115:, rational fideism involves the possibility of reason becoming self-critical. Seeing it as the kind of responsible fideism, he states, "If human reason has limitations and also has some ability to recognise those limitations, then the possibility of responsible fideism emerges." Evans states that not only does reason have limitations, it is also tainted by sin making one entitled to faith where reason fails.
84:
rational fideism is the view that "Faith, and faith alone, is the basis for our belief in our reason. We believe in our reason because we believe in God's veracity. We do not try to prove that God is truthful; we believe this. Thus, faith in God gives us faith in reason, which in turn "justifies" our
146:
R.C. Sproul, John
Gerstner, and Arthur Lindsley argue that "Rational fideism is a contradiction in terms" since requiring a criterion for belief is non-fideistic as fideism begins with belief; that is, fideistic belief proceeds from faith rather than reaching faith as a result of rational query.
316:
107:
is the view that truth in religion rests solely on faith and not on a reasoning process, rational fideism "holds that truth in religion rests solely on faith; not blind faith, but faith that can give rational and cogent answers or reason to warrant the belief."
137:
notes a type of rational fideism as a view developed by some thinkers who hold that the pragmatic spiritual and moral success of believing in God on faith alone could be used as an "indirect argument for the truth of fideism."
94:
Similarly, Domenic
Marbaniang sees rational fideism as "the view that the knowledge of God can be certified through faith alone that is based on a revelation that is rationally verified." Observing that the way of both
69:
respectively). Thus, faith is basic to knowability. On the other hand, such a conclusion is reached not with an act of faith but with reasoning, a rational argumentation.
118:
Patrick J. Clarke defines rational fideism as the approach that sees "reason as capable of providing the intellectual foundation of faith, not
433:
525:
485:
374:
324:
264:
354:
Dictionary of
Christianity and Science. The Definitive Reference for the Intersection of Christian Faith and Contemporary Science
232:
399:
256:
495:
287:
281:
490:
54:
358:
176:
171:
166:
17:
505:
448:
510:
480:
420:
515:
395:
370:
366:
320:
260:
457:
340:
246:
134:
112:
424:
348:
81:
103:
towards the knowledge of ultimate or transcendent reality is bleak, he thinks that while
520:
500:
312:
88:
474:
77:"Rational fideism" has been defined variously. The following are some definitions.
352:
302:
250:
156:
96:
42:
344:
308:
100:
66:
46:
26:
462:
443:
362:
34:
38:
161:
126:, much as philosophy provides an intellectual foundation to theology."
104:
62:
58:
226:
50:
30:
91:
sees rational fideism as the opposite of "pure, blind, fideism".
283:
Fideism, Evidentialism, and the
Epistemology of Religious Belief
304:
Examining
Philosophy and Ethics. Answers for A Level Nelson
53:
that are neither self-founding nor self-evident (see the
394:. Grand Rapids: Harper Collins Publishers. p. 336.
390:
Sproul, R.C.; Gerstner, John; Lindsey, Arthur (1984).
351:; Reese, Christopher L.; Strauss, Michael (eds.).
210:Intellectual Origins of the French Enlightenment,
8:
220:
218:
57:), so it appeals to assumptions accepted as
461:
212:Princeton University Press, 1971, p. 552.
188:
444:"'Kierkegaard': A Reasonable Fideist?"
199:Oxford University Press, 2003, p. 213.
7:
442:Insole, Christopher (October 1998).
434:Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
225:Marbaniang, Domenic Savio (2007).
142:Arguments against rational fideism
14:
85:belief that God is no deceiver."
33:to be precursor for any reliable
233:ACTS Academy of Higher Education
130:Arguments for rational fideism
41:system, whether one considers
1:
280:Butcher, Matthew P. (2013).
228:Epistemics of Divine Reality
301:Clarke, Patrick J. (2002).
542:
257:Edinburgh University Press
197:The History of Scepticism,
157:Metaphysics § Science
15:
526:Theories of justification
288:Loyola University Chicago
486:Epistemology of religion
421:"4. A Rational Fideism?"
463:10.1111/1468-2265.00084
437:(Summer 2022 ed.).
359:Grand Rapids, Michigan
247:Evans, Charles Stephen
177:Philosophy of religion
172:Philosophical theology
167:Religious epistemology
392:Classical Apologetics
18:Faith and rationality
449:The Heythrop Journal
349:Longman III, Tremper
55:Münchhausen trilemma
29:view that considers
419:Amesbury, Richard.
252:Faith Beyond Reason
195:Richard H. Popkin,
341:Sweetman, Brendan
533:
496:History of logic
467:
465:
438:
425:Zalta, Edward N.
406:
405:
387:
381:
380:
337:
331:
330:
298:
292:
291:
277:
271:
270:
243:
237:
236:
222:
213:
206:
200:
193:
135:Brendan Sweetman
113:C. Stephen Evans
23:Rational fideism
541:
540:
536:
535:
534:
532:
531:
530:
491:Foundationalism
471:
470:
441:
418:
415:
410:
409:
402:
389:
388:
384:
377:
339:
338:
334:
327:
300:
299:
295:
279:
278:
274:
267:
245:
244:
240:
224:
223:
216:
207:
203:
194:
190:
185:
153:
144:
132:
82:Joseph Glanvill
75:
20:
12:
11:
5:
539:
537:
529:
528:
523:
518:
513:
508:
503:
498:
493:
488:
483:
473:
472:
469:
468:
456:(4): 363–378.
439:
414:
413:External links
411:
408:
407:
400:
382:
375:
332:
325:
313:Nelson Thornes
293:
272:
265:
259:. p. 55.
238:
214:
201:
187:
186:
184:
181:
180:
179:
174:
169:
164:
159:
152:
149:
143:
140:
131:
128:
89:Richard Popkin
74:
71:
49:, is based on
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
538:
527:
524:
522:
519:
517:
514:
512:
509:
507:
504:
502:
499:
497:
494:
492:
489:
487:
484:
482:
479:
478:
476:
464:
459:
455:
451:
450:
445:
440:
436:
435:
430:
426:
422:
417:
416:
412:
403:
397:
393:
386:
383:
378:
376:9780310496069
372:
368:
364:
360:
356:
355:
350:
346:
342:
336:
333:
328:
326:9780748760091
322:
318:
314:
310:
306:
305:
297:
294:
289:
285:
284:
276:
273:
268:
266:9780748607945
262:
258:
254:
253:
248:
242:
239:
234:
230:
229:
221:
219:
215:
211:
205:
202:
198:
192:
189:
182:
178:
175:
173:
170:
168:
165:
163:
160:
158:
155:
154:
150:
148:
141:
139:
136:
129:
127:
125:
121:
116:
114:
111:According to
109:
106:
102:
98:
92:
90:
86:
83:
78:
72:
70:
68:
64:
60:
56:
52:
48:
44:
40:
36:
32:
28:
27:philosophical
24:
19:
453:
447:
432:
428:
391:
385:
353:
335:
303:
296:
282:
275:
251:
241:
227:
209:
208:Ira O.Wade,
204:
196:
191:
145:
133:
124:a posteriori
123:
119:
117:
110:
93:
87:
79:
76:
39:paradigmatic
22:
21:
506:Rationalism
345:Copan, Paul
97:rationalism
73:Definitions
43:rationalism
511:Empiricism
481:Epistemics
475:Categories
401:0310449510
365:. p.
315:. p.
309:Cheltenham
183:References
101:empiricism
67:experience
47:empiricism
16:See also:
363:Zondervan
37:. Every
35:knowledge
516:Theology
343:(2017).
249:(1998).
151:See also
120:a priori
429:Fideism
427:(ed.).
286:(PhD).
231:(PhD).
162:Fideism
105:fideism
25:is the
398:
373:
323:
263:
63:reason
59:belief
51:axioms
521:Faith
501:Logic
423:. In
31:faith
396:ISBN
371:ISBN
321:ISBN
261:ISBN
122:but
99:and
80:For
61:(in
458:doi
367:282
65:or
45:or
477::
454:39
452:.
446:.
431:.
369:.
361::
357:.
347:;
319:.
317:28
311::
307:.
255:.
217:^
466:.
460::
404:.
379:.
329:.
290:.
269:.
235:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.