Knowledge (XXG)

Forward secrecy

Source đź“ť

501:) are available. In theory, TLS could choose appropriate ciphers since SSLv3, but in everyday practice many implementations refused to offer forward secrecy or only provided it with very low encryption grade. This is no longer the case with TLS 1.3, which ensures forward secrecy by leaving ephemeral Diffie–Hellman (finite field and elliptic curve variants) as the only remaining key exchange mechanism. 181: 362:
in non-interactive key exchange, and, as forward security is a desirable property in a key exchange protocol, in non-interactive forward secrecy. This combination has been identified as desirable since at least 1996. However, combining forward secrecy and non-interactivity has proven challenging; it had been suspected that forward secrecy with protection against
433:
Weak perfect forward secrecy (Wpfs) is the weaker property whereby when agents' long-term keys are compromised, the secrecy of previously established session-keys is guaranteed, but only for sessions in which the adversary did not actively interfere. This new notion, and the distinction between this
361:
implementation, rather than requiring sender and recipient to be online at the same time; loosening the bidirectionality requirement can also improve performance even where it is not a strict requirement, for example at connection establishment or resumption. These use cases have stimulated interest
102:
The value of forward secrecy is that it protects past communication. This reduces the motivation for attackers to compromise keys. For instance, if an attacker learns a long-term key, but the compromise is detected and the long-term key is revoked and updated, relatively little information is leaked
78:
of the server. Forward secrecy protects past sessions against future compromises of keys or passwords. By generating a unique session key for every session a user initiates, the compromise of a single session key will not affect any data other than that exchanged in the specific session protected by
119:
to prevent reading past traffic. The ephemeral Diffie–Hellman key exchange is often signed by the server using a static signing key. If an adversary can steal (or obtain through a court order) this static (long term) signing key, the adversary can masquerade as the server to the client and as the
284:
Forward secrecy (achieved by generating new session keys for each message) ensures that past communications cannot be decrypted if one of the keys generated in an iteration of step 2 is compromised, since such a key is only used to encrypt a single message. Forward secrecy also ensures that past
114:
The value of forward secrecy is limited not only by the assumption that an adversary will attack a server by only stealing keys and not modifying the random number generator used by the server but it is also limited by the assumption that the adversary will only passively collect traffic on the
106:
The value of forward secrecy depends on the assumed capabilities of an adversary. Forward secrecy has value if an adversary is assumed to be able to obtain secret keys from a device (read access) but is either detected or unable to modify the way session keys are generated in the device (full
568:
At WWDC 2016, Apple announced that all iOS apps would need to use App Transport Security (ATS), a feature which enforces the use of HTTPS transmission. Specifically, ATS requires the use of an encryption cipher that provides forward secrecy. ATS became mandatory for apps on January 1, 2017.
321:
attack, an attacker in control of the network may itself store messages while preventing them from reaching the intended recipient; as the messages are never received, the corresponding private keys may not be destroyed or punctured, so a compromise of the private key can lead to successful
301:
being used, since a cryptanalysis consists of finding a way to decrypt an encrypted message without the key, and forward secrecy only protects keys, not the ciphers themselves. A patient attacker can capture a conversation whose confidentiality is protected through the use of
94:
security bug. If forward secrecy is used, encrypted communications and sessions recorded in the past cannot be retrieved and decrypted should long-term secret keys or passwords be compromised in the future, even if the adversary actively interfered, for example via a
564:
also provide forward secrecy. TLS 1.3, published in August 2018, dropped support for ciphers without forward secrecy. As of February 2019, 96.6% of web servers surveyed support some form of forward secrecy, and 52.1% will use forward secrecy with most browsers.
166:
An encryption system has the property of forward secrecy if plain-text (decrypted) inspection of the data exchange that occurs during key agreement phase of session initiation does not reveal the key that was used to encrypt the remainder of the session.
434:
and forward secrecy was introduced by Hugo Krawczyk in 2005. This weaker definition implicitly requires that full (perfect) forward secrecy maintains the secrecy of previously established session keys even in sessions where the adversary
31: 380:
With pre-computed keys, many key pairs are created and the public keys shared, with the private keys destroyed after a message has been received using the corresponding public key. This approach has been deployed as part of the
285:
communications cannot be decrypted if the long-term private keys from step 1 are compromised. However, masquerading as Alice or Bob would be possible going forward if this occurred, possibly compromising all future messages.
424:
to use a 0-RTT forward secure and replay-resistant key exchange implemented with puncturable encryption incurred significantly increased resource usage, but not so much as to make practical use infeasible.
293:
Forward secrecy is designed to prevent the compromise of a long-term secret key from affecting the confidentiality of past conversations. However, forward secrecy cannot defend against a successful
537:
Forward secrecy is seen as an important security feature by several large Internet information providers. Since late 2011, Google provided forward secrecy with TLS by default to users of its
342:, requiring bidirectional communication between the parties. A protocol that permits the sender to transmit data without first needing to receive any replies from the recipient may be called 388:
In puncturable encryption, the recipient modifies their private key after receiving a message in such a way that the new private key cannot read the message but the public key is unchanged.
79:
that particular key. This by itself is not sufficient for forward secrecy which additionally requires that a long-term secret compromise does not affect the security of past session keys.
108: 107:
compromise). In some cases an adversary who can read long-term keys from a device may also be able to modify the functioning of the session key generator, as in the backdoored
1708: 151: 38:(KDF) can help achieve Forward Secrecy. A KDF is a one-way function that generates a new key from the current key. Leaking a key does not allow discovery of prior keys. 280:
The process repeats for each new message sent, starting from step 2 (and switching Alice and Bob's roles as sender/receiver as appropriate). Step 1 is never repeated.
1420: 650: 326:
attack, the attacker sends many messages to the recipient and exhausts the private key material, forcing a protocol to choose between failing closed (and enabling
1984: 1860: 400:, which modifies the private key according to a schedule so that messages sent in previous periods cannot be read with the private key from a later period. 1805: 253:
in person or over an already-authenticated channel. Verification establishes with confidence that the claimed owner of a public key is the actual owner.
1811: 1683:
Dallmeier, Fynn; Drees, Jan P.; Gellert, Kai; Handrik, Tobias; Jager, Tibor; Klauke, Jonas; Nachtigall, Simon; Renzelmann, Timo; Wolf, Rudi (2020).
1229:
Unger, Nik; Dechand, Sergej; Bonneau, Joseph; Fahl, Sascha; Perl, Henning; Goldberg, Ian; Smith, Matthew (17–21 May 2015). "SoK: Secure Messaging".
111:. If an adversary can make the random number generator predictable, then past traffic will be protected but all future traffic will be compromised. 583:
Forward secrecy is supported on 92.6% of websites on modern browsers, while 0.3% of websites do not support forward secrecy at all as of May 2024.
1360: 1955: 1799: 405: 1586: 1556: 1251: 1066: 868: 702: 1148: 140: 2256: 2077: 1893: 1536: 602: 508: 490: 2291: 1999: 1787: 1758: 228: 317:
Non-interactive forward-secure key exchange protocols face additional threats that are not relevant to interactive protocols. In a
2286: 2220: 202: 1720: 1667: 597: 257: 116: 1912: 1188: 357:
Interactivity is onerous for some applications—for example, in a secure messaging system, it may be desirable to have a
158:, which establishes the related one-party and two-party forward secrecy properties of various standard key agreement schemes. 2225: 1822: 1714: 542: 462:
which provides additional features such as multi-user functionality in such clients, both provide forward secrecy as well as
206: 576:
messaging application employs forward secrecy in its protocol, notably differentiating it from messaging protocols based on
557:
have all provided forward secrecy to users since July 2014 and are requiring the use of forward secrecy since August 2018.
1459: 70:
will not be compromised even if long-term secrets used in the session key exchange are compromised, limiting damage. For
2037: 2007: 1906: 2017: 1887: 486: 314:
to be computed quickly). This would allow the recovery of old plaintexts even in a system employing forward secrecy.
191: 115:
communications link and not be active using a man-in-the-middle attack. Forward secrecy typically uses an ephemeral
560:
Facebook reported as part of an investigation into email encryption that, as of May 2014, 74% of hosts that support
2198: 1961: 607: 409: 311: 1083: 210: 195: 2057: 1989: 1928: 322:
decryption. Proactively retiring private keys on a schedule mitigates, but does not eliminate, this attack. In a
1391: 136:, and Michael James Wiener in 1992 where it was used to describe a property of the Station-to-Station protocol. 2178: 2141: 2108: 1781: 1767: 519: 470: 455: 96: 1051:. Advances in Cryptology – CRYPTO 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 3621. pp. 546–566. 241:
The following is a hypothetical example of a simple instant messaging protocol that employs forward secrecy:
2281: 1939: 1923: 1828: 303: 250: 246: 75: 35: 1918: 1882: 1793: 1098: 785: 734: 573: 526: 63: 2245: 2146: 1866: 1751: 366:
was impossible non-interactively, but it has been shown to be possible to achieve all three desiderata.
1230: 1640: 1338: 1209: 554: 1103: 1282: 790: 739: 577: 463: 478: 392:
informally described a puncturable encryption scheme for forward secure key exchange in 1997, and
2162: 1877: 1592: 1257: 1124: 874: 803: 752: 626: 511:
since version 1.0, with a computational overhead of approximately 15% for the initial handshake.
494: 482: 1517: 651:"tls - Does Perfect Forward Secrecy (PFS) make Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) attacks more difficult?" 128:
The term "perfect forward secrecy" was coined by C. G. GĂĽnther in 1990 and further discussed by
2113: 1839: 1582: 1552: 1247: 1062: 864: 698: 592: 358: 327: 307: 133: 1309: 2118: 1934: 1872: 1744: 1657: 1649: 1620: 1574: 1566: 1544: 1513: 1239: 1116: 1108: 1052: 856: 795: 744: 389: 271: 129: 1635: 719: 1569:; Miers, Ian (2015). "Forward Secure Asynchronous Messaging from Puncturable Encryption". 515: 416:
use a different construction that can be based on any hierarchical identity-based scheme.
382: 83: 855:. WiSec '08. Alexandria, VA, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. pp. 100–108. 691: 363: 17: 2275: 1899: 1834: 1084:"Beyond eCK: perfect forward secrecy under actor compromise and ephemeral-key reveal" 849:"Key management and secure software updates in wireless process control environments" 474: 458:, a cryptography protocol and library for many instant messaging clients, as well as 294: 267:. They use the keys from step 1 only to authenticate one another during this process. 261: 1726: 1160: 1128: 878: 776:
Jablon, David P. (October 1996). "Strong Password-Only Authenticated Key Exchange".
2193: 1967: 1709:
Perfect Forward Secrecy can block the NSA from secure web pages, but no one uses it
1596: 1261: 807: 756: 447: 43: 1434: 1685:"Forward-Secure 0-RTT Goes Live: Implementation and Performance Analysis in QUIC" 847:
Nilsson, Dennis K.; Roosta, Tanya; Lindqvist, Ulf; Valdes, Alfonso (2008-03-31).
1702: 1625: 1532: 1528: 1283:"Wi-Fi Gets More Secure: Everything You Need to Know About WPA3 - IEEE Spectrum" 1238:. San Jose, CA: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. p. 241. 264: 180: 67: 369:
Broadly, two approaches to non-interactive forward secrecy have been explored,
2240: 1464: 1120: 1112: 446:
Forward secrecy is present in several major protocol implementations, such as
155: 91: 1731: 1653: 1548: 821: 2235: 2047: 2012: 1616: 860: 86:
of a network that uses common transport layer security protocols, including
822:"IEEE 1363-2000 - IEEE Standard Specifications for Public-Key Cryptography" 848: 799: 718:
Diffie, Whitfield; van Oorschot, Paul C.; Wiener, Michael J. (June 1992).
2052: 2042: 2027: 1662: 1365: 561: 330:
attacks) or failing open (and giving up some amount of forward secrecy).
144: 139:
Forward secrecy has also been used to describe the analogous property of
1057: 2092: 2087: 2072: 2062: 1684: 1605: 1578: 1543:. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 2656. pp. 255–271. 1435:"App Transport Security REQUIRED January 2017 | Apple Developer Forums" 1243: 748: 546: 504: 298: 120:
client to the server and implement a classic man-in-the-middle attack.
87: 30: 2250: 2203: 2183: 2082: 2067: 2032: 1604:
GĂĽnther, Felix; Hale, Britta; Jager, Tibor; Lauer, Sebastian (2017).
1486: 1395: 1387: 914: 912: 853:
Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Wireless network security
396:
formally described such a system, building on the related scheme of
2230: 2188: 2022: 1817: 1046: 678:. Advances in Cryptology EUROCRYPT '89 (LNCS 434). pp. 29–37. 538: 498: 459: 451: 71: 29: 1334: 1287: 826: 550: 438:
actively interfere, or attempted to act as a man in the middle.
421: 277:
Bob decrypts Alice's message using the key negotiated in step 2.
1740: 1736: 689:
Menzies, Alfred; van Oorscot, Paul C; Vanstone, SCOTT (1997).
174: 90:, when its long-term secret keys are compromised, as with the 941: 939: 545:
service, and encrypted search services. Since November 2013,
525:
On the other hand, among popular protocols currently in use,
1032: 417: 306:
and wait until the underlying cipher is broken (e.g. large
968: 966: 1539:(2003). "A Forward-Secure Public-Key Encryption Scheme". 1189:"Protecting data for the long term with forward secrecy" 1460:"WhatsApp, Signal, and dangerously ignorant journalism" 1048:
HMQV: A High-Performance Secure Diffie-Hellman Protocol
109:
Dual Elliptic Curve Deterministic Random Bit Generator
1705:
IETF, H. Orman. The OAKLEY Key Determination Protocol
1020: 918: 413: 2213: 2171: 2155: 2134: 2127: 2101: 1998: 1977: 1948: 1853: 1774: 256:Alice and Bob use a key exchange algorithm such as 143:protocols where the long-term secret is a (shared) 1149:Discussion on the TLS mailing list in October 2007 690: 1183: 1181: 397: 245:Alice and Bob each generate a pair of long-term, 720:"Authentication and Authenticated Key Exchanges" 549:provided forward secrecy with TLS to its users. 270:Alice sends Bob a message, encrypting it with a 1782:Transport Layer Security / Secure Sockets Layer 1361:"The Current State of SMTP STARTTLS Deployment" 1606:"0-RTT Key Exchange with Full Forward Secrecy" 1161:"A Detailed Look at RFC 8446 (a.k.a. TLS 1.3)" 1985:Export of cryptography from the United States 1752: 529:did not support forward secrecy before WPA3. 8: 1861:Automated Certificate Management Environment 1634:Boyd, Colin; Gellert, Kai (24 August 2020). 1571:2015 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 1232:2015 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 1008: 984: 945: 930: 903: 891: 274:using the session key negotiated in step 2. 209:. Unsourced material may be challenged and 2131: 1806:DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities 1759: 1745: 1737: 1715:SSL: Intercepted today, decrypted tomorrow 972: 401: 393: 1812:DNS Certification Authority Authorization 1661: 1102: 1056: 789: 738: 627:"/docs/man1.1.1/man3/SSL_set_tmp_dh.html" 229:Learn how and when to remove this message 996: 74:, the long-term secret is typically the 1541:Advances in Cryptology — EUROCRYPT 2003 1210:"SSL/TLS & Perfect Forward Secrecy" 676:An identity-based key-exchange protocol 618: 1956:Domain Name System Security Extensions 1800:Application-Layer Protocol Negotiation 1518:"Two Remarks on Public Key Cryptology" 406:hierarchical identity-based encryption 1648:(4) (published April 2021): 639–652. 1082:Cremers, Cas; Feltz, Michèle (2015). 82:Forward secrecy protects data on the 7: 957: 420:experimentally found that modifying 207:adding citations to reliable sources 141:password-authenticated key agreement 1636:"A Modern View on Forward Security" 1208:Vincent Bernat (28 November 2011). 655:Information Security Stack Exchange 1894:Online Certificate Status Protocol 247:asymmetric public and private keys 25: 1788:Datagram Transport Layer Security 1621:"non-interactive forward secrecy" 778:ACM Computer Communication Review 398:Canetti, Halevi & Katz (2003) 310:could be created which allow the 2221:Certificate authority compromise 1670:from the original on 7 June 2021 693:Handbook of Applied Cryptography 338:Most key exchange protocols are 179: 2226:Random number generator attacks 1913:Extended Validation Certificate 1091:Designs, Codes and Cryptography 727:Designs, Codes and Cryptography 507:supports forward secrecy using 334:Non-interactive forward secrecy 97:man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack 1823:HTTP Strict Transport Security 1727:SSL Labs test for web browsers 1458:Evans, Jon (22 January 2017). 450:and as an optional feature in 1: 1732:SSL Labs test for web servers 1487:"Qualys SSL Labs - SSL Pulse" 603:Elliptic curve Diffie–Hellman 509:elliptic curve Diffie–Hellman 491:elliptic curve Diffie–Hellman 1907:Domain-validated certificate 1310:"Forward Secrecy at Twitter" 522:to provide forward secrecy. 429:Weak perfect forward secrecy 103:in a forward secure system. 62:), is a feature of specific 1888:Certificate revocation list 1711:Computerworld June 21, 2013 598:Diffie–Hellman key exchange 117:Diffie–Hellman key exchange 66:that gives assurances that 2308: 1962:Internet Protocol Security 1775:Protocols and technologies 1439:forums.developer.apple.com 1335:"Tech/News/2014/27 - Meta" 608:Harvest now, decrypt later 410:attribute-based encryption 312:discrete logarithm problem 260:, to securely agree on an 1990:Server-Gated Cryptography 1929:Public key infrastructure 1854:Public-key infrastructure 1721:Deploying Forward Secrecy 1113:10.1007/s10623-013-9852-1 2292:Transport Layer Security 2142:Man-in-the-middle attack 2109:Certificate Transparency 1549:10.1007/3-540-39200-9_16 1308:Hoffman-Andrews, Jacob. 520:Double Ratchet Algorithm 471:Transport Layer Security 456:Off-the-Record Messaging 402:Green & Miers (2015) 394:Green & Miers (2015) 324:malicious key exhaustion 27:Practice in cryptography 2287:Public-key cryptography 2253:(in regards to TLS 1.0) 2206:(in regards to SSL 3.0) 1940:Self-signed certificate 1924:Public-key cryptography 1845:Perfect forward secrecy 1829:HTTP Public Key Pinning 1045:Krawczyk, Hugo (2005). 1009:Boyd & Gellert 2020 985:Boyd & Gellert 2020 946:Boyd & Gellert 2020 931:Boyd & Gellert 2020 904:Boyd & Gellert 2020 892:Boyd & Gellert 2020 861:10.1145/1352533.1352550 674:GĂĽnther, C. G. (1990). 418:Dallmeier et al. (2020) 304:public-key cryptography 251:public-key fingerprints 64:key-agreement protocols 56:perfect forward secrecy 36:Key derivation function 18:Perfect Forward Secrecy 2257:Kazakhstan MITM attack 1919:Public key certificate 1883:Certificate revocation 1794:Server Name Indication 1723:SSL Labs June 25, 2013 1717:Netcraft June 25, 2013 1654:10.1093/comjnl/bxaa104 973:Green & Miers 2015 375:puncturable encryption 39: 2246:Lucky Thirteen attack 2147:Padding oracle attack 1867:Certificate authority 1033:Dallmeier et al. 2020 800:10.1145/242896.242897 414:GĂĽnther et al. (2017) 33: 1641:The Computer Journal 1619:(6 September 1996). 1573:. pp. 305–320. 1339:Wikimedia Foundation 555:Wikimedia Foundation 493:key exchange (ECDHE- 203:improve this section 1401:on 15 February 2019 1165:The Cloudflare Blog 1058:10.1007/11535218_33 1021:GĂĽnther et al. 2017 919:GĂĽnther et al. 2017 464:deniable encryption 319:message suppression 2163:Bar mitzvah attack 1878:Certificate policy 1579:10.1109/SP.2015.26 1244:10.1109/SP.2015.22 1121:20.500.11850/73097 1011:, p. 643-644. 987:, p. 644-645. 906:, p. 639-640. 749:10.1007/BF00124891 481:key exchange (DHE- 297:of the underlying 40: 2269: 2268: 2265: 2264: 1840:Opportunistic TLS 1588:978-1-4673-6949-7 1567:Green, Matthew D. 1558:978-3-540-14039-9 1399:(3 February 2019) 1253:978-1-4673-6949-7 1068:978-3-540-28114-6 870:978-1-59593-814-5 704:978-0-8493-8523-0 593:Forward anonymity 371:pre-computed keys 359:store-and-forward 328:denial of service 308:quantum computers 239: 238: 231: 134:Paul van Oorschot 54:), also known as 16:(Redirected from 2299: 2132: 2119:HTTPS Everywhere 1935:Root certificate 1873:CA/Browser Forum 1761: 1754: 1747: 1738: 1691: 1689: 1679: 1677: 1675: 1665: 1630: 1612: 1610: 1600: 1562: 1524: 1522: 1501: 1500: 1498: 1497: 1483: 1477: 1476: 1474: 1472: 1455: 1449: 1448: 1446: 1445: 1431: 1425: 1424: 1417: 1411: 1410: 1408: 1406: 1400: 1394:. Archived from 1384: 1378: 1377: 1375: 1373: 1357: 1351: 1350: 1348: 1346: 1331: 1325: 1324: 1322: 1320: 1305: 1299: 1298: 1296: 1295: 1279: 1273: 1272: 1270: 1268: 1237: 1226: 1220: 1219: 1217: 1216: 1205: 1199: 1198: 1196: 1195: 1185: 1176: 1175: 1173: 1172: 1157: 1151: 1146: 1140: 1139: 1137: 1135: 1106: 1088: 1079: 1073: 1072: 1060: 1042: 1036: 1035:, p. 18-19. 1030: 1024: 1018: 1012: 1006: 1000: 994: 988: 982: 976: 970: 961: 955: 949: 943: 934: 928: 922: 916: 907: 901: 895: 889: 883: 882: 844: 838: 837: 835: 834: 818: 812: 811: 793: 773: 767: 766: 764: 763: 742: 724: 715: 709: 708: 696: 686: 680: 679: 671: 665: 664: 662: 661: 647: 641: 640: 638: 637: 623: 390:Ross J. Anderson 272:symmetric cipher 234: 227: 223: 220: 214: 183: 175: 130:Whitfield Diffie 21: 2307: 2306: 2302: 2301: 2300: 2298: 2297: 2296: 2272: 2271: 2270: 2261: 2209: 2167: 2151: 2128:Vulnerabilities 2123: 2097: 2000:Implementations 1994: 1973: 1944: 1849: 1770: 1765: 1698: 1687: 1682: 1673: 1671: 1633: 1629:(Mailing list). 1615: 1608: 1603: 1589: 1565: 1559: 1527: 1520: 1512: 1509: 1504: 1495: 1493: 1491:www.ssllabs.com 1485: 1484: 1480: 1470: 1468: 1457: 1456: 1452: 1443: 1441: 1433: 1432: 1428: 1419: 1418: 1414: 1404: 1402: 1398: 1388:Qualys SSL Labs 1386: 1385: 1381: 1371: 1369: 1359: 1358: 1354: 1344: 1342: 1333: 1332: 1328: 1318: 1316: 1307: 1306: 1302: 1293: 1291: 1281: 1280: 1276: 1266: 1264: 1254: 1235: 1228: 1227: 1223: 1214: 1212: 1207: 1206: 1202: 1193: 1191: 1187: 1186: 1179: 1170: 1168: 1159: 1158: 1154: 1147: 1143: 1133: 1131: 1104:10.1.1.692.1406 1086: 1081: 1080: 1076: 1069: 1044: 1043: 1039: 1031: 1027: 1019: 1015: 1007: 1003: 995: 991: 983: 979: 971: 964: 956: 952: 944: 937: 929: 925: 917: 910: 902: 898: 890: 886: 871: 846: 845: 841: 832: 830: 820: 819: 815: 775: 774: 770: 761: 759: 722: 717: 716: 712: 705: 688: 687: 683: 673: 672: 668: 659: 657: 649: 648: 644: 635: 633: 631:www.openssl.org 625: 624: 620: 616: 589: 535: 516:Signal Protocol 444: 431: 383:Signal protocol 352:zero round trip 344:non-interactive 336: 291: 235: 224: 218: 215: 200: 184: 173: 164: 154:first ratified 126: 84:transport layer 48:forward secrecy 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 2305: 2303: 2295: 2294: 2289: 2284: 2282:Key management 2274: 2273: 2267: 2266: 2263: 2262: 2260: 2259: 2254: 2248: 2243: 2238: 2233: 2228: 2223: 2217: 2215: 2214:Implementation 2211: 2210: 2208: 2207: 2201: 2196: 2191: 2186: 2181: 2175: 2173: 2169: 2168: 2166: 2165: 2159: 2157: 2153: 2152: 2150: 2149: 2144: 2138: 2136: 2129: 2125: 2124: 2122: 2121: 2116: 2111: 2105: 2103: 2099: 2098: 2096: 2095: 2090: 2085: 2080: 2075: 2070: 2065: 2060: 2055: 2050: 2045: 2040: 2035: 2030: 2025: 2020: 2015: 2010: 2004: 2002: 1996: 1995: 1993: 1992: 1987: 1981: 1979: 1975: 1974: 1972: 1971: 1965: 1959: 1952: 1950: 1946: 1945: 1943: 1942: 1937: 1932: 1926: 1921: 1916: 1910: 1904: 1903: 1902: 1897: 1891: 1880: 1875: 1870: 1864: 1857: 1855: 1851: 1850: 1848: 1847: 1842: 1837: 1832: 1826: 1820: 1815: 1809: 1803: 1797: 1791: 1785: 1778: 1776: 1772: 1771: 1766: 1764: 1763: 1756: 1749: 1741: 1735: 1734: 1729: 1724: 1718: 1712: 1706: 1697: 1696:External links 1694: 1693: 1692: 1680: 1631: 1613: 1601: 1587: 1563: 1557: 1537:Katz, Jonathan 1525: 1514:Anderson, Ross 1508: 1505: 1503: 1502: 1478: 1450: 1426: 1412: 1379: 1352: 1326: 1300: 1274: 1252: 1221: 1200: 1177: 1152: 1141: 1097:(1): 183–218. 1074: 1067: 1037: 1025: 1013: 1001: 989: 977: 962: 950: 948:, p. 643. 935: 933:, p. 640. 923: 908: 896: 894:, p. 645. 884: 869: 839: 813: 791:10.1.1.81.2594 768: 740:10.1.1.59.6682 733:(2): 107–125. 710: 703: 681: 666: 642: 617: 615: 612: 611: 610: 605: 600: 595: 588: 585: 553:hosted by the 534: 531: 479:Diffie–Hellman 443: 440: 430: 427: 364:replay attacks 335: 332: 290: 287: 282: 281: 278: 275: 268: 258:Diffie–Hellman 254: 249:, then verify 237: 236: 187: 185: 178: 172: 169: 163: 160: 125: 122: 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2304: 2293: 2290: 2288: 2285: 2283: 2280: 2279: 2277: 2258: 2255: 2252: 2249: 2247: 2244: 2242: 2239: 2237: 2234: 2232: 2229: 2227: 2224: 2222: 2219: 2218: 2216: 2212: 2205: 2202: 2200: 2197: 2195: 2192: 2190: 2187: 2185: 2182: 2180: 2177: 2176: 2174: 2170: 2164: 2161: 2160: 2158: 2154: 2148: 2145: 2143: 2140: 2139: 2137: 2133: 2130: 2126: 2120: 2117: 2115: 2112: 2110: 2107: 2106: 2104: 2100: 2094: 2091: 2089: 2086: 2084: 2081: 2079: 2076: 2074: 2071: 2069: 2066: 2064: 2061: 2059: 2056: 2054: 2051: 2049: 2046: 2044: 2041: 2039: 2036: 2034: 2031: 2029: 2026: 2024: 2021: 2019: 2016: 2014: 2011: 2009: 2008:Bouncy Castle 2006: 2005: 2003: 2001: 1997: 1991: 1988: 1986: 1983: 1982: 1980: 1976: 1969: 1966: 1963: 1960: 1957: 1954: 1953: 1951: 1947: 1941: 1938: 1936: 1933: 1930: 1927: 1925: 1922: 1920: 1917: 1914: 1911: 1908: 1905: 1901: 1900:OCSP stapling 1898: 1895: 1892: 1889: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1881: 1879: 1876: 1874: 1871: 1868: 1865: 1862: 1859: 1858: 1856: 1852: 1846: 1843: 1841: 1838: 1836: 1835:OCSP stapling 1833: 1830: 1827: 1824: 1821: 1819: 1816: 1813: 1810: 1807: 1804: 1801: 1798: 1795: 1792: 1789: 1786: 1783: 1780: 1779: 1777: 1773: 1769: 1762: 1757: 1755: 1750: 1748: 1743: 1742: 1739: 1733: 1730: 1728: 1725: 1722: 1719: 1716: 1713: 1710: 1707: 1704: 1700: 1699: 1695: 1686: 1681: 1669: 1664: 1663:11250/2730309 1659: 1655: 1651: 1647: 1643: 1642: 1637: 1632: 1628: 1627: 1622: 1618: 1614: 1607: 1602: 1598: 1594: 1590: 1584: 1580: 1576: 1572: 1568: 1564: 1560: 1554: 1550: 1546: 1542: 1538: 1534: 1530: 1526: 1519: 1515: 1511: 1510: 1506: 1492: 1488: 1482: 1479: 1467: 1466: 1461: 1454: 1451: 1440: 1436: 1430: 1427: 1422: 1416: 1413: 1397: 1393: 1389: 1383: 1380: 1368: 1367: 1362: 1356: 1353: 1340: 1336: 1330: 1327: 1315: 1311: 1304: 1301: 1290: 1289: 1284: 1278: 1275: 1263: 1259: 1255: 1249: 1245: 1241: 1234: 1233: 1225: 1222: 1211: 1204: 1201: 1190: 1184: 1182: 1178: 1166: 1162: 1156: 1153: 1150: 1145: 1142: 1130: 1126: 1122: 1118: 1114: 1110: 1105: 1100: 1096: 1092: 1085: 1078: 1075: 1070: 1064: 1059: 1054: 1050: 1049: 1041: 1038: 1034: 1029: 1026: 1022: 1017: 1014: 1010: 1005: 1002: 998: 997:Anderson 2002 993: 990: 986: 981: 978: 974: 969: 967: 963: 959: 954: 951: 947: 942: 940: 936: 932: 927: 924: 920: 915: 913: 909: 905: 900: 897: 893: 888: 885: 880: 876: 872: 866: 862: 858: 854: 850: 843: 840: 829: 828: 823: 817: 814: 809: 805: 801: 797: 792: 787: 783: 779: 772: 769: 758: 754: 750: 746: 741: 736: 732: 728: 721: 714: 711: 706: 700: 695: 694: 685: 682: 677: 670: 667: 656: 652: 646: 643: 632: 628: 622: 619: 613: 609: 606: 604: 601: 599: 596: 594: 591: 590: 586: 584: 581: 579: 575: 570: 566: 563: 558: 556: 552: 548: 544: 540: 532: 530: 528: 523: 521: 517: 512: 510: 506: 502: 500: 496: 492: 488: 484: 480: 476: 475:cipher suites 472: 467: 465: 461: 457: 453: 449: 441: 439: 437: 428: 426: 423: 419: 415: 411: 407: 403: 399: 395: 391: 386: 384: 378: 376: 372: 367: 365: 360: 355: 353: 349: 345: 341: 333: 331: 329: 325: 320: 315: 313: 309: 305: 300: 296: 295:cryptanalysis 288: 286: 279: 276: 273: 269: 266: 263: 259: 255: 252: 248: 244: 243: 242: 233: 230: 222: 219:February 2018 212: 208: 204: 198: 197: 193: 188:This section 186: 182: 177: 176: 170: 168: 161: 159: 157: 153: 148: 146: 142: 137: 135: 131: 123: 121: 118: 112: 110: 104: 100: 98: 93: 89: 85: 80: 77: 73: 69: 65: 61: 57: 53: 49: 45: 37: 32: 19: 1968:Secure Shell 1844: 1672:. Retrieved 1645: 1639: 1624: 1570: 1540: 1533:Halevi, Shai 1529:Canetti, Ran 1507:Bibliography 1494:. Retrieved 1490: 1481: 1469:. Retrieved 1463: 1453: 1442:. Retrieved 1438: 1429: 1415: 1403:. Retrieved 1396:the original 1382: 1370:. Retrieved 1364: 1355: 1343:. Retrieved 1341:. 2014-06-30 1329: 1317:. Retrieved 1313: 1303: 1292:. Retrieved 1286: 1277: 1265:. Retrieved 1231: 1224: 1213:. Retrieved 1203: 1192:. Retrieved 1169:. Retrieved 1167:. 2018-08-10 1164: 1155: 1144: 1132:. Retrieved 1094: 1090: 1077: 1047: 1040: 1028: 1023:, p. 5. 1016: 1004: 992: 980: 975:, p. 1. 953: 926: 921:, p. 1. 899: 887: 852: 842: 831:. Retrieved 825: 816: 781: 777: 771: 760:. Retrieved 730: 726: 713: 697:. CRC Pres. 692: 684: 675: 669: 658:. Retrieved 654: 645: 634:. Retrieved 630: 621: 582: 571: 567: 559: 536: 527:WPA Personal 524: 513: 503: 468: 454:(RFC 2412). 445: 435: 432: 404:make use of 387: 379: 374: 370: 368: 356: 351: 348:asynchronous 347: 343: 339: 337: 323: 318: 316: 292: 283: 240: 225: 216: 201:Please help 189: 165: 150:In 2000 the 149: 138: 127: 113: 105: 101: 81: 68:session keys 59: 55: 51: 47: 44:cryptography 41: 2114:Convergence 1768:TLS and SSL 1626:Cypherpunks 1405:25 February 1392:"SSL Pulse" 1319:25 November 784:(5): 5–26. 543:Google Docs 340:interactive 265:session key 76:private key 2276:Categories 2241:Heartbleed 1617:Back, Adam 1496:2024-05-25 1465:TechCrunch 1444:2016-10-20 1294:2024-05-04 1267:4 December 1215:2012-11-05 1194:2012-11-05 1171:2019-02-26 1134:8 December 833:2018-06-14 762:2013-09-07 660:2020-10-11 636:2024-05-25 614:References 162:Definition 92:Heartbleed 2236:goto fail 2048:MatrixSSL 2013:BoringSSL 1784:(TLS/SSL) 1701:RFC  1421:"iOS 9.0" 1099:CiteSeerX 958:Back 1996 786:CiteSeerX 735:CiteSeerX 541:service, 518:uses the 477:based on 442:Protocols 354:(0-RTT). 262:ephemeral 190:does not 156:IEEE 1363 2172:Protocol 2102:Notaries 2078:SChannel 2053:mbed TLS 2043:LibreSSL 2028:cryptlib 1958:(DNSSEC) 1949:See also 1668:Archived 1516:(2002). 1471:18 April 1366:Facebook 1129:53306672 879:15382932 587:See also 562:STARTTLS 497:, ECDHE- 412:, while 145:password 2093:wolfSSL 2088:stunnel 2073:s2n-tls 2063:OpenSSL 1978:History 1964:(IPsec) 1597:9171925 1345:30 June 1314:Twitter 1262:2471650 808:2870433 757:7356608 547:Twitter 505:OpenSSL 473:(TLS), 299:ciphers 289:Attacks 211:removed 196:sources 171:Example 124:History 88:OpenSSL 2251:POODLE 2204:POODLE 2199:Logjam 2184:BREACH 2156:Cipher 2135:Theory 2083:SSLeay 2068:Rustls 2033:GnuTLS 1896:(OCSP) 1863:(ACME) 1831:(HPKP) 1825:(HSTS) 1808:(DANE) 1802:(ALPN) 1790:(DTLS) 1674:8 June 1595:  1585:  1555:  1372:7 June 1260:  1250:  1127:  1101:  1065:  877:  867:  806:  788:  755:  737:  701:  574:Signal 489:) and 485:, DHE- 2231:FREAK 2194:DROWN 2189:CRIME 2179:BEAST 2023:BSAFE 2018:Botan 1970:(SSH) 1931:(PKI) 1890:(CRL) 1818:HTTPS 1814:(CAA) 1796:(SNI) 1688:(PDF) 1609:(PDF) 1593:S2CID 1521:(PDF) 1258:S2CID 1236:(PDF) 1125:S2CID 1087:(PDF) 875:S2CID 804:S2CID 753:S2CID 723:(PDF) 551:Wikis 539:Gmail 499:ECDSA 460:OMEMO 452:IPsec 350:, or 346:, or 72:HTTPS 2038:JSSE 1915:(EV) 1909:(DV) 1869:(CA) 1703:2412 1676:2021 1583:ISBN 1553:ISBN 1473:2018 1407:2019 1374:2014 1347:2014 1321:2013 1288:IEEE 1269:2015 1248:ISBN 1136:2015 1063:ISBN 865:ISBN 827:IEEE 699:ISBN 572:The 514:The 422:QUIC 408:and 373:and 194:any 192:cite 152:IEEE 2058:NSS 1658:hdl 1650:doi 1575:doi 1545:doi 1240:doi 1117:hdl 1109:doi 1053:doi 857:doi 796:doi 745:doi 578:PGP 533:Use 495:RSA 487:DSA 483:RSA 469:In 448:SSH 436:did 205:by 60:PFS 42:In 2278:: 1666:. 1656:. 1646:64 1644:. 1638:. 1623:. 1591:. 1581:. 1551:. 1535:; 1531:; 1489:. 1462:. 1437:. 1390:. 1363:. 1337:. 1312:. 1285:. 1256:. 1246:. 1180:^ 1163:. 1123:. 1115:. 1107:. 1095:74 1093:. 1089:. 1061:. 965:^ 938:^ 911:^ 873:. 863:. 851:. 824:. 802:. 794:. 782:26 780:. 751:. 743:. 729:. 725:. 653:. 629:. 580:. 466:. 385:. 377:. 147:. 132:, 99:. 52:FS 46:, 34:A 1760:e 1753:t 1746:v 1690:. 1678:. 1660:: 1652:: 1611:. 1599:. 1577:: 1561:. 1547:: 1523:. 1499:. 1475:. 1447:. 1423:. 1409:. 1376:. 1349:. 1323:. 1297:. 1271:. 1242:: 1218:. 1197:. 1174:. 1138:. 1119:: 1111:: 1071:. 1055:: 999:. 960:. 881:. 859:: 836:. 810:. 798:: 765:. 747:: 731:2 707:. 663:. 639:. 232:) 226:( 221:) 217:( 213:. 199:. 58:( 50:( 20:)

Index

Perfect Forward Secrecy

Key derivation function
cryptography
key-agreement protocols
session keys
HTTPS
private key
transport layer
OpenSSL
Heartbleed
man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack
Dual Elliptic Curve Deterministic Random Bit Generator
Diffie–Hellman key exchange
Whitfield Diffie
Paul van Oorschot
password-authenticated key agreement
password
IEEE
IEEE 1363

cite
sources
improve this section
adding citations to reliable sources
removed
Learn how and when to remove this message
asymmetric public and private keys
public-key fingerprints
Diffie–Hellman

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑