82:
24:
284:
225:
newspaper, Jennings said that he “did not resile from his claim about the officials' relationship”, and as a result, Buchanan sued
Jennings in defamation for his comments in the subsequent interview.
228:
Jennings defended the matter, saying that he was merely repeating comments he made in
Parliament, and those original comments were absolutely protected by parliamentary privilege.
210:
who had arranged a sponsorship by the NZWB for a rugby event, in order that he could take his mistress on the tour to carry on their "illicit affair".
299:
92:
289:
262:
294:
81:
151:
216:
Unfortunately for
Buchanan, as this comment was made in Parliament, Jennings was protected by parliamentary privilege.
221:
155:
143:
191:
207:
213:
Whilst he did not name this official, most people knew he was talking about NZWB member Roger
Buchanan.
147:
128:
34:
258:
236:
The court ruled that privilege did not apply in the interview, and so his defence failed.
53:
278:
203:
183:
187:
159:
43:
23:
285:
Judicial
Committee of the Privy Council cases on appeal from New Zealand
17:
182:
NZPC 4; UKPC 36; 2 NZLR 577; 1 AC 115 is a cited case in
219:
However, several months later, during an interview with
48:
38:
103:
Owen Robert
Jennings v Roger Edward Wyndham Buchanan
165:
139:
134:
124:
116:
108:
98:
88:
74:
202:In 1997, during a parliamentary debate, ACT MP
8:
206:made a claim about an unnamed member of the
80:
71:
120:NZPC 4; UKPC 36; 2 NZLR 577; 1 AC 115
245:
93:Judicial Committee of the Privy Council
7:
255:Butterworths Student Companion Torts
14:
22:
300:2004 in United Kingdom case law
1:
257:(4th ed.). LexisNexis.
152:Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe
316:
290:New Zealand tort case law
170:
156:Baroness Hale of Richmond
79:
144:Lord Bingham of Cornhill
295:2004 in New Zealand law
192:parliamentary privilege
37:, as no other articles
129:Privy Council judgment
253:McLay, Geoff (2003).
148:Lord Scott of Foscote
190:and the defence of
179:Jennings v Buchanan
75:Jennings v Buchanan
56:for suggestions.
46:to this page from
175:
174:
70:
69:
307:
269:
268:
250:
135:Court membership
84:
72:
65:
62:
51:
49:related articles
26:
18:
315:
314:
310:
309:
308:
306:
305:
304:
275:
274:
273:
272:
265:
252:
251:
247:
242:
234:
222:The Independent
200:
160:Dame Sian Elias
66:
60:
57:
47:
44:introduce links
27:
12:
11:
5:
313:
311:
303:
302:
297:
292:
287:
277:
276:
271:
270:
263:
244:
243:
241:
238:
233:
230:
199:
196:
173:
172:
168:
167:
163:
162:
141:
140:Judges sitting
137:
136:
132:
131:
126:
122:
121:
118:
114:
113:
110:
106:
105:
100:
99:Full case name
96:
95:
90:
86:
85:
77:
76:
68:
67:
61:September 2015
54:Find link tool
30:
28:
21:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
312:
301:
298:
296:
293:
291:
288:
286:
283:
282:
280:
266:
264:0-408-71686-X
260:
256:
249:
246:
239:
237:
231:
229:
226:
224:
223:
217:
214:
211:
209:
205:
204:Owen Jennings
197:
195:
193:
189:
185:
181:
180:
169:
164:
161:
157:
153:
149:
145:
142:
138:
133:
130:
127:
123:
119:
115:
111:
107:
104:
101:
97:
94:
91:
87:
83:
78:
73:
64:
55:
50:
45:
41:
40:
36:
31:This article
29:
25:
20:
19:
16:
254:
248:
235:
227:
220:
218:
215:
212:
201:
178:
177:
176:
112:14 July 2004
102:
58:
32:
15:
184:New Zealand
279:Categories
240:References
208:Wool Board
198:Background
188:defamation
186:regarding
171:defamation
125:Transcript
52:; try the
39:link to it
42:. Please
166:Keywords
117:Citation
109:Decided
261:
35:orphan
33:is an
89:Court
259:ISBN
232:Held
281::
194:.
158:,
154:,
150:,
146:,
267:.
63:)
59:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
