38:
154:
256:
held ‘the assured is under a duty of disclosure… extent of the duty is the matter in controversy.’ You could have a duty to disclose everything you think is material, everything a reasonable person thinks is, everything the particular insurer thinks is, or everything a reasonable or prudent insurer
244:
and was fined £25. The Co-op issued the policy. Mr
Lambert was convicted of two more dishonesty offences in 1971 and sentenced to 15 months jail. Mrs Lambert did not reveal this either when the policy was renewed in 1972. In April 1972 some items worth £311 were lost or stolen and the Co-op refused
261:. Because there is no difference between this insurance and marine insurance in principle, it should be the latter. He did however say the law was unsatisfactory and the Co-op were doing ‘a heartless thing… but that is their business, not mine.’
59:
357:
240:
Mrs
Lambert signed a proposal form for ‘All Risks’ insurance over her husband’s jewelry, without mentioning her husband was convicted previously of receiving 1730 stolen
290:
539:
373:
549:
110:
82:
477:
283:
89:
544:
319:
96:
129:
78:
519:
503:
276:
225:
489:
408:
63:
396:
436:
480:
464:
48:
450:
386:
103:
67:
52:
258:
253:
185:
493:
514:
221:
197:
17:
331:
206:
440:
307:
426:
412:
533:
422:
468:
454:
343:
363:
347:
37:
241:
229:
268:
201:
153:
272:
31:
228:. It is an example of the operation of a positive duty of
359:
Hedley Byrne & Co Ltd v Heller & Partners Ltd
191:
181:
176:
168:
160:
144:
284:
8:
217:Lambert v Co-operative Insurance Society Ltd
146:Lambert v Co-operative Insurance Society Ltd
375:Car and Universal Finance Co Ltd v Caldwell
66:. Unsourced material may be challenged and
291:
277:
269:
152:
141:
130:Learn how and when to remove this message
245:on the basis of a failure to disclose.
79:"Lambert v Co-op Insurance Society Ltd"
478:Unfair Commercial Practices Directive
7:
320:Erlanger v New Sombrero Phosphate Co
64:adding citations to reliable sources
540:English misrepresentation case law
25:
520:Misrepresentation in English law
504:Misrepresentation in English law
36:
550:1975 in United Kingdom case law
490:Unfair Trading Regulations 2008
409:Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Mardon
1:
397:Lambert v Co-op Insurance Ltd
18:Lambert v Co-op Insurance Ltd
437:Royscot Trust Ltd v Rogerson
232:in contracts for insurance.
545:High Court of Justice cases
465:Shogun Finance Ltd v Hudson
566:
451:Saamco v York Montague Ltd
387:Misrepresentation Act 1967
501:
487:
475:
461:
447:
433:
419:
405:
393:
384:
370:
354:
340:
328:
316:
304:
299:Misrepresentation sources
259:Marine Insurance Act 1906
196:
151:
27:English contract law case
257:thinks is, like in s 18
220:2 Lloyd’s Rep 485 is an
323:(1878) 3 App Cas 1218
515:English contract law
222:English contract law
60:improve this article
311:(1766) 3 Burr 1905
510:
509:
400:2 Lloyd's Rep 485
226:misrepresentation
213:
212:
198:Misrepresentation
172:2 Lloyd’s Rep 485
140:
139:
132:
114:
16:(Redirected from
557:
376:
360:
335:(1881) 20 Ch D 1
293:
286:
279:
270:
224:case concerning
177:Court membership
156:
142:
135:
128:
124:
121:
115:
113:
72:
40:
32:
21:
565:
564:
560:
559:
558:
556:
555:
554:
530:
529:
528:
511:
506:
497:
483:
471:
457:
443:
429:
415:
401:
389:
380:
374:
366:
358:
350:
336:
332:Redgrave v Hurd
324:
312:
300:
297:
267:
251:
238:
207:uberrimae fidei
136:
125:
119:
116:
73:
71:
57:
41:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
563:
561:
553:
552:
547:
542:
532:
531:
527:
524:
523:
522:
517:
508:
507:
502:
499:
498:
488:
485:
484:
476:
473:
472:
462:
459:
458:
448:
445:
444:
434:
431:
430:
420:
417:
416:
406:
403:
402:
394:
391:
390:
385:
382:
381:
371:
368:
367:
355:
352:
351:
341:
338:
337:
329:
326:
325:
317:
314:
313:
308:Carter v Boehm
305:
302:
301:
298:
296:
295:
288:
281:
273:
266:
263:
250:
247:
237:
234:
211:
210:
194:
193:
189:
188:
183:
179:
178:
174:
173:
170:
166:
165:
162:
158:
157:
149:
148:
138:
137:
44:
42:
35:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
562:
551:
548:
546:
543:
541:
538:
537:
535:
525:
521:
518:
516:
513:
512:
505:
500:
495:
491:
486:
482:
479:
474:
470:
467:
466:
460:
456:
453:
452:
446:
442:
439:
438:
432:
428:
425:
424:
423:East v Maurer
418:
414:
411:
410:
404:
399:
398:
392:
388:
383:
378:
377:
369:
365:
362:
361:
353:
349:
346:
345:
339:
334:
333:
327:
322:
321:
315:
310:
309:
303:
294:
289:
287:
282:
280:
275:
274:
271:
264:
262:
260:
255:
248:
246:
243:
235:
233:
231:
227:
223:
219:
218:
209:
208:
203:
199:
195:
190:
187:
184:
182:Judge sitting
180:
175:
171:
167:
163:
159:
155:
150:
147:
143:
134:
131:
123:
112:
109:
105:
102:
98:
95:
91:
88:
84:
81: –
80:
76:
75:Find sources:
69:
65:
61:
55:
54:
50:
45:This article
43:
39:
34:
33:
30:
19:
494:SI 2008/1277
463:
449:
435:
421:
407:
395:
372:
356:
344:Derry v Peek
342:
330:
318:
306:
252:
239:
216:
215:
214:
205:
145:
126:
117:
107:
100:
93:
86:
74:
58:Please help
46:
29:
441:EWCA Civ 12
534:Categories
481:2005/29/EC
427:EWCA Civ 6
413:EWCA Civ 4
254:Mackenna J
242:cigarettes
230:good faith
186:MacKenna J
164:High Court
120:March 2020
90:newspapers
249:Judgement
202:insurance
47:does not
379:1 QB 525
265:See also
192:Keywords
169:Citation
469:UKHL 62
455:UKHL 10
104:scholar
68:removed
53:sources
364:UKHL 4
348:UKHL 1
106:
99:
92:
85:
77:
526:Notes
236:Facts
161:Court
111:JSTOR
97:books
83:news
51:any
49:cite
62:by
536::
204:,
200:,
496:)
492:(
292:e
285:t
278:v
133:)
127:(
122:)
118:(
108:·
101:·
94:·
87:·
70:.
56:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
