170:
429:
68:
27:
372:
upon him, he has no obligation to obtain medical assistance to alleviate the gravity of the wound. Nor is there any obligation on him to follow rigidly all the advice given him by his medical advisers if he does seek that assistance. Provided that, in disregarding that advice, he does not introduce
373:
some new danger which would not have existed had the advice never been taken at all, his failure to follow that advice cannot be a factor which can avail the accused in any argument that the original injury was not the cause of death.
347:
is an important case in South
African and Zimbabwean criminal law, heard on August 17, 1955, in which the accused was charged with murder. DP McCormac appeared for the Crown, and John Morris for the accused.
470:
199:
499:
463:
504:
365:
between X's conduct and Y's death; it also expressed it positively, in the contention that Y's death must follow directly from X's conduct.
489:
456:
239:
221:
151:
54:
89:
132:
182:
104:
85:
40:
192:
186:
178:
382:
111:
78:
494:
297:
203:
118:
100:
436:
361:
440:
356:
352:
46:
125:
483:
428:
408:
401:
67:
368:
The court held that, when a complainant has been injured as the result of an
336:
Criminal law, Murder, Causation, Novus actus interveniens, Proximate cause
369:
407:
163:
61:
20:
444:
330:
322:
317:
309:
304:
292:
277:
267:
259:
254:
92:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
351:Its significance lies particularly in the area of
191:but its sources remain unclear because it lacks
355:. The court expressed negatively the idea of a
464:
8:
359:, with the statement that there must be no
55:Learn how and when to remove these messages
471:
457:
251:
240:Learn how and when to remove this message
222:Learn how and when to remove this message
152:Learn how and when to remove this message
16:South African and Zimbabwean case law
7:
425:
423:
90:adding citations to reliable sources
443:. You can help Knowledge (XXG) by
14:
36:This article has multiple issues.
427:
168:
66:
25:
500:South African criminal case law
77:needs additional citations for
44:or discuss these issues on the
409:The Rhodesian Law Journal 1969
1:
505:South African case law stubs
263:Southern Rhodesia, Bulawayo
521:
422:
402:Current Law Year Book 1956
383:South African criminal law
490:1955 in South African law
435:This article relating to
335:
437:case law in South Africa
362:novus actus interveniens
281:17 August 1955
177:This article includes a
411:, 144 at 150 (Volume 9)
206:more precise citations.
313:Beadle J and assessors
397:1956 (1) SA 31 (SR).
86:improve this article
179:list of references
452:
451:
404:. Paragraph 2020.
400:John Burke (ed).
340:
339:
250:
249:
242:
232:
231:
224:
162:
161:
154:
136:
59:
512:
495:1955 in case law
473:
466:
459:
431:
424:
305:Court membership
288:
286:
252:
245:
238:
227:
220:
216:
213:
207:
202:this article by
193:inline citations
172:
171:
164:
157:
150:
146:
143:
137:
135:
94:
70:
62:
51:
29:
28:
21:
520:
519:
515:
514:
513:
511:
510:
509:
480:
479:
478:
477:
420:
418:
391:
379:
357:proximate cause
353:legal causation
284:
282:
246:
235:
234:
233:
228:
217:
211:
208:
197:
183:related reading
173:
169:
158:
147:
141:
138:
95:
93:
83:
71:
30:
26:
17:
12:
11:
5:
518:
516:
508:
507:
502:
497:
492:
482:
481:
476:
475:
468:
461:
453:
450:
449:
432:
417:
414:
413:
412:
405:
398:
390:
387:
386:
385:
378:
375:
338:
337:
333:
332:
328:
327:
324:
320:
319:
315:
314:
311:
307:
306:
302:
301:
294:
290:
289:
279:
275:
274:
269:
268:Full case name
265:
264:
261:
257:
256:
248:
247:
230:
229:
187:external links
176:
174:
167:
160:
159:
74:
72:
65:
60:
34:
33:
31:
24:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
517:
506:
503:
501:
498:
496:
493:
491:
488:
487:
485:
474:
469:
467:
462:
460:
455:
454:
448:
446:
442:
438:
433:
430:
426:
421:
415:
410:
406:
403:
399:
396:
393:
392:
388:
384:
381:
380:
376:
374:
371:
366:
364:
363:
358:
354:
349:
346:
345:
334:
329:
325:
321:
318:Case opinions
316:
312:
310:Judge sitting
308:
303:
299:
295:
291:
280:
276:
273:
270:
266:
262:
258:
253:
244:
241:
226:
223:
215:
212:December 2021
205:
201:
195:
194:
188:
184:
180:
175:
166:
165:
156:
153:
145:
134:
131:
127:
124:
120:
117:
113:
110:
106:
103: –
102:
98:
97:Find sources:
91:
87:
81:
80:
75:This article
73:
69:
64:
63:
58:
56:
49:
48:
43:
42:
37:
32:
23:
22:
19:
445:expanding it
434:
419:
394:
367:
360:
350:
343:
342:
341:
271:
236:
218:
209:
198:Please help
190:
148:
139:
129:
122:
115:
108:
101:"R v Mubila"
96:
84:Please help
79:verification
76:
52:
45:
39:
38:Please help
35:
18:
323:Decision by
272:R v Mubila
204:introducing
484:Categories
395:R v Mubila
389:References
344:R v Mubila
285:1955-08-17
255:R v Mubila
112:newspapers
41:improve it
296:1956 (1)
142:July 2017
47:talk page
377:See also
331:Keywords
326:Beadle J
293:Citation
370:assault
300:31 (SR)
283: (
278:Decided
200:improve
126:scholar
128:
121:
114:
107:
99:
439:is a
416:Notes
260:Court
185:, or
133:JSTOR
119:books
441:stub
105:news
88:by
486::
298:SA
189:,
181:,
50:.
472:e
465:t
458:v
447:.
287:)
243:)
237:(
225:)
219:(
214:)
210:(
196:.
155:)
149:(
144:)
140:(
130:·
123:·
116:·
109:·
82:.
57:)
53:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
