210:
275:
118:
29:
251:
280:
270:
285:
133:"should be applied only when it is likely that the ordinary American purchaser would 'stop and translate into its English equivalent.'"
130:
126:
122:
244:
237:
217:
192:
155:
61:
183:
76:
80:
221:
114:
264:
111:
84:
209:
159:
125:. The court explained that there is a threshold limitation to applying the
177:
Palm Bay
Imports, Inc. v. Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin Maison Fondee en 1772
151:
Palm Bay
Imports, Inc. v. Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin Maison Fondee en 1772
107:
Palm Bay
Imports, Inc. v. Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin Maison Fondee en 1772
40:
Palm Bay
Imports, Inc. v. Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin Maison Fondee en 1772
21:
Palm Bay
Imports, Inc. v. Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin Maison Fondee en 1772
58:
276:
United States Court of
Appeals for the Federal Circuit cases
225:
119:
United States Court of
Appeals for the Federal Circuit
30:
United States Court of
Appeals for the Federal Circuit
179:, 396 F.3d 1369 (Fed. Cir. 2005) is available from:
95:
90:
72:
67:
53:
45:
35:
25:
20:
117:1369 (Fed. Cir. 2005), was a case decided by the
245:
8:
252:
238:
17:
142:
220:or its constituent jurisdictions is a
7:
206:
204:
224:. You can help Knowledge (XXG) by
14:
281:United States trademark case law
208:
127:doctrine of foreign equivalents
123:doctrine of foreign equivalents
271:2005 in United States case law
1:
218:case law in the United States
286:United States case law stubs
302:
203:
99:Rader, joined by unanimous
216:This article relating to
156:396 F.3d 1369
77:Paul Redmond Michel
233:
232:
103:
102:
81:Randall Ray Rader
293:
254:
247:
240:
212:
205:
197:
191:
188:
182:
163:
153:
147:
68:Court membership
49:February 9, 2005
18:
301:
300:
296:
295:
294:
292:
291:
290:
261:
260:
259:
258:
201:
195:
189:
186:
180:
172:
167:
166:
149:
148:
144:
139:
121:clarifying the
12:
11:
5:
299:
297:
289:
288:
283:
278:
273:
263:
262:
257:
256:
249:
242:
234:
231:
230:
213:
199:
198:
184:Google Scholar
171:
170:External links
168:
165:
164:
141:
140:
138:
135:
101:
100:
97:
93:
92:
88:
87:
74:
73:Judges sitting
70:
69:
65:
64:
55:
51:
50:
47:
43:
42:
37:
36:Full case name
33:
32:
27:
23:
22:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
298:
287:
284:
282:
279:
277:
274:
272:
269:
268:
266:
255:
250:
248:
243:
241:
236:
235:
229:
227:
223:
219:
214:
211:
207:
202:
194:
185:
178:
174:
173:
169:
161:
157:
152:
146:
143:
136:
134:
132:
128:
124:
120:
116:
113:
109:
108:
98:
94:
91:Case opinions
89:
86:
82:
78:
75:
71:
66:
63:
60:
56:
52:
48:
44:
41:
38:
34:
31:
28:
24:
19:
16:
226:expanding it
215:
200:
176:
158:, 1377 (
150:
145:
106:
105:
104:
85:Sharon Prost
39:
15:
162: 2005).
265:Categories
137:References
160:Fed. Cir.
175:Text of
131:doctrine
96:Majority
54:Citation
129:. The
46:Decided
196:
193:Justia
190:
187:
181:
154:,
26:Court
222:stub
115:F.3d
62:1369
59:F.3d
57:396
112:396
267::
110:,
83:,
79:,
253:e
246:t
239:v
228:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
