Knowledge (XXG)

Powers v. Ohio

Source ๐Ÿ“

133: 366: 403:, Batson, the black defendant of the case, called out racially-based discrimination in the courtroom. The court agreed with him, and concluded that racially motivated peremptory challenges were unconstitutional; however, the Batson court argued that: "a criminal defendant may object to race-based... peremptory challenges whether or not the defendant and excluded juror share the same race." The 24: 388:, where the court concluded: " state's purposeful or deliberate denial to Negroes on account of race of participation as jurors in the administration of justice violates the Equal Protection Clause." Ultimately, the state has a right to practice peremptory challenges in the jury selection process; however, this right is only protected "as long as that reason is related to the outcome" ( 445:
was an important case that helped continue to remove discrimination within the courtroom. However, it is important to note that it did not entirely dismantle discrimination in jury selection. Questions about the constitutionality of race-based peremptory challenges by defendants were not addressed in
407:
decision re-examined this provision and established that defendants have the right to call out and question racial discrimination in the courtroom regardless of a difference in race. In other words, a white defendant could question the exclusion of a black juror and vice versa as it was a defendant's
336:
to help prove him innocent; however, during the jury selection process, seven Black venirepersons were cut out from the final jury selection. Powers objected and requested an explanation as to why these venirepersons were excluded. The Court dismissed his objection, and in the trial Powers was found
411:
In the final decision, the Court ruled in favor of Powers's question in a 7โ€“2 decision; but, it did not overrule Powers's personal case. The Court's majority opinion explained, "if for any reason the State is unable to reconvict Powers for the double murder at issue here, later victims may pay the
340:
Following his conviction, Powers went to the Ohio Court of Appeals under the belief that his Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights were infringed upon. According to Powers, he was not given a fair, impartial jury because of racially justified preemptory challenges. This move was ultimately another
378:
delivered the following statement in regards to this: "Invoking the Equal Protection Clause and federal statutory law, and relying upon well-established principles of standing, we hold that a criminal defendant may object to race-based exclusions of jurors effected through peremptory challenges
344:
Powers argued his status as a white man was irrelevant to case at hand. He explained that he had the right to question "the prosecution's discriminatory use of peremptories." The Court of Appeals approved his appeal, but the Ohio Supreme Court denied his case. Powers, distraught, took it to the
315:
on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender, and sex. Powers expanded the jurisdictions of this principle, allowing all parties within a case, defendants especially, to question preemptory challenges during a jury selection, regardless of race. This holding was protected under the
379:
whether or not the defendant and the excluded jurors share the same race." Additionally, the Supreme Court concluded that "discriminatory use of peremptories harms the excluded jurors by depriving them of a significant opportunity to participate in civil life."
425: 356:
did not prevent jury selectors from excluding potential jurors on the basis of race. With this new conclusion, Powers had to restructure his case around the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
885: 373:
The Court came to multiple conclusions with this case. For starters, it did establish, once again, that racial bias and discrimination in juries and jury selection processes were unconstitutional. Justice
332:
Larry Joe Powers, a white defendant, was prosecuted on two counts of murder and one count of attempted murder in Franklin County, Ohio. Under the Sixth Amendment, Powers requested a
519: 321: 779: 751: 184: 412:
price for our extravagance...crime would go unpunished and criminals go free." While racial discrimination was unconstitutional, it did not take away from Power's crimes. Thus
353: 880: 432:, important voice in the dissent of the case. Along with Marshall, Stevens, Blackmun, White, and O'Connor, Rehnquist was part of the Court that decided 890: 416:
re-examined the Batson Challenge and expanded its jurisdictions, but it did not directly address or overturn Powers's status as guilty.
137: 619: 107: 589: 41: 88: 45: 60: 541: 302: 67: 34: 74: 365: 317: 628:: The Discriminatory Effect of the Peremptory Challenge Evaluated from the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments" 165: 56: 235: 783: 755: 727: 176: 312: 817: 715:"Milking the New Sacred Cow: The Supreme Court Limits the Peremptory Challenge on Racial Grounds in 746: 448: 408:
right to question the integrity of their impartial trial without race standing in the way of that.
694: 434: 307: 799: 429: 231: 219: 203: 808: 384: 81: 651:"Another Step Towards Ending Discrimination in the Jury Selection Process - Powers v. Ohio" 714: 375: 247: 790: 650: 826: 700: 677: 243: 223: 835: 758: 874: 493: 255: 853: 179: 564: 424: 211: 23: 311:, 476 U.S. 79 (1986), the Batson Challenge prohibits jury selectors from using 333: 446:
this case. The following year, such challenges were held unconstitutional in
341:
infringement upon the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
862: 479: 844: 559: 369:
Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, leading majority opinion for Powers v. Ohio.
272:
Kennedy, joined by White, Marshall, Blackmun, Stevens, O'Connor, Souter
661:(3): 369โ€“383 – via Campbell University Institutional Repository. 337:
guilty of all charges. The court sentenced him to 53 years in prison.
423: 364: 382:
As the justices came to this conclusion, they drew heavily from
132: 17: 604:(Criminal Procedure Edition): 219โ€“236 – via HeinOnline. 348:
As Powers's case was reviewed, the Supreme Court dealt with
305:
case that re-examined the Batson Challenge. Established by
886:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court
345:
Supreme Court instead, where they agreed to review it.
735:(2): 691โ€“731 – via Pepperdine Digital Commons. 284: 276: 268: 263: 192: 171: 161: 151: 144: 125: 48:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. 469: 467: 465: 530:(4): 895โ€“939 – via Gale Academic Onefile. 8: 520:"Juries and Race in the Nineteenth Century" 122: 108:Learn how and when to remove this message 392:). Powers v. Ohio helped reaffirm this. 461: 688: 686: 120:1991 United States Supreme Court case 7: 649:Hornthal, L. Phillip (Summer 1992). 638:(2): 335โ€“356 – via HeinOnline. 613: 611: 583: 581: 579: 553: 551: 395:The case also addressed a provision 46:adding citations to reliable sources 594:: Race-Based Peremptory Challenges" 721:Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co. 138:Supreme Court of the United States 14: 881:United States Supreme Court cases 786:400 (1991) is available from: 572:(7): 38, 40โ€“42 – via JSTOR. 131: 22: 598:University of Kansas Law Review 588:Wilson, Christopher T. (1992). 558:Stewart, David O. (July 1991). 544:. National Constitution Center. 33:needs additional citations for 891:1991 in United States case law 1: 494:"What is a Batson Challenge?" 301:, 499 U.S. 400 (1991), was a 352:. This case found that the 303:United States Supreme Court 280:Scalia, joined by Rehnquist 907: 863:Oyez (oral argument audio) 618:Murray, Paul (1991โ€“1992). 518:Forman, James Jr. (2004). 390:United States v. Robinson 289: 197: 130: 632:Criminal Justice Journal 562:. Supreme Court Report. 560:"Whither Peremptories?" 318:Equal Protection Clause 290:U.S. Const. amends. XIV 713:Bradley, Kirk (1992). 439: 370: 145:Argued October 9, 1990 728:Pepperdine Law Review 427: 368: 313:peremptory challenges 147:Decided April 1, 1991 678:493 U.S. 474 480:499 U.S. 400 322:Fourteenth Amendment 42:improve this article 845:Library of Congress 747:Georgia v. McCollum 701:499 U.S. 79 673:Holland v. Illinois 655:Campbell Law Review 622:Holland v. Illinois 449:Georgia v. McCollum 350:Holland v. Illinois 236:Sandra Day O'Connor 695:Batson v. Kentucky 440: 435:Batson v. Kentucky 420:Later developments 401:Batson v. Kentucky 397:Batson v. Kentucky 371: 308:Batson v. Kentucky 208:Associate Justices 498:Appeals Law Group 430:William Rehnquist 294: 293: 220:Thurgood Marshall 204:William Rehnquist 118: 117: 110: 92: 898: 867: 861: 858: 852: 849: 843: 840: 834: 831: 825: 822: 816: 813: 807: 804: 798: 795: 789: 762: 743: 737: 736: 710: 704: 698: 690: 681: 675: 669: 663: 662: 646: 640: 639: 615: 606: 605: 585: 574: 573: 555: 546: 545: 542:"14th Amendment" 538: 532: 531: 524:Yale Law Journal 515: 509: 508: 506: 504: 489: 483: 477: 471: 385:Swain v. Alabama 193:Court membership 135: 134: 123: 113: 106: 102: 99: 93: 91: 57:"Powers v. Ohio" 50: 26: 18: 906: 905: 901: 900: 899: 897: 896: 895: 871: 870: 865: 859: 856: 850: 847: 841: 838: 832: 829: 823: 820: 814: 811: 805: 802: 796: 793: 787: 771: 766: 765: 744: 740: 712: 711: 707: 692: 691: 684: 671: 670: 666: 648: 647: 643: 617: 616: 609: 587: 586: 577: 557: 556: 549: 540: 539: 535: 517: 516: 512: 502: 500: 491: 490: 486: 473: 472: 463: 458: 422: 376:Anthony Kennedy 363: 354:Sixth Amendment 330: 248:Anthony Kennedy 246: 234: 232:John P. Stevens 222: 146: 140: 121: 114: 103: 97: 94: 51: 49: 39: 27: 12: 11: 5: 904: 902: 894: 893: 888: 883: 873: 872: 869: 868: 818:Google Scholar 776:Powers v. Ohio 770: 769:External links 767: 764: 763: 738: 717:Powers v. Ohio 705: 682: 664: 641: 626:Powers v. Ohio 607: 592:Powers v. Ohio 575: 547: 533: 510: 484: 475:Powers v. Ohio 460: 459: 457: 454: 443:Powers v. Ohio 428:Chief Justice 421: 418: 414:Powers v. Ohio 399:failed to. In 362: 359: 329: 326: 298:Powers v. Ohio 292: 291: 287: 286: 282: 281: 278: 274: 273: 270: 266: 265: 261: 260: 259: 258: 244:Antonin Scalia 224:Harry Blackmun 209: 206: 201: 195: 194: 190: 189: 173: 169: 168: 163: 159: 158: 156:Powers v. Ohio 153: 152:Full case name 149: 148: 142: 141: 136: 128: 127: 126:Powers v. Ohio 119: 116: 115: 30: 28: 21: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 903: 892: 889: 887: 884: 882: 879: 878: 876: 864: 855: 846: 837: 828: 819: 810: 801: 800:CourtListener 792: 785: 781: 777: 773: 772: 768: 760: 757: 753: 749: 748: 742: 739: 734: 730: 729: 724: 722: 718: 709: 706: 702: 697: 696: 689: 687: 683: 679: 674: 668: 665: 660: 656: 652: 645: 642: 637: 633: 629: 627: 623: 614: 612: 608: 603: 599: 595: 593: 584: 582: 580: 576: 571: 567: 566: 561: 554: 552: 548: 543: 537: 534: 529: 525: 521: 514: 511: 499: 495: 492:Shiga, Shun. 488: 485: 481: 476: 470: 468: 466: 462: 455: 453: 451: 450: 444: 437: 436: 431: 426: 419: 417: 415: 409: 406: 402: 398: 393: 391: 387: 386: 380: 377: 367: 360: 358: 355: 351: 346: 342: 338: 335: 327: 325: 323: 319: 314: 310: 309: 304: 300: 299: 288: 283: 279: 275: 271: 267: 264:Case opinions 262: 257: 253: 249: 245: 241: 237: 233: 229: 225: 221: 217: 213: 210: 207: 205: 202: 200:Chief Justice 199: 198: 196: 191: 187: 186: 181: 178: 174: 170: 167: 164: 160: 157: 154: 150: 143: 139: 129: 124: 112: 109: 101: 90: 87: 83: 80: 76: 73: 69: 66: 62: 59: โ€“  58: 54: 53:Find sources: 47: 43: 37: 36: 31:This article 29: 25: 20: 19: 16: 775: 761: (1992). 745: 741: 732: 726: 720: 716: 708: 703: (1986). 693: 680: (1990). 672: 667: 658: 654: 644: 635: 631: 625: 621: 601: 597: 591: 569: 563: 536: 527: 523: 513: 501:. Retrieved 497: 487: 482: (1991). 474: 447: 442: 441: 433: 413: 410: 404: 400: 396: 394: 389: 383: 381: 372: 349: 347: 343: 339: 331: 306: 297: 296: 295: 285:Laws applied 256:David Souter 251: 239: 227: 215: 183: 155: 104: 95: 85: 78: 71: 64: 52: 40:Please help 35:verification 32: 15: 565:ABA Journal 212:Byron White 875:Categories 854:OpenJurist 456:References 334:jury trial 328:Background 162:Docket no. 98:March 2021 68:newspapers 172:Citations 774:Text of 503:April 4, 361:Decision 269:Majority 809:Findlaw 791:Cornell 320:of the 277:Dissent 166:89-5011 82:scholar 866:  860:  857:  851:  848:  842:  839:  836:Leagle 833:  830:  827:Justia 824:  821:  815:  812:  806:  803:  797:  794:  788:  750:, 699:, 676:, 478:, 405:Powers 254: 252:· 250:  242: 240:· 238:  230: 228:· 226:  218: 216:· 214:  84:  77:  70:  63:  55:  782: 754: 89:JSTOR 75:books 784:U.S. 756:U.S. 719:and 624:and 505:2021 185:more 177:U.S. 175:499 61:news 780:499 752:505 528:113 180:400 44:by 877:: 778:, 759:42 733:19 731:. 725:. 685:^ 659:14 657:. 653:. 636:13 634:. 630:. 610:^ 602:40 600:. 596:. 578:^ 570:77 568:. 550:^ 526:. 522:. 496:. 464:^ 452:. 324:. 723:" 620:" 590:" 507:. 438:. 188:) 182:( 111:) 105:( 100:) 96:( 86:ยท 79:ยท 72:ยท 65:ยท 38:.

Index


verification
improve this article
adding citations to reliable sources
"Powers v. Ohio"
news
newspapers
books
scholar
JSTOR
Learn how and when to remove this message
Supreme Court of the United States
89-5011
U.S.
400
more
William Rehnquist
Byron White
Thurgood Marshall
Harry Blackmun
John P. Stevens
Sandra Day O'Connor
Antonin Scalia
Anthony Kennedy
David Souter
United States Supreme Court
Batson v. Kentucky
peremptory challenges
Equal Protection Clause
Fourteenth Amendment

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

โ†‘