Knowledge (XXG)

Walter Rau Lebensmittelwerke v De Smedt PVBA

Source 📝

538: 33: 231:
which prescribes for that product a specific kind of packaging such as the cubic form to the exclusion of any other form of packaging considerably exceeds the requirements of the object in view. Consumers may in fact be protected just as effectively by other measures, for example by rules on labelling, which hinder the free movement of goods less.
139: 230:
17. It cannot be reasonably denied that in principle legislation designed to prevent butter and margarine from being confused in the mind of the consumer is justified. However, the application by one member state to margarine lawfully manufactured and marketed in another member state of legislation
225:
The ECJ held that the measure was not lawful. In principle packaging requirements to prevents consumers being confused would be justified. But it must be ‘also necessary for such rules to be proportionate to the aim in view.’
50: 459: 263: 213:
shaped packages, to avoid confusion with butter. This was applied to all kinds, domestic and imports. Walter Rau argued that the law contravened (what is now)
410: 97: 435: 69: 76: 579: 326: 598: 83: 338: 65: 386: 398: 256: 116: 290: 54: 249: 90: 572: 424: 302: 43: 603: 362: 350: 149: 608: 628: 623: 467: 565: 314: 194: 172: 493: 186: 160: 17: 618: 474: 374: 613: 549: 592: 537: 32: 206: 545: 241: 447: 190: 514:
Case 261/81 Walter Rau Lebensmittelwerke v De Smedt PVBA ECR 3961
279: 214: 210: 138: 245: 26: 553: 166: 155: 145: 131: 57:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. 460:Canadian Federation of Agriculture v Quebec (AG) 228: 66:"Walter Rau Lebensmittelwerke v De Smedt PVBA" 573: 257: 8: 495:Walter Rau Lebensmittelwerke v De Smedt PVBA 182:Walter Rau Lebensmittelwerke v De Smedt PVBA 132:Walter Rau Lebensmittelwerke v De Smedt PVBA 412:Deutscher Apothekerverband v 0800 DocMorris 580: 566: 437:Unfair Commercial Practices Directive 2005 264: 250: 242: 137: 128: 117:Learn how and when to remove this message 485: 339:Rau Lebensmittelwerke v De Smedt PVBA 18:Rau Lebensmittelwerke v De Smedt PVBA 7: 534: 532: 471:: US case on margarine food coloring 463:: Canadian case on banning margarine 327:Rewe-Zentral AG v BMV für Branntwein 55:adding citations to reliable sources 387:Konsumentombudsmannen v De Agostini 552:. You can help Knowledge (XXG) by 399:Konsumentombudsmannen v Gourmet AB 25: 536: 31: 42:needs additional citations for 291:Procureur du Roi v Dassonville 1: 599:European Union goods case law 645: 531: 444: 433: 421: 407: 395: 383: 371: 359: 347: 335: 323: 311: 299: 287: 277: 171: 150:European Court of Justice 136: 468:McCray v. United States 205:A Belgian law required 197:in the European Union. 315:Schmidberger v Austria 272:Free movement of goods 233: 195:free movement of goods 173:Free movement of goods 193:case, concerning the 425:Commission v Germany 51:improve this article 303:Commission v France 498:, 10 November 1982 475:European Union law 428:(1987) Case 178/84 375:Keck and Mithouard 363:Commission v Italy 351:Commission v Italy 342:(1983) Case 261/81 330:(1979) Case 120/78 209:to be marketed in 561: 560: 454: 453: 178: 177: 127: 126: 119: 101: 16:(Redirected from 636: 604:1983 in case law 582: 575: 568: 540: 533: 515: 512: 506: 505: 504: 503: 490: 438: 413: 294:(1974) Case 8/74 266: 259: 252: 243: 141: 129: 122: 115: 111: 108: 102: 100: 59: 35: 27: 21: 644: 643: 639: 638: 637: 635: 634: 633: 609:1983 in Belgium 589: 588: 587: 586: 529: 523: 518: 513: 509: 501: 499: 492: 491: 487: 483: 455: 450: 440: 436: 429: 417: 416:(2003) C-322/01 411: 403: 402:(2001) C-405/98 391: 379: 378:(1993) C-267/91 367: 366:(2009) C-110/05 355: 343: 331: 319: 318:(2003) C-112/00 307: 306:(1997) C-265/95 295: 283: 273: 270: 240: 223: 203: 123: 112: 106: 103: 60: 58: 48: 36: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 642: 640: 632: 631: 629:Case law stubs 626: 624:Food packaging 621: 616: 611: 606: 601: 591: 590: 585: 584: 577: 570: 562: 559: 558: 541: 527: 526: 522: 519: 517: 516: 507: 484: 482: 479: 478: 477: 472: 464: 452: 451: 445: 442: 441: 434: 431: 430: 422: 419: 418: 408: 405: 404: 396: 393: 392: 390:(1997) C-34/95 384: 381: 380: 372: 369: 368: 360: 357: 356: 354:(2003) C-14/00 348: 345: 344: 336: 333: 332: 324: 321: 320: 312: 309: 308: 300: 297: 296: 288: 285: 284: 278: 275: 274: 271: 269: 268: 261: 254: 246: 239: 236: 222: 219: 202: 199: 176: 175: 169: 168: 164: 163: 157: 153: 152: 147: 143: 142: 134: 133: 125: 124: 39: 37: 30: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 641: 630: 627: 625: 622: 620: 617: 615: 612: 610: 607: 605: 602: 600: 597: 596: 594: 583: 578: 576: 571: 569: 564: 563: 557: 555: 551: 548:article is a 547: 542: 539: 535: 530: 525: 524: 520: 511: 508: 497: 496: 489: 486: 480: 476: 473: 470: 469: 465: 462: 461: 457: 456: 449: 443: 439: 432: 427: 426: 420: 415: 414: 406: 401: 400: 394: 389: 388: 382: 377: 376: 370: 365: 364: 358: 353: 352: 346: 341: 340: 334: 329: 328: 322: 317: 316: 310: 305: 304: 298: 293: 292: 286: 281: 276: 267: 262: 260: 255: 253: 248: 247: 244: 237: 235: 232: 227: 220: 218: 216: 212: 208: 200: 198: 196: 192: 188: 184: 183: 174: 170: 165: 162: 158: 154: 151: 148: 144: 140: 135: 130: 121: 118: 110: 107:February 2023 99: 96: 92: 89: 85: 82: 78: 75: 71: 68: –  67: 63: 62:Find sources: 56: 52: 46: 45: 40:This article 38: 34: 29: 28: 19: 554:expanding it 543: 528: 510: 500:, retrieved 494: 488: 466: 458: 423: 409: 397: 385: 373: 361: 349: 337: 325: 313: 301: 289: 234: 229: 224: 217:article 34. 204: 181: 180: 179: 113: 104: 94: 87: 80: 73: 61: 49:Please help 44:verification 41: 187:Case 261/81 161:Case 261/81 593:Categories 521:References 502:2024-02-06 282:arts 28-36 77:newspapers 619:Margarine 207:margarine 614:Food law 546:case law 238:See also 221:Judgment 167:Keywords 156:Citation 185:(1983) 159:(1983) 91:scholar 448:EU law 191:EU law 189:is an 93:  86:  79:  72:  64:  544:This 481:Notes 201:Facts 146:Court 98:JSTOR 84:books 550:stub 446:See 280:TFEU 215:TFEU 211:cube 70:news 53:by 595:: 581:e 574:t 567:v 556:. 265:e 258:t 251:v 120:) 114:( 109:) 105:( 95:· 88:· 81:· 74:· 47:. 20:)

Index

Rau Lebensmittelwerke v De Smedt PVBA

verification
improve this article
adding citations to reliable sources
"Walter Rau Lebensmittelwerke v De Smedt PVBA"
news
newspapers
books
scholar
JSTOR
Learn how and when to remove this message

European Court of Justice
Case 261/81
Free movement of goods
Case 261/81
EU law
free movement of goods
margarine
cube
TFEU
v
t
e
TFEU
Procureur du Roi v Dassonville
Commission v France
Schmidberger v Austria
Rewe-Zentral AG v BMV für Branntwein

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.