Pseudoarchaeology - Knowledge (XXG)

1386:. One of the main draws in this material for Cotterell and other pseudoarchaeologists is that the ancient Aztec and Maya people possessed knowledge beyond our imagination. From being able to “take off in spaceships”, to dealing with complex numbers and equations, these people possessed “godly intelligence”. Their biggest study and answer came from analyzing the Mayan calendar and finding correlations with the Sun and Earth. He states that “they (Sun, Earth, Mayan Calendar) come close together every 260 days, this agreed with his suspicion that the Mayan numbering system was connected with solar magnetic cycles”. There are no professionals that endorse his statements, and his conclusions are based on insufficient evidence. Cotterell's work is pseudoarcheology because it reports his own non-scientific interpretations, without any scientific 639:(1921–1994) were formerly considered to be eminent by both academic and alternative archaeologists. He came to the conclusion that a constructive dialogue should be begun between academic and alternative archaeologists. Fagan and Feder have responded to Holtorf's statements in detail, asserting that such a dialogue is no more possible than is one between evolutionary biologists and creationists or between astronomers and astrologers: one is scientific, the other is anti-scientific. 555:

expertise and motives of the critic become the main focus of attention." Fagan has maintained this idea elsewhere, remarking that arguing with supporters of pseudoarchaeological theories was "pointless" because they denied logic. He noted that they included those "who openly admitted to not having read a word written by a trained Egyptologist" but who at the same time "were pronouncing how academic Egyptology was all wrong, even sinister."

1399:. The Calendar Round seems to have been based on two overlapping annual cycles: a 260-day sacred year and a 365-day secular year that named 18 months with 20 days each. The Maya calendar also included what were termed Long Counts, these were created by priests at the time and a single cycle lasted 5,126 solar years. From the time this was created, the end of the solar years occurred on 21 December 2012. Ancient hieroglyphs from 5190: 38: 1423:

concern. The claim is that this passageway was and still is a direct channel to the underworld. There are many possibilities for what this could have been used for, but there are not any facts to prove this statement. Many experts, including Guillermo de And, an underwater archaeologist who directed a few expeditions to uncover Mayan aqua life, believe that the passageway was a “secret

413:

scientific method, he argued, that pseudoarchaeological arguments were faulty. He then argued that most pseudoarchaeologists do not consider alternative explanations to that which they want to propagate, and that their "theories" were typically just "notions", not having sufficient evidence to allow them to be considered "theories" in the scientific, academic meaning of the word.

47: 1442: 5201: 551:

did so because of the difficulties in making academic archaeological ideas comprehensible and interesting to the average viewer. Renfrew however believed that those television executives commissioning these documentaries knew that they were erroneous, and that they had allowed them to be made and broadcast simply for the hope of "short-term financial gain".

370:

commonalities of pseudeoarchaeological theories: the unscientific nature of its method and evidence, its history of providing "simple, compact answers to complex, difficult issues", and its tendency to present itself as being persecuted by the archaeological establishment, accompanied by an ambivalent attitude towards the scientific ethos of the

386:. Instead of testing evidence to see what hypotheses it satisfies best, pseudoarchaeologists force the archaeological data to fit a "favored conclusion" that is often arrived at through hunches, intuition, or religious or nationalist dogma. Pseudoarchaeological groups have a variety of basic assumptions that are typically unscientific: the 361:"Archaeological readings of the landscape enrich the experience of inhabiting or visiting a place," Holtorf asserted. "Those readings may well be based on science but even non-scientific research contributes to enriching our landscapes." The question for opponents of folk archaeology is whether such enrichment is delusional. 1262:. These similarities commonly mention creation of pyramids, use of archways, and similarities in artwork of the divine. Arguments such as these claim an association between ancient Egypt and Maya through either a transatlantic outing that brought Egypt to the Mayas or through a shared origin in both civilizations (either in 254:(2006) however claimed this term was only chosen because it "imparts a warmer, fuzzier feel" that "appeals to our higher ideals and progressive inclinations". They argued that the term "pseudoarchaeology" was much more appropriate, a term also used by other prominent academic and professional archaeologists such as 331:

Countering the misleading "discoveries" of pseudoarchaeology binds academic archaeologists in a quandary, described by Cornelius Holtorf as whether to strive to disprove pseudoarchaeology by "crusading" methods or to concentrate on better public knowledge of the sciences involved; Holtorf suggested a

476:

Pseudoarchaeologists typically present themselves as being disadvantaged with respect to the much larger archaeological establishment. They often use language that disparages academics and dismisses them as being unadventurous, spending all their time in dusty libraries and refusing to challenge the

416:

Commonly lacking scientific evidence, pseudoarchaeologists typically use other types of evidence for their arguments. For instance, they often use "generalized cultural comparisons", using various artefacts and monuments from one society, and emphasizing similarities with those of another society to

1204:

slightly more than four months after the excavation. There were also claims that all lights in Cairo went out at the moment of Lord Carnavon's death. However, skeptics believe that reporters overlooked rational explanations and relied on supernatural legends. In 2021, mummies discovered mostly from

1184:, which involves a belief of imprecations being directed against those who enter the tombs of mummies, and pharaohs. These curses often include natural disaster or illness or death for those who have entered the tomb. One of the most influential iterations of this theory comes from the discovery of 498:

Conversely, many pseudoarchaeologists, whilst criticising the academic archaeological establishment, also attempt to get endorsements from people with academic credentials and affiliations. At times, they quote historical, and in most cases dead academics to strengthen their arguments; for instance

440:

civilisation represented a cosmic catastrophe that occurred during the 7th and 8th centuries BCE. This was criticised by academic archaeologist William H. Stiebing Jr., who noted that such myths only developed during the 12th to the 14th centuries CE, two millennia after Velikovsky claimed that the

1135:

The theory the Egyptian pyramids were not built as tombs of ancient pharaohs, but for other purposes, has resulted in a variety of alternative theories about their purpose and origins. One such pseudoarchaeological theory is from Scott Creighton, who argues that the pyramids were built as recovery

550:

Many academic archaeologists have argued that the spread of alternative archaeological theories is a threat to the general public's understanding of the past. Fagan was particularly scathing of television shows that presented pseudoarchaeological theories to the general public, believing that they

494:

expanded on this, noting how in the academic archaeological community, "New evidence or arguments have to be thoroughly scrutinised to secure their validity ... and longstanding, well-entrenched positions will take considerable effort and particularly compelling data to overturn." Fagan noted

369:

William H. Stiebing Jr. argued that despite their many differences, there were a set of common characteristics shared by almost all pseudoarchaeological interpretations. He believed that because of this, pseudoarchaeology could be categorised as a "single phenomenon". He then identified three main

301:

A type of pseudoarcheology of the Middle East has created a pseudo-history of Babylon, in contradiction to Judeo-Christian and Biblical history, resulting in the production of fraudulent cuneiform tablets, as clay tablets are difficult to date. "By 1904, during the early period of cuneiform tablet

451:

have formed a massive and global network through universities, museums, institutes, societies and foundations. And this immense powerhouse and clearing-house of knowledge has presented their dogma of history to the general public totally unhindered and unchallenged from the outside. ... On a

412:

Academic archaeologist John R. Cole believed that most pseudoarchaeologists do not understand how scientific investigation works, and that they instead believe it to be a "simple, catastrophic right versus wrong battle" between contesting theories. It was because of this failure to understand the

244:

Various terms have been employed to refer to these non-academic interpretations of archaeology. During the 1980s, the term "cult archaeology" was used by some people such as John R. Cole (1980) and William H. Stiebing Jr. (1987). "Fantastic archaeology" was used during the 1980s as the name of an

1422:

Chichén Itzá in Mexico has long been an important archaeological site. Throughout the past few years there have been many wild claims by pseudoarchaeologists. The passageway beneath the Kulkulcan pyramid, a part of Chichén Itzá, was found and this is what many of the pseudoarchaeologists' claims

271:, used the derogative term "bullshit archaeology", and similarly the academic William H. Stiebing Jr. noted that there were certain terms used for pseudoarchaeology that were heard "in the privacy of professional archaeologists' homes and offices but which cannot be mentioned in polite society". 554:

Fagan and Feder believed that it was not possible for academic archaeologists to successfully engage with pseudoarchaeologists, remarking that "you cannot reason with unreason". Speaking from their own experiences, they thought that attempted dialogues just became "slanging matches in which the

938:

species is much older than the 200,000 years it is generally believed to have existed. Archaeologist John R. Cole refers to such beliefs as "cult archaeology" and believes them to be pseudoarchaeological. He said that this "pseudoarchaeology" had "many of the attributes, causes, and effects of

786:

Archaeologists distinguish their research from pseudoarchaeology by indicating differences of research methods, including recursive methods, falsifiable theories, peer review, and a generally systematic approach to collecting data. Though there is overwhelming evidence of cultural associations

642:

During the early 1980s, Kenneth Feder performed a survey of his archaeology students. On the 50-question survey, 10 questions had to do with archaeology and/or pseudoscience. Some of the claims were more rational; the world is 5 billion years old, and human beings came about through evolution.

622:

Academic archaeologist Cornelius Holtorf believed however that critics of alternative archaeologies like Fagan were "opinionated and patronizing" towards alternative theories, and that purporting their opinions in such a manner was damaging to the public's perception of archaeologists. Holtorf

481:

to hide the truth about history from the public. When academics challenge pseudoarchaeologists and criticise their theories, many pseudoarchaeologists claim it as further evidence that their own ideas are right, and that they are simply being harassed by members of this academic conspiracy.

249:

taught by Stephen Williams, who published a book with the same title. During the 2000s, the term "alternative archaeology" began to be instead applied by academics like Tim Sebastion (2001), Robert J. Wallis (2003), Cornelius Holtorf (2006), and Gabriel Moshenka (2008). Garrett F. Fagan and

1282:

criticized Schoch's theory on the grounds that it demonstrated ignorance of relevant facts and that it did not explain variations in appearance or how various civilizations' pyramids were built. Fagan also describes known research by several archaeologists about the development of various

302:

collecting, J. Edgar Banks, a Mesopotamian explorer and tablet dealer, estimated that nearly 80% of tablets offered for sale in Baghdad were fakes. In 2016, Syria's Director General for Antiquities and Museums reported that approximately 70% of seized artefacts in the country are fakes."

546:

and Kenneth L. Feder have argued that pseudoarchaeological interpretations of the past were based upon sensationalism, self-contradiction, fallacious logic, manufactured or misinterpreted evidence, quotes taken out of context and incorrect information. Fagan and Feder characterised such

1412:

that have been important to archaeologists attempting to recreate the past, have also been used by pseudoarchaeologists to fabricate false claims about the past. In reality these carvings have been used to reconstruct the stories and history of more than thirty dynastic rulers. Some

571:, Luanne Hudson and Francis Harrold decided to hold a symposium to examine pseudoarchaeological beliefs from a variety of academic standpoints, including archaeology, physical anthropology, sociology, history and psychology. From this symposium, an anthology was produced, entitled 1417:. These claims are widely regarded as false by archeologists. When these claims were circulated during the early 1990s, the rate of tourism boomed. In cases like this, pseudoarcheological claims can often garner public attention more effectively than peer-reviewed archeology. 547:

interpretations of the past as being "anti-reason and anti-science" with some being "hyper-nationalistic, racist and hateful". In turn, many pseudoarchaeologists have dismissed academics as being closed-minded and not willing to consider theories other than their own.

408:

is much older than the 200,000 years old it has been shown to be by archaeologists. Despite this, many of pseudoarchaeology's proponents claim that they gained their conclusions using scientific techniques and methods, even when it is demonstrable that they have not.

1299:

or other flood theories. Scott Creighton claims that knowledge of a coming deluge (which he refers to as "Thoth's Flood") generated the idea of building pyramids as recovery vaults from which civilization could rebuild. Another fringe theory relating to this is the

356:

If God were to hold in his right hand all the truth and in his left the unique ever-active spur for truth, although with the corollary to err forever, asking me to choose, I would humbly take his left and say "Father, give; for the pure truth is for you alone!"

107:

There is no unified pseudoarchaeological theory or method, but rather many different interpretations of the past which are jointly at odds with those developed by the scientific community as well as with each other. These include religious philosophies such as

1355:

beliefs about Mayas and Maya religion and/or spirituality. That said, Mayan culture has long been a subject of scientific archaeology. Archaeologists have uncovered evidence that has furthered our knowledge of the past. Some of these include stone carvings in

1237:

in 1492. Part of these arguments stem from the discovery of nicotine and cocaine traces found in various mummies. The argument is that plants producing these were not known to exist outside the Americas, although Duncan Edlin found that plants containing both

541:

stated his opinion that it was appalling that pseudoarchaeologists treated archaeological evidence in such a "frivolous and self-serving way", something he believed trivialised the "serious matter" of the study of human origins. Academics like John R. Cole,

517:, a theory that has been abandoned by the academic community but which Hancock endorses. As Fagan noted however, the fact that Einstein was a physicist and not a geologist is not even mentioned by Hancock, nor is the fact that the present understanding of 99:

interpretations involve the use of artifacts, sites or materials to construct scientifically insubstantial theories to strengthen the pseudoarchaeologists' claims. Methods include exaggeration of evidence, dramatic or romanticized conclusions, use of

466:] (to name but a few) in order to act as the gatekeepers of the truth (as they see it), ready to come down like the proverbial ton of bricks on all those whom they perceive as "frauds", "charlatans", and "pseudo-scientists"—in short, heretics. 647:'s tomb actually killed people upon discovery, and there is good evidence for the existence of Atlantis. As it resulted, some of the students Feder was teaching gave some credibility to the pseudoscience claims. 12% actually believed people on 1144:). Another alternative theory for the purpose of the pyramids comes from known pseudoarchaeologist Graham Hancock, who argues that the pyramids originated from an early civilization that was destroyed by an asteroid that also began the 1312:

as ignoring Old Kingdom societal evidence about the Sphinx and being flawed in citing specifics about a possible erosion. Currently Egyptologists tend to date the Sphinx sometime about 2500 B.C., approximately the reign of the pharaoh

6298: 228:, misuse of logic and evidence, misunderstanding of scientific method, and internal contradictions in their arguments". The relationship between alternative and academic archaeologies has been compared to the relationship between 1308:'s modern body appearance is caused by erosion due to flooding or rain. This theory, which has been perpetuated by Robert Schoch who claims the Sphinx was built between 5000 and 7000 BCE, has been criticized by Zahi Hawass and 425:, or an extraterrestrial influence. This takes the different artefacts or monuments entirely out of their original contexts, something which is anathema to academic archaeologists, for whom context is of the utmost importance. 1381:

and his burial. Pseudoarchaeologists have discussed much about the discovery of Pakal's sarcophagus lid and the answers they gained from studying it. Pseudoarchaeology author Maurice Cotterell writes about this in his book

1104:, but was so beautiful that it could it have been crafted only by the hand of God. Though Smyth contributed to the idea of the Great Pyramid not being created originally by Khufu, this belief has been further propagated by 1124:(the discoverer of Khufu cartouches within the Great Pyramid) presented the earliest evidence that the Great Pyramid's builder) faked the markings of Khufu's name. However, Sitchin's research has been challenged as being 2802: 1622:" was the product of extraterrestrial-human breeding or extraterrestrial genetic engineering, despite DNA evidence proving that the skull was that of an anatomically modern human infant, most likely suffering from 613:

for political, religious, and ideological purposes. Emphasis was placed on the media's reporting of sensational and politically motivated archaeological claims and the academy's responsibility in responding to it.

332:

third method, relativist and contextualised, by identifying the social and cultural demands that both scientific and alternative archaeologies address and by identifying the engagement of present people with the

742:, using cultural superiority of the ancient Aryan race as a basic assumption to establish the Germanic people as the descendants of the original Aryan 'master race') or a desire to prove a particular religious ( 1253:

Another argument in favor of contact between ancient Egyptians and Mayans is from claims of similarities of art, architecture and writing. These theories are explained by authors such as Graham Hancock in

489:

admitted that the archaeological establishment was often "set in its ways and resistant to radical new ideas" but that this was not the reason why pseudoarchaeological theories were rejected by academics.

2753:

Translated and notes by A.M. Harmon, 1936, Published in Loeb Classical Library, 9 volumes, Greek texts and facing English translation: Harvard University Press. This extract transcribed by Roger Pearse,

305:

Especially in the past, but also in the present, pseudoarchaeology has been affected by racism, which can be suggested by attempts to attribute ancient sites and artefacts to ancient Egyptians, Hebrew

1152:. This belief is sometimes explained for why the pyramids supposedly appear suddenly in history. However, this claim is challenged by Egyptologists who describe an evolution of pyramid designs from 3875:

Baumann, Stefan (2018). Fakten und Fiktionen: Archäologie vs. Pseudowissenschaft. Sonderbände der Antiken Welt (in German). Darmstadt: Philipp von Zabern Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft (WBG).

934:

theory of some Judeo-Christian fundamentalists. They argue that the Earth is 4,000–10,000 years old, with claims varying depending on the source. Some Hindu pseudoarchaeologists believe that the

1510:

from Egypt being responsible for influencing most of the major ancient civilizations of the world in Asia, the Middle East, Europe, and particularly the ancient Native Americans. This includes

4497: 627:, which was once considered as a component of fringe archaeological interpretations before being adopted by mainstream academics. He also noted that certain archaeological scholars, like 477:

orthodoxies of the establishment lest they lose their jobs. In some more extreme examples, pseudoarchaeologists have accused academic archaeologists of being members of a widespread

623:

emphasized that there were similarities between academic and alternative archaeological interpretations, with the former being influenced by the latter. As evidence, he emphasized

1246:

existed in Egypt and therefore could have been used by ancient Egyptians. Another argument against possible contact is that there is a massive body of literature in the form of

529:

Pseudoarchaeological theories have come to be much criticised by academic and professional archaeologists. One of the first books to address these directly was by archaeologist

324:

Practitioners of pseudoarchaeology often criticise academic archaeologists and established scientific methods, claiming that conventional science has ignored critical evidence.

4757: 763:

conclusion is established, and fieldwork is performed explicitly to corroborate the theory in detail. According to archaeologist John Hoopes, writing for the magazine of the

2765: 1339:

usually do not receive. Many examples of pseudoarcheology pertaining to Maya civilization can be found in literature, art, and movies. Many of them have to do with the

3774: 1403:

claimed that when this cycle ended, Bolon Yokte, the Mayan god of creation and war would arrive. Some pseudoarchaeologists assumed to mean that the world would end.

4116: 3649: 3064: 5359: 5256: 2011: 962:, and numerous other important sites. However, he has not presented evidence sufficient to impress Bible scholars, scientists, and historians. The organization 3143: 4263: 1517: 6364: 6305: 4310:

Flemming, Nic (2006). "The Attraction of Non-Rational Archaeological Hypotheses: The Individual and Sociological Factors". In Garrett G. Fagan (ed.).

1335:

have inspired pseudoarchaeological speculation. In Mexico, this history can bring more people which in turn brings more money for the area, which the

3499:"The Stoned Age?: Did the discovery, in Egyptian mummies, of the chemicals found in cocaine and tobacco prove an ancient contact with the Americas?" 715:, identified helpfully with an inscribed plaque. Arthur was reinterred at Glastonbury with a magnificent ceremonial attended by the king and queen. 3916:

Fagan, Garrett G.; Feder, Kenneth L. (2006). "Crusading against straw men: an alternative view of alternative archaeologies: response to Holtorf".

3370: 6269: 5238: 5146: 606: 432:

as representing historical events, but in doing so these myths are often taken out of their cultural contexts. For instance, pseudoarchaeologist

3561:"Early theories attributing Mesoamerican civilization to lost civilizations continue to deprive Native Americans of their cultural legacy today" 3396: 3728: 3340: 1615:, which are all contested by mainstream archaeologists and historians as lacking critical physical evidence and general historical credibility. 224:

Academic archaeologists have often criticised pseudoarchaeology, with one of the major critics, John R. Cole, characterising it as relying on "

5463: 4626: 4205: 3880: 3625: 3316: 3040: 2974: 1511: 1172:. Many alternative beliefs have been criticized as ignoring the knowledge, architectural and constructive capabilities of ancient Egyptians. 594: 5715: 6408: 3541: 602: 4370: 3341:"Carnarvon Is Dead of an Insect's Bite at Pharaoh's Tomb; Blood Poisoning and Ensuing Pneumonia Conquer Tut-ankh-Amen Discoverer in Egypt" 1209:

period were to be paraded through Cairo during a transference for study. However, several events occurred, including a ship blocking the

168:(1968). Others instead argue there were human societies in the ancient period which were significantly technologically advanced, such as 579: 310: 495:

that pseudoarchaeological theories simply do not have sufficient evidence to allow them to be accepted by professional archaeologists.

6318: 3232: 2949: 2892: 1994: 1758: 136:. Some pseudoarchaeological theories concern the idea that prehistoric and ancient human societies were aided in their development by 4405:

Schadla-Hall, Tim (2004). "The Comforts of Unreason: The importance and relevance of alternative archaeology". In N. Merriman (ed.).

3032:

Operations carried on at the pyramids of Gizeh in 1837 : with an account of a voyage into upper Egypt, and an appendix. Volume 1

1213:

and accidents involving several members of the crew. Many claimed these were the results of a pharaoh's curse, however, Egyptologist

4456: 4395: 4351: 4288: 4237: 4179: 4151: 3954: 3856: 3824: 3259: 2969:. Sonderbände der Antiken Welt (in German). Darmstadt: Philipp von Zabern Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft (WBG). pp. 83–93. 2093: 1485: 1250:

from ancient Egypt, however ancient Egyptian scholars never noted contacting the Americas in any of the texts that have been found.

791:

terms of their cultural contexts and the cultural desires to which they respond—have been comparatively few. However, in this vein,

1452: 5693: 5490: 4767: 4422: 2810: 1637: 764: 564: 5818: 4569: 6413: 6343: 6285: 6001: 5480: 3524: 1301: 695:

and take up his residence at Abonoteichus. The opportune discovery of these tablets caused this story to spread quickly to all

582:, a workshop was held on the topic of pseudoarchaeology. It subsequently resulted in the publication of an academic anthology, 530: 453: 2322:"We might want to remind ourselves of the truism that every past is the construct of a particular present-day context" p. 548. 5337: 5153: 4666: 4467: 2776: 2309: 6138: 4334: 4320: 1774: 609:, sponsored a conference entitled "Archaeology, Politics, and the Media," which addressed the abuse of archaeology in the 314: 6350: 5605: 5175: 4885: 4772: 2005: 154: 1192:

in November 1922. Several deaths of those present at the excavation have been attributed to a curse, including that of

5961: 5678: 5231: 5108: 4951: 4880: 4721: 1972: 1846: 1750: 1665: 724: 291:. Genuine archaeological finds may be converted to pseudoarchaeology unintentionally by unscientific interpretation. ( 6371: 1467: 1378: 687:

n the temple of Apollo, which is the most ancient in Chalcedon, they buried bronze tablets which said that very soon

197:

tradition. Many alternative archaeologies have been adopted by religious groups. Fringe archaeological ideas such as

3750:"Tikal: Stone Sculpture | Essay | The Metropolitan Museum of Art | Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History" 6403: 6393: 6357: 6088: 6031: 5555: 4661: 3287: 2837: 994: 4271: 3788: 1463: 601:

Center for Jewish Studies, along with the Duke Department of Religion, the Duke Graduate Program in Religion, the

116:" that apply to the archaeology of historic periods such as those that would have included the supposed worldwide 5971: 5418: 4995: 4983: 4849: 4789: 4742: 4619: 1361: 1009: 759: 668: 3589: 5929: 5823: 5789: 5673: 5017: 4910: 4859: 4809: 4799: 2679: 1686: 1651: 1395:

Another example of pseudoarcheology concerning Maya civilization are some conclusions gained from studying the

1278:

argues that both Egyptian and Maya pyramids result from a common lost civilization. However, ancient historian

505: 178: 1503:

were a long vanished non-Native American people thought to have come from Europe, the Middle East, or Africa.

6336: 6254: 6006: 5688: 5627: 5398: 5123: 5048: 4946: 4824: 3223:

Feder, Kenneth L. (2020). "Chapter 10: The Mystery of Ancient Civilizations: How Did People Get So Smart?".

2877: 1766: 1712: 1583: 1296: 1141: 1049: 931: 210: 121: 2274:

Holtorf, Cornelius (December 2005). "Beyond Crusades: How (Not) to Engage with Alternative Archaeologies".

521:(which came to disprove earth crustal displacement) only became accepted generally after Einstein's death. 6398: 6168: 6036: 5949: 5924: 5914: 5772: 5475: 5342: 5224: 5168: 5158: 5078: 5073: 5043: 5022: 4895: 4890: 4854: 4643: 4585: 1989: 1644: 1400: 1148:

period. A third common pseudoarchaeological theory about the Egyptian pyramids is that they were built by

280: 164: 886: 6173: 6158: 6051: 5683: 5622: 5617: 5510: 5163: 5083: 4839: 4752: 4747: 4737: 3816: 2661: 2303: 1927: 1921: 1811: 1801: 1679: 1414: 1181: 1082: 652: 514: 452:

more sinister note: now this "church of science" has formed a network of watchdog organisations such as

4060:

Moshenka, Gabriel (2008). "'The Bible in Stone': Pyramids, Lost Tribes and Alternative Archaeologies".

374:. This idea that there are common characteristics of pseudoarchaeologies is shared by other academics. 17: 4502: 1128:. Arguments against these theories often detail the discovery of external texts on papyri such as the 441:

events had occurred, and that the Aztec society itself had not even developed by the 7th century BCE.

6163: 6123: 5794: 5600: 5393: 5322: 5193: 5093: 5088: 5063: 5058: 5053: 4844: 4834: 4762: 4691: 4686: 4612: 3434: 2016: 1999: 1658: 1547: 1543: 1528: 1507: 1305: 1247: 1230: 1206: 1113: 1094: 817: 457: 399: 371: 233: 159: 95:

and who reject or ignore the accepted data gathering and analytical methods of the discipline. These

55: 807:

and "Welsh Indians" was set in its changing and evolving sociohistorical contexts by Gwyn Williams.

6259: 6093: 5403: 4988: 4973: 4875: 4681: 4671: 4651: 4414: 2253: 2021: 1698: 1612: 1597: 1579: 1027: 871: 708: 433: 428:

Another type of evidence used by a number of pseudoarchaeologists is the interpretation of various

422: 267: 198: 194: 4031:

Holtorf, Cornelius (2005). "Beyond crusades: how (not) to engage with alternative archaeologies".

1806: 6329: 6228: 6203: 6041: 5991: 5866: 5700: 5648: 5535: 5515: 5270: 5068: 4931: 4110: 4077: 4048: 4010: 4002: 3933: 3710: 3679: 3643: 3450: 3091: 3058: 3011: 2291: 1734: 1705: 1589: 1149: 963: 955: 894: 780: 746: 318: 246: 229: 206: 137: 3169: 261:

Other academic archaeologists have chosen to use other terms to refer to these interpretations.

4378: 6291: 6264: 6193: 5861: 5849: 5801: 5663: 5305: 5118: 5098: 4452: 4391: 4347: 4328: 4312: