Knowledge (XXG)

Restraining order

Source 📝

395:
restrictions. It is sought when household members or police believe a particular individual is at risk to use firearms to harm themselves or others. If a court agrees, the person can have their firearms taken away. This type of restraining order is not intended to protect a specific individual but rather the community at large from someone believed to be a danger for gun violence. It has been cited as a possible tool to help prevent mass shootings such as the
125:
it be by telephone, notes, mail, fax, email, text, social media, or delivery of flowers, gifts, or drinks be prohibited ("no contact" provisions). Courts can also instruct an alleged abuser to not hurt or threaten someone ("cease abuse" provisions) known as no violent contact orders. The no-violent contact order statutes from the court may allow the alleged abuser to maintain their current living situation with the alleged victim or have contact with them.
218:"followed by worse events" almost 21 percent of the time, and concluded that "evidence of relative efficacy is lacking", and that they may pose some degree of risk. Other studies have found that restraining orders offer little or no assurance against future interpersonal violence. A large America-wide telephone survey conducted in 1998 found that, of stalking victims who obtained a restraining order, only 30% of these orders kept the stalker away. 57: 129:
property damage caused by the alleged abuser ("restitution" provisions). Some courts might also be able to instruct the alleged abuser to turn over any firearms and ammunition they have ("relinquish firearms" provisions), attend a batterers' treatment program, appear for regular drug tests, or start alcohol or drug abuse counselling. Its issuance is sometimes called a "de facto divorce".
372:
order if the sexual assault occurred in the context of a domestic relationship or if the statute is written sufficiently broad. In such cases, sexual assault survivors can sometimes qualify for domestic violence restraining orders because any act of sexual intercourse between petitioner and respondent, even during rape, legally establishes the required sexually intimate relationship.
333:
every state and federal territory would be required to adhere to every provision. Federal law prohibits any person who is subject to a state protective order from possessing a firearm, provided that the protected party is an intimate partner, meaning a spouse or former spouse, or a person with whom the protected party has had a child. Violating a restraining order is a
1419: 363:
In the United States, every state has some form of domestic violence restraining order law, and many states also have specific restraining order laws for stalking and sexual assault. In the US, each state has its own restraining order laws, but they tend to be divided into five main types. Not every
124:
All protective order statutes permit the court to instruct an alleged abuser to stay a certain distance away from someone, such as their home, workplace or school ("stay away" provisions), and not to contact them. Alleged victims generally may also request the court to order that all contact, whether
410:
Any police officer has authority under the Police Act to issue restraining order prohibiting a person from entering common dwelling and nearby areas and from contacting the threatened person. Such restraining order is valid for a period of ten days. In case that the threatened person files for court
283:
Restraining orders most commonly protect a woman against a male alleged abuser. A California study found that 72% of restraining orders active in the state at the time protected a woman against an alleged male abuser. The Wisconsin Coalition Against Domestic Violence uses female pronouns to refer to
200:
after a woman made claims of abuse and harassment, including allegations that Letterman had spoken to her via coded messages on his TV show. The judge later admitted that he granted the restraining order not on the merits of the case, but because the petitioner had completely filled out the required
103:
Restraining and personal protection order laws vary from one jurisdiction to another but all establish who can file for an order, what protection or relief a person can get from such an order, and how the order will be enforced. The court will order the adverse party to refrain from certain actions
414:
A court may issue a domestic violence or stalking restraining order based on application of threatened person for a period of up to one month. This may later be extended if the threatened person files for extension. Extension is possible for necessary period of time, but no more than six months in
375:
Harassment and stalking restraining orders also generally do not require any specific relationship to exist or not exist between the parties, but also may not be available in all states. These types of restraining orders also generally require at least two instances of, respectively, harassment or
371:
A sexual assault restraining order specifically protects a victim of sexual assault regardless of what relationship may or may not exist between petitioner and respondent. If the state has no sexual assault restraining order statute, the victim may still qualify for a domestic violence restraining
332:
Federal law requires that all states give "full faith and credit" to every portion of a restraining order issued by any state provided that certain minimum due process requirements are met. Thus a state with very lax standards for issuing a restraining order may enter such a protective order, and
217:
reviewed 15 U.S. studies of restraining order effectiveness, and concluded that restraining orders "can serve a useful role in threat management". However, a 2002 analysis of 32 U.S. studies found that restraining orders are violated an average of 40 percent of the time and are perceived as being
128:
Some states also allow the court to order the alleged abuser to pay temporary support or continue to make mortgage payments on a home owned by both people ("support" provisions), to award sole use of a home or car owned by both people ("exclusive use" provisions), or to pay for medical costs or
204:
Some attorneys have criticized the use of restraining orders on the theory that parties to a divorce may file such orders to gain tactical advantages, rather than out of a legitimate fear of harm. Liz Mandarano, an attorney who specializes in family and matrimonial law, speculates that divorce
164:
Judges have some incentives to err on the side of granting restraining orders. If a judge grants a restraining order against someone who might not warrant it, typically the only repercussion is that the defendant might appeal the order. If, however, the judge denies a restraining order and the
394:
is a form of US restraining order, currently used in 13 states. Other forms of restraining order will sometimes order firearms restrictions as a part of a larger injunction intended to protect a specific individual. But with an extreme risk restraining order, the sole focus is on the firearms
205:
attorneys are incentivized to push for restraining orders because such orders force all communications to go through the parties' lawyers and may prolong the legal struggle. Some attorneys offer to have restraining orders dropped in exchange for financial concessions in such proceedings.
270:
Both parties must be informed of the restraining order for it to go into effect. Law enforcement may have trouble serving the order, making the petition unproductive. A study found that some counties had 91 percent of restraining orders non-served. A temporary order of restraint
386:
In California, domestic violence restraining orders are issued under Family Code Section 6200, et. seq. The California courts have designed domestic violence restraining orders to be accessible to the public so as not to require a lawyer to obtain or defend against one.
229:
characterized restraining orders as "homework assignments police give to women to prove they're really committed to getting away from their pursuers," and said they "clearly serve police and prosecutors," but "they do not always serve victims". The
515:
Sullivan, Tami P.; Weiss, Nicole H.; Woerner, Jacqueline; Wyatt, Janan; Carey, Camille (28 October 2019). "Criminal Orders of Protection for Domestic Violence: Associated Revictimization, Mental Health, and Well-being Among Victims".
367:
A domestic violence restraining order generally protects only parties deemed to be in some form of "domestic" relationship which may, depending on the statute, include a family, household, intimate, or sexual relationship.
176:
order, the defendant must "appear before the court at a specific time and date and . . . show cause, if any, why said temporary civil protection order should not be made permanent". That is, Colorado courts place the
867:
McFarlane J, Malecha A, Gist J et al. Protection orders and intimate partner violence: An 18-month study of 150 Black, Hispanic, and White women. American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 94, No. 4, pp. 613–618.
857:
Harrell A and Smith B. Effects of restraining orders on domestic violence victims. In Buzawa C and Buzawa E (eds.): Do Arrests and Restraining Orders Work? Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1996. p.
181:
on the accused to establish his or her innocence, rather than requiring the accuser to prove his or her case. Hawaii similarly requires the defendant to prove his or her own innocence.
1390: 316:. Non-molestation orders are a type of injunction used to protect an individual from intimidation or harassment. Breaching a non-molestation order is a criminal offence. Under the 1068: 952: 247: 981: 1217: 1294: 43: 1251: 334: 317: 1145: 811: 1019: 320:, cohabiting same-sex couples are able to seek a non-molestation order. Non-molestation orders sought for protection from domestic violence qualify for 275:" order) is in effect for two weeks before a court settles the terms of the order, but it is still not in effect until the alleged abuser is served. 848:
Grau J, Fagan J, and Wexler S. Restraining orders for battered women: Issues of access and efficacy. Women and Politics, Vol. 4, 1984, pp. 13–28.
687: 257: (2005), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled, 7–2, that a town and its police department could not be sued under 1439: 1330: 1449: 1076: 351:
Many jurisdictions offer a simplified process for filing a civil complaint for unrepresented litigants. For example, in North Carolina,
221:
Threat management experts are often suspicious of restraining orders, believing they may escalate or enrage stalkers. In his 1997 book
1114: 1097: 889: 471: 259: 593: 284:
petitioners and male pronouns to refer to abusers due to the fact that most petitioners are women and most alleged abusers are men.
1391:"When marriage becomes unbearable: Restraining order and preliminary injunction for alimony prior to divorce in the Czech Republic" 1357: 141:
required to obtain a restraining order can vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, but it is generally lower than the standard of
560: 1305: 213:
Experts disagree on whether restraining orders are effective in preventing further harassment. A 2010 analysis published in the
267:
for failing to enforce a restraining order, which had led to the murder of a woman's three children by her estranged husband.
1234: 231: 1269: 1170: 391: 1423: 1196: 355:
litigants can file a 50B (also called a DVPO, for domestic violence protective order) complaint with the clerk of court.
380: 759: 707:
Slocum, Peter (2010). "Biting the D.V. Bullet: Are Domestic-Restraining Orders Trampling on Second Amendment Rights?".
745: 635: 428: 345: 39: 104:
or require compliance with certain provisions. Failure to comply is a violation of the order which can result in the
348:
laws in the UK. Minnesota law provides for an order for protection (OFP) and a harassment restraining order (HRO).
617: 396: 1149: 1131: 235: 165:
plaintiff is killed or injured, poor publicity and an enraged community reaction may harm the jurist's career.
50: 1026: 407:
A domestic violence restraining order in the Czech Republic may be issued by a police officer or by a court.
379:
In many cases, one statute may cover more than one type of restraining order. For example, what is called a
242: 650: 1444: 456: 303: 251: 178: 154: 138: 35: 446: 655: 451: 313: 234:
decries them as "lulling women into a false sense of security," and in its Family Legal Guide, the
418:
Breaching of restraining order is a separate crime punishable by up to two years of imprisonment.
934: 906: 831: 668: 611: 541: 492:
There are other names such as "criminal orders of protection" and "criminal protective orders".
975: 926: 885: 792: 784: 599: 589: 533: 113: 77: 918: 823: 660: 525: 466: 411:
restraining order, the police restraining order remains valid until court renders decision.
184:
The low burden of proof for restraining orders has led to some high-profile cases involving
142: 746:"The Worst Thing A Woman Can Do In Divorce Proceedings - The Abuse Of Orders of Protection" 226: 197: 188:
of celebrities obtaining restraining orders against their targets. For example, in 2005 a
31: 995: 962:. Wisconsin Coalition Against Domestic Violence. Archived from the original on 2016-03-10 636:"Erring on the Side of Hidden Harm: The Granting of Domestic Violence Restraining Orders" 504:
Davis, J.A. (2001, August). Stalking Crimes and Victim Protection, CRC Press, 568 pages.
112:
of the offender. Violations in some jurisdictions may also constitute criminal or civil
878: 254: 97: 1433: 1118: 835: 545: 461: 193: 1101: 938: 672: 150: 688:"Standards of Proof for Domestic Violence Civil Protection Orders (CPOs) By State" 263: 1270:"Rights and Remedies: Meeting the Civil Legal Needs of Sexual Violence Survivors" 1362: 1174: 309: 169: 109: 81: 56: 17: 664: 440: 383:
in Wisconsin also specifically includes cases of sexual assault and stalking.
341: 189: 89: 922: 827: 788: 603: 529: 321: 158: 1358:"How a temporary restraining order for guns could help stop mass shootings" 930: 796: 537: 1418: 561:"Criminal Protective Orders in Connecticut: The Problem of a Hidden Right" 161:, which require that restraining orders be based on "reasonable grounds". 771:
Benitez, Christopher T.; McNiel, Dale E.; Binder, Renée L. (2010-09-01).
185: 93: 1223:. American Bar Association Commission on Domestic Violence. August 2016. 1257:. American Bar Association Commission on Domestic Violence. April 2015. 85: 1240:. American Bar Association Commission on Domestic Violence. June 2009. 686:
University of Baltimore School of Law Family Law Clinic (June 2009).
238:
warns “a court order might even add to the alleged offender's rage".
146: 105: 1050: 772: 340:
Some states (e.g. Mississippi) may also call a restraining order a
812:"The Tactical Topography of Stalking Victimization and Management" 73: 55: 312:, a non-molestation order may be granted under Section 42 of the 777:
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
434: 1304:. Wisconsin Coalition Against Domestic Violence. Archived from 364:
state will have every type of restraining order on the books.
27:
Legal order prohibiting certain entities from specified actions
1235:"Stalking/Harassment Civil Protection Orders (CPOs) by State" 168:
Colorado's statute inverts the standard court procedures and
60:
A restraining order issued by the Justice Court of Las Vegas.
907:"Restraining Orders in California: A Look at Statewide Data" 586:
Partner stalking : how women respond, cope, and survive
1218:"Domestic Violence Civil Protection Orders (CPOs) By State" 693:. American Bar Association Commission on Domestic Violence. 76:
to protect a person in a situation often involving alleged
215:
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
1252:"Sexual Assault Civil Protection Orders (CPOs) By State" 953:"Process for Obtaining a Restraining Order in Wisconsin" 145:
required in criminal trials. Many US states—such as
761:
HuffingtonPost The Blog, accessed 15 September 2018
877: 725:Colorado Revised Statutes Annotated § 13-14-102(5) 157:. Other states use different standards, such as 980:: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown ( 1384: 1382: 1380: 580: 578: 8: 734:Hawaii Revised Statutes Annotated § 586-5(b) 318:Domestic Violence Crime and Victims Act 2004 1173:. Minnesota Judicial Branch. Archived from 880:American Bar Association Family Legal Guide 588:. Logan, TK. New York: Springer Pub. 2006. 172:, providing that after the court issues an 1132:"Prosecutions Under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8)" 1134:. U.S. Attorney Manual. 19 February 2015. 884:. Random House Reference. 27 April 2004. 654: 192:judge issued a restraining order against 1268:Mindlin, Jessica; Reeves, Liani (2005). 702: 700: 629: 627: 1274:The National Crime Victim Law Institute 507: 485: 1069:"The Survivor's Handbook - Womens Aid" 973: 609: 324:regardless of the applicant's income. 1197:"Domestic Violence Protective Orders" 7: 810:Spitzberg, Brian H. (October 2002). 1331:"Domestic Violence Prevention Act" 472:Civil Harassment Restraining Order 25: 1295:"Restraining Orders in Wisconsin" 905:Sorenson SB, Shen H (July 2005). 518:Journal of Interpersonal Violence 1417: 1356:Fies, Andy (February 16, 2018). 744:Mandarano, Liz (13 April 2011). 435:Anti-Social Behaviour Injunction 773:"Do Protection Orders Protect?" 225:, American security specialist 392:extreme risk restraining order 1: 1389:Gawron, Tomáš (12 May 2020). 1146:"LexisNexis® Legal Resources" 155:preponderance of the evidence 1440:Common law legal terminology 381:harassment restraining order 120:Restraining order provisions 634:Heleniak, David N. (2010). 565:Quinnipiac Law Review (QLR) 559:DeVito, Frank (2018–2019). 429:Anti-Social Behaviour Order 40:Temporary restraining order 1466: 1450:Judicial legal terminology 397:Orlando nightclub shooting 301: 133:Burden of proof and misuse 48: 29: 665:10.1891/1946-6560.1.2.220 232:Independent Women’s Forum 143:beyond a reasonable doubt 923:10.1177/1077801205276944 828:10.1177/1524838002237330 649:(2). Springer: 220–229. 530:10.1177/0886260519883865 236:American Bar Association 72:, is an order used by a 51:Restraining Order (film) 30:Not to be confused with 758:Mandarano, Liz (2011). 243:Castle Rock v. Gonzales 1335:California Family Code 1000:www.legislation.gov.uk 911:Violence Against Women 616:: CS1 maint: others ( 524:(21–22): 10198–10219. 61: 1055:broken-rainbow.org.uk 996:"Family Law Act 1996" 816:Trauma Violence Abuse 709:Seton Hall Law Review 376:stalking to qualify. 304:Non-molestation order 59: 36:Civil restraint order 1426:at Wikimedia Commons 447:Anti-suit injunction 452:Anti-Injunction Act 344:and are similar to 314:Family Law Act 1996 153:—use a standard of 1424:Restraining orders 1177:on August 15, 2013 1020:"About guidelines" 748:. Huffington Post. 62: 49:For the film, see 1422:Media related to 279:Gender of parties 139:standard of proof 114:contempt of court 78:domestic violence 66:restraining order 16:(Redirected from 1457: 1421: 1406: 1405: 1403: 1401: 1386: 1375: 1374: 1372: 1370: 1353: 1347: 1346: 1344: 1342: 1327: 1321: 1320: 1318: 1316: 1311:on 8 August 2014 1310: 1299: 1291: 1285: 1284: 1282: 1280: 1265: 1259: 1258: 1256: 1248: 1242: 1241: 1239: 1231: 1225: 1224: 1222: 1214: 1208: 1207: 1205: 1203: 1193: 1187: 1186: 1184: 1182: 1167: 1161: 1160: 1158: 1157: 1148:. Archived from 1142: 1136: 1135: 1128: 1122: 1121: 1119:§ 922(g)(8) 1111: 1105: 1104: 1094: 1088: 1087: 1085: 1084: 1075:. Archived from 1065: 1059: 1058: 1047: 1041: 1040: 1038: 1037: 1031: 1025:. Archived from 1024: 1016: 1010: 1009: 1007: 1006: 992: 986: 985: 979: 971: 969: 967: 957: 949: 943: 942: 902: 896: 895: 883: 874: 868: 865: 859: 855: 849: 846: 840: 839: 807: 801: 800: 768: 762: 756: 750: 749: 741: 735: 732: 726: 723: 717: 716: 704: 695: 694: 692: 683: 677: 676: 658: 640: 631: 622: 621: 615: 607: 582: 573: 572: 556: 550: 549: 512: 493: 490: 467:Cease and desist 266: 223:The Gift of Fear 70:protective order 44:Protective order 21: 18:Protection order 1465: 1464: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1456: 1455: 1454: 1430: 1429: 1414: 1409: 1399: 1397: 1388: 1387: 1378: 1368: 1366: 1355: 1354: 1350: 1340: 1338: 1329: 1328: 1324: 1314: 1312: 1308: 1297: 1293: 1292: 1288: 1278: 1276: 1267: 1266: 1262: 1254: 1250: 1249: 1245: 1237: 1233: 1232: 1228: 1220: 1216: 1215: 1211: 1201: 1199: 1195: 1194: 1190: 1180: 1178: 1169: 1168: 1164: 1155: 1153: 1144: 1143: 1139: 1130: 1129: 1125: 1113: 1112: 1108: 1096: 1095: 1091: 1082: 1080: 1067: 1066: 1062: 1049: 1048: 1044: 1035: 1033: 1029: 1022: 1018: 1017: 1013: 1004: 1002: 994: 993: 989: 972: 965: 963: 955: 951: 950: 946: 904: 903: 899: 892: 876: 875: 871: 866: 862: 856: 852: 847: 843: 809: 808: 804: 770: 769: 765: 757: 753: 743: 742: 738: 733: 729: 724: 720: 706: 705: 698: 690: 685: 684: 680: 656:10.1.1.694.8750 638: 633: 632: 625: 608: 596: 584: 583: 576: 558: 557: 553: 514: 513: 509: 502: 497: 496: 491: 487: 482: 477: 457:Burden of proof 424: 405: 361: 330: 306: 300: 295: 290: 281: 258: 227:Gavin de Becker 211: 198:David Letterman 196:-based TV host 179:burden of proof 135: 122: 54: 47: 32:Restraint order 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 1463: 1461: 1453: 1452: 1447: 1442: 1432: 1431: 1428: 1427: 1413: 1412:External links 1410: 1408: 1407: 1376: 1348: 1322: 1286: 1260: 1243: 1226: 1209: 1188: 1162: 1137: 1123: 1106: 1102:§ 2265(a) 1089: 1060: 1042: 1011: 987: 944: 917:(7): 912–933. 897: 891:978-0375720772 890: 869: 860: 850: 841: 822:(4): 261–288. 802: 783:(3): 376–385. 763: 751: 736: 727: 718: 696: 678: 623: 594: 574: 551: 506: 501: 498: 495: 494: 484: 483: 481: 478: 476: 475: 469: 464: 459: 454: 449: 444: 438: 432: 425: 423: 420: 404: 403:Czech Republic 401: 360: 357: 329: 326: 302:Main article: 299: 296: 294: 293:United Kingdom 291: 289: 286: 280: 277: 210: 207: 134: 131: 121: 118: 98:sexual assault 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1462: 1451: 1448: 1446: 1443: 1441: 1438: 1437: 1435: 1425: 1420: 1416: 1415: 1411: 1396: 1392: 1385: 1383: 1381: 1377: 1365: 1364: 1359: 1352: 1349: 1336: 1332: 1326: 1323: 1307: 1303: 1296: 1290: 1287: 1275: 1271: 1264: 1261: 1253: 1247: 1244: 1236: 1230: 1227: 1219: 1213: 1210: 1198: 1192: 1189: 1176: 1172: 1166: 1163: 1152:on 2009-04-05 1151: 1147: 1141: 1138: 1133: 1127: 1124: 1120: 1116: 1110: 1107: 1103: 1099: 1093: 1090: 1079:on 2015-07-04 1078: 1074: 1070: 1064: 1061: 1056: 1052: 1046: 1043: 1032:on 2010-05-09 1028: 1021: 1015: 1012: 1001: 997: 991: 988: 983: 977: 961: 954: 948: 945: 940: 936: 932: 928: 924: 920: 916: 912: 908: 901: 898: 893: 887: 882: 881: 873: 870: 864: 861: 854: 851: 845: 842: 837: 833: 829: 825: 821: 817: 813: 806: 803: 798: 794: 790: 786: 782: 778: 774: 767: 764: 760: 755: 752: 747: 740: 737: 731: 728: 722: 719: 714: 710: 703: 701: 697: 689: 682: 679: 674: 670: 666: 662: 657: 652: 648: 644: 643:Partner Abuse 637: 630: 628: 624: 619: 613: 605: 601: 597: 595:9780826137579 591: 587: 581: 579: 575: 570: 566: 562: 555: 552: 547: 543: 539: 535: 531: 527: 523: 519: 511: 508: 505: 499: 489: 486: 479: 473: 470: 468: 465: 463: 462:Interim order 460: 458: 455: 453: 450: 448: 445: 442: 439: 436: 433: 430: 427: 426: 421: 419: 416: 412: 408: 402: 400: 398: 393: 388: 384: 382: 377: 373: 369: 365: 358: 356: 354: 349: 347: 343: 338: 336: 328:United States 327: 325: 323: 319: 315: 311: 305: 297: 292: 288:Jurisdictions 287: 285: 278: 276: 274: 268: 265: 261: 256: 253: 249: 245: 244: 239: 237: 233: 228: 224: 219: 216: 209:Effectiveness 208: 206: 202: 199: 195: 194:New York City 191: 187: 182: 180: 175: 171: 166: 162: 160: 156: 152: 148: 144: 140: 132: 130: 126: 119: 117: 115: 111: 107: 101: 99: 95: 91: 87: 83: 79: 75: 71: 67: 58: 52: 45: 41: 37: 33: 19: 1445:Court orders 1398:. Retrieved 1394: 1369:February 18, 1367:. Retrieved 1361: 1351: 1339:. Retrieved 1334: 1325: 1313:. Retrieved 1306:the original 1301: 1289: 1277:. Retrieved 1273: 1263: 1246: 1229: 1212: 1200:. Retrieved 1191: 1181:February 15, 1179:. Retrieved 1175:the original 1165: 1154:. Retrieved 1150:the original 1140: 1126: 1109: 1092: 1081:. Retrieved 1077:the original 1072: 1063: 1054: 1045: 1034:. Retrieved 1027:the original 1014: 1003:. Retrieved 999: 990: 964:. Retrieved 959: 947: 914: 910: 900: 879: 872: 863: 853: 844: 819: 815: 805: 780: 776: 766: 754: 739: 730: 721: 712: 708: 681: 646: 642: 585: 568: 564: 554: 521: 517: 510: 503: 488: 474:(California) 417: 413: 409: 406: 390:Finally, an 389: 385: 378: 374: 370: 366: 362: 352: 350: 339: 331: 307: 282: 272: 269: 241: 240: 222: 220: 214: 212: 203: 183: 173: 167: 163: 151:Pennsylvania 136: 127: 123: 102: 69: 65: 63: 1363:ABCNews.com 1073:Women's Aid 310:English law 264:§ 1983 201:paperwork. 170:due process 110:prosecution 82:child abuse 1434:Categories 1341:13 October 1171:"HRO FAQs" 1156:2009-03-13 1083:2016-05-10 1036:2010-04-19 1005:2016-05-10 966:12 January 500:References 441:Peace bond 342:peace bond 337:offense. 335:deportable 190:New Mexico 90:harassment 1395:gawron.cz 1337:. LegInfo 1115:18 U.S.C. 1098:18 U.S.C. 836:146721263 789:1093-6793 651:CiteSeerX 612:cite book 604:228168873 546:204954937 322:legal aid 260:42 U.S.C. 159:Wisconsin 1202:March 3, 976:cite web 939:39711827 931:16043577 797:20852224 673:71884596 538:31658852 443:(Canada) 422:See also 273:ex parte 186:stalkers 174:ex parte 94:stalking 1315:26 July 415:total. 298:England 86:assault 1400:12 May 1279:1 June 1117:  1100:  1051:"Home" 937:  929:  888:  834:  795:  787:  671:  653:  602:  592:  571:: 343. 544:  536:  353:pro se 262:  147:Oregon 106:arrest 1309:(PDF) 1302:WCADV 1298:(PDF) 1255:(PDF) 1238:(PDF) 1221:(PDF) 1030:(PDF) 1023:(PDF) 960:WCADV 956:(PDF) 935:S2CID 832:S2CID 691:(PDF) 669:S2CID 639:(PDF) 542:S2CID 480:Notes 359:Types 250: 96:, or 74:court 42:, or 1402:2020 1371:2018 1343:2018 1317:2014 1281:2016 1204:2015 1183:2012 982:link 968:2014 927:PMID 886:ISBN 858:229. 793:PMID 785:ISSN 715:(2). 618:link 600:OCLC 590:ISBN 534:PMID 437:(UK) 431:(UK) 346:ASBO 252:U.S. 149:and 137:The 108:and 919:doi 824:doi 661:doi 526:doi 308:In 255:748 248:545 100:. 68:or 1436:: 1393:. 1379:^ 1360:. 1333:. 1300:. 1272:. 1071:. 1053:. 998:. 978:}} 974:{{ 958:. 933:. 925:. 915:11 913:. 909:. 830:. 818:. 814:. 791:. 781:38 779:. 775:. 713:40 711:. 699:^ 667:. 659:. 645:. 641:. 626:^ 614:}} 610:{{ 598:. 577:^ 569:37 567:. 563:. 540:. 532:. 522:36 520:. 399:. 271:(" 246:, 116:. 92:, 88:, 84:, 80:, 64:A 38:, 34:, 1404:. 1373:. 1345:. 1319:. 1283:. 1206:. 1185:. 1159:. 1086:. 1057:. 1039:. 1008:. 984:) 970:. 941:. 921:: 894:. 838:. 826:: 820:3 799:. 675:. 663:: 647:1 620:) 606:. 548:. 528:: 53:. 46:. 20:)

Index

Protection order
Restraint order
Civil restraint order
Temporary restraining order
Protective order
Restraining Order (film)

court
domestic violence
child abuse
assault
harassment
stalking
sexual assault
arrest
prosecution
contempt of court
standard of proof
beyond a reasonable doubt
Oregon
Pennsylvania
preponderance of the evidence
Wisconsin
due process
burden of proof
stalkers
New Mexico
New York City
David Letterman
Gavin de Becker

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.