Knowledge (XXG)

Jordan House Hotel Ltd v Menow

Source 📝

29: 248: 254: 192:
The Supreme Court upheld much of the trial judge's ruling. Ritchie J. found that the hotel was aware of Menow's behaviour yet still assisted him in becoming intoxicated, which they ought to have known might result in danger to Menow. This awareness should have "seized them with a duty to be careful
173:
Menow had a reputation of behaving badly and was banned from the Jordan House Hotel for drunken behavior. Eventually he was allowed back and was allowed to be served alcohol on the condition that he be escorted by a responsible adult. On a later night he went to the hotel bar but was abandoned by
188:
At trial, the court held that the hotel violated a common law duty of care to protect patrons from "danger of personal injury, foreseeable as a result of the eviction". The duty, the trial judge found, could have easily been discharged by calling the police or arrange for a safe way home.
193:
not to serve him with repeated drinks after the effects of what he had already consumed should have been obvious." The breach of duty was a result of both a failure to protect Menow once he became intoxicated and a failure to ensure he did not become intoxicated in the first place.
174:
his escort for three hours while he was served drinks. He became extremely intoxicated and began to harass other patrons. Menow was soon ejected from the hotel bar and started to make his way home down a highway but was hit by a car.
170:
on the commercial host liability where the Court held that a bar owner has a duty to reasonably ensure their intoxicated patrons are able to make it home safely.
297: 226: 316: 230: 326: 321: 290: 331: 283: 167: 68: 34: 123: 28: 155:
Fauteux CJ and Abbott, Hall and Pigeon JJ took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
211: 92: 267: 203: 247: 103: 119: 111: 107: 99: 310: 50: 263: 182: 127: 115: 185:
by serving him alcohol and not ensuring he was safe when he left the hotel.
178: 271: 146: 138: 133: 83: 75: 59: 49: 42: 21: 291: 177:Menow brought an action against the hotel in 8: 298: 284: 142:Laskin J, joined by Martland and Spence JJ 18: 166:(1973) is a landmark decision of the 7: 243: 241: 270:. You can help Knowledge (XXG) by 14: 252: 246: 27: 163:Jordan House Hotel Ltd v Menow 22:Jordan House Hotel Ltd v Menow 1: 317:Supreme Court of Canada cases 150:Ritchie J, joined by Judson J 16:Supreme Court of Canada case 43:Hearing: 8–9 November 1972 348: 240: 65:Menow v. Honsberger et al. 327:1973 in Canadian case law 225:Full text of decision at 154: 88: 26: 168:Supreme Court of Canada 35:Supreme Court of Canada 322:Canadian tort case law 124:Louis-Philippe Pigeon 181:for violating their 71: (27 April 1970) 45:Judgment: 7 May 1973 262:This article about 212:Childs v Desormeaux 332:Canadian law stubs 279: 278: 159: 158: 339: 300: 293: 286: 258: 257: 256: 255: 250: 242: 204:Stewart v Pettie 97:Puisne Justices: 84:Court membership 79:Appeal dismissed 31: 19: 347: 346: 342: 341: 340: 338: 337: 336: 307: 306: 305: 304: 253: 251: 245: 238: 222: 199: 104:Ronald Martland 95: 44: 38: 17: 12: 11: 5: 345: 343: 335: 334: 329: 324: 319: 309: 308: 303: 302: 295: 288: 280: 277: 276: 259: 234: 233: 221: 220:External links 218: 217: 216: 208: 198: 195: 157: 156: 152: 151: 148: 144: 143: 140: 136: 135: 131: 130: 120:Wishart Spence 112:Roland Ritchie 108:Wilfred Judson 100:Douglas Abbott 93:Gérald Fauteux 90:Chief Justice: 86: 85: 81: 80: 77: 73: 72: 69:1970 CanLII 47 61: 57: 56: 53: 47: 46: 40: 39: 32: 24: 23: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 344: 333: 330: 328: 325: 323: 320: 318: 315: 314: 312: 301: 296: 294: 289: 287: 282: 281: 275: 273: 269: 265: 260: 249: 244: 239: 236: 232: 228: 224: 223: 219: 214: 213: 209: 206: 205: 201: 200: 196: 194: 190: 186: 184: 180: 175: 171: 169: 165: 164: 153: 149: 145: 141: 137: 134:Reasons given 132: 129: 125: 121: 117: 113: 109: 105: 101: 98: 94: 91: 87: 82: 78: 74: 70: 66: 62: 60:Prior history 58: 54: 52: 48: 41: 37: 36: 30: 25: 20: 272:expanding it 264:Canadian law 261: 237: 235: 210: 207:1 S.C.R. 131 202: 191: 187: 183:duty of care 176: 172: 162: 161: 160: 96: 89: 64: 63:APPEAL from 33: 147:Concurrence 128:Bora Laskin 116:Emmett Hall 311:Categories 227:canlii.org 215:1 SCR 643 51:Citations 197:See also 139:Majority 67:, 55:SCR 239 76:Ruling 266:is a 231:lexum 268:stub 229:and 179:tort 313:: 126:, 122:, 118:, 114:, 110:, 106:, 102:, 299:e 292:t 285:v 274:.

Index

Supreme Court of Canada
Supreme Court of Canada
Citations
1970 CanLII 47
Gérald Fauteux
Douglas Abbott
Ronald Martland
Wilfred Judson
Roland Ritchie
Emmett Hall
Wishart Spence
Louis-Philippe Pigeon
Bora Laskin
Supreme Court of Canada
tort
duty of care
Stewart v Pettie
Childs v Desormeaux
canlii.org
lexum
Flag of Canada
Canadian law
stub
expanding it
v
t
e
Categories
Supreme Court of Canada cases
Canadian tort case law

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.