119:. Supporters of the bill hoped it would encourage the growth of the software industry in Louisiana. It passed with minimal opposition in September 1984. Louisiana was the first state to adopt the SLEA, and the only state to adopt the bill as written by Vault Corporation. The bill was criticized for being, "a special-interest legislation designed to improve the economic position of software manufacturers without doing anything of substance to challenge software piracy," Jay BloomBecker.
167:, because, "Louisiana's License Act 'touched upon the area' of federal copyright law." Upon appeal, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling. Thus, the Louisiana Revised Statutes 51:1963:4 provision for reverse engineering, decompiling, or disassembling, was invalidated.
100:
This bill is intended to strengthen significantly the ability of software publishers and distributors to enforce their rights under trade secret and copyright laws. This bill strikes a balance between the legitimate interests of the software industry in preventing piracy and the legitimate interests
111:
Vault
Corporation's, a company that developed software protection systems (anti-piracy tools), Chairman Krag Brotby was attributed to saying, " helped write most of the bill...and that the announcement was timed to coincide with Softcon coming to New Orleans." Brotby predicted that the law would
146:. Vault argued that Quaid's actions in decompiling and disassembling PROLOK constituted a violation of the software license agreement. Therefore, by Louisiana's Software License Enforce Act, Quaid would be in violation of the Louisiana Uniform Trade Secret Act for trade secret misappropriation.
51:
The
Louisiana SLEA consists of sections 1961-1966 of Title 51 of the Louisiana Revised Statutes, which outlines and specifies: relevant definitions, requirements for enforceability, accepted licensing terms, proper display of licensing terms, and enforceability. Under section 1963, a software
20:
refers to the
Software License Enforcement Act (SLEA) adopted by the state of Louisiana. The bill was voted into law in September 1984 under Title 51 (Trade and Commerce) of the Louisiana Revised Statutes by the
156:
348:
34:
84:
In addition, the licensor may automatically terminate the software license agreement without notice if any provision of the agreement was breached by the licensee.
59:
The software license notice indicates that by opening the package or using the software the end user accepts the terms of the enclosed license agreement.
33:
and the requirements for enforceability. The reverse engineering, decompiling or disassembling provision of the
Louisiana SLEA was invalidated by the
70:
to retain ownership of a licensed software copy. If retained, the agreement may also include the following limitations of the end user's ability:
365:
342:
151:
39:
77:
To modify, adapt, translate, reverse engineer, decompile, disassemble, and/or develop derivative works of the licensed software copy.
432:
437:
22:
93:
115:
The SLEA was introduced to the
Louisiana State Legislature by State Senator William Atkins and Representative
135:
112:
provide a model for the other 49 states; Vault Corp. had invested $ 50,000 in an effort to push the bill.
62:
The notice states that the software may be returned if the end user does not accept the license agreement.
316:
164:
371:
26:
289:
143:
131:
219:
160:
92:
The
Louisiana SLEA was first announced at Softcon in New Orleans by Louisiana Secretary of State
152:
Vault Corp. v. Quaid
Software Ltd., 655 F.Supp. 750 (US District Court, E.D. Louisiana 1987)
30:
80:
To further transfer, assign, rent, sell, or otherwise dispose of a licensed software copy.
417:
412:
407:
402:
397:
392:
199:
184:
426:
387:
139:
253:
56:
The end user can clearly read a software license notice on the software packaging.
101:
of the customers who acquire copies of software pursuant to license agreements.
66:
Under section 1964, the terms of a software license agreement can enable the
52:
license agreement can only be enforced if the following conditions are met:
130:
The
Louisiana SLEA was first examined in court when Vault Corporation sued
351: (United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana 12 February 1987).
116:
67:
374: (United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit 20 June 1988).
157:
United States
District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
40:
Vault Corp. v. Quaid
Software, Ltd., 847 F.2d 255 (5th Cir. 1988)
200:
Software Enforcement Act - Louisiana Revised Statutes 51:1964.
185:
Software Enforcement Act - Louisiana Revised Statutes 51:1963.
96:
during a press conference sponsored by Vault Corporation.
418:
Software Enforcement Act - Louisiana Revised Statutes 51:1966
413:
Software Enforcement Act - Louisiana Revised Statutes 51:1965
408:
Software Enforcement Act - Louisiana Revised Statutes 51:1964
403:
Software Enforcement Act - Louisiana Revised Statutes 51:1963
398:
Software Enforcement Act - Louisiana Revised Statutes 51:1962
393:
Software Enforcement Act - Louisiana Revised Statutes 51:1961
29:, the SLEA defines the permissible terms and conditions of a
317:"High-Tech Piracy: Dispute Points Up Copying Controversy"
220:"Louisiana legislation would punish software pirates"
35:
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
74:To reproduce/replicate the licensed software copy.
258:ACM Special Interest Group Computers and Society
283:
281:
279:
98:
8:
213:
211:
209:
207:
106:Louisiana Secretary of State James H. Brown
359:
357:
18:Louisiana Software License Enforcement Act
195:
193:
176:
247:
245:
243:
241:
7:
254:"Lobbying for Computer Legislation"
366:Vault Corp. v. Quaid Software Ltd.
343:Vault Corp. v. Quaid Software Ltd.
288:Bloombecker, Jay (4 August 1986).
125:Vault Corp. v. Quaid Software Ltd.
25:. Sponsored and mostly written by
14:
290:"Software laws: A brief history"
252:Bloombecker, Jay (Spring 1986).
218:Bartimo, Jim (19 March 1984).
1:
315:Bates, James (24 June 1986).
23:Louisiana State Legislature
454:
388:Louisiana Revised Statutes
31:software license agreement
159:ruled that the SLEA was
349:655 F.Supp. 750
142:misappropriation, and
136:copyright infringement
109:
433:Computing legislation
372:847 F.2d 255
88:Road to becoming law
144:patent infringement
132:Quaid Software Ltd.
438:Louisiana statutes
321:Los Angeles Times
27:Vault Corporation
445:
375:
369:
361:
352:
346:
338:
332:
331:
329:
327:
312:
306:
305:
303:
301:
285:
274:
273:
271:
269:
249:
236:
235:
233:
231:
215:
202:
197:
188:
181:
107:
453:
452:
448:
447:
446:
444:
443:
442:
423:
422:
384:
379:
378:
363:
362:
355:
340:
339:
335:
325:
323:
314:
313:
309:
299:
297:
287:
286:
277:
267:
265:
251:
250:
239:
229:
227:
217:
216:
205:
198:
191:
182:
178:
173:
128:
108:
105:
90:
49:
12:
11:
5:
451:
449:
441:
440:
435:
425:
424:
421:
420:
415:
410:
405:
400:
395:
390:
383:
382:External links
380:
377:
376:
353:
333:
307:
275:
237:
203:
189:
175:
174:
172:
169:
127:
121:
103:
94:James H. Brown
89:
86:
82:
81:
78:
75:
64:
63:
60:
57:
48:
47:Summary of act
45:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
450:
439:
436:
434:
431:
430:
428:
419:
416:
414:
411:
409:
406:
404:
401:
399:
396:
394:
391:
389:
386:
385:
381:
373:
368:
367:
360:
358:
354:
350:
345:
344:
337:
334:
322:
318:
311:
308:
295:
294:Computerworld
291:
284:
282:
280:
276:
263:
259:
255:
248:
246:
244:
242:
238:
225:
221:
214:
212:
210:
208:
204:
201:
196:
194:
190:
187:
186:
180:
177:
170:
168:
166:
165:Copyright Act
162:
158:
154:
153:
147:
145:
141:
137:
133:
126:
122:
120:
118:
113:
102:
97:
95:
87:
85:
79:
76:
73:
72:
71:
69:
61:
58:
55:
54:
53:
46:
44:
42:
41:
36:
32:
28:
24:
19:
364:
341:
336:
324:. Retrieved
320:
310:
298:. Retrieved
296:. p. 58
293:
266:. Retrieved
261:
257:
228:. Retrieved
226:. p. 17
223:
183:
179:
150:
148:
140:trade secret
129:
124:
114:
110:
99:
91:
83:
65:
50:
38:
17:
15:
427:Categories
326:17 October
300:17 October
268:17 October
230:17 October
171:References
37:ruling in
224:InfoWorld
161:preempted
264:(1): 2–6
123:Role in
104:—
68:licensor
163:by the
117:Al Ater
370:,
347:,
155:, the
328:2011
302:2011
270:2011
232:2011
134:for
16:The
149:In
429::
356:^
319:.
292:.
278:^
262:16
260:.
256:.
240:^
222:.
206:^
192:^
138:,
43:.
330:.
304:.
272:.
234:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.