Knowledge (XXG)

Pro-innovation bias

Source đź“ť

22: 165:. There would be an age of peace and plenty in which atomic energy would "provide the power needed to desalinate water for the thirsty, irrigate the deserts for the hungry, and fuel interstellar travel deep into outer space". This use would render the Atomic Age as significant a step in technological progress as the first smelting of 126:
is a belief that innovation should be adopted by the whole society without the need for its alteration. The innovation's "champion" has a such strong bias in favor of the innovation, that they may not see its limitations or weaknesses and continue to promote it nonetheless.
328: 292: 1072: 1047: 141:
A feeling of nuclear optimism emerged in the 1950s in which it was believed that all power generators in the future would be atomic in nature. The
1077: 346: 443: 409: 382: 253: 39: 306: 157:. There was a general feeling that everything would use a nuclear power source of some sort, in a positive and productive way, from 105: 86: 474: 58: 1067: 877: 43: 996: 65: 882: 536: 531: 191:." In the late 20th century, there were many predictions of this kind. This transformation has so far not taken place. 654: 72: 990: 516: 622: 32: 1120: 844: 644: 215: 54: 1149: 1144: 1057: 939: 704: 684: 580: 269:
Palacios Fenech,J. and Longford,N.T. (2014). "The International Rate of Discontinuance of Some Old Products".
180: 119: 1130: 814: 794: 575: 553: 909: 824: 799: 744: 174: 862: 714: 590: 467: 341: 1170: 1017: 934: 834: 709: 699: 694: 558: 914: 899: 659: 649: 632: 286: 79: 1027: 964: 949: 872: 854: 789: 585: 501: 439: 435: 429: 405: 399: 378: 322: 249: 243: 200: 188: 374: 1094: 954: 894: 819: 804: 664: 617: 526: 521: 506: 352: 274: 220: 162: 158: 1062: 1052: 829: 809: 724: 627: 602: 597: 570: 548: 460: 210: 1104: 1099: 1089: 1012: 929: 889: 839: 784: 774: 759: 754: 719: 674: 639: 543: 492: 239: 184: 142: 1175: 1164: 1042: 1022: 985: 959: 944: 924: 904: 867: 779: 739: 734: 729: 607: 511: 367: 146: 1002: 764: 749: 278: 919: 689: 679: 669: 565: 21: 1037: 1032: 1007: 166: 136: 1125: 612: 154: 1084: 969: 205: 170: 483: 150: 456: 309:. January 26, 2010. Archived from the original on July 22, 2011 187:, said in 1986: "By the turn of the century, we will live in a 15: 452: 145:
would render all conventional explosives obsolete and
365:
Howard F. Didsbury, Jr.; Howard F. Didsbury (2004).
1113: 978: 853: 490: 149:plants would do the same for power sources such as 46:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. 366: 327:: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown ( 349:: A Critical Global Assessment of Atomic Energy 468: 8: 291:: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( 273:. Vol. 27, no. 2. pp. 59–73. 1131:Heuristics in judgment and decision-making 475: 461: 453: 106:Learn how and when to remove this message 231: 398:Edward R. Dougherty (1 January 1999). 369:Thinking Creatively in Turbulent Times 347:Contesting the Future of Nuclear Power 320: 284: 161:to preserve it, to the development of 245:Diffusion of Innovations, 4th Edition 7: 44:adding citations to reliable sources 428:Rogers, Everett (August 16, 2003). 14: 373:. World Future Society. p.  307:"Beyond the pro-innovation bias" 20: 31:needs additional citations for 1: 401:Electronic Imaging Technology 173:, or the commencement of the 279:10.1080/08911762.2013.850142 997:DĂ©formation professionnelle 404:. SPIE Press. p. 289. 271:Journal of Global Marketing 248:. Free Press. p. 100. 1192: 991:Basking in reflected glory 134: 1139: 1121:Cognitive bias mitigation 216:Technological determinism 705:Illusion of transparency 431:Diffusion of Innovations 434:. Free Press. pp.  120:diffusion of innovation 1073:Arab–Israeli conflict 800:Social influence bias 745:Out-group homogeneity 175:Industrial Revolution 55:"Pro-innovation bias" 715:Mere-exposure effect 645:Extrinsic incentives 591:Selective perception 342:Benjamin K. Sovacool 40:improve this article 940:Social desirability 835:von Restorff effect 710:Mean world syndrome 685:Hostile attribution 183:, then chairman of 124:pro-innovation bias 855:Statistical biases 633:Curse of knowledge 1158: 1157: 795:Social comparison 576:Choice-supportive 445:978-0-7432-2209-9 411:978-0-8194-3037-3 384:978-0-930242-59-6 255:978-1-4516-0247-0 240:Everett M. Rogers 201:Appeal to novelty 189:paperless society 116: 115: 108: 90: 1183: 955:Systematic error 910:Omitted-variable 825:Trait ascription 665:Frog pond effect 493:Cognitive biases 477: 470: 463: 454: 449: 416: 415: 395: 389: 388: 372: 362: 356: 353:World Scientific 339: 333: 332: 326: 318: 316: 314: 303: 297: 296: 290: 282: 266: 260: 259: 236: 221:Wishful thinking 206:Myth of Progress 163:nuclear medicine 159:irradiating food 111: 104: 100: 97: 91: 89: 48: 24: 16: 1191: 1190: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1154: 1135: 1109: 974: 849: 830:Turkey illusion 598:Compassion fade 495: 486: 481: 446: 427: 424: 422:Further reading 419: 412: 397: 396: 392: 385: 364: 363: 359: 340: 336: 319: 312: 310: 305: 304: 300: 283: 268: 267: 263: 256: 242:(6 July 2010). 238: 237: 233: 229: 211:Status quo bias 197: 139: 133: 112: 101: 95: 92: 49: 47: 37: 25: 12: 11: 5: 1189: 1187: 1179: 1178: 1173: 1163: 1162: 1156: 1155: 1153: 1152: 1147: 1140: 1137: 1136: 1134: 1133: 1128: 1123: 1117: 1115: 1114:Bias reduction 1111: 1110: 1108: 1107: 1102: 1097: 1092: 1090:Political bias 1087: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1075: 1070: 1065: 1060: 1055: 1050: 1045: 1035: 1030: 1025: 1020: 1018:Infrastructure 1015: 1010: 1005: 1000: 993: 988: 982: 980: 976: 975: 973: 972: 967: 962: 957: 952: 947: 942: 937: 935:Self-selection 932: 927: 922: 917: 912: 907: 902: 897: 892: 887: 886: 885: 875: 870: 865: 859: 857: 851: 850: 848: 847: 842: 837: 832: 827: 822: 817: 812: 807: 802: 797: 792: 787: 782: 777: 772: 770:Pro-innovation 767: 762: 757: 755:Overton window 752: 747: 742: 737: 732: 727: 722: 717: 712: 707: 702: 697: 692: 687: 682: 677: 672: 667: 662: 657: 652: 647: 642: 637: 636: 635: 625: 623:Dunning–Kruger 620: 615: 610: 605: 600: 595: 594: 593: 583: 578: 573: 568: 563: 562: 561: 551: 546: 541: 540: 539: 537:Correspondence 534: 532:Actor–observer 524: 519: 514: 509: 504: 498: 496: 491: 488: 487: 482: 480: 479: 472: 465: 457: 451: 450: 444: 423: 420: 418: 417: 410: 390: 383: 357: 334: 298: 261: 254: 230: 228: 225: 224: 223: 218: 213: 208: 203: 196: 193: 185:General Motors 135:Main article: 132: 129: 114: 113: 28: 26: 19: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1188: 1177: 1174: 1172: 1169: 1168: 1166: 1151: 1148: 1146: 1142: 1141: 1138: 1132: 1129: 1127: 1124: 1122: 1119: 1118: 1116: 1112: 1106: 1103: 1101: 1098: 1096: 1093: 1091: 1088: 1086: 1083: 1079: 1076: 1074: 1071: 1069: 1068:United States 1066: 1064: 1061: 1059: 1056: 1054: 1051: 1049: 1046: 1044: 1043:False balance 1041: 1040: 1039: 1036: 1034: 1031: 1029: 1026: 1024: 1021: 1019: 1016: 1014: 1011: 1009: 1006: 1004: 1001: 999: 998: 994: 992: 989: 987: 984: 983: 981: 977: 971: 968: 966: 963: 961: 958: 956: 953: 951: 948: 946: 943: 941: 938: 936: 933: 931: 928: 926: 923: 921: 918: 916: 915:Participation 913: 911: 908: 906: 903: 901: 898: 896: 893: 891: 888: 884: 883:Psychological 881: 880: 879: 876: 874: 871: 869: 866: 864: 861: 860: 858: 856: 852: 846: 843: 841: 838: 836: 833: 831: 828: 826: 823: 821: 818: 816: 813: 811: 808: 806: 803: 801: 798: 796: 793: 791: 788: 786: 783: 781: 778: 776: 773: 771: 768: 766: 763: 761: 758: 756: 753: 751: 748: 746: 743: 741: 738: 736: 733: 731: 728: 726: 723: 721: 718: 716: 713: 711: 708: 706: 703: 701: 698: 696: 693: 691: 688: 686: 683: 681: 678: 676: 673: 671: 668: 666: 663: 661: 658: 656: 653: 651: 650:Fading affect 648: 646: 643: 641: 638: 634: 631: 630: 629: 626: 624: 621: 619: 616: 614: 611: 609: 606: 604: 601: 599: 596: 592: 589: 588: 587: 584: 582: 579: 577: 574: 572: 569: 567: 564: 560: 557: 556: 555: 552: 550: 547: 545: 542: 538: 535: 533: 530: 529: 528: 525: 523: 520: 518: 515: 513: 510: 508: 505: 503: 500: 499: 497: 494: 489: 485: 478: 473: 471: 466: 464: 459: 458: 455: 447: 441: 437: 433: 432: 426: 425: 421: 413: 407: 403: 402: 394: 391: 386: 380: 376: 371: 370: 361: 358: 354: 350: 348: 343: 338: 335: 330: 324: 308: 302: 299: 294: 288: 280: 276: 272: 265: 262: 257: 251: 247: 246: 241: 235: 232: 226: 222: 219: 217: 214: 212: 209: 207: 204: 202: 199: 198: 194: 192: 190: 186: 182: 178: 176: 172: 168: 164: 160: 156: 152: 148: 147:nuclear power 144: 138: 130: 128: 125: 121: 110: 107: 99: 88: 85: 81: 78: 74: 71: 67: 64: 60: 57: â€“  56: 52: 51:Find sources: 45: 41: 35: 34: 29:This article 27: 23: 18: 17: 1028:In education 995: 979:Other biases 965:Verification 950:Survivorship 900:Non-response 873:Healthy user 815:Substitution 790:Self-serving 769: 586:Confirmation 554:Availability 502:Acquiescence 430: 400: 393: 368: 360: 345: 337: 311:. Retrieved 301: 270: 264: 244: 234: 179: 140: 123: 117: 102: 93: 83: 76: 69: 62: 50: 38:Please help 33:verification 30: 1095:Publication 1048:Vietnam War 895:Length time 878:Information 820:Time-saving 680:Horn effect 670:Halo effect 618:Distinction 527:Attribution 522:Attentional 181:Roger Smith 143:atomic bomb 1171:Innovation 1165:Categories 1058:South Asia 1033:Liking gap 845:In animals 810:Status quo 725:Negativity 628:Egocentric 603:Congruence 581:Commitment 571:Blind spot 559:Mean world 549:Automation 227:References 137:Atomic Age 122:theory, a 96:March 2023 66:newspapers 1126:Debiasing 1105:White hat 1100:Reporting 1013:Inductive 930:Selection 890:Lead time 863:Estimator 840:Zero-risk 805:Spotlight 785:Restraint 775:Proximity 760:Precision 720:Narrative 675:Hindsight 660:Frequency 640:Emotional 613:Declinism 544:Authority 517:Anchoring 507:Ambiguity 355:, p. 259. 313:April 17, 287:cite news 1023:Inherent 986:Academic 960:Systemic 945:Spectrum 925:Sampling 905:Observer 868:Forecast 780:Response 740:Optimism 735:Omission 730:Normalcy 700:In-group 695:Implicit 608:Cultural 512:Affinity 344:(2011). 323:cite web 195:See also 1145:General 1143:Lists: 1078:Ukraine 1003:Funding 765:Present 750:Outcome 655:Framing 131:Example 80:scholar 1150:Memory 1063:Sweden 1053:Norway 920:Recall 690:Impact 566:Belief 484:Biases 442:  408:  381:  252:  167:Bronze 82:  75:  68:  61:  53:  1038:Media 1008:FUTON 169:, of 87:JSTOR 73:books 1176:Bias 440:ISBN 406:ISBN 379:ISBN 329:link 315:2011 293:link 250:ISBN 171:Iron 153:and 151:coal 59:news 1085:Net 970:Wet 436:512 275:doi 155:oil 118:In 42:by 1167:: 438:. 377:. 375:41 351:, 325:}} 321:{{ 289:}} 285:{{ 177:. 476:e 469:t 462:v 448:. 414:. 387:. 331:) 317:. 295:) 281:. 277:: 258:. 109:) 103:( 98:) 94:( 84:· 77:· 70:· 63:· 36:.

Index


verification
improve this article
adding citations to reliable sources
"Pro-innovation bias"
news
newspapers
books
scholar
JSTOR
Learn how and when to remove this message
diffusion of innovation
Atomic Age
atomic bomb
nuclear power
coal
oil
irradiating food
nuclear medicine
Bronze
Iron
Industrial Revolution
Roger Smith
General Motors
paperless society
Appeal to novelty
Myth of Progress
Status quo bias
Technological determinism
Wishful thinking

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑