39:
122:
An hour before the sale by the receiver of Forth Dry Dock to the Forth
Estuary company, the receiver sacked all of its twelve employees. The new Forth Estuary company had another set of employees already lined up on lower pay. The receivers had no money left to pay damages for dismissal and holiday
146:
Lord Oliver agreed that the ECJ cases required a purposive interpretation to be given to the regulations. He noted the remedies provided ‘in the case of an insolvent transferor are largely illusory unless they can be exerted against the transferee’. The dismissals are ‘required to be treated as
147:
ineffective’, employment is ‘statutorily continued’ The
Directive applied both to an employee at the transfer moment and one who ‘would have been so employed if he had not been unfairly dismissed in the circumstances described in regulation 8(1)’ (now regulation 7(1)).
142:
77/187/EC. The ‘courts of the United
Kingdom are under a duty to follow the practice of the European Court of Justice by giving a purposive construction to Directives and to Regulations issued for the purpose of complying with Directive…’
205:
356:
339:
497:
176:
487:
130:
The Court of
Session held that, following Spence, none of the employees were employed ‘immediately before’ the transfer. The employees appealed.
432:
308:
192:
416:
107:
278:
313:
376:
346:
123:
pay. TUPER 1981 regulation 5(3) said the
Regulations apply to employees who are such ‘immediately before’ the transfer (now,
371:
492:
386:
169:
139:
264:
195:
220:
162:
450:
234:
361:
406:
329:
298:
254:
210:
421:
38:
436:
282:
268:
390:
17:
138:
Lord
Templeman held that a purposive approach should be taken, under article 4 of the
481:
446:
103:
238:
224:
99:
65:
154:
403:
326:
295:
251:
124:
111:
399:
322:
291:
247:
158:
207:
82:
72:
61:
53:
45:
31:
114:, though decided under the older 1981 version.
96:Litster v Forth Dry Dock and Engineering Co Ltd
32:Litster v Forth Dry Dock and Engineering Co Ltd
88:Collective dismissal, transfer of undertakings
170:
8:
177:
163:
155:
37:
28:
341:Spijkers v Gebroeders Benedik Abattoir CV
465:
357:Süzen v Zehnacker Gebaeudereingung GmbH
7:
433:Oakland v Wellswood (Yorkshire) Ltd
309:Parkwood Leisure Ltd v Alemo-Herron
193:Transfers of Undertakings Directive
417:SS for Trade and Industry v Slater
25:
108:Business Transfers Directive 2001
279:University of Oxford v Humphreys
498:1989 in United Kingdom case law
185:Transfer of undertaking sources
488:United Kingdom labour case law
110:relevant for the implementing
1:
387:RCO Support Services v Unison
140:Business Transfers Directive
372:Oy Liikenne Ab v Liskojärvi
78:Lord Templeman, Lord Oliver
514:
265:Credit Suisse Ltd v Lister
443:
429:
413:
397:
383:
368:
353:
336:
320:
305:
289:
275:
261:
245:
231:
217:
203:
190:
87:
77:
36:
221:Litster v Forth Dry Dock
18:Litster v Forth Dry Dock
235:Wilson v St Helens BC
68:, IRLR 161, ICR 341
493:House of Lords cases
106:case concerning the
451:business transfers
127:regulation 4(3)).
457:
456:
92:
91:
16:(Redirected from
505:
473:
470:
342:
208:
179:
172:
165:
156:
41:
29:
21:
513:
512:
508:
507:
506:
504:
503:
502:
478:
477:
476:
471:
467:
463:
458:
453:
439:
425:
409:
393:
379:
364:
349:
340:
332:
316:
301:
285:
271:
257:
241:
227:
213:
206:
199:
186:
183:
153:
136:
120:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
511:
509:
501:
500:
495:
490:
480:
479:
475:
474:
464:
462:
459:
455:
454:
444:
441:
440:
430:
427:
426:
414:
411:
410:
398:
395:
394:
384:
381:
380:
369:
366:
365:
354:
351:
350:
337:
334:
333:
321:
318:
317:
306:
303:
302:
294:arts 3(3) and
290:
287:
286:
276:
273:
272:
262:
259:
258:
246:
243:
242:
232:
229:
228:
218:
215:
214:
204:
201:
200:
191:
188:
187:
184:
182:
181:
174:
167:
159:
152:
149:
135:
132:
119:
116:
90:
89:
85:
84:
80:
79:
75:
74:
70:
69:
63:
59:
58:
55:
51:
50:
49:House of Lords
47:
43:
42:
34:
33:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
510:
499:
496:
494:
491:
489:
486:
485:
483:
472:IRLR 161, 172
469:
466:
460:
452:
448:
447:UK labour law
442:
438:
437:EWCA Civ 1094
435:
434:
428:
423:
419:
418:
412:
408:
405:
401:
396:
392:
389:
388:
382:
378:
374:
373:
367:
363:
359:
358:
352:
348:
344:
343:
335:
331:
328:
324:
319:
315:
311:
310:
304:
300:
297:
293:
288:
284:
283:EWCA Civ 3050
281:
280:
274:
270:
269:EWCA Civ 1551
267:
266:
260:
256:
253:
249:
244:
240:
237:
236:
230:
226:
223:
222:
216:
212:
209:
202:
197:
194:
189:
180:
175:
173:
168:
166:
161:
160:
157:
150:
148:
144:
141:
133:
131:
128:
126:
117:
115:
113:
109:
105:
104:UK labour law
101:
98:
97:
86:
81:
76:
73:Case opinions
71:
67:
64:
60:
57:16 March 1989
56:
52:
48:
44:
40:
35:
30:
27:
19:
468:
431:
415:
391:EWCA Civ 464
385:
370:
355:
338:
307:
277:
263:
233:
219:
145:
137:
129:
121:
95:
94:
93:
26:
325:arts 1 and
482:Categories
420:IRLR 928 (
404:TUPER 2006
402:art 5 and
327:TUPER 2006
296:TUPER 2006
252:TUPER 2006
250:art 5 and
196:2001/23/EC
125:TUPER 2006
112:TUPER 2006
62:Citations
400:TUD 2001
377:C-172/99
323:TUD 2001
314:C-426/11
292:TUD 2001
248:TUD 2001
198:arts 3-4
151:See also
134:Judgment
83:Keywords
375:(2001)
362:C-13/95
360:(1997)
347:C-24/85
345:(1986)
312:(2013)
239:UKHL 37
225:UKHL 10
100:UKHL 10
66:UKHL 10
54:Decided
461:Notes
118:Facts
102:is a
46:Court
449:and
445:see
422:EAT
407:r 8
330:r 3
299:r 5
255:r 4
211:r 7
484::
424:)
178:e
171:t
164:v
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
