138:(JCT) contract clause used could, the Court held, legitimately on grounds of public policy somewhat prohibit assignment (that is be subject to its qualified consent to assign the underlying asset, the property). The two potential lines of liability were decided in the negative and in the affirmative respectively. In summary, the first case was not brought by the original owner who commissioned the works (the new owner of the building should have considered the old asbestos contractor in his purchase transaction), the second case was brought by the original owner, still in business, at the behest of the new owner and in a case where both the original parties knew the development would very likely be assigned and relied on by third parties.
34:
172:
action were not assignable without the defendants' consent, the parties could properly be treated as having entered into the contract on the basis that the first claimants would be entitled to enforce against the defendant's contractual duties on behalf of all those third parties who would suffer from defective performance of the contract but were unable to acquire rights under it, subject to causation, limitation periods and quantum. Accordingly, the first plaintiffs were entitled to substantial damages for any breaches of the contract by the defendants.
147:
was soon found, and a third business was contracted. Then Stock
Conversions Ltd assigned the building lease to Linden Gardens, and at the same time, without Lenesta ever having consented, assigning its right of action (against Lenesta) to Linden Gardens. More asbestos was found and Linden Gardens sued the contractors for negligence and breach of contract. The Court of Appeal found the assignment was effective. Lenesta appealed.
158:
as a builder. St Martin's assigned their property interest and the benefits of the contracts to a new owner after the works were completed, without their contractor's consent. Then in 1981 it was found that the building work was defective, and remedial work would cost £800,000. The Court of Appeal by
167:
The House of Lords held that a true construction of clause 17(1) prohibited assignment without consent and that since a party to such a contract might have a genuine commercial interest in ensuring that contractual relations with the party he selected were preserved, there was no reason for holding
146:
Stock
Conversions Ltd, the original lessee of a building, used a JCT standard form contract to hire Lenesta to remove asbestos. Clause 17(1) said "The employer shall not without written consent of the contractor assign this contract." Lenesta subcontracted another firm to do the job. More asbestos
171:
In the second case because the development was, to the knowledge of the parties, very likely to be occupied or purchased by third parties, any defective works damage would accrue to a subsequent owner rather than the original developer. Because of the specific contractual provision that rights of
188:
that there is an exception applicable to contracts of carriage: "that the consignor may recover substantial damages against the shipowner if there is privity of contract between him and the carrier for the carriage of goods; although, if the goods are not his property or at his risk, he will be
133:
The cases concerned substantial defective works and whether the assignee who was directly impacted could recover money for this directly (the Linden appeal) and/or the assignor (the original owner) could recover the money by suing the works contractor (the St Martin's appeal). The standard
154:("St Martin's") had been granted a 150-year lease on a site where they commissioned a shop development — in 1974 using the JCT standard contract with clause 17 as in the other conjoined appeal to hire
379:
299:
273:
366:
422:
410:
511:
115:
44:
218:
311:
480:
33:
506:
151:
352:
516:
211:
340:
135:
439:
204:
119:
287:
235:
175:
87:
450:
127:
155:
184:
258:
325:
246:
123:
429:
159:
a majority held the assignment was incorrect but that St Martin's was entitled to damages.
485:
263:
370:
356:
500:
386:
401:
330:
179:
111:
315:
114:, 1 AC 85 is the short title for a judicial decision of conjoined appeals in the
83:
77:
168:
the contractual prohibition on assignment as being contrary to public policy.
73:
196:
189:
accountable to the true owner for the proceeds of his judgment."
200:
381:
Woodar
Investment Development Ltd v Wimpey Construction UK Ltd
25:
St Martin's
Property Corporation Ltd v Sir Robert McAlpine Ltd
481:"Law Report: Assignment of building contract ineffective"
107:
Linden
Gardens Trust Ltd v Lenesta Sludge Disposals Ltd
93:
69:
64:
50:
40:
20:
424:Nisshin Shipping Co Ltd v Cleaves & Co Ltd
275:Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre v Selfridge & Co Ltd
212:
8:
412:Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999
219:
205:
197:
118:in relation to the relevance of continued
32:
17:
116:Judicial Committee of the House of Lords
462:
21:Linden Gardens Ltd v Lenesta Sludge Ltd
397:Linden Gardens Trust v Lenesta Sludge
312:Scruttons Ltd v Midland Silicones Ltd
7:
430:[2003] EWHC 2602 (Comm)
14:
99:Duty of care, privity, assignment
264:[1861] EWHC J57 (QB)
512:1993 in United Kingdom case law
353:Jackson v Horizon Holidays Ltd
300:Smith and Snipes Hall Farm Ltd
1:
479:Ying Hui Tan (29 July 1993).
152:St Martin's Property Corp Ltd
533:
507:English contract case law
436:
419:
408:
393:
376:
363:
349:
341:Dutton v Bognor Regis UDC
337:
322:
308:
296:
284:
270:
255:
243:
232:
227:Privity of contract cases
150:In a second joined case,
98:
31:
136:Joint Contracts Tribunal
178:adapted the concept of
440:Privity in English law
387:[1980] UKHL 11
402:[1993] UKHL 4
331:[1967] UKHL 2
291:, 117 N.E. 807 (1917)
236:Dutton v Poole (1678)
176:Lord Browne-Wilkinson
112:[1993] UKHL 4
88:Lord Browne-Wilkinson
517:House of Lords cases
451:English contract law
288:De Cicco v Schweizer
128:English contract law
156:Sir Robert McAlpine
120:privity of contract
27:(conjoined appeals)
259:Tweddle v Atkinson
126:of property under
446:
445:
326:Beswick v Beswick
250:(1756) Ambler 330
103:
102:
524:
491:
490:
476:
470:
467:
425:
413:
382:
276:
247:Tomlinson v Gill
221:
214:
207:
198:
65:Court membership
36:
18:
532:
531:
527:
526:
525:
523:
522:
521:
497:
496:
495:
494:
486:The Independent
478:
477:
473:
468:
464:
459:
447:
442:
432:
423:
415:
411:
404:
389:
380:
372:
359:
345:
333:
318:
304:
292:
280:
274:
266:
251:
239:
228:
225:
195:
165:
144:
86:
82:
80:
76:
59:
57:
55:
26:
24:
22:
12:
11:
5:
530:
528:
520:
519:
514:
509:
499:
498:
493:
492:
471:
461:
460:
458:
455:
454:
453:
444:
443:
437:
434:
433:
420:
417:
416:
409:
406:
405:
394:
391:
390:
377:
374:
373:
364:
361:
360:
350:
347:
346:
338:
335:
334:
323:
320:
319:
309:
306:
305:
297:
294:
293:
285:
282:
281:
271:
268:
267:
256:
253:
252:
244:
241:
240:
233:
230:
229:
226:
224:
223:
216:
209:
201:
194:
191:
164:
161:
143:
140:
101:
100:
96:
95:
91:
90:
81:Lord Griffiths
71:
70:Judges sitting
67:
66:
62:
61:
52:
48:
47:
45:House of Lords
42:
38:
37:
29:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
529:
518:
515:
513:
510:
508:
505:
504:
502:
488:
487:
482:
475:
472:
466:
463:
456:
452:
449:
448:
441:
435:
431:
427:
426:
418:
414:
407:
403:
399:
398:
392:
388:
384:
383:
375:
371:
369:
368:
367:The Eurymedon
362:
358:
355:
354:
348:
343:
342:
336:
332:
328:
327:
321:
317:
314:
313:
307:
302:
301:
295:
290:
289:
283:
278:
277:
269:
265:
261:
260:
254:
249:
248:
242:
238:
237:
231:
222:
217:
215:
210:
208:
203:
202:
199:
192:
190:
187:
186:
181:
177:
173:
169:
162:
160:
157:
153:
148:
141:
139:
137:
131:
129:
125:
121:
117:
113:
109:
108:
97:
92:
89:
85:
79:
75:
72:
68:
63:
53:
49:
46:
43:
39:
35:
30:
19:
16:
484:
474:
465:
421:
396:
395:
378:
365:
351:
339:
324:
310:
298:
286:
272:
257:
245:
234:
185:The Albazero
183:
180:Lord Diplock
174:
170:
166:
149:
145:
132:
106:
105:
104:
58:3 All ER 417
15:
469:AC 774, 847
357:EWCA Civ 12
84:Lord Ackner
78:Lord Bridge
501:Categories
457:References
124:assignment
122:following
74:Lord Keith
56:3 WLR 408
51:Citations
344:1 QB 373
303:2 KB 500
193:See also
163:Judgment
94:Keywords
54:1 AC 85
316:UKHL 4
279:AC 847
60:UKHL 4
428:
400:
385:
329:
262:
142:Facts
110:
41:Court
438:see
182:in
23:and
503::
483:.
130:.
489:.
220:e
213:t
206:v
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
