29:
409:
281:
as necessary. Trial judges should adopt all reasonable measures to permit defence counsel to make meaningful submissions regarding what occurs in their absence. Trial judges have broad discretion to craft appropriate procedures in this regard.
109:
is claimed until a judge has decided that the privilege does not exist or an exception applies. This may sometimes require a hearing without the defendant or defence counsel present to resolve the issue.
243:
split 2-1 in upholding the trial judge's decision. This allowed the defendants' lawyers to be present during a hearing regarding disclosure of documents to the defence that involved a police informant.
365:
575:
294:
358:
585:
605:
351:
277:, without the defendant or their counsel present, but only if it is required to keep the informer's identity confidential. The hearing should only be held
261:
580:
231:
ruled against a pre-trial Crown request to exclude defence lawyers from an in-camera hearing on information involving a police informant.
595:
590:
374:
157:
388:
240:
82:
253:
549:
224:
600:
273:
The Court found that where a hearing is required to determine a claim of informer privilege, the hearing must be held
257:
408:
524:
481:
228:
534:
529:
554:
330:
285:
The Court went on to suggest various methods trial judges may adopt to limit the unfairness to a defendant.
193:
34:
486:
313:
28:
338:
217:
197:
106:
153:
122:
544:
440:
435:
430:
464:
334:
213:
137:
149:
145:
569:
498:
452:
343:
252:
The
Supreme Court of Canada heard the appeal on April 22, 2009. Intervenors were the
189:
177:
Deschamps and
Cromwell JJ. took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
60:
539:
476:
268:
141:
133:
54:
Her
Majesty The Queen v. Udhe Singh (Dave) Basi, Bobby Singh Virk and Aneal Basi
398:
393:
129:
201:
103:
519:
274:
514:
102:
A defendant and their counsel may not access information over which
347:
216:
were charged with corruption and breach of trust following the
196:
where the Court weighed the rights of the defendant versus the
204:
in an important trial into alleged government corruption.
507:
416:
381:
168:
163:
113:
96:
88:
77:
69:
59:
49:
42:
21:
576:Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms case law
212:Three employees of the provincial government of
359:
264:and Criminal Lawyers’ Association (Ontario).
8:
366:
352:
344:
254:Director of Public Prosecutions of Canada
262:Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police
306:
267:The unanimous judgment was written by
18:
295:List of Supreme Court of Canada cases
7:
586:Canadian criminal procedure case law
606:British Columbia political scandals
314:SCC Case Information - Docket 32719
375:British Columbia Legislature raids
14:
16:2009 Supreme Court of Canada case
407:
241:British Columbia Court of Appeal
235:British Columbia Court of Appeal
83:British Columbia Court of Appeal
81:Judgment for the defence in the
27:
225:British Columbia Supreme Court
1:
581:Supreme Court of Canada cases
258:Attorney General of Ontario
45:Judgment: November 19, 2009
622:
596:Trials of political people
65:2009 SCC 52, 3 S.C.R. 389
591:2009 in Canadian case law
535:Pilothouse Communications
405:
176:
118:
101:
26:
394:BC Rail Corruption Trial
43:Hearing: April 22, 2009
331:Supreme Court of Canada
316:Supreme Court of Canada
194:Supreme Court of Canada
35:Supreme Court of Canada
525:Canadian National (CN)
333:decision available at
530:Canadian Pacific (CP)
223:On December 6, 2007,
601:Corruption in Canada
248:Reasons of the Court
218:BC Legislature Raids
169:Unanimous reasons by
459:Special Prosecutor
154:Marshall Rothstein
123:Beverley McLachlin
563:
562:
555:RCMP "E" Division
482:Elizabeth Bennett
465:William Berardino
229:Elizabeth Bennett
190:landmark decision
181:
180:
613:
495:
473:
461:
449:
427:
411:
368:
361:
354:
345:
317:
311:
214:British Columbia
127:Puisne Justices:
114:Court membership
31:
19:
621:
620:
616:
615:
614:
612:
611:
610:
566:
565:
564:
559:
503:
491:
469:
457:
445:
423:
412:
403:
377:
372:
326:
321:
320:
312:
308:
303:
291:
250:
237:
210:
158:Thomas Cromwell
138:Marie Deschamps
125:
92:Appeal allowed.
44:
38:
17:
12:
11:
5:
619:
617:
609:
608:
603:
598:
593:
588:
583:
578:
568:
567:
561:
560:
558:
557:
552:
547:
542:
537:
532:
527:
522:
517:
511:
509:
505:
504:
502:
501:
496:
489:
487:Anne MacKenzie
484:
479:
474:
467:
462:
455:
450:
443:
438:
433:
428:
420:
418:
414:
413:
406:
404:
402:
401:
399:Federal appeal
396:
391:
385:
383:
379:
378:
373:
371:
370:
363:
356:
348:
342:
341:
325:
324:External links
322:
319:
318:
305:
304:
302:
299:
298:
297:
290:
287:
249:
246:
236:
233:
209:
206:
179:
178:
174:
173:
170:
166:
165:
161:
160:
150:Louise Charron
146:Rosalie Abella
120:Chief Justice:
116:
115:
111:
110:
99:
98:
94:
93:
90:
86:
85:
79:
75:
74:
71:
67:
66:
63:
57:
56:
51:
50:Full case name
47:
46:
40:
39:
32:
24:
23:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
618:
607:
604:
602:
599:
597:
594:
592:
589:
587:
584:
582:
579:
577:
574:
573:
571:
556:
553:
551:
548:
546:
543:
541:
538:
536:
533:
531:
528:
526:
523:
521:
518:
516:
513:
512:
510:
508:Organizations
506:
500:
499:Bill Tieleman
497:
494:
490:
488:
485:
483:
480:
478:
475:
472:
468:
466:
463:
460:
456:
454:
453:Erik Bornmann
451:
448:
444:
442:
439:
437:
434:
432:
429:
426:
422:
421:
419:
415:
410:
400:
397:
395:
392:
390:
387:
386:
384:
380:
376:
369:
364:
362:
357:
355:
350:
349:
346:
340:
336:
332:
329:Full text of
328:
327:
323:
315:
310:
307:
300:
296:
293:
292:
288:
286:
283:
280:
276:
271:
270:
265:
263:
259:
255:
247:
245:
242:
234:
232:
230:
226:
221:
219:
215:
207:
205:
203:
199:
195:
191:
187:
186:
175:
171:
167:
164:Reasons given
162:
159:
155:
151:
147:
143:
139:
135:
131:
128:
124:
121:
117:
112:
108:
105:
100:
95:
91:
87:
84:
80:
78:Prior history
76:
72:
68:
64:
62:
58:
55:
52:
48:
41:
37:
36:
30:
25:
20:
492:
477:Patrick Dohm
470:
458:
446:
424:
309:
284:
278:
272:
266:
251:
238:
222:
211:
184:
183:
182:
126:
119:
53:
33:
550:BC Liberals
493:Journalists
142:Morris Fish
134:Louis LeBel
570:Categories
545:Ferroequus
447:Informants
441:Bobby Virk
436:Aneal Basi
301:References
208:Background
198:privileges
130:Ian Binnie
70:Docket No.
431:Dave Basi
202:informant
107:privilege
61:Citations
520:OmniTRAX
389:Timeline
289:See also
279:ex parte
275:ex parte
227:Justice
185:R v Basi
104:informer
22:R v Basi
515:BC Rail
425:Accused
269:Fish J.
172:Fish J.
97:Holding
471:Judges
417:People
382:Events
339:CanLII
200:of an
89:Ruling
73:32719
335:LexUM
188:is a
540:BNSF
337:and
239:The
192:by
572::
260:,
256:,
220:.
156:,
152:,
148:,
144:,
140:,
136:,
132:,
367:e
360:t
353:v
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
