Knowledge (XXG)

Love v Commonwealth

Source đź“ť

31: 504: 518: 459:, said the decision created "an entirely new category of people in terms of what the government can and can't do" a non-citizen non-alien, or "belonger". Porter said that the government would be looking to deport the small group of Aboriginal non-citizens who have committed serious offences in a different way. 426:
Kiefel CJ criticised Edelman J who in his judgement argued that it would create a "hopeless and incoherent contradiction" within the legal system if despite the recognition of native title Aboriginal Australians could be treated as aliens. She stated that it would be wrong to assume that a connection
294:
Daniel Love and Brendan Thoms were men who had failed their migration character tests as a result of serving jail sentences. Neither Love nor Thoms was an Australian citizen, but both identified as Aboriginal Australians. The government was trying to deport both men as aliens under the provisions of
422:
Justice Gageler said he was opposed to the “judicial creation of any race-based constitutional distinction”, and that such a distinction, if it was to be created, should be created by a referendum. He argued that citizenship and alienage are mutually exclusive, and that it was within the power of
355:
intervened and made submissions in support of both Love and Thoms. It argued that Aboriginality is equivalent to citizenship, on the basis the unique relationship between members of Aboriginal societies and the land and waters of Australia meant that Aboriginal Australians could not be considered
442:
is limited to native title law and geographically limited, only applying to Indigenous groups and their specific to particular lands. They concluded that Aboriginal Australians can be aliens, and as the plaintiffs were not citizens, they could be deported.
434:, which was carefully rejected in the Mabo decision. Kiefel CJ and Kean J said that the determination by Aboriginal elders of Aboriginality would prevent parliament from designating such people as aliens, thus creating a sovereignty which was rejected by 677: 595: 344:
The two men were aged in their 30s and 40s at the time of the court case. Both had lived in Australia since they were small children, and had close family in Australia. Both men were legal
853: 1030: 474:
said that it was too early to tell what the ramifications would be, especially in light of the fact that each of the seven-person bench had given individual reasonings. The
396:
to deal with that question. As Thoms had already been recognised as an Aboriginal Australian through his native title claim, the Court determined that he was not an alien.
790: 430:
All three dissenting justices found no basis to limit parliament's power to determine alienage. They implied that the majority's decision recognised a competing
492:
said the judgment concerned a "very narrow application of the aliens power" and explicitly stated that it was not a recognition of Aboriginal sovereignty.
269: 212: 753: 276:. As a result, legislation passed under that power is inapplicable to Aboriginal Australians. In this case, this meant that the power to deport non- 222:
As Thoms is an Aboriginal Australian and therefore not an alien, the Commonwealth does not have the power to deport him under the provisions of the
1025: 1010: 1000: 464: 315: 311: 919: 1020: 881: 626: 563: 1015: 463:
described the decision as "a very bad thing" that would be "exploited by lawyers", and said he had sought legal advice from the
1005: 712: 531: 536: 489: 456: 345: 243: 231:
On the facts before them, the Court was unable by majority to determine whether or not Love was an Aboriginal Australian.
934: 891: 352: 423:
parliament to define these and not to be justiciable. Kean J expressed similar concerns about a race based limitation.
823: 478:
said that a number of "complex issues" had been raised, and would give rise to a great deal of debate and scrutiny.
392:
The majority could not, however, determine whether Love was an Aboriginal Australian and remitted the matter to the
393: 219:, to legislate in regard to "aliens" (per Bell, Nettle, Gordon and Edelman; Kiefel, Gageler and Keane dissenting). 128: 1035: 273: 121: 35: 564:"High Court rules Aboriginal people cannot be deported for criminal convictions, cannot be 'alien' to Australia" 475: 385: 103: 286:
could not be exercised against non-citizen Aboriginal Australians. The case was decided on 11 February 2020.
965: 721: 257: 216: 208: 46: 915: 471: 431: 261: 204: 596:"High court rules Aboriginal Australians are not 'aliens' under the constitution and cannot be deported" 485: 365: 157: 741: 924: 828:– an analysis of Justice Gageler's and Justice Edelman's approaches to constitutional interpretation" 631: 568: 310:. He had been placed in immigration detention after he was sentenced to more than a year in jail for 416: 296: 282: 224: 854:"Coalition seeks to sidestep high court ruling that Aboriginal non-citizens can't be deported" 791:"Legal experts urge caution on high court ruling that Aboriginal Australians are not 'aliens'" 389:) were not within the reach of the "aliens" power conferred by s 51(xix) of the Constitution. 338: 427:
to land, necessary for native title, could be used in a completely different are of the law.
337:. He was also placed in immigration detention after serving part of an 18-month sentence for 523: 452: 307: 303: 30: 707: 408: 373: 369: 330: 181: 175: 163: 97: 920:"High Court decision in Love and Thoms case reflects Aboriginal connection to the land" 974: 627:"Man released from detention as High Court rules Aboriginal people cannot be deported" 994: 412: 377: 187: 169: 383:) found that Aboriginal Australians (understood according to the tripartite test in 858: 795: 767: 600: 460: 404: 326: 319: 151: 364:
In the judgment, each judge issued a separate judgment. A majority of the Court (
953: 882:"'A very bad thing': Peter Dutton slams High Court's Aboriginal 'aliens' ruling" 503: 481: 334: 277: 265: 746:[2020] HCA 3: The Constitution, Indigenous rights and immigration law" 509: 499: 665: 886: 678:
Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies
322:, but this was later overturned and he was released from detention. 704:
Love v Commonwealth of Australia; Thoms v Commonwealth of Australia
380: 341:. He remained in detention until the judgment was handed down. 935:"High Court decision defines Aboriginal Australian identity" 356:"aliens" for the purposes of s 51(xix) of the Constitution. 438:("Indigenous people are part of the people of Australia"). 742:"Case note: Reflections on the High Court decision in 625:
Byrne, Elizabeth; Robertson, Josh (11 February 2020).
562:
Byrne, Elizabeth; Robertson, Josh (11 February 2020).
237: 196: 143: 138: 113: 90: 75: 52: 42: 23: 852:Karp, Paul; Wahlquist, Calla (12 February 2020). 699: 697: 695: 557: 555: 553: 551: 467:that would be "looking to restrict the damage". 735: 733: 731: 314:. His permanent residency visa was revoked by 8: 985:. High Court of Australia. 11 February 2020. 1031:Rights in the Australian Constitution cases 784: 782: 780: 847: 845: 353:Attorney-General for the State of Victoria 29: 20: 660: 658: 656: 654: 652: 650: 253:Love v Commonwealth; Thoms v Commonwealth 24:Love v Commonwealth; Thoms v Commonwealth 754:Australasian Legal Information Institute 299:, based on a 2014 amendment of the Act. 817: 815: 813: 750:Precedent (Australian Lawyers Alliance) 620: 618: 547: 228:(per Bell, Nettle, Gordon and Edelman). 66:Thoms and The Commonwealth of Australia 589: 587: 312:assault occasioning actual bodily harm 63:Love and The Commonwealth of Australia 939:Constitution Education Fund Australia 789:Wahlquist, Calla (12 February 2020). 7: 302:Love was a recognised member of the 16:2020 case in High Court of Australia 740:Kate Slack; Arron Hartnett (2020). 207:do not fall under the ambit of the 960:Thoms v. Commonwealth of Australia 14: 987:– full hearing and final judgment 981:Thoms v Commonwealth of Australia 956:Love v. Commonwealth of Australia 672:Thoms v Commonwealth of Australia 977:Love v Commonwealth of Australia 880:Young, Evan (13 February 2020). 744:Love v Commonwealth of Australia 668:Love v Commonwealth of Australia 516: 502: 822:Mikaela Smith (17 March 2021). 594:Karp, Paul (11 February 2020). 348:prior to their jail sentences. 1026:Indigenous Australian case law 766:(The authors appeared, led by 532:Australian Aboriginal identity 346:Australian permanent residents 1: 1011:Australian constitutional law 1001:High Court of Australia cases 537:Australian constitutional law 490:University of New South Wales 470:Constitutional law professor 457:Attorney-General of Australia 892:Special Broadcasting Service 930:– analysis of ramifications 329:holder and a member of the 1052: 1021:Australian nationality law 770:SC, for the plaintiffs in 484:lawyer Eddie Synot of the 465:Department of Home Affairs 79:11 February 2020 824:"The divided decision in 242: 209:Commonwealth Parliament's 201: 36:Commonwealth Coat of Arms 28: 1016:Australian migration law 970:– includes all documents 476:Law Council of Australia 386:Mabo v Queensland (No 2) 966:High Court of Australia 830:. Australian Public Law 722:High Court of Australia 258:High Court of Australia 47:High Court of Australia 1006:2020 in Australian law 979:[2020] HCA 3: 432:Aboriginal sovereignty 268:" for the purposes of 262:Aboriginal Australians 205:Aboriginal Australians 674:[2020] HCA 3" 486:Indigenous Law Centre 918:(12 February 2020). 708:[2020] HCA 3 260:case that held that 98:[2020] HCA 3 968:. 11 February 2020. 941:. 14 February 2020. 826:Love v Commonwealth 451:The following day, 417:dissenting opinions 400:Dissenting opinions 724:, 11 February 2020 415:JJ each delivered 297:Migration Act 1958 283:Migration Act 1958 244:Constitutional law 225:Migration Act 1958 339:domestic violence 249: 248: 1043: 1036:2020 in case law 986: 969: 954:"Case B43/2018: 942: 929: 903: 902: 900: 898: 877: 871: 870: 868: 866: 849: 840: 839: 837: 835: 819: 808: 807: 805: 803: 786: 775: 765: 763: 761: 737: 726: 725: 719: 714:Judgment summary 701: 690: 689: 687: 685: 662: 645: 644: 642: 640: 622: 613: 612: 610: 608: 591: 582: 581: 579: 577: 559: 526: 524:Australia portal 521: 520: 519: 512: 507: 506: 453:Christian Porter 333:who was born in 308:Papua New Guinea 306:who was born in 304:Kamilaroi people 139:Court membership 131: 124: 86: 84: 33: 21: 1051: 1050: 1046: 1045: 1044: 1042: 1041: 1040: 991: 990: 973: 952: 949: 933: 914: 911: 909:Further reading 906: 896: 894: 879: 878: 874: 864: 862: 851: 850: 843: 833: 831: 821: 820: 811: 801: 799: 788: 787: 778: 759: 757: 739: 738: 729: 717: 711: 702: 693: 683: 681: 664: 663: 648: 638: 636: 624: 623: 616: 606: 604: 593: 592: 585: 575: 573: 561: 560: 549: 545: 522: 517: 515: 508: 501: 498: 449: 402: 362: 331:Gunggari people 292: 192: 182:Michelle Gordon 176:Geoffrey Nettle 164:Stephen Gageler 134: 129:5 December 2019 127: 120: 109: 82: 80: 69: 38: 17: 12: 11: 5: 1049: 1047: 1039: 1038: 1033: 1028: 1023: 1018: 1013: 1008: 1003: 993: 992: 989: 988: 971: 948: 947:External links 945: 944: 943: 931: 910: 907: 905: 904: 872: 841: 809: 776: 756:. Precedent 37 727: 691: 646: 614: 583: 546: 544: 541: 540: 539: 534: 528: 527: 513: 497: 494: 448: 445: 401: 398: 361: 358: 291: 288: 247: 246: 240: 239: 235: 234: 233: 232: 229: 220: 199: 198: 194: 193: 191: 190: 184: 178: 172: 166: 160: 154: 150:Chief Justice 147: 145: 144:Judges sitting 141: 140: 136: 135: 133: 132: 125: 117: 115: 111: 110: 108: 107: 100: 94: 92: 88: 87: 77: 73: 72: 68: 67: 64: 58: 54: 53:Full case name 50: 49: 44: 40: 39: 34: 26: 25: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1048: 1037: 1034: 1032: 1029: 1027: 1024: 1022: 1019: 1017: 1014: 1012: 1009: 1007: 1004: 1002: 999: 998: 996: 984: 982: 978: 972: 967: 963: 961: 957: 951: 950: 946: 940: 936: 932: 927: 926: 921: 917: 913: 912: 908: 893: 889: 888: 883: 876: 873: 861: 860: 855: 848: 846: 842: 829: 827: 818: 816: 814: 810: 798: 797: 792: 785: 783: 781: 777: 773: 769: 755: 751: 747: 745: 736: 734: 732: 728: 723: 716: 715: 709: 705: 700: 698: 696: 692: 679: 675: 673: 669: 661: 659: 657: 655: 653: 651: 647: 634: 633: 628: 621: 619: 615: 603: 602: 597: 590: 588: 584: 571: 570: 565: 558: 556: 554: 552: 548: 542: 538: 535: 533: 530: 529: 525: 514: 511: 505: 500: 495: 493: 491: 487: 483: 479: 477: 473: 468: 466: 462: 458: 454: 446: 444: 441: 437: 433: 428: 424: 420: 418: 414: 410: 406: 399: 397: 395: 394:Federal Court 390: 388: 387: 382: 379: 375: 371: 367: 359: 357: 354: 349: 347: 342: 340: 336: 332: 328: 323: 321: 317: 313: 309: 305: 300: 298: 289: 287: 285: 284: 279: 275: 272:(xix) of the 271: 267: 263: 259: 255: 254: 245: 241: 236: 230: 227: 226: 221: 218: 215:(xix) of the 214: 211:power, under 210: 206: 203: 202: 200: 197:Case opinions 195: 189: 188:James Edelman 185: 183: 179: 177: 173: 171: 170:Patrick Keane 167: 165: 161: 159: 158:Virginia Bell 155: 153: 149: 148: 146: 142: 137: 130: 126: 123: 119: 118: 116: 112: 105: 101: 99: 96: 95: 93: 89: 78: 74: 71: 65: 62: 61: 60: 57: 55: 51: 48: 45: 41: 37: 32: 27: 22: 19: 980: 976: 959: 955: 938: 928:. Australia. 923: 916:Twomey, Anne 895:. Retrieved 885: 875: 863:. Retrieved 859:The Guardian 857: 834:29 September 832:. Retrieved 825: 800:. Retrieved 796:The Guardian 794: 771: 768:Stephen Keim 760:29 September 758:. Retrieved 749: 743: 713: 703: 682:. Retrieved 671: 667: 637:. Retrieved 630: 605:. Retrieved 601:The Guardian 599: 574:. Retrieved 567: 480: 469: 461:Peter Dutton 450: 447:Consequences 439: 436:Mabo (No. 2) 435: 429: 425: 421: 403: 391: 384: 363: 350: 343: 327:native title 325:Thoms was a 324: 320:Peter Dutton 316:Home Affairs 301: 293: 281: 274:Constitution 252: 251: 250: 223: 217:Constitution 152:Susan Kiefel 70: 59: 56: 18: 897:13 February 865:12 February 802:12 February 639:12 February 635:. Australia 607:12 February 576:11 February 572:. Australia 482:Wamba Wamba 472:Anne Twomey 335:New Zealand 238:Area of law 114:Transcripts 102:(2020) 270 995:Categories 543:References 510:Law portal 290:Background 280:under the 270:section 51 264:were not " 213:section 51 122:8 May 2019 83:2020-02-11 680:(AIATSIS) 318:Minister 91:Citations 925:ABC News 887:SBS News 632:ABC News 569:ABC News 496:See also 360:Decision 278:citizens 186:Justice 180:Justice 174:Justice 168:Justice 162:Justice 156:Justice 684:22 June 488:at the 455:, then 409:Gageler 407:CJ and 378:Edelman 81: ( 76:Decided 405:Kiefel 374:Gordon 370:Nettle 266:aliens 718:(PDF) 706: 413:Keane 411:and 256:is a 43:Court 899:2020 867:2020 836:2023 804:2020 772:Love 762:2023 686:2022 641:2020 609:2020 578:2020 440:Mabo 376:and 366:Bell 351:The 295:the 106:152 104:CLR 997:: 964:. 958:, 937:. 922:. 890:. 884:. 856:. 844:^ 812:^ 793:. 779:^ 774:.) 752:. 748:. 730:^ 720:, 710:. 694:^ 676:. 670:; 649:^ 629:. 617:^ 598:. 586:^ 566:. 550:^ 419:. 381:JJ 372:, 368:, 983:" 975:" 962:" 901:. 869:. 838:. 806:. 764:. 688:. 666:" 643:. 611:. 580:. 85:)

Index


Commonwealth Coat of Arms
High Court of Australia
[2020] HCA 3
CLR
8 May 2019
5 December 2019
Susan Kiefel
Virginia Bell
Stephen Gageler
Patrick Keane
Geoffrey Nettle
Michelle Gordon
James Edelman
Aboriginal Australians
Commonwealth Parliament's
section 51
Constitution
Migration Act 1958
Constitutional law
High Court of Australia
Aboriginal Australians
aliens
section 51
Constitution
citizens
Migration Act 1958
Migration Act 1958
Kamilaroi people
Papua New Guinea

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑