78:
33:
207:, did require both languages and that those laws that were not in both languages were of no force and effect. However, they were deemed temporarily valid for a time until translations could be re-enacted in order to avoid a legal vacuum in Manitoba and to ensure the continuity of the rule of law.
210:
This reference was the first time that the courts in Canada had used the remedy of a delayed declaration of invalidity. Despite its exceptional origins, this remedy has grown to become a preferred one in
Canadian
323:
131:
163:
stipulating the provision of French language services in the province of
Manitoba. The Court heard the appeal in June 1984 and gave its ruling a year later, on June 13, 1985.
188:
215:. Manitoba was given a generous period of time to translate the laws and, in 1992, the court was still extending this grace period to be decided by the parties.
298:
293:
303:
313:
308:
270:
156:
83:
278:
181:
If so, are those
Manitoban laws not printed in both languages invalid under section 23 of the Manitoba Act?
200:
171:
318:
231:
77:
17:
274:
244:
204:
192:
175:
152:
178:, requiring laws be in both French and English, mandatory in Manitoba, Quebec, and Parliament?
46:
Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.
189:
An Act
Respecting the Operation of Section 23 of the Manitoba Act in Regard to Statutes
287:
99:
139:
Ritchie and
Chouinard JJ. took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
160:
212:
195:, and if so are the provisions invalid and of no legal force and effect?
184:
If so, do the laws have any force and effect, and if so to what extent?
245:
http://www.emp.ca/downloads/adminlaw/AdminLaw_04_c3_Manitoba.doc
26:
126:
121:
116:
108:
98:
91:
70:
324:Supreme Court of Canada reference question cases
8:
224:
67:
147:Reference Re Manitoba Language Rights
71:Reference Re Manitoba Language Rights
18:Reference re Manitoba Language Rights
7:
256:Supplementary reasons 1 S.C.R. 212.
191:inconsistent with section 23 of the
232:SCC Case Information - Docket 18606
25:
299:Canadian constitutional case law
76:
31:
92:Hearing: June 11, 12, 13, 1984
1:
294:Supreme Court of Canada cases
187:Are any of the provisions of
159:regarding provisions in the
65:Supreme Court of Canada case
166:Four questions were asked:
340:
304:1984 in Canadian case law
199:The Court found that the
138:
75:
40:This article needs to be
314:Franco-Manitoban culture
170:Are sections 133 of the
271:Supreme Court of Canada
243:Case comment at end of
234:Supreme Court of Canada
157:Supreme Court of Canada
94:Judgment: June 13, 1985
84:Supreme Court of Canada
309:Bilingualism in Canada
201:Constitution Act, 1867
172:Constitution Act, 1867
151:1 S.C.R. 721, was a
127:Unanimous reasons by
205:Manitoba Act, 1870
193:Manitoba Act, 1870
176:Manitoba Act, 1870
153:reference question
143:
142:
61:
60:
16:(Redirected from
331:
257:
254:
248:
241:
235:
229:
174:, and 23 of the
117:Court membership
80:
68:
56:
53:
47:
35:
34:
27:
21:
339:
338:
334:
333:
332:
330:
329:
328:
284:
283:
266:
261:
260:
255:
251:
242:
238:
230:
226:
221:
93:
87:
66:
57:
51:
48:
45:
36:
32:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
337:
335:
327:
326:
321:
316:
311:
306:
301:
296:
286:
285:
282:
281:
265:
264:External links
262:
259:
258:
249:
236:
223:
222:
220:
217:
197:
196:
185:
182:
179:
141:
140:
136:
135:
128:
124:
123:
119:
118:
114:
113:
110:
106:
105:
102:
96:
95:
89:
88:
81:
73:
72:
64:
59:
58:
39:
37:
30:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
336:
325:
322:
320:
317:
315:
312:
310:
307:
305:
302:
300:
297:
295:
292:
291:
289:
280:
276:
272:
269:Full text of
268:
267:
263:
253:
250:
246:
240:
237:
233:
228:
225:
218:
216:
214:
208:
206:
202:
194:
190:
186:
183:
180:
177:
173:
169:
168:
167:
164:
162:
158:
155:posed to the
154:
150:
148:
137:
134:
133:
129:
125:
122:Reasons given
120:
115:
111:
107:
103:
101:
97:
90:
86:
85:
79:
74:
69:
63:
55:
43:
38:
29:
28:
19:
319:Language law
273:decision at
252:
239:
227:
209:
198:
165:
161:Manitoba Act
146:
145:
144:
130:
104:1 S.C.R. 721
82:
62:
49:
41:
288:Categories
277: and
219:References
213:public law
203:, and the
109:Docket No.
132:The Court
100:Citations
52:May 2020
42:updated
279:CanLII
112:18606
275:LexUM
290::
247:.
149:,
54:)
50:(
44:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
