57:
106:
122:, investigating the Queen's finances, expenditures, and patronage. Judge proposed to make a public exhibition of the etchings, and drew up a catalogue for it, 50 copies of which were printed by his publisher, William Strange; with two copies sent to Windsor Castle, for the sight of the Queen and the Prince.
113:
Both Queen
Victoria and Prince Albert created a number of etchings in the 1840s as a hobby. The copper plates for these were entrusted to a printer in Windsor called John Brown to create copies that the couple showed to friends or gave away. The plates and the good copies were returned by Brown.
133:
The Royal
Collection holds six volumes of etchings by the Queen and the Prince Consort, plus further copies. In all sixty-two plates were made by the Queen, and twenty-five by the Prince. An almost complete set of the prints was given to the
97:
noted that "this case by no means depends solely upon the question of property; for a breach of trust, confidence, or contract, would of itself entitle the plaintiff to an injunction".
56:
344:(1849) 1 H & Tw 1, 2 De G & SM 293, (1849) 1 Mac & G 25, EWHC Ch J20, EngR 255, (1849) 41 ER 1171, EngR 261, (1849) 47 ER 1302, (1849) 2 De Gex & Sim 652
125:
Prince Albert filed suit for the surrender of the etchings, for the prohibition of the exhibition, and for prevention of publication of the etchings. His plea was granted.
403:
114:
However, a number of extra copies had been run off by an employee of Brown's, called
Middleton. Middleton sold a set of 63 different prints for the sum of £5 to
147:
311:
270:
363:
151:
94:
78:
295:
383:
398:
253:
393:
388:
61:
170:
115:
86:
74:
40:
193:(1849), in: Mitchell, Charles/Mitchell, Paul Mitchell (Ed.), Landmark Cases in Equity 2012, p.235–267.
158:
in 1869 came up for auction in
Cirencester in 2016, but failed to make a reserve price of £24,000.
143:
327:
358:
204:
138:
by King George V in 1926. There is also a volume with 74 of the etchings in the collections of
249:
222:
154:
in 1922. A volume of 80 etchings that the Queen presented to Prince Albert's biographer Sir
283:
354:
155:
17:
315:
299:
139:
135:
93:, restraining Strange from publishing a catalogue describing Prince Albert's etchings.
377:
312:
Collection of etchings by
Victoria and Albert go on public display for the first time
105:
268:
Aydua H. Scott-Elliot (1961), The
Etchings by Queen Victoria and Prince Albert,
209:
90:
332:
82:
109:
An etching by Queen
Victoria of Princess Vicky being fed by her nurse
142:. This volume had been owned by Prince Albert's private secretary
104:
55:
161:
No copy is known to have survived of Mr
Strange's catalogue.
64:
at the age of two, drawn and etched by Queen
Victoria in 1843
246:
Can I sue? : an introduction to
Canadian tort law
46:
36:
31:
328:Queen Victoria etchings fail to sell at auction
8:
118:, a writer who in 1848 had published a book
146:, and was given by a descendant of his to
28:
223:"Prince Albert v Strange: ChD 8 Feb 1849"
271:Bulletin of the New York Public Library
248:. Toronto: Pitman Pub. pp. 29–30.
182:
150:on the occasion of her marriage to the
60:"Before Going to Bed" - three views of
404:Prince Albert of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha
77:in 1849, and began the development of
364:European Intellectual Property Review
296:Queen Victoria (biographical details)
7:
205:Sketches of her majesty's household
120:Sketches of Her Majesty's Household
25:
286:, Sheila O'Connell, 29 April 2019
73:was a court decision made by the
359:Prince Albert and the Etchings
1:
202:Jasper Tomsett Judge (1848),
129:Extant copies of the etchings
225:. Swarb.Co.Uk. 17 June 2016
420:
244:Spetz, Steven N. (1974).
384:English privacy case law
302:. Accessed 30 April 2019
18:Prince Albert v. Strange
399:Court of Chancery cases
191:Prince Albert v Strange
70:Prince Albert v Strange
32:Prince Albert v Strange
171:Privacy in English law
110:
75:High Court of Chancery
65:
41:High Court of Chancery
108:
59:
152:6th Earl of Harewood
116:Jasper Tomsett Judge
85:. The court awarded
394:1849 in British law
111:
66:
208:; online copy at
95:Lord Cottenham LC
54:
53:
16:(Redirected from
411:
389:1849 in case law
337:
325:
319:
318:, 26 March 2017.
309:
303:
293:
287:
281:
275:
266:
260:
259:
241:
235:
234:
232:
230:
219:
213:
200:
194:
189:Bently, Lionel,
187:
29:
21:
419:
418:
414:
413:
412:
410:
409:
408:
374:
373:
355:Jeremy Phillips
351:
349:Further reading
341:
340:
326:
322:
310:
306:
294:
290:
282:
278:
267:
263:
256:
243:
242:
238:
228:
226:
221:
220:
216:
201:
197:
188:
184:
179:
167:
156:Theodore Martin
131:
103:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
417:
415:
407:
406:
401:
396:
391:
386:
376:
375:
372:
371:
350:
347:
346:
345:
339:
338:
320:
316:Harewood House
304:
300:British Museum
288:
276:
261:
254:
236:
214:
195:
181:
180:
178:
175:
174:
173:
166:
163:
140:Harewood House
136:British Museum
130:
127:
102:
99:
79:confidence law
62:Princess Vicky
52:
51:
48:
44:
43:
38:
34:
33:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
416:
405:
402:
400:
397:
395:
392:
390:
387:
385:
382:
381:
379:
369:
366:
365:
360:
356:
353:
352:
348:
343:
342:
336:, 11 May 2016
335:
334:
329:
324:
321:
317:
313:
308:
305:
301:
297:
292:
289:
285:
280:
277:
273:
272:
265:
262:
257:
251:
247:
240:
237:
224:
218:
215:
211:
207:
206:
199:
196:
192:
186:
183:
176:
172:
169:
168:
164:
162:
159:
157:
153:
149:
148:Princess Mary
145:
141:
137:
128:
126:
123:
121:
117:
107:
100:
98:
96:
92:
88:
87:Prince Albert
84:
80:
76:
72:
71:
63:
58:
49:
45:
42:
39:
35:
30:
27:
19:
367:
362:
331:
323:
307:
291:
279:
269:
264:
245:
239:
229:12 September
227:. Retrieved
217:
203:
198:
190:
185:
160:
144:George Anson
132:
124:
119:
112:
69:
68:
67:
26:
210:archive.org
378:Categories
255:0273041894
177:References
91:injunction
357:(1984),
333:BBC News
165:See also
370:344–349
101:Summary
83:England
47:Decided
252:
284:Tweet
37:Court
250:ISBN
231:2017
50:1849
89:an
81:in
380::
368:12
361:,
330:,
314:,
298:,
274:.
258:.
233:.
212:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
