Knowledge (XXG)

Pregnant women in clinical research

Source đź“ť

90:
that 91% of medications for adults lacked data about the safety and efficacy for pregnant women, or determinations of risk to the fetus. In the case of highly lethal illnesses like Ebola and HIV/AIDS before the development of effective therapies, the exclusion of pregnant women from potentially life-saving clinical therapies results in them being "protected to death".
89:
As a result of excluding pregnant women from clinical trials, the safety and efficacy of therapies cannot be evaluated for them. Over 80% of pregnant women are regularly prescribed therapies that are untested in pregnant populations. A study of medications approved by the FDA from 1980 to 2010 showed
40:
cannot give consent to participate in the research. Some clinical research could also result in unexpected harm to the fetus. Other concerns are that pregnant women are potentially more vulnerable to negative side effects than other populations. It has also been hypothesized that pregnant women could
106:
Several projects and coalitions have formed to promote the inclusion of pregnant women in clinical research. These include the Coalition to Advance Maternal Therapeutics, which consists of twenty member organizations, and the Pregnancy Research Ethics for Vaccines, Epidemics, and New Technologies
102:
generally agree that clinical trials should include pregnant women. Because pregnancy changes the way the body metabolizes drugs, it is otherwise difficult to predict how drugs tested in non-pregnant adults will affect pregnant women. In order to treat illness in pregnant women, clinical research
27:
or the perception of increased risk to the woman. Excluding pregnant women from research has also been called unethical, as it results in a scarcity of data about how therapies affect pregnant women and their fetuses. Despite consensus from bioethicists, researchers, and regulators that pregnant
44:
Conversely, the exclusion of pregnant women from clinical research has also been called unethical. The data regarding drug use and pregnancy is scarce and of poor quality. Therefore, pregnant women do not necessarily have the same access to informed, effective healthcare as other populations.
81:
clinical trials that could have included pregnant women instead excluded them. note that this “review” is not linked to in this article and that is a study about testing during an Ebola outbreak.
200:
Van Der Graaf, Rieke; Van Der Zande, Indira S. E.; Den Ruijter, Hester M.; Oudijk, Martijn A.; Van Delden, Johannes J. M.; Oude Rengerink, Katrien; Groenwold, Rolf H. H. (2018).
28:
women should be included in clinical research, up to 95% of Phase IV clinical trials that could have included pregnant women did not, according to a 2013 review.
41:
be more susceptible to coercion than non-pregnant adults. There is insufficient data to support either of these two latter concerns, according to a 2020 review.
77:
concluding that "pregnant women should be presumed to be eligible for participation in biomedical research", a 2013 publication noted that about 95% of
359: 150:
Heyrana, Katrina; Byers, Heather M.; Stratton, Pamela (2018). "Increasing the Participation of Pregnant Women in Clinical Trials".
36:
There are several points of concern regarding clinical research with pregnant women. Some concern is related to the idea that the
364: 120: 70: 62: 78: 354: 125: 69:. However, the guidelines were interpreted to exclude pregnant women from any clinical trial. Despite a 1994 107:(PREVENT), a project that sought to increase the inclusion of pregnant women in vaccine trials during 202:"Fair inclusion of pregnant women in clinical trials: An integrated scientific and ethical approach" 301:"The Moral Imperative to Include Pregnant Women in Clinical Trials of Interventions for COVID-19" 175: 58: 330: 281: 233: 167: 20: 320: 312: 271: 223: 213: 159: 276: 259: 325: 300: 228: 201: 348: 179: 54: 218: 66: 163: 99: 16: 334: 285: 237: 171: 108: 65:(FDA) enacted protections to limit reproductive-age women's exposure to 316: 37: 24: 260:"Ethics of Conducting Clinical Research in an Outbreak Setting" 75:
Ethical and Legal Issues of Including Women in Clinical Studies
299:
Malhamé, Isabelle; d'Souza, Rohan; Cheng, Matthew P. (2020).
195: 193: 191: 189: 258:Edwards, Kathryn M.; Kochhar, Sonali (2020). 8: 23:due to ethical concerns about harming the 324: 275: 253: 251: 249: 247: 227: 217: 145: 143: 141: 61:in women in the 1960s and 1970s, the US 137: 67:substances that may cause birth defects 277:10.1146/annurev-virology-013120-013123 19:have historically been excluded from 7: 53:Due to complications from the drugs 14: 1: 121:Children in clinical research 98:Regulators, researchers, and 71:National Academy of Medicine 63:Food and Drug Administration 305:Annals of Internal Medicine 381: 264:Annual Review of Virology 219:10.1186/s13063-017-2402-9 360:Clinical research ethics 126:Clinical research ethics 164:10.1001/jama.2018.17716 94:Promoting participation 365:Human subject research 49:Limiting participation 32:Ethical considerations 103:must involve them. 59:diethylstilbestrol 158:(20): 2077–2078. 21:clinical research 372: 339: 338: 328: 317:10.7326/M20-3106 296: 290: 289: 279: 255: 242: 241: 231: 221: 197: 184: 183: 147: 380: 379: 375: 374: 373: 371: 370: 369: 355:Human pregnancy 345: 344: 343: 342: 311:(10): 836–837. 298: 297: 293: 257: 256: 245: 199: 198: 187: 149: 148: 139: 134: 117: 96: 87: 51: 34: 12: 11: 5: 378: 376: 368: 367: 362: 357: 347: 346: 341: 340: 291: 270:(1): 475–494. 243: 185: 136: 135: 133: 130: 129: 128: 123: 116: 113: 95: 92: 86: 83: 50: 47: 33: 30: 17:Pregnant women 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 377: 366: 363: 361: 358: 356: 353: 352: 350: 336: 332: 327: 322: 318: 314: 310: 306: 302: 295: 292: 287: 283: 278: 273: 269: 265: 261: 254: 252: 250: 248: 244: 239: 235: 230: 225: 220: 215: 211: 207: 203: 196: 194: 192: 190: 186: 181: 177: 173: 169: 165: 161: 157: 153: 146: 144: 142: 138: 131: 127: 124: 122: 119: 118: 114: 112: 110: 104: 101: 93: 91: 84: 82: 80: 76: 72: 68: 64: 60: 56: 48: 46: 42: 39: 31: 29: 26: 22: 18: 308: 304: 294: 267: 263: 209: 205: 155: 151: 105: 100:bioethicists 97: 88: 74: 52: 43: 35: 15: 55:thalidomide 349:Categories 132:References 212:(1): 78. 109:epidemics 335:32598164 286:32212920 238:29378652 180:53293199 172:30422300 115:See also 79:Phase IV 326:7384266 229:5789693 85:Effects 73:Report 333:  323:  284:  236:  226:  206:Trials 178:  170:  176:S2CID 38:fetus 25:fetus 331:PMID 282:PMID 234:PMID 168:PMID 152:JAMA 57:and 321:PMC 313:doi 309:173 272:doi 224:PMC 214:doi 160:doi 156:320 351:: 329:. 319:. 307:. 303:. 280:. 266:. 262:. 246:^ 232:. 222:. 210:19 208:. 204:. 188:^ 174:. 166:. 154:. 140:^ 111:. 337:. 315:: 288:. 274:: 268:7 240:. 216:: 182:. 162::

Index

Pregnant women
clinical research
fetus
fetus
thalidomide
diethylstilbestrol
Food and Drug Administration
substances that may cause birth defects
National Academy of Medicine
Phase IV
bioethicists
epidemics
Children in clinical research
Clinical research ethics



doi
10.1001/jama.2018.17716
PMID
30422300
S2CID
53293199




"Fair inclusion of pregnant women in clinical trials: An integrated scientific and ethical approach"
doi
10.1186/s13063-017-2402-9

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑