225:. Its premises were on a 99-year lease for £23,444 a year from a charity called Oddfellows Friendly Society. ‘During the next 11 years the value of money got much less. In 1958 the building was worth about £2,000,000 if sold with vacant possession. And the rent obtainable on a tenancy from year to year granted in 1958 would be £60,000 a year. Yet Littlewoods had a lease with another 88 years to go at a rent of £23,444… in 1958 the advisers of Oddfellows and Littlewoods carried through a deal which was designed to confer a considerable advantage on both of them. It came to this: the Oddfellows transferred the freehold in Jubilee House to the Fork Manufacturing Co. Ltd., which was a wholly owned subsidiary of Littlewoods. The Fork Company let Jubilee House to the Oddfellows for 22 years and 10 days at a rent of £6 a year. The Oddfellows granted an underlease to Littlewoods for 22 years at a rent of £42,450 a year. The result was that Littlewoods gave up their lease for 88 years at a rent of £23,444 and took instead a lease from the Oddfellows for 22 years at £42,450: and, in addition, Littlewoods, through their wholly owned subsidiary, the Fork Manufacturing Co. Ltd., at the end of the 22 years, would have the entire freehold in hand in possession. In return the Oddfellows received a rent of £42,450 for 22 years and then lost all interest in the premises. The deal was designed to advantage both in this way: on the one hand Oddfellows would receive a rent of £42,450 a year for 22 years, which would be clear of tax as they were a charity. On the other hand, Littlewoods would claim to deduct the full rent of £42,450 from their profits instead of the smaller sum of £23,444. So they would escape a lot of tax. The deal would be to the advantage of both sides, at the expense of the revenue.
141:
254:
lies behind. The legislature has shown the way with group accounts and the rest. And the courts should follow suit. I think that we should look at the Fork
Manufacturing Co. Ltd. and see it as it really is — the wholly owned subsidiary of Littlewoods. It is the creature, the puppet, of Littlewoods, in point of fact: and it should be so regarded in point of law. The basic fact here is that Littlewoods, through their wholly owned subsidiary, have acquired a capital asset — the freehold of Jubilee House: and they have acquired it by paying an extra £19,006 a year. So regarded, the case is indistinguishable from the
35:
253:
has to be watched very carefully. It has often been supposed to cast a veil over the personality of a limited company through which the courts cannot see. But that is not true. The courts can and often do draw aside the veil. They can, and often do, pull off the mask. They look to see what really
229:
Littlewoods was complaining that the whole rent of £42,450 was deductible as an expense wholly for the purpose of trade under s 137 Income Tax Act 1952. The
Commissioners rejected this. Plowman J held that the rent payments by Littlewoods were of a revenue character and properly deductible, but
242:
held that FM’s interposition made no difference to the real nature of the payments, the transfers were not ‘money wholly and exclusively laid out’ for the purpose of trade and not deductible. For the purpose of annual expenditure the courts must look to the true nature of the transaction. Lord
419:
52:
614:
529:
290:
99:
619:
609:
71:
431:
78:
140:
151:
85:
395:
333:
118:
67:
543:
319:
283:
515:
56:
357:
487:
345:
307:
624:
206:
92:
276:
45:
558:
445:
243:
Denning MR held more broadly that the wholly owned subsidiary was not in this case a separate legal entity.
473:
256:
407:
383:
501:
17:
554:
435:
249:
239:
178:
459:
505:
477:
449:
361:
580:
569:
491:
371:
260:. Littlewoods are not entitled to deduct this extra £19,006 in computing their profits.
202:
603:
222:
519:
463:
174:
533:
323:
34:
268:
230:
relying on a case that was soon reversed by the House of Lords.
272:
217:
The facts were summarised by Lord
Denning MR, in his judgment.
28:
198:
Littlewoods Mail Order Stores v Inland
Revenue Commissioners
184:
170:
165:
157:
147:
133:
59:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
245:
219:
284:
8:
291:
277:
269:
221:Littlewoods had a store in Jubilee House,
139:
130:
615:Court of Appeal (England and Wales) cases
119:Learn how and when to remove this message
68:"Littlewoods Mail Order Stores Ltd v IRC"
432:Woolfson v Strathclyde Regional Council
7:
152:Court of Appeal of England and Wales
57:adding citations to reliable sources
530:VTB Capital plc v Nutritek Int Corp
396:Littlewoods Mail Order Stores v IRC
334:Macaura v Northern Assurance Co Ltd
134:Littlewoods Mail Order Stores v IRC
18:Littlewoods Mail Order Stores v IRC
25:
320:Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd
33:
620:1969 in United Kingdom case law
610:United Kingdom company case law
544:Lungowe v Vedanta Resources plc
44:needs additional citations for
516:Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd
1:
488:Trustor AB v Smallbone (No 2)
346:Gilford Motor Co Ltd v Horne
420:DHN Ltd v Tower Hamlets LBC
358:Lee v Lee's Air Farming Ltd
299:Corporate personality cases
207:piercing the corporate veil
190:Piercing the corporate veil
641:
247:The doctrine laid down in
566:
552:
540:
526:
512:
498:
484:
470:
456:
442:
428:
416:
404:
392:
380:
368:
354:
342:
330:
316:
308:Case of Sutton's Hospital
304:
189:
138:
446:Ord v Belhaven Pubs Ltd
474:Gencor ACP Ltd v Dalby
262:
227:
408:Wallersteiner v Moir
384:Tunstall v Steigmann
257:Land Securities case
53:improve this article
502:Chandler v Cape plc
625:Lord Denning cases
561:arts 1(2)(d) and 4
555:Rome II Regulation
576:
575:
250:Salomon v Salomon
194:
193:
177:MR, Sachs LJ and
129:
128:
121:
103:
16:(Redirected from
632:
460:Lubbe v Cape Plc
311:(1612) 77 ER 960
293:
286:
279:
270:
205:case concerning
201:1 WLR 1241 is a
166:Court membership
143:
131:
124:
117:
113:
110:
104:
102:
61:
37:
29:
21:
640:
639:
635:
634:
633:
631:
630:
629:
600:
599:
594:
589:
577:
572:
562:
548:
536:
522:
508:
494:
480:
466:
452:
438:
424:
412:
400:
388:
376:
364:
350:
338:
326:
312:
300:
297:
267:
236:
215:
125:
114:
108:
105:
62:
60:
50:
38:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
638:
636:
628:
627:
622:
617:
612:
602:
601:
598:
597:
593:
590:
588:
585:
584:
583:
581:UK company law
574:
573:
570:UK company law
567:
564:
563:
553:
550:
549:
541:
538:
537:
527:
524:
523:
513:
510:
509:
499:
496:
495:
485:
482:
481:
478:EWHC 1560 (Ch)
471:
468:
467:
457:
454:
453:
443:
440:
439:
429:
426:
425:
417:
414:
413:
405:
402:
401:
393:
390:
389:
381:
378:
377:
372:Jones v Lipman
369:
366:
365:
355:
352:
351:
343:
340:
339:
331:
328:
327:
317:
314:
313:
305:
302:
301:
298:
296:
295:
288:
281:
273:
266:
263:
235:
232:
214:
211:
203:UK company law
192:
191:
187:
186:
182:
181:
172:
171:Judges sitting
168:
167:
163:
162:
159:
155:
154:
149:
145:
144:
136:
135:
127:
126:
41:
39:
32:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
637:
626:
623:
621:
618:
616:
613:
611:
608:
607:
605:
596:
595:
591:
586:
582:
579:
578:
571:
565:
560:
556:
551:
546:
545:
539:
535:
532:
531:
525:
521:
518:
517:
511:
507:
504:
503:
497:
493:
492:EWHC 703 (Ch)
490:
489:
483:
479:
476:
475:
469:
465:
462:
461:
455:
451:
448:
447:
441:
437:
434:
433:
427:
422:
421:
415:
410:
409:
403:
398:
397:
391:
386:
385:
379:
374:
373:
367:
363:
360:
359:
353:
348:
347:
341:
336:
335:
329:
325:
322:
321:
315:
310:
309:
303:
294:
289:
287:
282:
280:
275:
274:
271:
264:
261:
259:
258:
252:
251:
244:
241:
238:Sachs LJ and
233:
231:
226:
224:
223:Oxford Street
218:
212:
210:
208:
204:
200:
199:
188:
183:
180:
176:
173:
169:
164:
160:
156:
153:
150:
146:
142:
137:
132:
123:
120:
112:
101:
98:
94:
91:
87:
84:
80:
77:
73:
70: –
69:
65:
64:Find sources:
58:
54:
48:
47:
42:This article
40:
36:
31:
30:
27:
19:
542:
528:
514:
506:EWCA Civ 525
500:
486:
472:
458:
450:EWCA Civ 243
444:
430:
418:
406:
394:
382:
370:
356:
344:
332:
318:
306:
255:
248:
246:
240:Karminski LJ
237:
228:
220:
216:
197:
196:
195:
179:Karminski LJ
175:Lord Denning
115:
109:October 2020
106:
96:
89:
82:
75:
63:
51:Please help
46:verification
43:
26:
604:Categories
592:References
399:1 WLR 1214
161:1 WLR 1241
79:newspapers
423:1 WLR 852
411:1 WLR 991
375:1 WLR 832
559:864/2007
557:(EC) No
387:2 QB 593
265:See also
234:Judgment
185:Keywords
158:Citation
547:UKSC 20
520:UKSC 34
464:UKHL 41
362:UKPC 33
93:scholar
534:UKSC 5
436:UKHL 5
349:Ch 935
337:AC 619
324:UKHL 1
95:
88:
81:
74:
66:
587:Notes
213:Facts
148:Court
100:JSTOR
86:books
568:see
72:news
55:by
606::
209:.
292:e
285:t
278:v
122:)
116:(
111:)
107:(
97:·
90:·
83:·
76:·
49:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
