Knowledge (XXG)

R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Doody

Source đź“ť

1398: 1412: 81:
judged that the Home Secretary must give reasons for their decision. He argued that decisions made using a statutory power must be reached fairly, because all statutory powers are granted with the implicit assumption that they will be wielded fairly. As a result, he concluded it will often be
104:
Fairness will very often require that a person who may be adversely affected by the decision will have an opportunity to make representations on his own behalf either before the decision is taken with a view to producing a favourable result; or after it is taken, with a view to procuring its
86:
What does fairness require in the present case? My Lords, I think it unnecessary to refer by name or to quote from, any of the often-cited authorities in which the courts have explained what is essentially an intuitive judgment. They are far too well known. From them, I derive that:-
108:
Since the person affected usually cannot make worthwhile representations without knowing what factors may weigh against his interests fairness will very often require that he is informed of the gist of the case which he has to
82:
necessary to allow a person to make representations, and therefore to allow them to know what they are responding to, they must be permitted to hear the reason they are having to make the representations at all.
97:
The principles of fairness are not to be applied by rote identically in every situation. What fairness demands is dependent on the context of the decision, and this is to be taken into account in all its
101:
An essential feature of the context is the statute which creates the discretion, as regards both its language and the shape of the legal and administrative system within which the decision is taken.
94:
The standards of fairness are not immutable. They may change with the passage of time, both in the general and in their application to decisions of a particular type.
1472: 1452: 91:
Where an Act of Parliament confers an administrative power there is a presumption that it will be exercised in a manner which is fair in all the circumstances.
1462: 1379: 191: 170: 805: 363: 262: 919: 788: 1467: 1374: 721: 622: 881: 515: 113: 1457: 234: 1041: 520: 1036: 1011: 510: 1094: 889: 871: 540: 1264: 1051: 525: 55: 1319: 1304: 17: 1423: 1016: 694: 505: 43: 66:
refused to release them after serving their minimum terms, but gave no reason for the decision. Under
1144: 490: 1299: 439: 356: 1114: 773: 627: 612: 590: 334: 314: 267: 257: 171:"Regina v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Doody and Others: HL 25 Jun 1993" 70:, there is no duty to give reasons for decisions; however, this case is one of the exceptions. 54:
Four prisoners, Stephen Doody, John David Pierson, Elfed Wayne Smart and Kenneth Pegg, serving
1099: 1021: 859: 602: 597: 550: 475: 469: 309: 227: 1104: 1071: 570: 434: 429: 394: 160:
R. (on the application of Hasan) v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry EWCA Civ 1311
1353: 1326: 1314: 1294: 1228: 1223: 1206: 1186: 1181: 1161: 1026: 1006: 1001: 904: 864: 575: 500: 424: 409: 329: 128: 59: 1430: 1238: 1156: 745: 711: 662: 647: 419: 324: 304: 294: 63: 1446: 1284: 1243: 1129: 1109: 1081: 1031: 996: 970: 965: 958: 909: 849: 689: 679: 637: 560: 555: 485: 444: 368: 1416: 1166: 1134: 1089: 827: 822: 793: 706: 684: 652: 585: 565: 459: 399: 389: 341: 299: 277: 220: 187: 148: 78: 207: 39: 1397: 1338: 1279: 1269: 1066: 1061: 899: 800: 716: 675: 642: 607: 530: 454: 404: 319: 1402: 1331: 1211: 1149: 894: 815: 810: 768: 750: 738: 699: 545: 535: 495: 480: 464: 414: 351: 346: 67: 1309: 1274: 1216: 1191: 1056: 953: 941: 926: 914: 842: 760: 733: 617: 1358: 1343: 1046: 931: 728: 272: 33: 1248: 1196: 1176: 1124: 936: 854: 670: 632: 580: 1348: 1201: 946: 837: 832: 778: 449: 1289: 1233: 1139: 980: 783: 282: 149:
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p. Doody (1993)
1171: 1119: 975: 373: 289: 216: 243: 27:
UK court case regarding reasons for administrative decisions
184:
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p. Doody
212: 151:
UKHL 8, published 24 June 1993, accessed 19 June 2022
1367: 1257: 1080: 989: 880: 759: 661: 382: 250: 46:case concerning applications for judicial review. 32:R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, 84: 228: 8: 235: 221: 213: 190:, AC 531, 3 WLR 154 (24 June 2003), 18:R v SS for the Home Department, ex p Doody 1380:History of the American legal profession 140: 1473:United Kingdom constitutional case law 1453:United Kingdom administrative case law 7: 25: 364:Restitution and unjust enrichment 1411: 1410: 1396: 1463:1993 in United Kingdom case law 1375:History of the legal profession 1: 42:, 1 AC 531 was an important 1489: 1042:International legal theory 521:International slavery laws 516:International human rights 511:International criminal law 1390: 1095:Administration of justice 872:Basic structure doctrine 722:Natural and legal rights 603:Public international law 56:mandatory life sentences 1052:Principle of typicality 526:International trade law 1468:Home Office litigation 120: 105:modification; or both. 1047:Principle of legality 806:Delegated legislation 506:Intellectual property 188:[1993] UKHL 8 44:UK constitutional law 1458:House of Lords cases 1265:Barristers' chambers 1207:Legal representation 1145:Justice of the peace 491:Financial regulation 1300:Election commission 1012:Expressive function 541:Landlord–tenant law 440:Consumer protection 1258:Legal institutions 1125:Lawsuit/Litigation 1115:Dispute resolution 920:Catholic canon law 628:State of emergency 591:Will and testament 315:Law of obligations 268:Constitutional law 258:Administrative law 208:Judgment on BAILII 1440: 1439: 1100:Constitutionalism 1022:Law and economics 860:Act of parliament 598:Product liability 551:Legal archaeology 476:Environmental law 470:Entertainment law 310:International law 16:(Redirected from 1480: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1401: 1400: 1224:Question of fact 1105:Criminal justice 435:Construction law 430:Conflict of laws 395:Agricultural law 237: 230: 223: 214: 195: 181: 175: 174: 173:. November 2021. 167: 161: 158: 152: 147:House of Lords, 145: 116: 21: 1488: 1487: 1483: 1482: 1481: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1436: 1409: 1395: 1386: 1363: 1354:Political party 1327:Legal education 1315:Law enforcement 1295:Court of equity 1253: 1229:Question of law 1182:Practice of law 1162:Judicial review 1076: 1027:Legal formalism 1007:Comparative law 1002:Contract theory 985: 905:Legal pluralism 876: 865:Act of Congress 789:Executive order 755: 657: 576:Nationality law 501:Immigration law 425:Competition law 378: 246: 241: 204: 199: 198: 182: 178: 169: 168: 164: 159: 155: 146: 142: 137: 129:Judicial review 125: 117: 112: 76: 60:judicial review 52: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 1486: 1484: 1476: 1475: 1470: 1465: 1460: 1455: 1445: 1444: 1438: 1437: 1435: 1434: 1427: 1420: 1406: 1403:Law portal 1391: 1388: 1387: 1385: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1371: 1369: 1365: 1364: 1362: 1361: 1356: 1351: 1346: 1341: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1324: 1323: 1322: 1312: 1307: 1302: 1297: 1292: 1287: 1282: 1277: 1272: 1267: 1261: 1259: 1255: 1254: 1252: 1251: 1246: 1241: 1239:Trial advocacy 1236: 1231: 1226: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1214: 1209: 1204: 1199: 1194: 1189: 1179: 1174: 1169: 1164: 1159: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1147: 1137: 1132: 1127: 1122: 1117: 1112: 1107: 1102: 1097: 1092: 1086: 1084: 1078: 1077: 1075: 1074: 1069: 1064: 1059: 1054: 1049: 1044: 1039: 1034: 1029: 1024: 1019: 1014: 1009: 1004: 999: 993: 991: 987: 986: 984: 983: 978: 973: 968: 963: 962: 961: 951: 950: 949: 944: 939: 934: 929: 924: 923: 922: 907: 902: 897: 892: 886: 884: 878: 877: 875: 874: 869: 868: 867: 862: 857: 847: 846: 845: 835: 830: 825: 820: 819: 818: 813: 808: 798: 797: 796: 791: 786: 776: 771: 769:Ballot measure 765: 763: 757: 756: 754: 753: 748: 746:Legal treatise 743: 742: 741: 736: 726: 725: 724: 714: 712:Letters patent 709: 704: 703: 702: 692: 687: 682: 673: 667: 665: 663:Sources of law 659: 658: 656: 655: 650: 648:Unenforced law 645: 640: 635: 630: 625: 620: 615: 610: 605: 600: 595: 594: 593: 588: 578: 573: 568: 563: 558: 553: 548: 543: 538: 533: 528: 523: 518: 513: 508: 503: 498: 493: 488: 483: 478: 473: 467: 462: 457: 452: 447: 442: 437: 432: 427: 422: 420:Commercial law 417: 412: 407: 402: 397: 392: 386: 384: 380: 379: 377: 376: 371: 366: 361: 360: 359: 349: 344: 339: 338: 337: 332: 322: 317: 312: 307: 302: 297: 292: 287: 286: 285: 275: 270: 265: 260: 254: 252: 248: 247: 242: 240: 239: 232: 225: 217: 211: 210: 203: 202:External links 200: 197: 196: 192:House of Lords 176: 162: 153: 139: 138: 136: 133: 132: 131: 124: 121: 119: 118: 110: 106: 102: 99: 95: 92: 75: 72: 64:Home Secretary 51: 48: 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1485: 1474: 1471: 1469: 1466: 1464: 1461: 1459: 1456: 1454: 1451: 1450: 1448: 1433: 1432: 1428: 1426: 1425: 1421: 1419: 1418: 1407: 1405: 1404: 1399: 1393: 1392: 1389: 1381: 1378: 1377: 1376: 1373: 1372: 1370: 1366: 1360: 1357: 1355: 1352: 1350: 1347: 1345: 1342: 1340: 1337: 1333: 1330: 1329: 1328: 1325: 1321: 1318: 1317: 1316: 1313: 1311: 1308: 1306: 1303: 1301: 1298: 1296: 1293: 1291: 1288: 1286: 1285:Civil society 1283: 1281: 1278: 1276: 1273: 1271: 1268: 1266: 1263: 1262: 1260: 1256: 1250: 1247: 1245: 1244:Trier of fact 1242: 1240: 1237: 1235: 1232: 1230: 1227: 1225: 1222: 1218: 1215: 1213: 1210: 1208: 1205: 1203: 1200: 1198: 1195: 1193: 1190: 1188: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1180: 1178: 1175: 1173: 1170: 1168: 1165: 1163: 1160: 1158: 1155: 1151: 1148: 1146: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1138: 1136: 1133: 1131: 1130:Legal opinion 1128: 1126: 1123: 1121: 1118: 1116: 1113: 1111: 1110:Court-martial 1108: 1106: 1103: 1101: 1098: 1096: 1093: 1091: 1088: 1087: 1085: 1083: 1082:Jurisprudence 1079: 1073: 1070: 1068: 1065: 1063: 1060: 1058: 1055: 1053: 1050: 1048: 1045: 1043: 1040: 1038: 1035: 1033: 1030: 1028: 1025: 1023: 1020: 1018: 1015: 1013: 1010: 1008: 1005: 1003: 1000: 998: 995: 994: 992: 988: 982: 979: 977: 974: 972: 971:Statutory law 969: 967: 966:Socialist law 964: 960: 959:Byzantine law 957: 956: 955: 952: 948: 945: 943: 940: 938: 935: 933: 930: 928: 925: 921: 918: 917: 916: 913: 912: 911: 910:Religious law 908: 906: 903: 901: 898: 896: 893: 891: 888: 887: 885: 883: 882:Legal systems 879: 873: 870: 866: 863: 861: 858: 856: 853: 852: 851: 850:Statutory law 848: 844: 841: 840: 839: 836: 834: 831: 829: 826: 824: 821: 817: 814: 812: 809: 807: 804: 803: 802: 799: 795: 792: 790: 787: 785: 782: 781: 780: 777: 775: 772: 770: 767: 766: 764: 762: 758: 752: 749: 747: 744: 740: 737: 735: 732: 731: 730: 727: 723: 720: 719: 718: 715: 713: 710: 708: 705: 701: 698: 697: 696: 693: 691: 688: 686: 683: 681: 680:Statutory law 677: 674: 672: 669: 668: 666: 664: 660: 654: 651: 649: 646: 644: 641: 639: 638:Transport law 636: 634: 631: 629: 626: 624: 621: 619: 616: 614: 611: 609: 606: 604: 601: 599: 596: 592: 589: 587: 584: 583: 582: 579: 577: 574: 572: 569: 567: 564: 562: 559: 557: 556:Legal fiction 554: 552: 549: 547: 544: 542: 539: 537: 534: 532: 529: 527: 524: 522: 519: 517: 514: 512: 509: 507: 504: 502: 499: 497: 494: 492: 489: 487: 486:Financial law 484: 482: 479: 477: 474: 471: 468: 466: 463: 461: 458: 456: 453: 451: 448: 446: 445:Corporate law 443: 441: 438: 436: 433: 431: 428: 426: 423: 421: 418: 416: 413: 411: 408: 406: 403: 401: 398: 396: 393: 391: 388: 387: 385: 381: 375: 372: 370: 369:Statutory law 367: 365: 362: 358: 355: 354: 353: 350: 348: 345: 343: 340: 336: 333: 331: 328: 327: 326: 323: 321: 318: 316: 313: 311: 308: 306: 303: 301: 298: 296: 293: 291: 288: 284: 281: 280: 279: 276: 274: 271: 269: 266: 264: 261: 259: 256: 255: 253: 251:Core subjects 249: 245: 238: 233: 231: 226: 224: 219: 218: 215: 209: 206: 205: 201: 193: 189: 185: 180: 177: 172: 166: 163: 157: 154: 150: 144: 141: 134: 130: 127: 126: 122: 115: 107: 103: 100: 96: 93: 90: 89: 88: 83: 80: 73: 71: 69: 65: 61: 57: 49: 47: 45: 41: 38: 37: 35: 19: 1429: 1422: 1408: 1394: 1167:Jurisdiction 1135:Legal remedy 1090:Adjudication 990:Legal theory 828:Ratification 823:Promulgation 794:Proclamation 774:Codification 707:Human rights 695:Divine right 685:Constitution 653:Women in law 571:Military law 566:Marriage law 561:Maritime law 460:Election law 400:Aviation law 390:Abortion law 342:Property law 278:Criminal law 183: 179: 165: 156: 143: 114:Lord Mustill 85: 79:Lord Mustill 77: 58:, requested 53: 31: 30: 29: 1339:Legislature 1270:Bureaucracy 1067:Rule of man 1062:Rule of law 1037:Libertarian 900:Chinese law 801:Legislation 751:Regulations 739:Law reports 717:Natural law 613:Reparations 608:Refugee law 531:Jurimetrics 472:(Media law) 410:Banking law 405:Amnesty law 383:Disciplines 320:Private law 1447:Categories 1332:Law school 1212:Prosecutor 1150:Magistrate 937:Jewish law 895:Common law 816:Rulemaking 811:Regulation 761:Law making 700:Divine law 676:Legal code 623:Sports law 546:Law of war 496:Health law 481:Family law 465:Energy law 415:Bankruptcy 352:Punishment 347:Public law 135:References 68:common law 62:after the 1310:Judiciary 1305:Executive 1280:The bench 1217:Solicitor 1192:Barrister 1072:Sociology 1057:Pseudolaw 997:Anarchist 954:Roman law 942:Parsi law 927:Hindu law 915:Canon law 890:Civil law 843:Concordat 734:Precedent 643:Trust law 618:Space law 455:Drugs law 325:Procedure 263:Civil law 1417:Category 1359:Tribunal 1344:Military 1187:Attorney 1157:Judgment 1017:Feminist 932:Jain law 729:Case law 450:Cyberlaw 357:Corporal 335:Criminal 305:Evidence 295:Doctrine 273:Contract 123:See also 111:—  98:aspects. 74:Judgment 34:ex parte 1431:Outline 1368:History 1275:The bar 1249:Verdict 1197:Counsel 1177:Justice 1032:History 855:Statute 671:Charter 633:Tax law 581:Probate 109:answer. 1349:Police 1320:Agency 1202:Lawyer 947:Sharia 838:Treaty 833:Repeal 779:Decree 690:Custom 586:Estate 536:Labour 300:Equity 40:UKHL 8 1424:Index 1290:Court 1234:Trial 1140:Judge 981:Yassa 784:Edict 330:Civil 283:Crime 186: 50:Facts 36:Doody 1172:Jury 1120:Fiqh 976:Xeer 374:Tort 290:Deed 194:(UK) 244:Law 1449:: 678:/ 236:e 229:t 222:v 20:)

Index

R v SS for the Home Department, ex p Doody
ex parte
UKHL 8
UK constitutional law
mandatory life sentences
judicial review
Home Secretary
common law
Lord Mustill
Lord Mustill
Judicial review
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p. Doody (1993)
"Regina v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Doody and Others: HL 25 Jun 1993"
[1993] UKHL 8
House of Lords
Judgment on BAILII
v
t
e
Law
Administrative law
Civil law
Constitutional law
Contract
Criminal law
Crime
Deed
Doctrine
Equity
Evidence

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑