150:
224:, 304 U.S. 175, 182 (1938) (upholding as legitimate field-of-use limitations on scope of patent licenses to make and sell amplifiers only in “non-commercial” field), affirmed on rehearing, 305 U.S. 124 (1938), the Supreme Court held that a patent owner could permissibly license another to manufacture the patented product only in a defined field (in that case, amplifiers for sale and use other than to movie theaters, so-called noncommercial use). The defendants were held patent infringers for making and selling the patented product to movie theaters. The Court stated (305 U.S. at 127):
184:, sitting as a circuit justice in the circuit court in Rhode Island, held that Providence infringed Goodyear's patent. Providence sought to defend on the ground that it was licensed to engage in the allegedly infringing conduct, but the court held that the license was "restricted to the manufacture of cloths to be japanned, marbled, and variegated, as therein described, and that it confers no authority to manufacture any of the articles specified in the bill of complaint." It therefore ruled against Providence, which then appealed to the Supreme Court.
31:
232:, 9 Wall. 788, 799, 800 . . . So far as appears, its legality has never been questioned. The parties stipulated that "it is common practice where a patented invention is applicable to different uses, to grant written licenses to manufacture under United States Letters Patents restricted to one or more of the several fields of use permitting the exclusive or non-exclusive use of the invention by the licensee in one field and excluding it in another field."
164:" rubber by heating it to a high temperature in the presence of sulfur and lead carbonate or another chemical, so that it was converted from a soft, sticky, gummy product (so-called India rubber) to a hard, resilient, elastic, flexible product (so-called vulcanized rubber). Goodyear was issued a patent on the process by which vulcanized India-rubber is manufactured and another patent for the product that the process produced.
168:
his own establishment, but not to be disposed of to others for that purpose without the consent of said
Goodyear." Further, the licensee was to pay Goodyear "at the rate of three cents per square yard of cloth japanned, marbled, or variegated as aforesaid." The license expressly provided that it did not "convey any right to make any contract with the government of the United States."
199:
The Court described the limitations in the terms of the license to particular products and the exclusion of sales to the government, stating that the license "conveyed authority to this extent and nothing more." Accordingly, the Court held: "This defence cannot avail the defendants." The Court did
167:
In 1846, Goodyear granted what amounted to a royalty-free exclusive license to E.M. Chaffee, the assignor to the
Providence Rubber Company (Providence), to "use" the patented "metallic gum-elastic composition for coating of cloths for the purpose of japanning, marbling, and variegate japanning, at
171:
Providence subsequently made and sold to the government "army and navy equipments made of vulcanized India-rubber, including vulcanized India-rubber blankets, coats, cloaks, cloth, clothing, ponchos for army, navy, and other purposes" using the patented composition. Goodyear's assignees sued
140:
recognizing the right of a patent owner to license another person to practice the invention only in a limited field, and holding that such a licensee committed patent infringement when it made and sold products of the invention outside that field.
407:
316:
105:
253:
incorrectly (conflating sales and licenses to manufacture) for support that it was established law that it was lawful to impose post-sale restrictions on the sale of patented products. The court said:
464:
336:., 10 F. Cas. 712, 720 (C.C.D.R.I. 1864). Goodyear received other patents, as well, including one, U.S. Patent No. 9319, on a machine for making vulcanized-rubber fabric, depicted at right.
220:
399:
308:
97:
65:
459:
474:
149:
469:
245:
35:
290:
137:
261:, 76 U.S. 788, 9 Wall. 788, 799, 800. . . . So far as it appears, its legality has never been questioned.
432:
403:
312:
101:
57:
72:
414:
193:
157:
181:
172:
Providence for patent infringement, seeking an injunction and an accounting for profits.
423:
320:
109:
453:
273:
involved a license to manufacture subject to a limitation as to field of use (as in
60:
161:
228:
The practice of granting licenses for a restricted use is an old one, see
286:
257:
The practice of granting licenses for restricted use is an old one, see
76:
441:
148:
153:
Goodyear's patented machine for making vulcanized rubber fabric
30:
136:, 76 U.S. (9 Wall.) 788 (1869), is an early decision of the
249:, 976 F.2d 700 (Fed. Cir. 1992), the Federal Circuit cited
203:
The decree of the circuit court was therefore affirmed.
221:
General
Talking Pictures Corp. v. Western Electric Co.
465:
United States
Supreme Court cases of the Chase Court
121:
116:
89:
84:
52:
42:
23:
269:involved a sale subject to a restriction, while
196:delivered the unanimous opinion of the Court.
285:The citations in this article are written in
8:
200:not cite any case authority on this point.
20:
410:) 788 (1869) is available from:
297:
96:., 10 F. Cas. 712 (C.C.D.R.I. 1864);
18:1867 United States Supreme Court case
7:
246:Mallinckrodt, Inc. v. Medipart, Inc.
125:Swayne, joined by a unanimous court
36:Supreme Court of the United States
14:
460:United States Supreme Court cases
334:Goodyear v. Providence Rubber Co
94:Goodyear v. Providence Rubber Co
29:
475:1869 in United States case law
1:
470:United States patent case law
138:United States Supreme Court
491:
259:Rubber Company v. Goodyear
230:Rubber Company v. Goodyear
47:Rubber Company v. Goodyear
24:Rubber Company v. Goodyear
28:
332:76 U.S. at 789–90, 794;
275:General Talking Pictures
213:General Talking Pictures
160:invented a process for "
207:Subsequent developments
188:Ruling of Supreme Court
176:Ruling of circuit court
396:Rubber Co. v. Goodyear
305:Rubber Co. v. Goodyear
293:for more information.
289:style. Please see the
263:
234:
180:Supreme Court Justice
154:
133:Rubber Co. v. Goodyear
345:10 F. Cas. at 722–23.
255:
226:
152:
363:76 U.S. at 790, 800.
433:Library of Congress
372:76 U.S. at 799–800
155:
129:
128:
482:
446:
440:
437:
431:
428:
422:
419:
413:
382:
379:
373:
370:
364:
361:
355:
352:
346:
343:
337:
330:
324:
302:
158:Charles Goodyear
33:
32:
21:
490:
489:
485:
484:
483:
481:
480:
479:
450:
449:
444:
438:
435:
429:
426:
420:
417:
411:
391:
386:
385:
381:76 U.S. at 804.
380:
376:
371:
367:
362:
358:
354:79 U.S. at 799.
353:
349:
344:
340:
331:
327:
303:
299:
283:
241:
216:
209:
190:
182:Nathan Clifford
178:
147:
80:
38:
19:
12:
11:
5:
488:
486:
478:
477:
472:
467:
462:
452:
451:
448:
447:
415:Google Scholar
390:
389:External links
387:
384:
383:
374:
365:
356:
347:
338:
325:
296:
295:
282:
279:
240:
235:
215:
210:
208:
205:
189:
186:
177:
174:
146:
143:
127:
126:
123:
119:
118:
114:
113:
91:
87:
86:
82:
81:
70:
54:
50:
49:
44:
43:Full case name
40:
39:
34:
26:
25:
17:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
487:
476:
473:
471:
468:
466:
463:
461:
458:
457:
455:
443:
434:
425:
416:
409:
405:
401:
397:
393:
392:
388:
378:
375:
369:
366:
360:
357:
351:
348:
342:
339:
335:
329:
326:
322:
318:
314:
310:
306:
301:
298:
294:
292:
288:
280:
278:
276:
272:
268:
262:
260:
254:
252:
248:
247:
239:
236:
233:
231:
225:
223:
222:
214:
211:
206:
204:
201:
197:
195:
187:
185:
183:
175:
173:
169:
165:
163:
159:
151:
144:
142:
139:
135:
134:
124:
120:
115:
111:
107:
103:
99:
95:
92:
88:
83:
78:
74:
68:
67:
62:
59:
55:
51:
48:
45:
41:
37:
27:
22:
16:
395:
377:
368:
359:
350:
341:
333:
328:
323: (1869).
304:
300:
284:
274:
270:
267:Mallinckrodt
266:
264:
258:
256:
250:
244:
242:
238:Mallinckrodt
237:
229:
227:
219:
217:
212:
202:
198:
191:
179:
170:
166:
156:
132:
131:
130:
117:Case opinion
112: (1867).
93:
85:Case history
64:
46:
15:
162:vulcanizing
454:Categories
442:OpenJurist
281:References
145:Background
291:talk page
53:Citations
394:Text of
287:Bluebook
271:Goodyear
251:Goodyear
192:Justice
122:Majority
75:153; 18
445:
439:
436:
430:
427:
424:Justia
421:
418:
412:
319:)
194:Swayne
108:)
77:L. Ed.
408:Wall.
402:
317:Wall.
311:
106:Wall.
100:
90:Prior
73:Wall.
404:U.S.
313:U.S.
265:But
102:U.S.
66:more
58:U.S.
406:(9
321:788
315:(9
277:).
243:In
218:In
110:153
104:(6
79:762
61:788
56:76
456::
400:76
398:,
309:76
307:,
98:73
71:6
69:)
63:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
