Knowledge (XXG)

Competence (law)

Source 📝

1047:. As such, if a defendant is found competent to stand trial, they are also competent to waive their right to counsel. Therefore, competence to waive counsel is based on whether the criminal defendant does so knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily. In order for the waiver to be knowing, the criminal defendant must understand the right that they are waiving. In order for the waiver to be intelligent, the criminal defendant should understand the disadvantages of waiving their right to counsel and representing themselves. In order for the waiver to be voluntary, there should be no presence of coercion, and a defendant should opt to waive their right due to their own free will. 759:, also known as the forced patenting act. This Act further amended the GAA to give the Secretary of the Interior the power to issue allottees a patent in fee simple to people classified ‘competent and capable.’ The criteria for this determination is unclear but meant that allottees deemed ‘competent’ by the Secretary of the Interior would have their land taken out of trust status, subject to taxation, and could be sold by the allottee. 43: 844:. Competency refers to a witness' capacity to accurately relay the details of the event, but credibility refers to the likelihood of truthfulness in his testimony. While competency to testify is determined by the trial judge, the credibility (e.g., truthfulness) of that testimony is weighed by a jury. Historically, witness competency rules in most American states prohibited testimony by slaves and free blacks. 675: 829:. Groups most likely to trigger a competency issue are children (especially under 10 years old), people with intellectual or developmental disabilities, people with mental illnesses, and people who have abused substances. Before 1975, certain populations (e.g., children) had to prove competency in order to testify, however this changed after the addition of Rule 601 in the 1034:, the Supreme Court determined that criminal defendants have a right to waive this Sixth Amendment right and represent themselves in criminal proceedings, even if it is disadvantageous to the criminal defendant to do so. In order to waive their right to counsel, a criminal defendant must be found competent to do so. 589:, is whether the accused "has sufficient present ability to consult with his lawyer with a reasonable degree of rational understanding—and whether he has a rational as well as factual understanding of the proceedings against him." Being determined incompetent is substantially different from undertaking an 593:; competence regards the defendant's state of mind at the time of the trial, while insanity regards his state of mind at the time of the crime. In New York a hearing on competence to stand trial may be referred to as a "730 exam", after the law that governs the conduct of the exam, New York CPL Sec. 730. 861:
Witnesses must have been able to observe the event to which they testify. This standard is usually met, unless the witness has visual or hearing impairments which make observing the event difficult (see Williams v. State (2010) where witness testimony was called into questions because of their visual
1050:
When forensic evaluators determine if a defendant is competent to waive their right to counsel and self-represent, they also pay attention to the defendant's reasoning for waiving their right to counsel. To be found competent by a forensic evaluator, criminal defendants should have a rational reason
1001:
or thought-process underscoring the patient's decision. The patient must be able to rationally weigh the benefits and risks associated with their medical condition, consenting to treatment, assessing alternative treatments, and/or refusing treatment. An evaluator may question a patient's competence
976:
how that information may apply to them. This aspect is more than understanding the information in the abstract; the patient should be able to appreciate the consequences of a) consenting to the treatment, b) investigating alternate treatment options, or c) refusing the treatment, and how they would
879:
This is related to a witness' ability to utilize language and organize the details of the event by time and space. This is more difficult for young children who do not have a mastery of the language and may have trouble recalling event details in order. For people who have physical or developmental
852:
Competency to testify is decided by the judge and rarely requires formal evaluation because the threshold is low; judges often use their own discretion without expert input. Instead, judges use several basic criteria to decide if a witness has the capacity to testify: ability to observe, ability to
775:
due to his unlawful presence in the country. In these situations, non-citizens are placed in immigration court hearings where "immigration judges determine whether respondents should be ordered removed from the United States or granted relief or protection from removal... and permitted to remain in
896:
to tell the truth in the courtroom. Most people, children included, understand that they must tell the truth on the witness stand, even though they might have different motivations for so doing. Even young children can distinguish truth and lies, and do not lie any more frequently than adults do.
1042:
Faretta v. California specified that the competency to waive the right to counsel should not be determined based on the criminal defendant's understanding of legal jargon. Criminal defendants have a right to represent themselves even if they do not understand all legal jargon. In other words, a
503:
concerns the mental capacity of an individual to participate in legal proceedings or transactions, and the mental condition a person must have to be responsible for his or her decisions or acts. Competence is an attribute that is decision-specific. Depending on various factors which typically
870:
Research suggests that for witnesses, the two biggest problems that might interfere with their ability to remember the event are time and age. The more time that passes between the event and their recollection, the more difficult it will be for them to accurately recall the event. Also, young
762:
The Act of June 25, 1910 further amends the GAA to give the Secretary of the Interior the power to sell the land of deceased allottees or issue patent and fee to legal heirs. This decision is based on a determination made by the Secretary of Interior whether the legal heirs are ‘competent’ or
792:
but in the case that there is evidence of incompetency in the non-citizen, there are two instances where it differs. The first being that the court hearing may proceed regardless if the individual lacks "the competency to participate meaningfully in them" as long as there is the appropriate
1083:
In order to obtain evidence in criminal cases, the ability for law enforcement to conduct searches and/or seizures can be implemented. The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution states, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against
780:
where they have "a rational and factual understanding of the nature and object of the proceedings, can consult with the attorney or representative if there is one, and has a reasonable opportunity to examine and present evidence and cross-examine witnesses." The language in
2498: 515:
may be appointed by a court for a person who satisfies the state's tests for general incompetence, and the guardian or conservator exercises the incompetent's rights for the incompetent. Defendants who do not possess sufficient "competence" are usually excluded from
862:
impairment). Research with children and observational capacity has found that even though young children often struggle to understand and make meaning from the complex interactions they witness, it does not inhibit their ability to report what they observed.
1054:
Despite the fact that a criminal defendant has a right to proceed pro se, if a criminal defendant is incompetent due to a severe mental illness, they will be required to accept counsel even if they do not want counsel, a ruling by the Supreme Court in
1006:) is thought as less important than something relatively minor (e.g., hair loss). If the decision to refuse treatment appears to stem directly from mental illness, this may indicate a patient's decision-making process is not rational or reasonable. 504:
revolve around mental function integrity, an individual may or may not be competent to make a particular medical decision, a particular contractual agreement, to execute an effective deed to real property, or to execute a will having certain terms.
1043:
criminal defendant may be competent to represent him/herself even if they would do so poorly. Rather, the competency standard for the right to waive counsel is the same standard as competency to stand trial, a decision by the Supreme Court in
1084:
unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
776:
the country." Like in other court proceedings, competency can be raised by either parties or the judge if the non-citizen exhibits questionable capacity. In this particular setting, non-citizens are presumed to be competent as determined by
607:
A ruling of incompetence may later be reversed. A defendant may recover from a mental illness or disability, and a court may require a defendant to undergo treatment in an effort to render him competent to stand trial. For example, in 1989,
1305: 661:. The court ruled in his favor, stating that a forensic professional must make that competency evaluation and, if the inmate is found incompetent, must provide treatment to aid in his gaining competency so the execution can take place. 1087:
A search is conducted when law enforcement personnel are looking for evidence that might be useful in a case. A seizure is when law enforcement personnel actually take items from a person or scene to further investigate their case.
1075:. It is important to note, however, that pro se defendants are not required to have a standby counsel nor are they granted the right to have a standby counsel. The decision to appoint a standby counsel is in the hands of the court. 616:
was found mentally incompetent to stand trial following the murder of his estranged girlfriend. But years later, as he had attended college and received good grades, this ruling was reversed, and he was ordered to stand trial.
929:, their competence may be questioned. Still, adults from these more vulnerable populations are not incompetent by default and their competence should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. There are specific tools that a 1349: 989:, but believe that in their case, they are not mentally ill and taking this medicine would make them catatonic. In this case, the patient lacks the ability to appreciate the consequences of their decisions. 727:
Generally, in the United States, a person has the capacity or competence to make the decision to enter into a contract if he can understand and appreciate, to the extent relevant, all of the following:
948:
A patient should be able to understand any relevant information about their treatment or medical condition which would be disclosed to them during informed consent. If a patient does not possess the
209: 1887: 833:
which states “every person is competent to be a witness, except as otherwise provided in these rules." This sets a standard that individuals cannot be excluded from testifying based merely on age,
952:
to understand the information disclosed to them, they may not be competent to make treatment decisions. Some adults who may lack this ability to understand might be patients who suffer from
2499:"AAPL Practice Guideline for the Forensic Psychiatric Evaluation of Competence to Stand Trial – Mossman et al. 35 (4): S3 – Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online" 1822: 2433: 579:. If the court determines that a defendant's mental condition makes him unable to understand the proceedings, or that he is unable to help in his defense, he is found incompetent. The 2468:. John Petrila, Norman Godfrey Poythress, Christopher Slobogin, Randy K. Otto, Douglas Mossman, Lois Oberlander Condie (4th ed.). New York: The Guilford Press. pp. 162–164. 1091:
Law enforcement can request to search a person or location if they are given consent by the person in question, and a search may be conducted without consent if permitted by a
597: 1378: 837:, or mental illness. An individual may be deemed incompetent to testify as a witness if his testimony is found to be irrelevant or misleading, or if he cannot be truthful. 1019: 53: 1068: 1027: 793:
safeguards in place to ensure a fair trial. Secondly, because a non-citizen lacks the entitlements of a citizen, he is not entitled to counsel in removal proceedings.
1747:"Ensuring a Fair Hearing for Litigants with Mental Illnesses: The Law and Psychology of Capacity, Admissibility, and Credibility Assessments in Civil Proceedings" 601: 2147:
Grisso, Thomas; Appelbaum, Paul S.; Hill-Fotouhi, Carolyn (1997). "The MacCAT-T: a Clinical Tool to Assess Patients' Capacities to Make Treatment Decisions".
805:
in a trial are generally found to be competent unless proven otherwise. However, questions of competency can be raised regarding any person who might issue a
1275:, the term "fitness to plead" is used, as in designating a person "unfit to plead". The concept is identical to "competence", although detailed law differs. 940:
If competence to make treatment decisions is questioned, the individual's understanding, appreciation, and decision-making process may be evaluated.  
921:
and treatment. In the context of informed consent, most adults are assumed to be competent unless otherwise specified, but should they suffer from severe
600:
considered the legal standards for determining competence to stand trial and to waive counsel using the standards of objective unreasonableness under the
1788:
Valenti-Hein, D. C., & Schwartz, L. D. (1993). Witness competency in people with mental retardation: implications for prosecution of sexual abuse.
871:
children are more susceptible to outside influences and have a more difficult time remembering the details of the events compared to older children.
626: 486: 2473: 1577: 748: 1399: 1051:
for waiving their rights. Irrational reasons include defeatist attitudes, fantastic objectives, paranoid ideation, or irrational beliefs.
2050:
Melton, Gary B.; Petrila, John; Poythress, Norman G.; Slobogin, Christopher; Otto, Randy K.; Mossman, Douglass; Condie, Lois O. (2017).
1639:
Melton, Gary B.; Petrila, John; Poythress, Norman G.; Slobogin, Christopher; Otto, Randy K.; Mossman, Douglass; Condie, Lois O. (2017).
2059: 1648: 1015: 714: 692: 87: 738:(c) The significant risks, benefits, and reasonable alternatives involved in the decision. See, e.g., California Probate Code §812. 917:) may be identified in their stead. Competence to make treatment decisions stems from legal precedent about the right to refuse 543:
is used to describe persons who should not undergo or partake in certain judicial processes, and also for those who lack mental
1516: 1272: 696: 772: 2538: 394: 359: 262: 2182:
Wang, Shi-Bin; Wang, Yuan-Yuan; Ungvari, Gabor S.; Ng, Chee H.; Wu, Ren-Rong; Wang, Jijun; Xiang, Yu-Tao (2017-05-01).
1310: 1300: 972:
A patient should then be able to not only understand information about their treatment or medical condition, but also
934: 654: 580: 572: 909:
for medical treatment. Incompetent individuals cannot provide informed consent, so other decision-makers (such as a
69: 2184:"The MacArthur Competence Assessment Tools for assessing decision-making capacity in schizophrenia: A meta-analysis" 2548: 2543: 479: 369: 685: 830: 735:(b) The probable consequences for the decisionmaker and, where appropriate, the persons affected by the decision. 272: 161: 884:, a speech therapist was permitted to translate for a victim with cerebral palsy who had difficulty testifying. 1264: 399: 2553: 1106: 961: 926: 1294: 1206: 1118: 918: 787: 613: 585: 354: 214: 176: 156: 2533: 1762: 1230: 1142: 1031: 771:
In the United States, legal proceedings in immigration court typically revolves around the removal of a
472: 325: 229: 199: 194: 65: 335: 2465:
Psychological evaluations for the courts : a handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers
2183: 1699: 1174: 1198: 834: 310: 295: 238: 151: 146: 131: 2434:"The Role of Standby Counsel in Criminal Cases: In the Twilight Zone of the Criminal Justice System" 1422:""We Can Not Get a Living as We Used To": Dispossession and the White Earth Anishinaabeg, 1889-1920" 1330: 1190: 1072: 315: 1962:"Thinking about Fantasy: Are Children Fundamentally Different Thinkers and Believers from Adults?" 2219: 1989: 1449: 1238: 1222: 1158: 1126: 1056: 822: 658: 641: 576: 451: 300: 257: 219: 2052:
Psychological Evaluations for the Courts: a Handbook for Mental Health Professionals and Lawyers
1641:
Psychological Evaluations for the Courts: a Handbook for Mental Health Professionals and Lawyers
2244:"Competency and the Capacity to Make Treatment Decisions: a Primer for Primary Care Physicians" 571:, the right to not be prosecuted while one is incompetent to stand trial has been ruled by the 2479: 2469: 2281: 2263: 2211: 2203: 2164: 2055: 1997: 1981: 1842: 1754: 1750: 1727: 1719: 1644: 1583: 1573: 1441: 1214: 1134: 609: 568: 416: 379: 374: 320: 305: 204: 2271: 2255: 2195: 2156: 1973: 1834: 1711: 1433: 1258: 1182: 1166: 1044: 1023: 914: 906: 590: 528: 411: 389: 364: 267: 247: 141: 2299: 1601: 1775: 1289: 922: 893: 880:
disabilities, accommodations may be made based on the court's discretion. For example, in
826: 512: 384: 252: 185: 171: 937:
to make treatment decisions, such as the MacArthur Competency Assessment Tool-Treatment.
751:
could use land allotted to them from the General Allotment Act (GAA), also known as the
2405: 2328: 2123: 2099: 2075: 1284: 1150: 1092: 910: 818: 556: 544: 508: 330: 224: 103: 2276: 2243: 1715: 2527: 986: 982: 732:(a) The rights, duties, and responsibilities created by, or affected by the decision. 166: 136: 27:
Ability to understand the nature and effect of the act in which the person is engaged
1071:, a court may decide to appoint a standby counsel, a ruling by the Supreme Court in 555:
and other personal matters such as consenting to medical treatment, etc. and need a
2223: 1297:, regarding the competences of the European Union versus those of its member states 930: 636: 460: 446: 31: 17: 1860: 2199: 1936: 1669: 2381: 1911: 1098:
Voluntary consent is considered to be consent given that is free from coercion.
881: 841: 674: 524: 523:, while witnesses found not to possess requisite competence cannot testify. The 520: 1067:
If a defendant is found competent to waive their right to counsel and proceeds
1838: 1745:
Cremin, Kevin M.; Philips, Jean; Sickinger, Claudia; Zelhof, Jeanette (2009).
1306:
United States federal laws governing offenders with mental diseases or defects
1110: 1003: 426: 405: 2483: 2267: 2207: 1985: 1846: 1723: 1587: 1445: 1268: 998: 810: 806: 756: 752: 650: 632: 552: 455: 126: 2285: 2215: 1746: 2463: 2168: 2160: 2001: 1731: 1567: 2357: 2259: 978: 957: 548: 436: 1569:
Forensic psychology : research, clinical practice, and applications
1474: 905:
In the United States, an individual must be deemed competent to provide
1993: 1961: 1453: 1421: 953: 814: 802: 699: in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. 646: 344: 281: 1492: 1977: 1664: 1662: 1660: 1437: 639:
to determine if punishment can be carried out. This is a result of
2054:(4th ed.). New York: Guilford Publications. pp. 468–486. 1643:(4th ed.). New York: Guilford Publications. pp. 468–486. 853:
remember, ability to communicate, and ability to remain truthful.
517: 1888:"Testimonial Competence of Children | Office of Justice Programs" 892:
Witnesses must be able to distinguish between truth and lies and
2503:
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
1026:. However, some defendants want to waive this right and proceed 441: 1541: 30:
For the concept of authority to make legal pronouncements, see
1912:"People v. Miller, 247 A.D.2d 674 | Casetext Search + Citator" 668: 111: 36: 52:
deal primarily with the United States and do not represent a
2248:
Primary Care Companion to the Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
1861:"Williams v. State, 416 Md. 670 | Casetext Search + Citator" 1113:
in the United States. The landmark cases are the following:
801:
In the United States, individuals who want to testify as a
755:. The practice was used after 1906 with the passing of the 1354:
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
1400:"California Probate Code Part 17. Legal Mental Capacity" 981:
which are out of touch with reality may understand that
1572:(2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. 1010:
Competence to waive right to counsel and self-represent
61: 1937:"Rule 603. Oath or Affirmation to Testify Truthfully" 2352: 2350: 2348: 1823:"Free Black Witnesses in the Antebellum Upper South" 747:
Competency was used to determine whether individual
598:
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1704:
Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry
1700:"The Child as Witness: Competency and Credibility" 2045: 2043: 2041: 2039: 2037: 2035: 2033: 2031: 2358:"Waiver/Forfeiture of Right to Counsel | NC PRO" 2029: 2027: 2025: 2023: 2021: 2019: 2017: 2015: 2013: 2011: 1693: 1691: 1689: 977:be directly impacted. A patient who experiences 635:has a right to be evaluated for competency by a 1517:"Unlawful Presence and Inadmissibility | USCIS" 2457: 2455: 2453: 2451: 2427: 2425: 1882: 1880: 1634: 1632: 1630: 1628: 1626: 1624: 1622: 2323: 2321: 2319: 602:Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act 480: 50:The examples and perspective in this article 8: 2329:"Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975)" 2076:"Sell v. United States, 539 U.S. 166 (2003)" 1670:"Rule 601. Competency to Testify in General" 1002:if some substantial consequence (e.g., limb 997:This aspect of competence is related to the 2237: 2235: 2233: 1808:The Florida Bar's Evidence: Ch. 5 Witnesses 1350:"Standards for Determination of Competence" 763:‘incompetent’ to manage their own affairs. 2406:"McKaskle v. Wiggins, 465 U.S. 168 (1984)" 1079:Competence to consent to search or seizure 985:medication is a traditional treatment for 487: 473: 99: 2275: 2100:"Jackson v. Indiana, 406 U.S. 715 (1972)" 1542:"Executive Office for Immigration Review" 715:Learn how and when to remove this message 88:Learn how and when to remove this message 2124:"Riggins v. Nevada, 504 U.S. 127 (1992)" 1331:"People v Hasenflue, 48 AD3d 888 (2008)" 1322: 657:, declaring he was not competent to be 627:Capital punishment in the United States 424: 343: 280: 237: 184: 118: 102: 1771: 1760: 1348:Kissin, Miriam; Towers, Karin (2007). 901:Competence to make treatment decisions 2509:(Supplement 4). www.jaapl.org: S3–S72 1109:has been developed through a body of 840:Witness competency is different from 7: 697:adding citations to reliable sources 848:Criteria for Determining Competency 665:Competence to enter into a contract 499:In United States and Canadian law, 2497:Mossman, Douglas (December 2007). 993:Reasonable decision-making process 25: 2386:LII / Legal Information Institute 2304:LII / Legal Information Institute 1941:LII / Legal Information Institute 1806:Burhans, Glenn; Smitha, Bridget. 1674:LII / Legal Information Institute 1379:"Ford v. Wainwright 477 U.S. 399" 1821:Eisner, Eric (12 October 2023). 1481:. Indian Land Tenure Foundation. 785:is similar and holds aspects to 673: 41: 1960:Woolley, Jacqueline D. (1997). 743:Competence and Native Americans 684:needs additional citations for 2438:New York University Law Review 1935:Staff, L. I. I. (2011-11-30). 1698:Nurcombe, BARRY (1986-07-01). 1426:The American Historical Review 1: 1716:10.1016/S0002-7138(10)60004-0 1602:"BIA Precedent Chart REF-END" 1022:grants criminal defendants a 2200:10.1016/j.schres.2016.11.020 395:Declaration against interest 263:Self-authenticating document 1301:Suitable age and discretion 655:United States Supreme Court 575:to be guaranteed under the 573:United States Supreme Court 64:, discuss the issue on the 2570: 1420:Meyer, Melissa L. (1991). 1256: 1016:United States Constitution 888:Ability to remain truthful 624: 507:Depending on the state, a 29: 1839:10.1017/S0738248023000408 1566:Huss, Matthew T. (2014). 1265:laws of England and Wales 962:intellectual disabilities 927:intellectual disabilities 831:Federal Rules of Evidence 767:Competence and Immigrants 653:who took his case to the 621:Competence to be executed 563:Competence to stand trial 559:to handle their affairs. 273:Hague Evidence Convention 162:Eyewitness identification 2462:Melton, Gary B. (2018). 2242:Leo, Raphael J. (1999). 1790:Sexuality and Disability 1402:. California Legislature 821:) and can occur in both 400:Present sense impression 210:Public policy exclusions 1107:Adjudicative competence 882:People v. Miller (1988) 2188:Schizophrenia Research 1827:Law and History Review 1770:Cite journal requires 1295:Principle of conferral 1119:Dusky v. United States 919:psychiatric medication 875:Ability to communicate 788:Dusky v. United States 614:Stratford, Connecticut 586:Dusky v. United States 177:Consciousness of guilt 2432:Poulin, Anne (2000). 2161:10.1176/ps.48.11.1415 1311:Competency evaluation 1231:Sell v. United States 1143:Faretta v. California 1032:Faretta v. California 797:Competence to Testify 581:competency evaluation 326:Recorded recollection 2382:"Indiana v. Edwards" 2260:10.4088/PCC.v01n0501 2149:Psychiatric Services 1381:. Cornell Law School 1207:Medina v. California 1199:Washington v. Harper 835:cognitive impairment 773:non-citizen national 693:improve this article 645:, a case filed by a 360:in United States law 70:create a new article 62:improve this article 2539:Forensic psychology 1191:McKaskle v. Wiggins 1102:Competency case law 1073:McKaskle v. Wiggins 1038:Competency standard 935:evaluate competence 866:Ability to remember 583:, as determined in 200:Laying a foundation 18:Legally incompetent 1239:Indiana v. Edwards 1223:Cooper v. Oklahoma 1159:Ford v. Wainwright 1127:Jackson v. Indiana 1057:Indiana v. Edwards 857:Ability to observe 642:Ford v. Wainwright 577:due process clause 456:trusts and estates 336:Dead Man's Statute 301:Direct examination 258:Best evidence rule 2549:Criminal defenses 2544:Mental health law 2475:978-1-4625-3266-7 2362:ncpro.sog.unc.edu 2300:"Sixth Amendment" 2155:(11): 1415–1419. 1966:Child Development 1749:. Rochester, NY. 1579:978-1-118-55413-5 1215:Riggins v. Nevada 1135:Drope v. Missouri 915:health care proxy 725: 724: 717: 610:Kenneth L. Curtis 569:United States law 497: 496: 417:Implied assertion 380:Dying declaration 375:Excited utterance 321:Proffer agreement 306:Cross-examination 119:Types of evidence 98: 97: 90: 72:, as appropriate. 16:(Redirected from 2561: 2518: 2517: 2515: 2514: 2494: 2488: 2487: 2459: 2446: 2445: 2429: 2420: 2419: 2417: 2416: 2402: 2396: 2395: 2393: 2392: 2378: 2372: 2371: 2369: 2368: 2354: 2343: 2342: 2340: 2339: 2325: 2314: 2313: 2311: 2310: 2296: 2290: 2289: 2279: 2239: 2228: 2227: 2179: 2173: 2172: 2144: 2138: 2137: 2135: 2134: 2120: 2114: 2113: 2111: 2110: 2096: 2090: 2089: 2087: 2086: 2072: 2066: 2065: 2047: 2006: 2005: 1957: 1951: 1950: 1948: 1947: 1932: 1926: 1925: 1923: 1922: 1908: 1902: 1901: 1899: 1898: 1884: 1875: 1874: 1872: 1871: 1857: 1851: 1850: 1818: 1812: 1811: 1803: 1797: 1786: 1780: 1779: 1773: 1768: 1766: 1758: 1742: 1736: 1735: 1695: 1684: 1683: 1681: 1680: 1666: 1655: 1654: 1636: 1617: 1616: 1614: 1613: 1598: 1592: 1591: 1563: 1557: 1556: 1554: 1553: 1538: 1532: 1531: 1529: 1528: 1513: 1507: 1506: 1504: 1503: 1489: 1483: 1482: 1475:"History – ILTF" 1471: 1465: 1464: 1462: 1460: 1417: 1411: 1410: 1408: 1407: 1396: 1390: 1389: 1387: 1386: 1375: 1369: 1368: 1366: 1365: 1345: 1339: 1338: 1327: 1259:Fitness to plead 1183:Estelle v. Smith 1175:Pate v. Robinson 1167:Godinez v. Moran 1045:Godinez v. Moran 1024:right to counsel 960:, or those with 923:mental illnesses 907:informed consent 749:Native Americans 720: 713: 709: 706: 700: 677: 669: 591:insanity defense 529:fitness to plead 489: 482: 475: 412:Learned treatise 390:Ancient document 370:Business records 268:Ancient document 248:Chain of custody 100: 93: 86: 82: 79: 73: 45: 44: 37: 21: 2569: 2568: 2564: 2563: 2562: 2560: 2559: 2558: 2524: 2523: 2522: 2521: 2512: 2510: 2496: 2495: 2491: 2476: 2461: 2460: 2449: 2431: 2430: 2423: 2414: 2412: 2404: 2403: 2399: 2390: 2388: 2380: 2379: 2375: 2366: 2364: 2356: 2355: 2346: 2337: 2335: 2327: 2326: 2317: 2308: 2306: 2298: 2297: 2293: 2241: 2240: 2231: 2181: 2180: 2176: 2146: 2145: 2141: 2132: 2130: 2122: 2121: 2117: 2108: 2106: 2098: 2097: 2093: 2084: 2082: 2074: 2073: 2069: 2062: 2049: 2048: 2009: 1978:10.2307/1132282 1972:(6): 991–1011. 1959: 1958: 1954: 1945: 1943: 1934: 1933: 1929: 1920: 1918: 1910: 1909: 1905: 1896: 1894: 1886: 1885: 1878: 1869: 1867: 1859: 1858: 1854: 1820: 1819: 1815: 1805: 1804: 1800: 1787: 1783: 1769: 1759: 1744: 1743: 1739: 1697: 1696: 1687: 1678: 1676: 1668: 1667: 1658: 1651: 1638: 1637: 1620: 1611: 1609: 1606:www.justice.gov 1600: 1599: 1595: 1580: 1565: 1564: 1560: 1551: 1549: 1546:www.justice.gov 1540: 1539: 1535: 1526: 1524: 1515: 1514: 1510: 1501: 1499: 1491: 1490: 1486: 1473: 1472: 1468: 1458: 1456: 1438:10.2307/2163214 1419: 1418: 1414: 1405: 1403: 1398: 1397: 1393: 1384: 1382: 1377: 1376: 1372: 1363: 1361: 1347: 1346: 1342: 1329: 1328: 1324: 1319: 1290:Age of majority 1281: 1261: 1255: 1246:Matter of M-A-M 1104: 1081: 1065: 1063:Standby counsel 1040: 1020:Sixth Amendment 1012: 995: 970: 946: 903: 890: 877: 868: 859: 850: 799: 783:Matter of M-A-M 778:Matter of M-A-M 769: 745: 721: 710: 704: 701: 690: 678: 667: 629: 623: 565: 551:, handle their 537: 493: 385:Party admission 253:Judicial notice 195:Burden of proof 137:Real (physical) 94: 83: 77: 74: 59: 46: 42: 35: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 2567: 2565: 2557: 2556: 2554:Capacity (law) 2551: 2546: 2541: 2536: 2526: 2525: 2520: 2519: 2489: 2474: 2447: 2421: 2397: 2373: 2344: 2315: 2291: 2254:(5): 131–141. 2229: 2174: 2139: 2115: 2091: 2067: 2060: 2007: 1952: 1927: 1903: 1876: 1852: 1833:(2): 297–317. 1813: 1798: 1781: 1772:|journal= 1737: 1710:(4): 473–480. 1685: 1656: 1649: 1618: 1593: 1578: 1558: 1533: 1508: 1484: 1466: 1432:(2): 368–394. 1412: 1391: 1370: 1340: 1335:Google Scholar 1321: 1320: 1318: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1308: 1303: 1298: 1292: 1287: 1285:Age of consent 1280: 1277: 1257:Main article: 1254: 1253:United Kingdom 1251: 1250: 1249: 1243: 1235: 1227: 1219: 1211: 1203: 1195: 1187: 1179: 1171: 1163: 1155: 1151:Rogers v. Okin 1147: 1139: 1131: 1123: 1103: 1100: 1093:search warrant 1080: 1077: 1064: 1061: 1039: 1036: 1011: 1008: 994: 991: 969: 966: 945: 942: 902: 899: 889: 886: 876: 873: 867: 864: 858: 855: 849: 846: 798: 795: 768: 765: 744: 741: 740: 739: 736: 733: 723: 722: 681: 679: 672: 666: 663: 622: 619: 596:In 2006, the 564: 561: 557:legal guardian 536: 533: 527:equivalent is 495: 494: 492: 491: 484: 477: 469: 466: 465: 464: 463: 458: 449: 444: 439: 431: 430: 422: 421: 420: 419: 414: 409: 402: 397: 392: 387: 382: 377: 372: 367: 362: 357: 355:in English law 349: 348: 347:and exceptions 341: 340: 339: 338: 333: 331:Expert witness 328: 323: 318: 313: 308: 303: 298: 293: 285: 284: 278: 277: 276: 275: 270: 265: 260: 255: 250: 242: 241: 239:Authentication 235: 234: 233: 232: 227: 222: 217: 212: 207: 202: 197: 189: 188: 182: 181: 180: 179: 174: 169: 164: 159: 154: 149: 144: 139: 134: 129: 121: 120: 116: 115: 107: 106: 96: 95: 56:of the subject 54:worldwide view 49: 47: 40: 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2566: 2555: 2552: 2550: 2547: 2545: 2542: 2540: 2537: 2535: 2532: 2531: 2529: 2508: 2504: 2500: 2493: 2490: 2485: 2481: 2477: 2471: 2467: 2466: 2458: 2456: 2454: 2452: 2448: 2443: 2439: 2435: 2428: 2426: 2422: 2411: 2407: 2401: 2398: 2387: 2383: 2377: 2374: 2363: 2359: 2353: 2351: 2349: 2345: 2334: 2330: 2324: 2322: 2320: 2316: 2305: 2301: 2295: 2292: 2287: 2283: 2278: 2273: 2269: 2265: 2261: 2257: 2253: 2249: 2245: 2238: 2236: 2234: 2230: 2225: 2221: 2217: 2213: 2209: 2205: 2201: 2197: 2193: 2189: 2185: 2178: 2175: 2170: 2166: 2162: 2158: 2154: 2150: 2143: 2140: 2129: 2125: 2119: 2116: 2105: 2101: 2095: 2092: 2081: 2077: 2071: 2068: 2063: 2061:9781462535538 2057: 2053: 2046: 2044: 2042: 2040: 2038: 2036: 2034: 2032: 2030: 2028: 2026: 2024: 2022: 2020: 2018: 2016: 2014: 2012: 2008: 2003: 1999: 1995: 1991: 1987: 1983: 1979: 1975: 1971: 1967: 1963: 1956: 1953: 1942: 1938: 1931: 1928: 1917: 1913: 1907: 1904: 1893: 1889: 1883: 1881: 1877: 1866: 1862: 1856: 1853: 1848: 1844: 1840: 1836: 1832: 1828: 1824: 1817: 1814: 1809: 1802: 1799: 1796:(4), 287-294. 1795: 1791: 1785: 1782: 1777: 1764: 1756: 1752: 1748: 1741: 1738: 1733: 1729: 1725: 1721: 1717: 1713: 1709: 1705: 1701: 1694: 1692: 1690: 1686: 1675: 1671: 1665: 1663: 1661: 1657: 1652: 1650:9781462535538 1646: 1642: 1635: 1633: 1631: 1629: 1627: 1625: 1623: 1619: 1607: 1603: 1597: 1594: 1589: 1585: 1581: 1575: 1571: 1570: 1562: 1559: 1547: 1543: 1537: 1534: 1522: 1521:www.uscis.gov 1518: 1512: 1509: 1498: 1494: 1488: 1485: 1480: 1476: 1470: 1467: 1455: 1451: 1447: 1443: 1439: 1435: 1431: 1427: 1423: 1416: 1413: 1401: 1395: 1392: 1380: 1374: 1371: 1359: 1355: 1351: 1344: 1341: 1336: 1332: 1326: 1323: 1316: 1312: 1309: 1307: 1304: 1302: 1299: 1296: 1293: 1291: 1288: 1286: 1283: 1282: 1278: 1276: 1274: 1270: 1266: 1260: 1252: 1247: 1244: 1241: 1240: 1236: 1233: 1232: 1228: 1225: 1224: 1220: 1217: 1216: 1212: 1209: 1208: 1204: 1201: 1200: 1196: 1193: 1192: 1188: 1185: 1184: 1180: 1177: 1176: 1172: 1169: 1168: 1164: 1161: 1160: 1156: 1153: 1152: 1148: 1145: 1144: 1140: 1137: 1136: 1132: 1129: 1128: 1124: 1121: 1120: 1116: 1115: 1114: 1112: 1108: 1101: 1099: 1096: 1094: 1089: 1085: 1078: 1076: 1074: 1070: 1062: 1060: 1058: 1052: 1048: 1046: 1037: 1035: 1033: 1029: 1025: 1021: 1017: 1009: 1007: 1005: 1000: 992: 990: 988: 987:schizophrenia 984: 983:antipsychotic 980: 975: 967: 965: 963: 959: 955: 951: 944:Understanding 943: 941: 938: 936: 932: 928: 924: 920: 916: 912: 908: 900: 898: 895: 894:swear an oath 887: 885: 883: 874: 872: 865: 863: 856: 854: 847: 845: 843: 838: 836: 832: 828: 824: 820: 816: 812: 808: 804: 796: 794: 791: 789: 784: 779: 774: 766: 764: 760: 758: 754: 750: 742: 737: 734: 731: 730: 729: 719: 716: 708: 698: 694: 688: 687: 682:This section 680: 676: 671: 670: 664: 662: 660: 656: 652: 648: 644: 643: 638: 634: 631:An inmate on 628: 620: 618: 615: 611: 605: 603: 599: 594: 592: 588: 587: 582: 578: 574: 570: 562: 560: 558: 554: 550: 546: 542: 535:United States 534: 532: 530: 526: 522: 519: 514: 510: 505: 502: 490: 485: 483: 478: 476: 471: 470: 468: 467: 462: 459: 457: 453: 450: 448: 445: 443: 440: 438: 435: 434: 433: 432: 428: 423: 418: 415: 413: 410: 408: 407: 403: 401: 398: 396: 393: 391: 388: 386: 383: 381: 378: 376: 373: 371: 368: 366: 363: 361: 358: 356: 353: 352: 351: 350: 346: 342: 337: 334: 332: 329: 327: 324: 322: 319: 317: 314: 312: 309: 307: 304: 302: 299: 297: 294: 292: 289: 288: 287: 286: 283: 279: 274: 271: 269: 266: 264: 261: 259: 256: 254: 251: 249: 246: 245: 244: 243: 240: 236: 231: 228: 226: 223: 221: 218: 216: 213: 211: 208: 206: 203: 201: 198: 196: 193: 192: 191: 190: 187: 183: 178: 175: 173: 170: 168: 167:Genetic (DNA) 165: 163: 160: 158: 157:Demonstrative 155: 153: 150: 148: 145: 143: 140: 138: 135: 133: 130: 128: 125: 124: 123: 122: 117: 113: 109: 108: 105: 101: 92: 89: 81: 78:December 2010 71: 67: 63: 57: 55: 48: 39: 38: 33: 19: 2534:Evidence law 2511:. Retrieved 2506: 2502: 2492: 2464: 2441: 2437: 2413:. Retrieved 2409: 2400: 2389:. Retrieved 2385: 2376: 2365:. Retrieved 2361: 2336:. Retrieved 2332: 2307:. Retrieved 2303: 2294: 2251: 2247: 2191: 2187: 2177: 2152: 2148: 2142: 2131:. Retrieved 2127: 2118: 2107:. Retrieved 2103: 2094: 2083:. Retrieved 2079: 2070: 2051: 1969: 1965: 1955: 1944:. Retrieved 1940: 1930: 1919:. Retrieved 1916:casetext.com 1915: 1906: 1895:. Retrieved 1891: 1868:. Retrieved 1865:casetext.com 1864: 1855: 1830: 1826: 1816: 1807: 1801: 1793: 1789: 1784: 1763:cite journal 1740: 1707: 1703: 1677:. Retrieved 1673: 1640: 1610:. Retrieved 1608:. 2015-01-13 1605: 1596: 1568: 1561: 1550:. Retrieved 1548:. 2014-03-02 1545: 1536: 1525:. Retrieved 1523:. 2022-06-24 1520: 1511: 1500:. Retrieved 1496: 1487: 1478: 1469: 1457:. Retrieved 1429: 1425: 1415: 1404:. Retrieved 1394: 1383:. Retrieved 1373: 1362:. Retrieved 1360:(3): 386–388 1357: 1353: 1343: 1334: 1325: 1262: 1245: 1237: 1229: 1221: 1213: 1205: 1197: 1189: 1181: 1173: 1165: 1157: 1149: 1141: 1133: 1125: 1117: 1105: 1097: 1090: 1086: 1082: 1066: 1053: 1049: 1041: 1013: 996: 973: 971: 968:Appreciation 949: 947: 939: 931:psychologist 904: 891: 878: 869: 860: 851: 839: 827:civil trials 800: 786: 782: 777: 770: 761: 746: 726: 711: 702: 691:Please help 686:verification 683: 640: 637:psychologist 630: 606: 595: 584: 566: 540: 538: 506: 500: 498: 461:Criminal law 404: 290: 230:Similar fact 110:Part of the 84: 75: 51: 32:Jurisdiction 1892:www.ojp.gov 1497:www.ice.gov 933:may use to 842:credibility 705:August 2016 541:incompetent 521:prosecution 513:conservator 365:Confessions 316:Impeachment 205:Materiality 152:Inculpatory 147:Exculpatory 132:Documentary 2528:Categories 2513:2008-02-21 2415:2022-10-20 2410:Justia Law 2391:2022-10-20 2367:2022-10-20 2338:2022-10-20 2333:Justia Law 2309:2022-10-20 2133:2022-10-09 2128:Justia Law 2109:2022-10-09 2104:Justia Law 2085:2022-10-09 2080:Justia Law 1946:2022-12-06 1921:2022-12-06 1897:2022-12-06 1870:2022-12-06 1679:2022-11-07 1612:2022-12-05 1552:2022-12-05 1527:2022-12-05 1502:2022-12-05 1459:8 November 1406:2017-04-16 1385:2007-10-03 1364:2007-10-19 1111:common law 1004:amputation 974:appreciate 649:inmate on 625:See also: 501:competence 427:common law 406:Res gestae 291:Competence 215:Spoliation 2484:985073538 2268:1523-5998 2208:0920-9964 2194:: 56–63. 1986:0009-3920 1847:0738-2480 1724:0002-7138 1588:828481957 1493:"Removal" 1446:0002-8762 1317:Footnotes 999:cognition 979:delusions 815:witnesses 811:defendant 807:testimony 757:Burke Act 753:Dawes Act 651:death row 633:death row 553:financial 549:contracts 539:The word 296:Privilege 282:Witnesses 220:Character 186:Relevance 127:Testimony 66:talk page 2286:15014674 2216:27876273 1279:See also 1269:Scotland 958:dementia 911:guardian 823:criminal 659:executed 547:to make 545:capacity 518:criminal 509:guardian 447:Property 437:Contract 311:Redirect 104:Evidence 60:You may 2224:4490928 2169:9355168 2002:9418217 1994:1132282 1755:3765836 1732:3745727 1479:History 1454:2163214 1273:Ireland 1263:In the 1014:In the 954:amnesia 950:ability 819:experts 809:(e.g., 803:witness 647:Florida 525:English 345:Hearsay 142:Digital 2482:  2472:  2284:  2277:181079 2274:  2266:  2222:  2214:  2206:  2167:  2058:  2000:  1992:  1984:  1845:  1753:  1730:  1722:  1647:  1586:  1576:  1452:  1444:  1271:, and 1248:(2011) 1242:(2008) 1234:(2003) 1226:(1996) 1218:(1992) 1210:(1992) 1202:(1990) 1194:(1984) 1186:(1981) 1178:(1966) 1170:(1993) 1162:(1986) 1154:(1979) 1146:(1975) 1138:(1975) 1130:(1972) 1122:(1960) 1069:pro se 1028:pro se 1018:, the 425:Other 114:series 2220:S2CID 1990:JSTOR 1450:JSTOR 1030:. In 452:Wills 429:areas 225:Habit 68:, or 2480:OCLC 2470:ISBN 2444:(3). 2282:PMID 2264:ISSN 2212:PMID 2204:ISSN 2165:PMID 2056:ISBN 1998:PMID 1982:ISSN 1843:ISSN 1776:help 1751:SSRN 1728:PMID 1720:ISSN 1645:ISBN 1584:OCLC 1574:ISBN 1461:2022 1442:ISSN 825:and 442:Tort 172:Lies 2272:PMC 2256:doi 2196:doi 2192:183 2157:doi 1974:doi 1835:doi 1712:doi 1434:doi 925:or 913:or 695:by 612:of 567:In 511:or 112:law 2530:: 2507:35 2505:. 2501:. 2478:. 2450:^ 2442:75 2440:. 2436:. 2424:^ 2408:. 2384:. 2360:. 2347:^ 2331:. 2318:^ 2302:. 2280:. 2270:. 2262:. 2250:. 2246:. 2232:^ 2218:. 2210:. 2202:. 2190:. 2186:. 2163:. 2153:48 2151:. 2126:. 2102:. 2078:. 2010:^ 1996:. 1988:. 1980:. 1970:68 1968:. 1964:. 1939:. 1914:. 1890:. 1879:^ 1863:. 1841:. 1831:42 1829:. 1825:. 1794:11 1792:, 1767:: 1765:}} 1761:{{ 1726:. 1718:. 1708:25 1706:. 1702:. 1688:^ 1672:. 1659:^ 1621:^ 1604:. 1582:. 1544:. 1519:. 1495:. 1477:. 1448:. 1440:. 1430:96 1428:. 1424:. 1358:35 1356:. 1352:. 1333:. 1267:, 1095:. 1059:. 964:. 956:, 817:, 813:, 604:. 531:. 454:, 2516:. 2486:. 2418:. 2394:. 2370:. 2341:. 2312:. 2288:. 2258:: 2252:1 2226:. 2198:: 2171:. 2159:: 2136:. 2112:. 2088:. 2064:. 2004:. 1976:: 1949:. 1924:. 1900:. 1873:. 1849:. 1837:: 1810:. 1778:) 1774:( 1757:. 1734:. 1714:: 1682:. 1653:. 1615:. 1590:. 1555:. 1530:. 1505:. 1463:. 1436:: 1409:. 1388:. 1367:. 1337:. 790:, 718:) 712:( 707:) 703:( 689:. 488:e 481:t 474:v 91:) 85:( 80:) 76:( 58:. 34:. 20:)

Index

Legally incompetent
Jurisdiction
worldwide view
improve this article
talk page
create a new article
Learn how and when to remove this message
Evidence
law
Testimony
Documentary
Real (physical)
Digital
Exculpatory
Inculpatory
Demonstrative
Eyewitness identification
Genetic (DNA)
Lies
Consciousness of guilt
Relevance
Burden of proof
Laying a foundation
Materiality
Public policy exclusions
Spoliation
Character
Habit
Similar fact
Authentication

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.