29:
328:
262:
was then made, and granted, to have the appeal reargued before a full Court of nine judges. On the re-argument, it was conceded on behalf of the Crown that the conviction should be quashed due to errors in the trial judge's charge, and the only question which remained was as to whether there was evidence upon which a properly instructed jury could find the appellant guilty of publishing a seditious libel by reason of the publication of the pamphlet here in question.
393:
334:
249:. In 1946, he was arrested while distributing pamphlets entitled "Québec's Burning Hate for God and Christ and Freedom Is the Shame of all Canada." The pamphlets criticized the Québec government’s suppression of the Witnesses and the courts for doing nothing to prevent it. Boucher was charged for seditious libel — for endeavouring to promote public disorder — under section 133(2) of the
261:
The conviction was affirmed by a majority in the Court of King's Bench (Appeal Side). An appeal to this Court was allowed on grounds of misdirection and improper rejection of evidence. On the first hearing of this appeal, heard by a Court of five judges, the majority ordered a new trial. Application
265:
In a 5 to 4 decision, the
Supreme Court held that the mere publishing of critical statements, without any intention to incite violence against the government, could not be seditious libel.
483:
453:
434:
468:
377:
458:
498:
427:
478:
463:
95:
The criminal offence of seditious libel requires language that is calculated to promote public disorder or physical force or violence.
420:
370:
493:
473:
74:
363:
226:
34:
400:
250:
139:
135:
28:
312:
246:
131:
298:
108:
488:
119:
404:
347:
392:
327:
230:
242:
143:
115:
447:
275:
60:
343:
127:
233:, on the grounds that criticizing the government was a valid form of protest.
123:
253:. At trial, the jury found Boucher guilty, which was upheld on appeal.
313:
https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/2725/index.do
229:
decision. In the case, the Court overturned a conviction for
16:
Freedom of expression case of the
Supreme Court of Canada
408:
351:
210:
202:
194:
186:
178:
170:
162:
154:
149:
99:
89:
81:
69:
59:
49:
42:
21:
428:
371:
8:
435:
421:
378:
364:
294:
292:
75:Quebec Court of King's Bench, Appeal Side
484:Christianity and law in the 20th century
454:Canadian freedom of expression case law
288:
18:
7:
389:
387:
323:
321:
54:Aime Boucher v. His Majesty the King
214:Cartwright J., joined by Fauteux J.
407:. You can help Knowledge (XXG) by
350:. You can help Knowledge (XXG) by
14:
391:
332:
326:
27:
469:Jehovah's Witnesses litigation
73:Judgment for the Crown in the
1:
459:Supreme Court of Canada cases
241:Aimé Boucher was a farmer in
45:Judgment: December 18, 1950
515:
479:Canadian criminal case law
386:
320:
499:Jehovah's Witnesses stubs
464:1951 in Canadian case law
104:
94:
26:
227:Supreme Court of Canada
35:Supreme Court of Canada
403:-related article is a
140:John Robert Cartwright
136:Charles Holland Locke
257:Opinion of the Court
401:Jehovah's Witnesses
342:This article about
300:Boucher v. The King
245:, and a practising
132:James Wilfred Estey
494:Canadian law stubs
474:Religion in Canada
109:Thibaudeau Rinfret
22:Boucher v The King
416:
415:
359:
358:
247:Jehovah's Witness
218:
217:
120:Robert Taschereau
506:
437:
430:
423:
395:
388:
380:
373:
366:
338:
337:
336:
335:
330:
322:
315:
310:
304:
296:
113:Puisne Justices:
100:Court membership
31:
19:
514:
513:
509:
508:
507:
505:
504:
503:
444:
443:
442:
441:
385:
384:
333:
331:
325:
319:
318:
311:
307:
297:
290:
285:
271:
259:
239:
231:seditious libel
111:
85:Appeal allowed.
44:
38:
17:
12:
11:
5:
512:
510:
502:
501:
496:
491:
486:
481:
476:
471:
466:
461:
456:
446:
445:
440:
439:
432:
425:
417:
414:
413:
396:
383:
382:
375:
368:
360:
357:
356:
339:
317:
316:
305:
287:
286:
284:
281:
280:
279:
270:
267:
258:
255:
243:Beauce, Quebec
238:
235:
216:
215:
212:
208:
207:
204:
200:
199:
196:
192:
191:
188:
184:
183:
180:
176:
175:
172:
168:
167:
164:
160:
159:
156:
152:
151:
147:
146:
144:Gerald Fauteux
116:Patrick Kerwin
106:Chief Justice:
102:
101:
97:
96:
92:
91:
87:
86:
83:
79:
78:
71:
67:
66:
63:
57:
56:
51:
50:Full case name
47:
46:
40:
39:
32:
24:
23:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
511:
500:
497:
495:
492:
490:
487:
485:
482:
480:
477:
475:
472:
470:
467:
465:
462:
460:
457:
455:
452:
451:
449:
438:
433:
431:
426:
424:
419:
418:
412:
410:
406:
402:
397:
394:
390:
381:
376:
374:
369:
367:
362:
361:
355:
353:
349:
345:
340:
329:
324:
314:
309:
306:
302:
301:
295:
293:
289:
282:
278:
277:
276:Lamb v Benoit
273:
272:
268:
266:
263:
256:
254:
252:
251:Criminal Code
248:
244:
236:
234:
232:
228:
224:
223:
213:
209:
206:Taschereau J.
205:
201:
197:
193:
189:
185:
181:
177:
173:
169:
165:
161:
157:
153:
150:Reasons given
148:
145:
141:
137:
133:
129:
125:
121:
117:
114:
110:
107:
103:
98:
93:
88:
84:
80:
76:
72:
70:Prior history
68:
64:
62:
58:
55:
52:
48:
41:
37:
36:
30:
25:
20:
409:expanding it
398:
352:expanding it
344:Canadian law
341:
308:
299:
274:
264:
260:
240:
221:
220:
219:
198:Rinfret C.J.
112:
105:
53:
33:
303:, SCR 265.
222:R v Boucher
187:Concurrence
179:Concurrence
171:Concurrence
163:Concurrence
128:Roy Kellock
448:Categories
283:References
237:Background
174:Kellock J.
43:Hearing:
158:Kerwin J.
124:Ivan Rand
61:Citations
489:Sedition
269:See also
190:Locke J.
182:Estey J.
155:Majority
211:Dissent
203:Dissent
195:Dissent
166:Rand J.
90:Holding
65:SCR 265
82:Ruling
399:This
346:is a
225:is a
405:stub
348:stub
450::
291:^
142:,
138:,
134:,
130:,
126:,
122:,
118:,
436:e
429:t
422:v
411:.
379:e
372:t
365:v
354:.
77:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
