Knowledge (XXG)

R v Steyn

Source 📝

112: 53:
for the purpose that what they said would be given in evidence in a lawsuit that was contemplated, these statements were protected against disclosure until at least the conclusion of the proceedings, which would include any appeal or similar step after the decision in the court of first instance.
153: 79:
at the trial, the prosecutor must direct attention to that fact and, unless there was special and cogent reason to the contrary, make the statement available for
46:
The court held that the basic rule was that the police docket and contents thereof were privileged and the defense is not entitled to access to it.
146: 86:
This approach, which applied in South Africa before the advent of its new constitutional dispensation, has been described as "trial by ambush."
187: 177: 139: 28: 172: 43:, in which he convicted the applicant of the crime of theft as defined by the Stock and Produce Theft Repression Act. 182: 96: 119: 62: 75:
Where there was a serious discrepancy between the proof of a Crown witness and what he said on
80: 36: 123: 58: 166: 25: 111: 69: 40: 50: 32: 76: 72:
to disclose if a witness deviated from his original statement.
127: 68:
There was, however, an ethical rule which obliged the
57:This protection against disclosure applied in both 49:Therefore, when statements were procured from 147: 8: 39:, dismissing an appeal from a decision by a 154: 140: 31:, dealt with an application for leave to 35:against a judgment of the High Court of 7: 108: 106: 126:. You can help Knowledge (XXG) by 14: 110: 1: 24:(1954), an important case in 188:South African case law stubs 204: 105: 178:1954 in South African law 118:This article relating to 120:case law in South Africa 16:South African legal case 173:South African case law 95:R v Steyn 1954 (1) 29:criminal procedure 135: 134: 81:cross-examination 37:Southern Rhodesia 195: 183:1954 in case law 156: 149: 142: 114: 107: 203: 202: 198: 197: 196: 194: 193: 192: 163: 162: 161: 160: 103: 92: 17: 12: 11: 5: 201: 199: 191: 190: 185: 180: 175: 165: 164: 159: 158: 151: 144: 136: 133: 132: 115: 101: 100: 91: 88: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 200: 189: 186: 184: 181: 179: 176: 174: 171: 170: 168: 157: 152: 150: 145: 143: 138: 137: 131: 129: 125: 121: 116: 113: 109: 104: 98: 94: 93: 89: 87: 84: 82: 78: 73: 71: 66: 64: 60: 55: 52: 47: 44: 42: 38: 34: 30: 27: 26:South African 23: 22: 128:expanding it 117: 102: 85: 74: 67: 56: 48: 45: 20: 19: 18: 167:Categories 70:prosecutor 41:magistrate 51:witnesses 21:R v Steyn 65:trials. 63:criminal 99:324 (A) 33:appeal 122:is a 90:Notes 59:civil 124:stub 77:oath 61:and 169:: 97:SA 83:. 155:e 148:t 141:v 130:.

Index

South African
criminal procedure
appeal
Southern Rhodesia
magistrate
witnesses
civil
criminal
prosecutor
oath
cross-examination
SA
Stub icon
case law in South Africa
stub
expanding it
v
t
e
Categories
South African case law
1954 in South African law
1954 in case law
South African case law stubs

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.