Knowledge (XXG)

Pearson v Wynn

Source 📝

28: 129:
The court held that whilst the $ 9,500 - $ 10,000 in costs were not substantial in itself, that the inconvenience of the work that was entailed, met the standard required under either s 7 (4)(b)(I) or s7(4)(b)(ii). Williamson J stated
132:
Matters in relation to this term not necessarily relate only to value or money, but may also involve features which confer a benefit or cast a burden of some substantive on a party
187: 182: 160: 192: 115:
that the land was fully irrigated, when in fact that the irrigation system need a further $ 9,500 to $ 10,000 spent on it.
197: 38: 93: 156: 112: 27: 92:
regarding the requirement under section 7(4)(b) of the Contractual Remedies Act 1970 that a
176: 89: 97: 118:
When this came to the notice of Wynn, he cancelled the contract.
108:
Pearson sold to Wynn his horticultural land for $ 159,000.
151:
Chetwin, Maree; Graw, Stephen; Tiong, Raymond (2006).
153:
An introduction to the Law of Contract in New Zealand
75: 70: 62: 54: 44: 34: 20: 155:(4th ed.). Thomson Brookers. p. 354. 8: 121:Pearson sued to have the contract honoured. 17: 143: 88:(1986) 2 NZCPR 449 is a cited case in 7: 14: 26: 188:High Court of New Zealand cases 111:Prior to the sale, Pearson had 1: 183:New Zealand contract case law 96:must be "substantial" for a 214: 39:High Court of New Zealand 25: 193:1986 in New Zealand law 94:breach of contract 66:(1986) 2 NZCPR 449 100:to be cancelled. 83: 82: 205: 198:1986 in case law 167: 166: 148: 71:Court membership 49:Pearson v Wynn 30: 18: 213: 212: 208: 207: 206: 204: 203: 202: 173: 172: 171: 170: 163: 150: 149: 145: 140: 127: 106: 12: 11: 5: 211: 209: 201: 200: 195: 190: 185: 175: 174: 169: 168: 161: 142: 141: 139: 136: 126: 123: 113:misrepresented 105: 102: 86:Pearson v Wynn 81: 80: 77: 73: 72: 68: 67: 64: 60: 59: 56: 52: 51: 46: 45:Full case name 42: 41: 36: 32: 31: 23: 22: 21:Pearson v Wynn 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 210: 199: 196: 194: 191: 189: 186: 184: 181: 180: 178: 164: 162:0-86472-555-8 158: 154: 147: 144: 137: 135: 133: 124: 122: 119: 116: 114: 109: 103: 101: 99: 95: 91: 87: 78: 76:Judge sitting 74: 69: 65: 61: 57: 53: 50: 47: 43: 40: 37: 33: 29: 24: 19: 16: 152: 146: 131: 128: 120: 117: 110: 107: 85: 84: 48: 15: 90:New Zealand 79:Wlliamson J 177:Categories 138:References 104:Background 58:6 May 1986 98:contract 63:Citation 55:Decided 159:  35:Court 157:ISBN 125:Held 134:". 179:: 165:. 130:"

Index


High Court of New Zealand
New Zealand
breach of contract
contract
misrepresented
ISBN
0-86472-555-8
Categories
New Zealand contract case law
High Court of New Zealand cases
1986 in New Zealand law
1986 in case law

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.