78:
The privilege was highly prized by imperial estates, both because it lent prestige and because it furthered the integration of their administration by cutting off their judiciary from the rest of the Empire. Between the 16th and 18th century, virtually all the larger estates received the privilege.
214:
Stodolkowitz, Stefan
Andreas (2014). "Rechtsverweigerung und Territorialjustiz. Verfahren wegen iustitia denegata vel protracta am Oberappellationsgericht Celle".
86:
Even the unlimited privilege was not in fact absolute. It did not apply when a subject was given no recourse to territorial courts (refusal of justice,
258:
39:. It limited the right of an estate's subjects to appeal cases from territorial courts to either of the imperial supreme courts, the
253:
207:
Understanding the
Sources of Early Modern and Modern Commercial Law: Courts, Statutes, Contracts, and Legal Scholarship
205:
as a
Commercial Court (1820–1879)". In Heikki Pihlajamäki; Albrecht Cordes; Serge Dauchy; Dave De ruysscher (eds.).
50:
40:
72:
231:
189:
32:
20:
223:
181:
36:
201:
Oestmann, Peter (2018). "Court
Records as Sources for the History of Commercial Law: The
247:
235:
193:
185:
216:
Zeitschrift der
Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte, Germanistische Abteilung
174:
Zeitschrift der
Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte, Germanistische Abteilung
71:). When unlimited, it effectively turned the highest territorial court into a
227:
92:) or when a ruler refused to implement a court decision (delay of justice,
31:(privilege of not appealing) was a privilege that could be granted by the
80:
165:
Reich and Nation: The Holy Roman Empire as Idea and
Reality, 1763–1806
172:
Oestmann, Peter (2010). "Rechtsverweigerung im Alten Reich".
132:
130:
98:). In such cases the subject could go to an imperial court.
117:
115:
113:
111:
16:Privilege of some states in the Holy Roman Empire
156:Die kaiserlichen Privilegia de non appellando
8:
167:. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
93:
87:
54:
44:
66:
60:
25:
209:. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff. pp. 364–385.
59:). The privilege itself could be limited (
121:
136:
107:
7:
14:
203:Oberappellationsgericht Lübeck
1:
27:privilegium de non appellando
259:Law of the Holy Roman Empire
186:10.7767/zrgga.2010.127.1.51
163:Gagliardo, John G. (1980).
154:Eisenhardt, Ulrich (1980).
275:
83:also had the privilege.
254:Latin legal terminology
228:10.7767/zrgga-2014-0107
94:
88:
67:
61:
55:
51:Imperial Aulic Council
45:
41:Imperial Chamber Court
26:
73:court of last resort
139:, pp. 367–368.
46:Reichskammergericht
158:. Cologne: Böhlau.
89:Rechtsverweigerung
95:Rechtsverzögerung
21:Holy Roman Empire
266:
239:
210:
197:
168:
159:
140:
134:
125:
119:
97:
91:
70:
65:) or unlimited (
64:
58:
48:
29:
274:
273:
269:
268:
267:
265:
264:
263:
244:
243:
242:
213:
200:
171:
162:
153:
149:
144:
143:
135:
128:
120:
109:
104:
79:Almost all the
37:imperial estate
17:
12:
11:
5:
272:
270:
262:
261:
256:
246:
245:
241:
240:
211:
198:
169:
160:
150:
148:
145:
142:
141:
126:
122:Gagliardo 1980
106:
105:
103:
100:
81:Habsburg lands
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
271:
260:
257:
255:
252:
251:
249:
237:
233:
229:
225:
221:
217:
212:
208:
204:
199:
195:
191:
187:
183:
179:
175:
170:
166:
161:
157:
152:
151:
146:
138:
137:Oestmann 2018
133:
131:
127:
124:, p. 29.
123:
118:
116:
114:
112:
108:
101:
99:
96:
90:
84:
82:
76:
74:
69:
63:
57:
52:
47:
42:
38:
34:
30:
28:
22:
219:
215:
206:
202:
177:
173:
164:
155:
147:Bibliography
85:
77:
56:Reichshofrat
24:
18:
222:: 128–181.
68:illimitatum
19:Within the
248:Categories
180:: 51–141.
236:180940772
194:180393334
62:limitatum
49:) or the
33:emperor
234:
192:
35:to an
23:, the
232:S2CID
190:S2CID
102:Notes
224:doi
220:131
182:doi
178:127
250::
230:.
218:.
188:.
176:.
129:^
110:^
75:.
238:.
226::
196:.
184::
53:(
43:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.