81:
398:
116:
Lord
Hardwicke decided that a third person is entitled to sue if there can be spelt out of the contract an intention by one of the parties to contract as trustee for him, even though nothing was said about any trust in the contract, and there was no trust fund to be administered.
307:
227:
324:
201:
294:
350:
338:
439:
146:
239:
458:
473:
280:
463:
432:
139:
468:
268:
478:
425:
367:
132:
65:
215:
163:
378:
61:
186:
253:
409:
68:. It stands as an example of the flexible approach to privity under the earlier common law.
357:
191:
298:
284:
80:
452:
314:
329:
258:
243:
397:
124:
405:
128:
309:
Woodar
Investment Development Ltd v Wimpey Construction UK Ltd
75:
413:
92:
43:
33:
25:
20:
352:Nisshin Shipping Co Ltd v Cleaves & Co Ltd
203:Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre v Selfridge & Co Ltd
433:
140:
8:
340:Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999
440:
426:
147:
133:
125:
17:
325:Linden Gardens Trust v Lenesta Sludge
240:Scruttons Ltd v Midland Silicones Ltd
7:
394:
392:
358:[2003] EWHC 2602 (Comm)
412:. You can help Knowledge (XXG) by
14:
396:
192:[1861] EWHC J57 (QB)
79:
281:Jackson v Horizon Holidays Ltd
228:Smith and Snipes Hall Farm Ltd
1:
495:
391:
459:English contract case law
364:
347:
336:
321:
304:
291:
277:
269:Dutton v Bognor Regis UDC
265:
250:
236:
224:
212:
198:
183:
171:
160:
155:Privity of contract cases
48:
38:
60:(1756) Ambler 330 is an
474:Court of Chancery cases
368:Privity in English law
315:[1980] UKHL 11
330:[1993] UKHL 4
259:[1967] UKHL 2
219:, 117 N.E. 807 (1917)
164:Dutton v Poole (1678)
379:English contract law
216:De Cicco v Schweizer
62:English contract law
464:1756 in British law
66:privity of contract
187:Tweddle v Atkinson
91:. You can help by
469:1750s in case law
421:
420:
374:
373:
254:Beswick v Beswick
178:(1756) Ambler 330
109:
108:
53:
52:
29:(1756) Ambler 330
486:
442:
435:
428:
400:
393:
353:
341:
310:
204:
175:Tomlinson v Gill
149:
142:
135:
126:
104:
101:
83:
76:
64:case concerning
57:Tomlinson v Gill
21:Tomlinson v Gill
18:
494:
493:
489:
488:
487:
485:
484:
483:
449:
448:
447:
446:
389:
387:
375:
370:
360:
351:
343:
339:
332:
317:
308:
300:
287:
273:
261:
246:
232:
220:
208:
202:
194:
179:
167:
156:
153:
123:
114:
105:
99:
96:
89:needs expansion
74:
12:
11:
5:
492:
490:
482:
481:
479:Case law stubs
476:
471:
466:
461:
451:
450:
445:
444:
437:
430:
422:
419:
418:
401:
386:
383:
382:
381:
372:
371:
365:
362:
361:
348:
345:
344:
337:
334:
333:
322:
319:
318:
305:
302:
301:
292:
289:
288:
278:
275:
274:
266:
263:
262:
251:
248:
247:
237:
234:
233:
225:
222:
221:
213:
210:
209:
199:
196:
195:
184:
181:
180:
172:
169:
168:
161:
158:
157:
154:
152:
151:
144:
137:
129:
122:
119:
113:
110:
107:
106:
86:
84:
73:
70:
51:
50:
46:
45:
41:
40:
39:Lord Hardwicke
36:
35:
31:
30:
27:
23:
22:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
491:
480:
477:
475:
472:
470:
467:
465:
462:
460:
457:
456:
454:
443:
438:
436:
431:
429:
424:
423:
417:
415:
411:
408:article is a
407:
402:
399:
395:
390:
384:
380:
377:
376:
369:
363:
359:
355:
354:
346:
342:
335:
331:
327:
326:
320:
316:
312:
311:
303:
299:
297:
296:
295:The Eurymedon
290:
286:
283:
282:
276:
271:
270:
264:
260:
256:
255:
249:
245:
242:
241:
235:
230:
229:
223:
218:
217:
211:
206:
205:
197:
193:
189:
188:
182:
177:
176:
170:
166:
165:
159:
150:
145:
143:
138:
136:
131:
130:
127:
120:
118:
111:
103:
94:
90:
87:This section
85:
82:
78:
77:
71:
69:
67:
63:
59:
58:
47:
42:
37:
34:Case opinions
32:
28:
24:
19:
16:
414:expanding it
403:
388:
349:
323:
306:
293:
279:
267:
252:
238:
226:
214:
200:
185:
174:
173:
162:
115:
97:
93:adding to it
88:
56:
55:
54:
15:
285:EWCA Civ 12
453:Categories
385:References
100:April 2011
406:case law
272:1 QB 373
231:2 KB 500
121:See also
112:Judgment
44:Keywords
26:Citation
49:Privity
244:UKHL 4
207:AC 847
404:This
356:
328:
313:
257:
190:
72:Facts
410:stub
366:see
95:.
455::
441:e
434:t
427:v
416:.
148:e
141:t
134:v
102:)
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
