1519:
57:. Only when some of these presuppositions are not necessarily agreed to by the person who is asked the question does the argument containing them become fallacious. Hence, the same question may be loaded in one context, but not in the other. For example, the previous question would not be loaded if it were asked during a trial in which the defendant had already admitted to beating his wife. This
42:
tool: the question attempts to limit direct replies to be those that serve the questioner's agenda. The traditional example is the question "Have you stopped beating your wife?" Whether the respondent answers yes or no, they will admit to having beaten their wife at some time in the past. Thus, these
109:
nce when
Alexinus asked him whether he had left off beating his father, he said, "I have not beaten him, and I have not left off;" and when he said further that he ought to put an end to the doubt by answering explicitly yes or no, "It would be absurd," he rejoined, "to comply with your conditions,
118:
asked: "Should a smack as part of good parental correction be a criminal offence in New
Zealand?" Murray Edridge, of Barnardos New Zealand, criticized the question as "loaded and ambiguous" and claimed "the question presupposes that smacking is a part of good parental correction".
81:
A common way out of this argument is not to answer the question (e.g. with a simple 'yes' or 'no'), but to challenge the assumption behind the question. To use an earlier example, a good response to the question "Have you stopped beating your wife?" would be "I have
252:
86:
beaten my wife". This removes the ambiguity of the expected response, therefore nullifying the tactic. However, the asker may respond to a challenge by accusing the one who answers of
115:
636:
641:
53:
has been committed. The fallacy relies upon context for its effect: the fact that a question presupposes something does not in itself make the question
249:
268:
1019:
676:
518:
464:
830:
312:
245:
214:
359:
486:
1438:
646:
1474:
1450:
1039:
473:
360:"The fallacy of many questions: on the notions of complexity, loadedness and unfair entrapment in interrogative theory"
1543:
1051:
795:
1061:
441:
1469:
1026:
922:
318:
50:
1464:
1304:
772:
608:
564:
49:
by the question, and in this case an entrapment, because it narrows the respondent to a single answer, and the
1484:
1299:
815:
511:
139:
1406:
1396:
1346:
1320:
1096:
970:
937:
838:
820:
720:
569:
551:
1444:
1432:
1412:
1401:
1316:
1129:
1105:
927:
883:
735:
661:
574:
1459:
1363:
1327:
1242:
1198:
1034:
965:
755:
584:
559:
304:
272:
98:
62:
32:
1337:
1236:
1183:
1159:
1082:
985:
917:
843:
656:
651:
628:
603:
294:
174:
1522:
1455:
1269:
1154:
1139:
1086:
1046:
995:
932:
891:
868:
848:
751:
595:
579:
504:
382:
1341:
1178:
1168:
1144:
1121:
1077:
1003:
955:
913:
873:
715:
710:
532:
423:
355:
308:
241:
210:
179:
149:
1491:
1332:
1231:
1173:
1111:
906:
785:
780:
765:
730:
690:
618:
613:
419:
390:
374:
159:
134:
87:
58:
28:
24:
1212:
1188:
1008:
980:
960:
808:
760:
490:
477:
256:
1248:
725:
1149:
1134:
1056:
975:
901:
541:
169:
129:
483:
1537:
1274:
1164:
896:
859:
803:
671:
666:
386:
164:
144:
1286:
705:
200:
1479:
1256:
1193:
206:
154:
70:
45:
1389:
1383:
1310:
1222:
378:
54:
1496:
1280:
1264:
947:
470:
102:
73:
asked about, and which is often an implicit restatement of the proposition.
1426:
427:
496:
1374:
39:
528:
66:
298:
418:. Translated by Yonge, Charles Duke. London: H.G. Bohn. p.
500:
484:
What Is The Loaded
Question Fallacy? Definition and Examples
467:
Critical
Thinking exercises. San Jose State University.
238:
Informal logic: a handbook for critical argumentation
116:
2009 referendum on corporal punishment in New
Zealand
1373:
1361:
1220:
1211:
1120:
1095:
1070:
994:
946:
882:
857:
829:
794:
744:
698:
689:
627:
593:
549:
540:
107:
69:whose plausibility depends on the truth of the
637:Affirmative conclusion from a negative premise
416:The Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers
642:Negative conclusion from affirmative premises
512:
16:Question containing an unjustified assumption
8:
465:Fallacy: Loaded Questions and Complex Claims
101:wrote a brief biography of the philosopher
1370:
1217:
1092:
695:
546:
519:
505:
497:
442:"Anti-smacking debate goes to referendum"
232:
230:
228:
226:
191:
110:when I can stop you at the entrance."
61:should be distinguished from that of
7:
271:. The Nizkor Project. Archived from
240:, Cambridge University Press, 1989,
14:
1518:
1517:
471:Logical Fallacy: Loaded Question
321:from the original on 28 May 2019
38:Such questions may be used as a
269:"Fallacy: Begging the Question"
1015:Correlation implies causation
27:that contains a controversial
1:
414:Laertius, Diogenes (1853).
340:Layman, C. Stephen (2003).
1562:
1439:I'm entitled to my opinion
105:in which he relates that:
1513:
1422:
1295:
199:Bassham, Gregory (2004).
114:For another example, the
51:fallacy of many questions
1465:Motte-and-bailey fallacy
565:Affirming the consequent
300:The Skeptic's Dictionary
1485:Two wrongs make a right
816:Denying the correlative
444:. 3 News. June 15, 2009
379:10.1023/A:1007727929716
140:Entailment (pragmatics)
1470:Psychologist's fallacy
1407:Argument to moderation
1397:Argument from anecdote
1347:Chronological snobbery
971:Quoting out of context
938:Overwhelming exception
821:Suppressed correlative
721:Quoting out of context
596:quantificational logic
570:Denying the antecedent
112:
1433:The Four Great Errors
1413:Argumentum ad populum
1402:Argument from silence
1106:Argumentum ad baculum
884:Faulty generalization
575:Argument from fallacy
305:John Wiley & Sons
1451:Invincible ignorance
1257:Reductio ad Stalinum
1243:Reductio ad Hitlerum
1199:Wisdom of repugnance
966:Moving the goalposts
831:Illicit transference
756:Begging the question
677:Undistributed middle
585:Mathematical fallacy
560:Affirming a disjunct
295:Carroll, Robert Todd
88:dodging the question
63:begging the question
33:presumption of guilt
1184:Parade of horribles
1160:In-group favoritism
986:Syntactic ambiguity
629:Syllogistic fallacy
552:propositional logic
236:Douglas N. Walton,
175:Suggestive question
94:Historical examples
1544:Informal fallacies
1270:Poisoning the well
1087:Proof by assertion
1062:Texas sharpshooter
996:Questionable cause
933:Slothful induction
892:Anecdotal evidence
752:Circular reasoning
647:Exclusive premises
609:Illicit conversion
489:2021-05-11 at the
476:2020-12-11 at the
356:Walton, Douglas N.
342:The Power of Logic
255:2023-04-07 at the
1531:
1530:
1509:
1508:
1505:
1504:
1445:Ignoratio elenchi
1357:
1356:
1207:
1206:
1169:Not invented here
874:Converse accident
796:Correlative-based
773:Compound question
716:False attribution
711:False equivalence
685:
684:
480:The Fallacy Files
358:(November 1999).
275:on March 10, 2019
202:Critical Thinking
180:List of fallacies
150:Gotcha journalism
99:Diogenes Laërtius
65:, which offers a
1551:
1521:
1520:
1492:Special pleading
1371:
1232:Appeal to motive
1218:
1194:Stirring symbols
1174:Island mentality
1112:Wishful thinking
1093:
809:Perfect solution
786:No true Scotsman
781:Complex question
766:Leading question
745:Question-begging
731:No true Scotsman
696:
619:Quantifier shift
614:Proof by example
547:
521:
514:
507:
498:
493:Fallacy in Logic
453:
452:
450:
449:
438:
432:
431:
411:
405:
404:
402:
401:
395:
389:. Archived from
364:
352:
346:
345:
337:
331:
330:
328:
326:
297:(31 July 2003).
291:
285:
284:
282:
280:
265:
259:
234:
221:
220:
196:
160:Leading question
135:Complex question
59:informal fallacy
25:complex question
1561:
1560:
1554:
1553:
1552:
1550:
1549:
1548:
1534:
1533:
1532:
1527:
1501:
1475:Rationalization
1418:
1365:
1353:
1291:
1213:Genetic fallacy
1203:
1116:
1091:
1066:
990:
981:Sorites paradox
961:False precision
942:
923:Double counting
878:
853:
825:
790:
777:Loaded question
761:Loaded language
740:
681:
623:
589:
536:
525:
491:Wayback Machine
478:Wayback Machine
461:
456:
447:
445:
440:
439:
435:
413:
412:
408:
399:
397:
393:
362:
354:
353:
349:
339:
338:
334:
324:
322:
315:
293:
292:
288:
278:
276:
267:
266:
262:
257:Wayback Machine
235:
224:
217:
198:
197:
193:
189:
184:
125:
96:
79:
21:loaded question
17:
12:
11:
5:
1559:
1558:
1555:
1547:
1546:
1536:
1535:
1529:
1528:
1526:
1525:
1514:
1511:
1510:
1507:
1506:
1503:
1502:
1500:
1499:
1494:
1489:
1488:
1487:
1477:
1472:
1467:
1462:
1453:
1448:
1441:
1436:
1429:
1423:
1420:
1419:
1417:
1416:
1409:
1404:
1399:
1394:
1393:
1392:
1379:
1377:
1368:
1359:
1358:
1355:
1354:
1352:
1351:
1350:
1349:
1335:
1330:
1325:
1324:
1323:
1314:
1307:
1305:Accomplishment
1296:
1293:
1292:
1290:
1289:
1284:
1277:
1272:
1267:
1262:
1261:
1260:
1253:
1252:
1251:
1234:
1228:
1226:
1215:
1209:
1208:
1205:
1204:
1202:
1201:
1196:
1191:
1186:
1181:
1176:
1171:
1162:
1157:
1152:
1147:
1142:
1137:
1132:
1126:
1124:
1118:
1117:
1115:
1114:
1109:
1101:
1099:
1090:
1089:
1080:
1074:
1072:
1068:
1067:
1065:
1064:
1059:
1057:Slippery slope
1054:
1049:
1044:
1043:
1042:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1023:
1013:
1012:
1011:
1000:
998:
992:
991:
989:
988:
983:
978:
976:Slippery slope
973:
968:
963:
958:
952:
950:
944:
943:
941:
940:
935:
930:
925:
920:
911:
910:
909:
904:
902:Cherry picking
894:
888:
886:
880:
879:
877:
876:
871:
865:
863:
855:
854:
852:
851:
846:
841:
835:
833:
827:
826:
824:
823:
818:
813:
812:
811:
800:
798:
792:
791:
789:
788:
783:
770:
769:
768:
758:
748:
746:
742:
741:
739:
738:
733:
728:
723:
718:
713:
708:
702:
700:
693:
687:
686:
683:
682:
680:
679:
674:
669:
664:
659:
654:
649:
644:
639:
633:
631:
625:
624:
622:
621:
616:
611:
606:
600:
598:
591:
590:
588:
587:
582:
577:
572:
567:
562:
556:
554:
544:
538:
537:
526:
524:
523:
516:
509:
501:
495:
494:
481:
468:
460:
459:External links
457:
455:
454:
433:
406:
373:(4): 379–383.
347:
344:. p. 158.
332:
313:
307:. p. 51.
286:
260:
222:
215:
190:
188:
185:
183:
182:
177:
172:
170:Presupposition
167:
162:
157:
152:
147:
142:
137:
132:
130:Barber paradox
126:
124:
121:
95:
92:
78:
75:
23:is a form of
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1557:
1556:
1545:
1542:
1541:
1539:
1524:
1516:
1515:
1512:
1498:
1495:
1493:
1490:
1486:
1483:
1482:
1481:
1478:
1476:
1473:
1471:
1468:
1466:
1463:
1461:
1457:
1454:
1452:
1449:
1447:
1446:
1442:
1440:
1437:
1435:
1434:
1430:
1428:
1425:
1424:
1421:
1415:
1414:
1410:
1408:
1405:
1403:
1400:
1398:
1395:
1391:
1388:
1387:
1386:
1385:
1381:
1380:
1378:
1376:
1372:
1369:
1367:
1360:
1348:
1345:
1344:
1343:
1339:
1336:
1334:
1331:
1329:
1326:
1322:
1318:
1315:
1313:
1312:
1308:
1306:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1298:
1297:
1294:
1288:
1285:
1283:
1282:
1278:
1276:
1273:
1271:
1268:
1266:
1263:
1259:
1258:
1254:
1250:
1247:
1246:
1245:
1244:
1240:
1239:
1238:
1235:
1233:
1230:
1229:
1227:
1225:
1224:
1219:
1216:
1214:
1210:
1200:
1197:
1195:
1192:
1190:
1187:
1185:
1182:
1180:
1177:
1175:
1172:
1170:
1166:
1165:Invented here
1163:
1161:
1158:
1156:
1153:
1151:
1148:
1146:
1143:
1141:
1138:
1136:
1133:
1131:
1128:
1127:
1125:
1123:
1119:
1113:
1110:
1108:
1107:
1103:
1102:
1100:
1098:
1094:
1088:
1084:
1081:
1079:
1076:
1075:
1073:
1069:
1063:
1060:
1058:
1055:
1053:
1050:
1048:
1045:
1041:
1038:
1037:
1036:
1033:
1029:
1028:
1024:
1022:
1021:
1017:
1016:
1014:
1010:
1007:
1006:
1005:
1002:
1001:
999:
997:
993:
987:
984:
982:
979:
977:
974:
972:
969:
967:
964:
962:
959:
957:
954:
953:
951:
949:
945:
939:
936:
934:
931:
929:
928:False analogy
926:
924:
921:
919:
915:
912:
908:
905:
903:
900:
899:
898:
897:Sampling bias
895:
893:
890:
889:
887:
885:
881:
875:
872:
870:
867:
866:
864:
862:
861:
860:Secundum quid
856:
850:
847:
845:
842:
840:
837:
836:
834:
832:
828:
822:
819:
817:
814:
810:
807:
806:
805:
804:False dilemma
802:
801:
799:
797:
793:
787:
784:
782:
778:
774:
771:
767:
764:
763:
762:
759:
757:
753:
750:
749:
747:
743:
737:
734:
732:
729:
727:
724:
722:
719:
717:
714:
712:
709:
707:
704:
703:
701:
697:
694:
692:
688:
678:
675:
673:
672:Illicit minor
670:
668:
667:Illicit major
665:
663:
660:
658:
655:
653:
650:
648:
645:
643:
640:
638:
635:
634:
632:
630:
626:
620:
617:
615:
612:
610:
607:
605:
602:
601:
599:
597:
592:
586:
583:
581:
578:
576:
573:
571:
568:
566:
563:
561:
558:
557:
555:
553:
548:
545:
543:
539:
534:
530:
522:
517:
515:
510:
508:
503:
502:
499:
492:
488:
485:
482:
479:
475:
472:
469:
466:
463:
462:
458:
443:
437:
434:
429:
425:
421:
417:
410:
407:
396:on 2018-12-21
392:
388:
384:
380:
376:
372:
368:
367:Argumentation
361:
357:
351:
348:
343:
336:
333:
320:
316:
314:0-471-27242-6
310:
306:
302:
301:
296:
290:
287:
274:
270:
264:
261:
258:
254:
251:
247:
246:0-521-37925-3
243:
239:
233:
231:
229:
227:
223:
218:
216:9780072879599
212:
208:
204:
203:
195:
192:
186:
181:
178:
176:
173:
171:
168:
166:
165:Mu (negative)
163:
161:
158:
156:
153:
151:
148:
146:
145:False dilemma
143:
141:
138:
136:
133:
131:
128:
127:
122:
120:
117:
111:
106:
104:
100:
93:
91:
89:
85:
76:
74:
72:
68:
64:
60:
56:
52:
48:
47:
41:
36:
34:
30:
26:
22:
1460:Naturalistic
1443:
1431:
1411:
1382:
1366:of relevance
1309:
1287:Whataboutism
1279:
1255:
1249:Godwin's law
1241:
1221:
1104:
1097:Consequences
1078:Law/Legality
1052:Single cause
1025:
1018:
858:
776:
726:Loki's Wager
706:Equivocation
699:Equivocation
446:. Retrieved
436:
415:
409:
398:. Retrieved
391:the original
370:
366:
350:
341:
335:
323:. Retrieved
299:
289:
277:. Retrieved
273:the original
263:
237:
201:
194:
113:
108:
97:
83:
80:
44:
37:
20:
18:
1480:Red herring
1237:Association
918:Conjunction
839:Composition
736:Reification
652:Existential
604:Existential
279:January 22,
207:McGraw-Hill
155:Implicature
71:proposition
46:presupposed
1456:Moralistic
1390:Sealioning
1384:Ad nauseam
1311:Ipse dixit
1223:Ad hominem
1047:Regression
849:Ecological
662:Four terms
580:Masked man
448:2010-02-03
400:2020-04-25
325:22 January
187:References
55:fallacious
43:facts are
40:rhetorical
29:assumption
1497:Straw man
1375:Arguments
1364:fallacies
1338:Tradition
1328:Etymology
1300:Authority
1281:Tu quoque
1265:Bulverism
1035:Gambler's
1004:Animistic
948:Ambiguity
914:Base rate
657:Necessity
529:fallacies
387:141720470
250:pp. 36–37
103:Menedemus
31:(e.g., a
1538:Category
1523:Category
1155:Ridicule
1140:Flattery
1130:Children
1027:Post hoc
907:McNamara
869:Accident
844:Division
691:Informal
487:Archived
474:Archived
319:Archived
253:Archived
123:See also
1342:Novelty
1317:Poverty
1179:Loyalty
1145:Novelty
1122:Emotion
1071:Appeals
1040:Inverse
1020:Cum hoc
1009:Furtive
527:Common
428:3123020
77:Defense
67:premise
1427:Cliché
1362:Other
1333:Nature
1321:Wealth
956:Accent
542:Formal
426:
385:
311:
244:
213:
1189:Spite
1083:Stone
394:(PDF)
383:S2CID
363:(PDF)
84:never
1275:Tone
1150:Pity
1135:Fear
533:list
424:OCLC
327:2008
309:ISBN
281:2008
242:ISBN
211:ISBN
594:In
550:In
420:109
375:doi
35:).
1540::
1458:/
1340:/
1319:/
1167:/
1085:/
916:/
779:/
775:/
754:/
422:.
381:.
371:13
369:.
365:.
317:.
303:.
248:,
225:^
209:.
205:.
90:.
19:A
535:)
531:(
520:e
513:t
506:v
451:.
430:.
403:.
377::
329:.
283:.
219:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.