22:
168:
For example, the LORA process may discover that replacing a part actually costs hundreds of times that amount, when all cost are considered (maintenance manpower, warehousing facilities, shipping, etc.). If this part is replaced hundreds of times per year, over the course of many years, then there
327:
Non-economic LORA decision criteria are a list of rules or guidelines that are used to determine if there is an overriding reason why maintenance should be performed. Some organizations have policies that any item costing less than a predetermined price level will be discarded and replaced rather
137:
requirements. For a complex engineering system containing thousands of assemblies, sub-assemblies, components, organized into several levels of indenture and with a number of possible repair decisions, LORA seeks to determine an optimal provision of repair and maintenance facilities to minimize
190:
The LORA process produces the final support solution for the system. It determines where each required maintenance action will be performed, the physical resources that must be available to support performance of maintenance, and what the support infrastructure must be capable of sustaining
331:
Other decisions are addressed using cost models that calculate the possible costs of all support options and then identify the least cost solution. Then the total cost of each option can be compared to determine the lowest option in terms of long-term support over the life of the system.
164:
LORA establishes when and where each unit will be repaired and determines if it is more cost effective to discard an item than attempt to repair it. While this kind of analysis seems costly and unnecessary, at enterprise scales over many years, significant cost savings can be realized.
199:
The LORA process starts by identification of the options where maintenance can be performed. It is common for systems to use 2 or 3 levels of maintenance. LORA produces a decision for each item within the system, indicating where each maintenance action for the item will be performed.
262:
Because it is more specialized, I-level maintenance allows for more thorough and time-consuming diagnostic testing and repair procedures, usually in support of failed items removed at the organizational level of repair.
176:
This analysis drives the maintenance support for each repairable unit analyzed. LORA is the most important physical supportability analysis business decision made during acquisition of a system.
148:
personnel examine not only the cost of the part to be replaced or repaired but all of the elements required to make sure the job is done correctly. This includes the skill level of personnel,
191:
throughout the operational life of the system. The results of LORA are documented and used as the basis for development of the physical resources for support of the system.
312:(OEM) facilities. These sites are typically not at operating locations, and extensive diagnostic equipment and possibly even manufacturing capabilities exist.
361:
255:
that are typically allocated to multiple operating units residing at a common operating location, for example, an entire wing or multiple wings at an
43:
267:
is more common at this level of repair, and is used to automate many test procedures. Spare parts maintained at this level of repair are known as
133:) is used as an analytical methodology used to determine where an item will be replaced, repaired, or discarded based on cost considerations and
227:. Maintenance at this level typically consists of immediate remove and replace (R&R) operations that replace failed (unserviceable)
94:
66:
113:
274:
Intermediate-level maintenance deployment can vary widely, and is highly dependent on desired operating conditions. In minimal
73:
309:
47:
217:
80:
62:
32:
341:
51:
36:
282:
maintenance (O-level & D-level). A system deploying a typical I-level repair capability would be known as a
264:
153:
186:
Evaluate alternative economic models to determine the most cost effective support solution for the system.
275:
228:
149:
87:
256:
213:
305:
156:
required to test the repaired product, and the facilities required to house the entire operation.
170:
139:
212:
maintenance occurs at the organizational unit level, for example by a single maintenance
355:
169:
may be an opportunity to save money by adjusting the repair process to leverage this
224:
134:
316:
295:
21:
232:
183:
Establish noneconomic decision criteria used to make initial support decisions
223:
O-level maintenance is typically optimized for quick turn-around, to enhance
236:
145:
252:
278:, there may be minimal or no I-level maintenance, a system known as
319:
and modifications are typically executed at this repair level.
15:
179:
LORA is performed in two steps (SAE Standard AS1390A):
239:. Repair-in-place (RIP) procedures are also common.
173:(reliability improvements, component repair, etc.).
304:maintenance typically occurs in highly specialized
8:
50:. Unsourced material may be challenged and
286:maintenance system (O-, I-, and D-level).
114:Learn how and when to remove this message
7:
48:adding citations to reliable sources
362:United States Department of Defense
251:maintenance occurs in specialized
14:
235:(serviceable) assets taken from
204:Organizational level maintenance
20:
310:original equipment manufacturer
243:Intermediate level maintenance
152:required to perform the task,
1:
378:
342:Logistics support analysis
293:
63:"Level of Repair Analysis"
225:operational availability
127:Level of Repair Analysis
323:Decision considerations
290:Depot-level maintenance
216:as part of an aircraft
135:operational readiness
276:maintenance concepts
44:improve this article
208:Organizational, or
328:than be repaired.
247:Intermediate, or
150:support equipment
124:
123:
116:
98:
369:
171:economy of scale
140:life-cycle costs
119:
112:
108:
105:
99:
97:
56:
24:
16:
377:
376:
372:
371:
370:
368:
367:
366:
352:
351:
350:
338:
325:
298:
292:
245:
206:
197:
162:
138:overall system
120:
109:
103:
100:
57:
55:
41:
25:
12:
11:
5:
375:
373:
365:
364:
354:
353:
349:
346:
345:
344:
337:
334:
324:
321:
294:Main article:
291:
288:
265:Test equipment
257:operating base
244:
241:
205:
202:
196:
193:
188:
187:
184:
161:
158:
154:test equipment
122:
121:
28:
26:
19:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
374:
363:
360:
359:
357:
347:
343:
340:
339:
335:
333:
329:
322:
320:
318:
313:
311:
307:
306:repair depots
303:
297:
289:
287:
285:
281:
277:
272:
270:
266:
260:
258:
254:
250:
242:
240:
238:
234:
230:
226:
221:
219:
215:
211:
203:
201:
195:Repair levels
194:
192:
185:
182:
181:
180:
177:
174:
172:
166:
159:
157:
155:
151:
147:
143:
141:
136:
132:
128:
118:
115:
107:
96:
93:
89:
86:
82:
79:
75:
72:
68:
65: –
64:
60:
59:Find sources:
53:
49:
45:
39:
38:
34:
29:This article
27:
23:
18:
17:
330:
326:
314:
301:
299:
283:
279:
273:
268:
261:
248:
246:
222:
209:
207:
198:
189:
178:
175:
167:
163:
144:
130:
126:
125:
110:
101:
91:
84:
77:
70:
58:
42:Please help
30:
296:Maintenance
284:three-level
269:bench stock
104:August 2011
348:References
315:Equipment
300:Depot, or
74:newspapers
317:overhauls
280:two-level
253:backshops
237:inventory
146:Logistics
31:does not
356:Category
336:See also
308:, or at
214:squadron
302:D-level
249:I-level
210:O-level
160:Process
88:scholar
52:removed
37:sources
90:
83:
76:
69:
61:
233:spare
231:with
95:JSTOR
81:books
229:LRUs
218:wing
131:LORA
67:news
35:any
33:cite
46:by
358::
271:.
259:.
220:.
142:.
129:(
117:)
111:(
106:)
102:(
92:·
85:·
78:·
71:·
54:.
40:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.