Knowledge (XXG)

Prong setting

Source 📝

183:
On September 8, 2015, a federal judge ruled in favor of Tiffany & Co., rejecting Costco's generic-use argument and finding that Costco's usage of the "Tiffany" name violated Tiffany & Co.'s trademark rights. However, in August 2020, a court of appeals in New York tossed out that judgement and
135:
Over time, prongs may get worn out or become loose. Getting the ring checked regularly is a good idea to prevent any accidental loss of a mounted gemstone. Some effective ways include using a 10X loupe to check for gaps between prongs and gemstone, listening for sounds made by loose gemstone, and
123:. V-shaped prongs are recommended for a marquise-cut or pear-shaped stone, while flat prongs are recommended for a flat-cut emerald. A prong setting holds the gem securely while allowing the gem to be struck with more light and from more angles, increasing the brilliance of the gemstone. 131:
A prong setting offers less protection to the gem than inset mounts. In addition, prongs can snag on clothing or fabric. High-quality settings are less likely to snag on clothing, as the prongs are firmly attached to the gem and well finished.
77:
A 2017, $ 19 million lawsuit confirmed the exclusive right of Tiffany & Co. to use the term "Tiffany" within the jewelry sales industry. The judgment was eventually overturned, and the parties made a confidential settlement.
163:
While some in the jewelry industry use the term "Tiffany setting" to describe multiprong solitaire rings, the Tiffany setting is a specific trademarked design of Tiffany & Co. In February 2013, Tiffany & Co. filed a
55:, a claw-shaped type of binding (typically three, four, or six individual prongs per head) that is welded or soldered to a jewelry item to mount (or "set") a gemstone to the jewelry item. A common setting for 176:
to describe products that were not made or licensed by Tiffany & Co. In its defense, Costco asserted that it did not infringe because the terms "Tiffany" and "Tiffany setting" were
172:
over Costco's practice of selling prong-setting engagement rings described as "Tiffany setting" rings. The lawsuit alleged that Costco was unlawfully using the "Tiffany"
314: 103:. Heads used to prong set a gemstone are made in a variety of sizes and shapes, depending on the shape and size of the gemstone, or whether or not the gemstone is 418: 156:
engagement rings. The Tiffany setting popularized the general use of prong-setting engagement rings, and as of 2012, the trade association
17: 276: 398: 342: 370: 116: 444: 112: 165: 149: 91:
The head can be handmade, cast, or die struck, and it is made from some type of precious metal, such as
73:
rings, although this is a trademarked term specifically used to describe prong setting rings sold by
160:
reports that multiprong solitare rings are the most sought-after form of engagement ring available.
157: 63: 214: 177: 36: 153: 74: 288: 187:
On July 19, 2021, Tiffany and Costco settled their dispute with no details being offered.
145: 59: 284: 62:, the prong setting allows light to strike a gemstone from more angles, increasing its 438: 254: 120: 319: 315:"Deconstructing The Tiffany Setting, The World's Most Popular Engagement Ring" 173: 16: 222: 108: 100: 40: 375: 56: 48: 44: 21: 347: 169: 144:
One well-known prong setting is the "Tiffany setting", a trademarked
96: 184:
sided with Costco, sending the case back down to the trial court.
136:
taking it to a professional jeweler once every 6 months for checks.
104: 15: 399:"Tiffany, Costco settle 8-year lawsuit over fake 'Tiffany' rings" 92: 419:"Costco Settles Longtime Dispute Over 'Tiffany' Diamond Rings" 371:"Costco sold counterfeit Tiffany engagement rings: U.S. judge" 111:-shaped. Common shapes of heads used in stone setting include 69:
Prong-setting engagement rings are sometimes referred to as
180:
by common usage to describe prong-setting engagement ring.
35:
refers to the use of metal projections or tines, called "
343:"Tiffany Can't Kill Costco's Trademark Genericide Claim" 47:. A prong setting is one component of what is known to 152:in the 1880s that has become the signature line of 8: 249: 247: 245: 243: 241: 239: 208: 206: 204: 202: 200: 308: 306: 196: 7: 369:Raymond, Nate (September 8, 2015). 341:Donahue, Bill (January 17, 2014). 14: 119:, marquise cut, pear-shaped, and 215:"Engagement Ring Settings 101" 1: 313:Lee, Jane (October 2, 2012). 140:Tiffany design and trademark 277:"Charles Tiffany Biography" 461: 170:Costco Wholesale Corp. 166:trademark infringement 25: 255:"Ring Settings Guide" 115:, oval, emerald cut, 19: 291:on December 5, 2013 158:Jewelers of America 148:design created by 26: 257:. The Diamond Pro 154:Tiffany & Co. 75:Tiffany & Co. 452: 445:Jewellery making 429: 428: 426: 425: 415: 409: 408: 406: 405: 395: 389: 388: 386: 384: 366: 360: 359: 357: 355: 338: 332: 331: 329: 327: 310: 301: 300: 298: 296: 287:. Archived from 285:A&E Networks 273: 267: 266: 264: 262: 251: 234: 233: 231: 229: 210: 168:lawsuit against 87:General features 60:engagement rings 460: 459: 455: 454: 453: 451: 450: 449: 435: 434: 433: 432: 423: 421: 417: 416: 412: 403: 401: 397: 396: 392: 382: 380: 368: 367: 363: 353: 351: 340: 339: 335: 325: 323: 312: 311: 304: 294: 292: 275: 274: 270: 260: 258: 253: 252: 237: 227: 225: 212: 211: 198: 193: 150:Charles Tiffany 146:engagement ring 142: 129: 89: 84: 82:Characteristics 71:Tiffany setting 39:", to secure a 24:in a gold ring. 12: 11: 5: 458: 456: 448: 447: 437: 436: 431: 430: 410: 390: 361: 333: 302: 268: 235: 195: 194: 192: 189: 141: 138: 128: 125: 88: 85: 83: 80: 43:to a piece of 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 457: 446: 443: 442: 440: 420: 414: 411: 400: 394: 391: 378: 377: 372: 365: 362: 350: 349: 344: 337: 334: 322: 321: 316: 309: 307: 303: 290: 286: 282: 281:Biography.com 278: 272: 269: 256: 250: 248: 246: 244: 242: 240: 236: 224: 220: 216: 209: 207: 205: 203: 201: 197: 190: 188: 185: 181: 179: 175: 171: 167: 161: 159: 155: 151: 147: 139: 137: 133: 126: 124: 122: 118: 114: 110: 106: 102: 98: 94: 86: 81: 79: 76: 72: 67: 65: 61: 58: 54: 50: 46: 42: 38: 34: 30: 29:Prong setting 23: 18: 422:. Retrieved 413: 402:. Retrieved 393: 381:. Retrieved 374: 364: 352:. Retrieved 346: 336: 324:. Retrieved 318: 293:. Retrieved 289:the original 280: 271: 259:. Retrieved 226:. Retrieved 218: 213:Seto, Lori. 186: 182: 162: 143: 134: 130: 121:trillian cut 117:princess cut 90: 70: 68: 52: 32: 28: 27: 20:A prong set 383:October 18, 354:October 18, 326:October 18, 295:October 18, 261:October 18, 228:October 18, 219:theknot.com 178:genericized 33:prong mount 424:2021-07-08 404:2021-07-19 379:. New York 320:Forbes.com 191:References 64:brilliance 174:trademark 127:Drawbacks 439:Category 223:XO Group 109:cabochon 101:platinum 49:jewelers 41:gemstone 376:Reuters 105:faceted 57:diamond 45:jewelry 22:diamond 348:Law360 97:silver 37:prongs 113:round 99:, or 51:as a 385:2015 356:2015 328:2015 297:2015 263:2015 230:2015 93:gold 53:head 107:or 31:or 441:: 373:. 345:. 317:. 305:^ 283:. 279:. 238:^ 221:. 217:. 199:^ 95:, 66:. 427:. 407:. 387:. 358:. 330:. 299:. 265:. 232:.

Index


diamond
prongs
gemstone
jewelry
jewelers
diamond
engagement rings
brilliance
Tiffany & Co.
gold
silver
platinum
faceted
cabochon
round
princess cut
trillian cut
engagement ring
Charles Tiffany
Tiffany & Co.
Jewelers of America
trademark infringement
Costco Wholesale Corp.
trademark
genericized



Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.