon Holidays Ltd
1:
190:for himself and his friends.
519:
74:[1974] EWCA Civ 12
58:February 5, 1974
488:English contract case law
440:
423:
412:
397:
380:
367:
353:
345:Dutton v Bognor Regis UDC
341:
326:
312:
300:
288:
274:
259:
247:
236:
231:Privity of contract cases
105:
25:
169:Jarvis v Swans Tours Ltd
444:Privity in English law
391:[1980] UKHL 11
187:
164:
406:[1993] UKHL 4
335:[1967] UKHL 2
295:, 117 N.E. 807 (1917)
240:Dutton v Poole (1678)
455:English contract law
292:De Cicco v Schweizer
121:English contract law
166:The judge followed
503:Lord Denning cases
263:Tweddle v Atkinson
450:
449:
330:Beswick v Beswick
254:(1756) Ambler 330
119:1 WLR 1468 is an
112:
111:
510:
473:
470:
429:
417:
386:
280:
251:Tomlinson v Gill
225:
218:
211:
202:
81:Court membership
65:
63:
30:
18:
518:
517:
513:
512:
511:
509:
508:
507:
478:
477:
476:
471:
467:
463:
451:
446:
436:
427:
419:
415:
408:
393:
384:
376:
363:
349:
337:
322:
308:
296:
284:
278:
270:
255:
243:
232:
229:
199:
178:
143:
90:Lord Denning MR
61:
59:
12:
11:
5:
516:
514:
506:
505:
500:
495:
490:
480:
479:
475:
474:
464:
462:
459:
458:
457:
448:
447:
441:
438:
437:
424:
421:
420:
413:
410:
409:
398:
395:
394:
381:
378:
377:
368:
365:
364:
354:
351:
350:
342:
339:
338:
327:
324:
323:
313:
310:
309:
301:
298:
297:
289:
286:
285:
275:
272:
271:
260:
257:
256:
248:
245:
244:
237:
234:
233:
230:
228:
227:
220:
213:
205:
198:
195:
177:
174:
142:
139:
110:
109:
103:
102:
98:
97:
87:
86:Judges sitting
83:
82:
78:
77:
71:
67:
66:
56:
52:
51:
46:
45:Full case name
42:
41:
36:
32:
31:
23:
22:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
515:
504:
501:
499:
496:
494:
491:
489:
486:
485:
483:
469:
466:
460:
456:
453:
452:
445:
439:
435:
431:
430:
422:
418:
411:
407:
403:
402:
396:
392:
388:
387:
379:
375:
373:
372:
371:The Eurymedon
366:
362:
359:
358:
352:
347:
346:
340:
336:
332:
331:
325:
321:
318:
317:
311:
306:
305:
299:
294:
293:
287:
282:
281:
273:
269:
265:
264:
258:
253:
252:
246:
242:
241:
235:
226:
221:
219:
214:
212:
207:
206:
203:
196:
194:
191:
186:
181:
175:
173:
171:
170:
163:
158:
156:
152:
148:
147:Hendala Point
140:
138:
136:
135:
130:
126:
122:
118:
117:
108:
104:
99:
95:
91:
88:
84:
79:
76:, 1 WLR 1468
75:
72:
68:
57:
53:
50:
47:
43:
40:
37:
33:
29:
24:
19:
16:
468:
425:
399:
382:
369:
356:
355:
343:
328:
314:
302:
290:
276:
261:
249:
238:
192:
188:
183:
179:
167:
165:
160:
144:
132:
115:
114:
113:
48:
15:
361:EWCA Civ 12
482:Categories
96:and Orr LJ
62:1974-02-05
472:1 WLR 277
155:Sri Lanka
70:Citations
348:1 QB 373
307:2 KB 500
197:See also
176:Judgment
101:Keywords
94:James LJ
125:Privity
107:Privity
60: (
55:Decided
320:UKHL 4
283:AC 847
151:Ceylon
461:Notes
432:
404:
389:
333:
266:
153:(now
149:, in
141:Facts
35:Court
442:see
484::
92:,
224:e
217:t
210:v
64:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
