29:
322:
In that case, Chief
Justice Brian Dickson wrote that this freedom at least includes freedom of religious speech, including "the right to entertain such religious beliefs as a person chooses, the right to declare religious beliefs openly and without fear of hindrance or reprisal, and the right to
309:
433:(1961) - Contrary U.S Supreme Court decision on blue laws, holding that laws originally passed for religious reasons may nonetheless be constitutional if they can be shown to fulfill a secular purpose
335:
257:
216:
415:
299:
472:
323:
manifest religious belief by worship and practice or by teaching and dissemination." Freedom of religion would also prohibit imposing religious requirements.
286:
221:
315:, which is for those whose rights are violated. In as much as a corporation is not a natural person, it cannot have a religion and therefore the
477:
467:
482:
421:
492:
211:
82:
487:
147:
380:
444:
384:
242:
237:
store Big M Drug Mart was charged with unlawfully carrying on the sale of goods on a Sunday contrary to the
206:
34:
452:
304:
272:
364:
249:
225:. This case had many firsts in constitutional law including being the first to interpret section two.
28:
448:
429:
253:
284:
The
Supreme Court ruled that the statute was an unconstitutional violation of section 2 of the
298:-based requirement, and was therefore invalid. The drug store's victory was made possible by
187:
Laskin CJ and
Ritchie and Estey JJ took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
248:
The constitutional question put before the Court was whether the Act infringed the right to
151:
131:
461:
202:
159:
155:
143:
135:
60:
294:
basis for the legislation and its only purpose was, in effect, to establish a state
308:, which provides that unconstitutional laws can be found invalid, as opposed to
266:
124:
241:
of 1906. At trial the store was acquitted, and an appeal was dismissed by the
339:
139:
344:
65:
1 SCR 295, 18 DLR (4th) 321, 3 WWR 481, 18 CCC (3d) 385, 37 Alta LR (2d) 97
174:
Dickson J (paras 1–151), joined by Beetz, McIntyre, Chouinard and Lamer JJ
295:
291:
234:
270:("within") Parliament's criminal power under section 91(27) of the
334:
jurisprudence to be struck down in its entirety, and some of the
199:(Her Majesty The Queen in Right of Canada v Big M Drug Mart Ltd)
54:
Her
Majesty The Queen in Right of Canada v Big M Drug Mart Ltd
401:. Toronto, Ontario: Thomson Canada Limited. pp. 742–743.
338:
analysis in the decision played a role in developing the "
416:
List of
Supreme Court of Canada cases (Dickson Court)
178:
170:
165:
115:
97:
89:
77:
69:
59:
49:
42:
21:
399:Constitutional Law of Canada, 2003 Student Ed
8:
425:(1986) - later Sunday closing law decision
256:, if so, whether it is justified under
209:where the Court struck down the federal
357:
287:Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
222:Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
319:s religious freedom was not violated.
18:
473:Canadian freedom of religion case law
16:1982 Supreme Court of Canada decision
7:
365:SCC Case Information - Docket 18125
383:, 1 SCR 295 (24 April 1985),
290:, deciding that there was no true
81:Judgment for the defendant in the
14:
27:
1:
478:Supreme Court of Canada cases
422:R v Edwards Books and Art Ltd
233:On Sunday, May 30, 1982, the
468:Section Two Charter case law
509:
377:R. v. Big M Drug Mart Ltd.
264:, and whether the Act was
107:violates section 2 of the
83:Court of Appeal of Alberta
483:1985 in Canadian case law
186:
120:
111:and is therefore invalid.
102:
43:Hearing: March 6–7, 1984
26:
182:Wilson J (paras 152–164)
45:Judgment: April 24, 1985
445:Supreme Court of Canada
397:Hogg, Peter W. (2003).
367:Supreme Court of Canada
243:Alberta Court of Appeal
207:Supreme Court of Canada
195:R v Big M Drug Mart Ltd
35:Supreme Court of Canada
22:R v Big M Drug Mart Ltd
305:Constitution Act, 1982
273:Constitution Act, 1867
330:was the first law in
250:freedom of conscience
342:" in the later case
430:McGowan v. Maryland
493:History of Calgary
310:section 24 of the
203:landmark decision
191:
190:
500:
403:
402:
394:
388:
374:
368:
362:
152:Julien Chouinard
148:William McIntyre
129:Puisne Justices:
116:Court membership
93:Appeal dismissed
31:
19:
508:
507:
503:
502:
501:
499:
498:
497:
488:Sunday shopping
458:
457:
440:
412:
407:
406:
396:
395:
391:
375:
371:
363:
359:
354:
282:
231:
127:
44:
38:
17:
12:
11:
5:
506:
504:
496:
495:
490:
485:
480:
475:
470:
460:
459:
456:
455:
439:
438:External links
436:
435:
434:
426:
418:
411:
408:
405:
404:
389:
381:1985 CANLII 69
369:
356:
355:
353:
350:
328:Lord's Day Act
281:
278:
239:Lord's Day Act
230:
227:
215:for violating
212:Lord's Day Act
189:
188:
184:
183:
180:
176:
175:
172:
168:
167:
163:
162:
132:Roland Ritchie
122:Chief Justice:
118:
117:
113:
112:
105:Lord's Day Act
100:
99:
95:
94:
91:
87:
86:
79:
75:
74:
71:
67:
66:
63:
57:
56:
51:
50:Full case name
47:
46:
40:
39:
32:
24:
23:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
505:
494:
491:
489:
486:
484:
481:
479:
476:
474:
471:
469:
466:
465:
463:
454:
450:
446:
443:Full text of
442:
441:
437:
432:
431:
427:
424:
423:
419:
417:
414:
413:
409:
400:
393:
390:
386:
385:Supreme Court
382:
378:
373:
370:
366:
361:
358:
351:
349:
347:
346:
341:
337:
333:
329:
324:
320:
318:
314:
313:
307:
306:
301:
297:
293:
289:
288:
279:
277:
275:
274:
269:
268:
263:
259:
255:
251:
246:
244:
240:
236:
228:
226:
224:
223:
218:
214:
213:
208:
204:
200:
197:
196:
185:
181:
177:
173:
169:
166:Reasons given
164:
161:
160:Bertha Wilson
157:
156:Antonio Lamer
153:
149:
145:
144:Willard Estey
141:
137:
136:Brian Dickson
133:
130:
126:
123:
119:
114:
110:
106:
101:
96:
92:
88:
84:
80:
78:Prior history
76:
72:
68:
64:
62:
58:
55:
52:
48:
41:
37:
36:
30:
25:
20:
447:decision at
428:
420:
398:
392:
376:
372:
360:
343:
331:
327:
325:
321:
317:corporation'
316:
311:
303:
285:
283:
271:
265:
261:
247:
238:
232:
220:
210:
198:
194:
193:
192:
128:
121:
108:
104:
53:
33:
267:intra vires
179:Concurrence
125:Bora Laskin
462:Categories
451: and
340:Oakes test
300:section 52
229:Background
140:Jean Beetz
70:Docket No.
352:Footnotes
345:R v Oakes
336:section 1
296:religious
258:section 1
217:section 2
61:Citations
410:See also
387:(Canada)
254:religion
171:Majority
379:,
332:Charter
312:Charter
302:of the
292:secular
262:Charter
260:of the
235:Calgary
219:of the
109:Charter
98:Holding
453:CanLII
280:Ruling
90:Ruling
73:18125
449:LexUM
201:is a
326:The
252:and
103:The
205:by
464::
348:.
276:.
245:.
158:,
154:,
150:,
146:,
142:,
138:,
134:,
85:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
