980:, "papers cited by formal review articles generally experience a dramatic loss in future citations. Typically, the review gets cited instead of the specific articles mentioned in the review." The study identifies an exception to this trend: articles that are characterized by the review as being bridges between clusters of scholarship tend to get disproportionate future attention. An analysis was conducted by McAlister et al. of review articles in six different medical journals. Of the six journals, less than 25% included a description, evaluation, or synthesis of evidence that had been provided. Only one-third of the articles had a clinical topic at the forefront, and only half of the articles presented
901:
1039:". This term was coined by Sackett (2000) and refers to the combination of available research, practitioner expertise, and consumer values. Due to the inundation of original research in the field, there is a need for review articles which highlight relevant studies, results and trends. The varying methods and participants used among original research studies can provide inconsistent results, thereby presenting a challenge in synthesising information using one common metric. The conjunction of meta-analyses and systematic reviews has proven to be more effective in organising data and drawing conclusions, especially when it comes to
719:
54:
847:
existing research and identifying gaps in this research. They were born out of the necessity to categorise and make sense of the ongoing plethora of research publications being released annually. Between 1991 and 2008, there were forty times more papers published within the field of biodiversity alone. This overload of research papers makes it difficult for scientists and clinicians to remain up to date on current findings and developments within their discipline.
988:
studies commenting on the effect of review articles on the impactfullness of journals that usually only publish research papers. This prevents one from saying with certainty that review articles could replace original research papers in large journals. Of the 538 review articles published in pathology journals within the year 2005, a mere 21% of them have been cited over ten times following their issuance. Furthermore, in a 2000-2006 comparison of journals;
736:. Once the scope of the journal the author intends to submit to is identified, then identify the own personal scope and aim for the article. Experienced author, Angus Crake emphasises the need to define a scope that is "manageable, not too large or small" and to "focus on recent advances if the field is well established". This equates to a succinct, refreshing review article that adds a new perspective to the field whilst still being grounded in academia.
830:
paper to be acknowledged so that the review can be as well-informed and comprehensive as possible. Peers will often recommend other research articles and studies to be included in the review, which can add strength to the article. Confusion amongst peers also indicates that your paper is not clear or lacking synergy.
949:. Literature reviews provide a summary of what the authors believe are the best and most relevant prior publications. Systematic reviews determine an objective list of criteria, and find all previously published original papers that meet the criteria; they then compare the results presented in these papers.
773:
at the start. The 'Abstract' section of the review article should include: a synopsis of the topic being discussed or the issue studied, an overview of the study participants used in the empirical study being reviewed, a discussion of the results found and conclusions drawn by the scholars conducting
1014:
increased from 14,815 to 45,829 between 1991 and 2005. Following the same trend, the number of dedicated review journals within the
Science Citation Index database grew from 163 to 198 between 1999 and 2006. Although, the percentage of review articles in review journals that formed the foundation of
933:
results. An expert's opinion is valuable, but an expert's assessment of the literature can be more valuable. When reading individual articles, readers could miss features that are apparent to an expert clinician-researcher. Readers benefit from the expert's explanation and assessment of the validity
710:
where they are published. A meta-analysis lends itself more to statistical research, often converting the original research into one common metric referred to as "effect sizes", so as to easily identify patterns and anomalies among publications. Systematic reviews may include meta-analysis results.
829:
is critical to their credibility. The peer review process is a way to ensure the article is as polished and accurate as possible. Most often, those reviewing the article are fellow academics or experts within the field under discussion in the paper. Sending out a peer review allows for gaps in the
786:
Within this section of the review article is the suggestion of improvements and areas to further extend the research in reference. The bibliography included at the end of review articles is equally important as it leads to further information on the study being discussed and is a way for academics
616:
Review articles have increased in impact and relevance alongside the increase in the amount of research that needs to be synthesised. They are a concise way of collating information for practitioners or academics that are not able to read the plethora of original research that is being published.
987:
Historically, review journals have a higher impact than primary research journals. The year 2006 showed the top 10 most impactful journals to be compiled exclusively of review articles. In addition to this, review articles are cited more frequently than research articles. There are currently no
842:
under review and how future studies of the same nature can be improved. They also present findings of other studies within the same discipline, comparing results and drawing conclusions based on each individual finding. Essentially, they are an evaluation of already published academic research.
1018:
Separate to the quality of articles, the number of review articles published poses its own challenge to those searching for succinct but comprehensive research analysis. This makes it just as difficult for experts to navigate through the synthesised review articles as it is to sift through the
846:
It is important that review articles do not introduce new results, but rather, reiterate existing results. However, they are able to draw conclusions on the results presented (within reason). Review articles hold importance as they forecast to see new research opportunities by synthesising the
731:
Review articles initially identify the scope and aim. If submitting the review article to a journal, the author must familiarise themselves with the theme of the journal as well as its conditions for submission. Some journals only accept review articles whereas others strictly publish
666:. It details the aims, hypothesis, and research method clearly so as to remain transparent and neutral. This review format adheres to explicit criteria when selecting what research is included in the review. Common methods used to analyse selected research articles include
774:
the study, an explanation of how such findings have already or could potentially impact the theory and practice within the relevant discipline. Within this section, context and the relevance of the review is included. The jargon used will depend on the intended audience.
1015:
review literature decreased by 17% between 1999 and 2005. This indicates that most review articles are being allocated to original research journals as opposed to strictly review journals. This is also dependent on the quality of the review articles published.
585:
Academic publications that specialize in review articles are known as review journals. Review journals have their own requirements for the review articles they accept, so review articles may vary slightly depending on the journal they are being submitted to.
915:
A research article has more narrow parameters on what is included (often depending on the journal it is being pitched to), whereas a review article is more open, being able to incorporate multiple research papers albeit still being contained within journal
796:... The review selects from these (research) papers, juxtaposes them, and puts them in a narrative that holds them together… clearly the best reviews are not only concerned with what was done in the past, but also present a means to sculpt the future."
1009:
In terms of the growth of review articles, the rate has been exponential. The number of papers on the topic of 'pathology' has increased 2.3 times between the years 1991 to 2006. Within the science discipline, the number of review articles in the
747:. This ensures a wide berth of knowledge that presents multiple perspectives and allows for a reasonably balanced article. Some disciplines encourage the use of certain search engines. For example, science-based review articles heavily utilise
682:. These types of reviews also include a discussion on the theoretical implications of such research. Systematic reviews are more highly regarded and selected than narrative reviews due to their specificity and neutrality. In the field of
705:
summarises quantitative results from a variety of research articles on a chosen topic. Given that these articles are formulating conclusions from multiple data sets, meta-analyses adhere to specific guidelines stipulated by the
777:
The discussion section of the article presents multiple perspectives, stating limitations and potential extensions of the study being reviewed. Also, within this section, similarities and dissonances among studies are stated.
1031:, the use of review articles within the social, behavioural and health science disciplines has proliferated. 2007 statistics showed that systematic review articles were produced at a rate of 2,500 per year on the
1019:
primary research itself. Additionally, the inclusion of poorly referenced, inadequately researched, and overly biased review articles serve to muddy the water and make it even harder to determine quality writing.
633:. Review articles do not introduce new results, but rather state existing results, drawing conclusions on the results presented. Review articles can be categorised by using the same domain, underlying theory, or
783:
Previous work is always vulnerable. Criticising is easy, and of little value; it is more important to explain how research builds upon previous findings rather than to claim previous research is inadequate and
1006:, published both with and without review articles included, it was found that journals published with review articles had a greater impact on readers than those that did not include review articles.
781:
The presentation of both the shortcomings and advancements of the research papers under review is important for comprehensiveness. Daft (1985, p 198) emphasised this by saying "
197:
858:
form the basis of review articles. Review articles use the original information presented in research articles to draw conclusions and pose suggestions for future research.
460:
963:
literature. A review article, even one that is requested or "peer-invited", will be either peer-reviewed or non-peer-reviewed depending on how submissions are treated.
2656:
2641:
2484:
2133:
1743:
Melissa L. Rethlefsen; M. Hassan Murad; Edward H. Livingston (September 10, 2014). "Engaging
Medical Librarians to Improve the Quality of Review Articles".
912:
A research article presents original content, whereas a review article synthesises that content and makes sense of it within the context of the discipline.
529:
1442:
2651:
909:
A research article presents original information from the perspective of the author, whereas a review article analyses that statement and information.
715:
aided the development of various analysis techniques that could be used in systematic review articles, thereby developing this form of literature.
487:
470:
157:
1857:
1700:
1311:
1035:
platform (Moher et al., 2007). The increase in prevalence of review articles within these disciplines can be attributed to the pull towards "
900:
613:
summarizes a large number of already published experimental or epidemiological studies and provides statistical analysis of their result.
1725:
762:
The title, abstract and keywords chosen bring awareness to the audience of the article, and should describe what the article is about.
2411:
578:, since they do not provide additional analysis and synthesis of new conclusions. A review of such sources is often referred to as a
2474:
2126:
1082:
990:
1494:
966:
Writing review articles can be a popular task among students. At times, teachers from schools and universities assign this task
1011:
465:
2421:
522:
1846:
Research
Companion to Green International Management Studies: A Guide for Future Research, Collaboration and Review Writing
2671:
492:
145:
2697:
2666:
2636:
2119:
976:
718:
450:
1402:
Webster, Jane; Watson, Richard T. (2002). "Analyzing the Past to
Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review".
2631:
2646:
2626:
763:
26:
Not to be confused with articles that are reviews in the more general sense (such as a book review), for which see
515:
477:
264:
2702:
1002:
996:
20:
1807:
1165:
2563:
2507:
2034:"Impact factor: certainly a factor, but just whom does it impact? Important lessons from another discipline"
1849:
1036:
838:
A key aim of review articles is to pose other potential avenues of research, stating the limitations of the
687:
558:
since it may analyze and discuss the method and conclusions in previously published studies. It resembles a
432:
2692:
2603:
2319:
2275:
1752:
307:
254:
2593:
2568:
2345:
2254:
2166:
981:
482:
455:
361:
192:
132:
2033:
1116:
861:
Research and empirical articles are reporting the results of the author's study, thereby deeming it a
2661:
2583:
2548:
2502:
2390:
2350:
2335:
1585:
946:
766:
is important when publishing articles within a discipline where the literature is already saturated.
547:
420:
162:
120:
1757:
1644:"Delaware State University Guides Patrons into more Effective Research with Standardized Lib Guides"
2717:
2184:
2142:
1729:
890:
110:
1471:"Research Guides: NFS 4021 Contemporary Topics in Nutrition: Research Articles vs Review Articles"
1303:
53:
2553:
2189:
2161:
2069:
2014:
1957:
1706:
1419:
1229:
938:
882:
839:
770:
551:
388:
312:
125:
1059:
because it reviews or summarizes the records for a series of patients at a single medical clinic
2712:
2707:
2609:
2497:
2464:
2285:
2206:
2061:
2053:
2006:
1998:
1949:
1910:
1853:
1770:
1696:
1665:
1621:
1603:
1411:
1307:
1269:
1221:
1144:
1136:
942:
806:
683:
675:
663:
659:
640:
626:
505:
413:
398:
356:
339:
274:
259:
75:
70:
37:
1327:
Higgins JP, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA, eds. (February 2022).
2598:
2512:
2234:
2156:
2100:
2045:
1988:
1941:
1900:
1819:
1762:
1688:
1655:
1611:
1593:
1519:
1354:
1299:
1261:
1211:
1128:
953:
926:
855:
788:
707:
695:
575:
571:
555:
376:
344:
334:
302:
115:
80:
2573:
2370:
2360:
2307:
2290:
2216:
1929:
1520:"Research Guides: Publishing in the Sciences: How to Write a Scientific Literature Review"
1470:
1378:
579:
383:
322:
239:
234:
229:
224:
63:
1090:
1823:
1589:
2522:
2492:
2428:
2395:
2365:
2314:
2201:
1788:
1616:
1573:
1040:
862:
643:
describe the published information on a theme or topic, but often does not include the
567:
408:
351:
249:
202:
182:
152:
1351:
Proceedings of the
Workshop on Publishing for Biomedical Journal Editors and Reviewers
1132:
929:
analyze or discuss research previously published by others, rather than reporting new
817:
are useful for when it comes to actually structuring and writing your review article.
2686:
2578:
2385:
2355:
2239:
2224:
2049:
1873:
1710:
1549:"What's the difference between a research article and a review article? - LibAnswers"
1233:
1062:
960:
744:
702:
630:
610:
574:, instead of reporting new facts and results. Survey articles are however considered
403:
393:
2073:
2018:
1961:
647:
involved in researching the topic. This can lead to narrative review articles being
655:, and innovative suggestions to further develop the field through further studies.
554:
on a topic within a certain discipline. A review article is generally considered a
244:
1353:. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Department of Biomedical Imaging, University of Malaya.
1598:
1379:"MVCC Libraries: Identify Types of Academic Journal Articles: Literature Reviews"
1328:
2558:
2416:
2375:
2229:
1052:
826:
679:
667:
644:
371:
317:
217:
172:
2438:
2340:
1993:
1976:
1216:
1199:
930:
625:
There are various categories of review articles, including narrative reviews,
425:
329:
297:
269:
187:
177:
167:
2057:
2002:
1953:
1914:
1905:
1888:
1692:
1669:
1607:
1415:
1273:
1225:
1140:
956:
likewise specialize in review of a field; they are known as review journals.
2459:
2302:
1945:
1683:
Young, Suzanne (2022-02-16). "Writing Up and
Presenting Your Dissertation".
366:
2104:
2065:
2010:
1774:
1766:
1660:
1643:
1625:
1548:
1359:
1346:
1148:
1889:"Creative Destruction: The Structural Consequences of Scientific Curation"
2532:
2527:
2454:
2244:
1117:"Why publish review articles? Why write review articles for publication?"
740:
733:
671:
652:
634:
292:
90:
85:
45:
2091:
Woodward, A. M. (1977). "The roles of reviews in information transfer".
1329:"Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, version 6.3"
2469:
2433:
2380:
1423:
1294:
Littell, Julia H.; Corcoran, Jacqueline; Pillai, Vijayan (2008-03-13).
1265:
1032:
810:
748:
2111:
2517:
2280:
2270:
814:
756:
752:
27:
1198:
Palmatier, Robert W.; Houston, Mark B.; Hulland, John (2018-01-01).
2588:
2249:
1495:"Tips for writing your first scientific literature review article"
899:
717:
2297:
959:
The concept of "review article" is separate from the concept of
881:
frequently throughout. Review articles are academic but are not
648:
2115:
904:
Key differences between review articles and research articles.
865:. They often include raw data and statistics, using the words
739:
When finding sources, it is ideal to search through multiple
1975:
Ketcham, Catherine M.; Crawford, James M. (December 2007).
1685:
984:
that support the suggestions made at the end of the piece.
769:
Like most academic articles, a review article includes an '
1252:
Barczak, Gloria (2017-01-17). "Writing a Review
Article".
651:, missing important theoretical details pertaining to the
19:"Review journal" redirects here. For daily newspaper, see
566:, which also surveys and summarizes previously published
787:
and students alike to further their research. These are
2093:
Journal of the
American Society for Information Science
1443:"How to write a review article | Writing your paper"
1340:
1338:
2619:
2541:
2483:
2447:
2404:
2328:
2263:
2215:
2177:
2149:
1347:"What do Editors of General Medical Journals Want?"
1574:"Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review"
1200:"Review articles: purpose, process, and structure"
1023:Social, behavioural and health science disciplines
722:Exemplar of Alzheimer's Disease review article
2127:
1934:Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry
1887:McMahan, Peter; McFarland, Daniel A. (2021).
523:
8:
1930:"What IF? Does Impact Factor Really Matter?"
1793:The Regents of the University of California
1642:Brooks-Tatum, Shanesha R. F. (2012-02-01).
1204:Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
605:suggestions of where research might go next
2134:
2120:
2112:
897:the results of already published studies.
530:
516:
52:
32:
1992:
1904:
1756:
1659:
1615:
1597:
1358:
1304:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195326543.001.0001
1289:
1287:
1285:
1283:
1247:
1245:
1243:
1215:
934:and applicability of individual studies.
889:the results of a study (which would be a
1254:Journal of Product Innovation Management
461:Library and information science software
1808:"Preface: A "Peer-Invited" Publication"
1687:. London: Routledge. pp. 111–123.
1074:
696:Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
662:is more detailed and structured than a
44:
16:Summary of the understanding on a topic
1193:
1191:
1189:
1187:
1185:
805:Reference management software such as
637:. Sometimes these categories overlap.
456:Geographic information system software
2642:Academic databases and search engines
1637:
1635:
1543:
1541:
1539:
1464:
1462:
1437:
1435:
1433:
825:The process of review articles being
690:publishes systematic reviews (called
596:recent major advances and discoveries
7:
1372:
1370:
1296:Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis
1160:
1158:
1110:
1108:
937:Review articles come in the form of
834:Relevance within academic literature
1824:10.1146/annurev.an.33.090204.100001
1806:Durham, William H. (October 2004).
1726:"Have I Found A Scholarly Article?"
2412:Academic journal publishing reform
1818:(1): annurev.an.33.090204.100001.
1166:"LISTSERV 16.5 - Archives - Error"
851:Difference from a research article
593:the main people working in a field
14:
1115:Jerrells, Thomas R (2000-11-01).
991:The American Journal of Pathology
974:According to a 2021 study in the
2050:10.1111/j.0303-6987.2006.00340.x
599:significant gaps in the research
2032:Smoller, Bruce R. (June 2006).
1977:"The impact of review articles"
2038:Journal of Cutaneous Pathology
1572:Pautasso, Marco (2013-07-18).
1029:Handbook of Research Synthesis
713:Handbook of Research Synthesis
694:) on healthcare topics in the
1:
2672:Category:Scientific documents
1928:Roth, Kevin A. (April 2007).
1812:Annual Review of Anthropology
1133:10.1016/S0741-8329(00)00123-3
1027:Following the release of the
727:Structure of a review article
589:Review articles teach about:
2667:Category:Academic publishing
1893:American Sociological Review
1844:Deborah E. De Lange (2011).
1599:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003149
1083:"What's a "Review Article?""
977:American Sociological Review
550:that summarizes the current
1298:. Oxford University Press.
2734:
2485:Indexes and search engines
1578:PLOS Computational Biology
1043:within the medical field.
791:. Meyers and Sinding say,
764:Search engine optimisation
25:
18:
1994:10.1038/labinvest.3700688
1217:10.1007/s11747-017-0563-4
711:The first edition of the
483:Qualitative data analysis
1981:Laboratory Investigation
1906:10.1177/0003122421996323
1874:"Article Review Writing"
1693:10.4324/9781003016335-10
1003:Laboratory Investigation
997:The Journal of Pathology
941:and, more specifically,
562:or, in news publishing,
21:Las Vegas Review-Journal
2662:Style/formatting guides
2564:Scholarly communication
2264:Other publication types
1946:10.1369/jhc.7E7201.2007
1850:Edward Elgar Publishing
1789:"Scientific Literature"
1087:The University of Texas
1037:evidence-based practice
2604:Least publishable unit
2276:Collection of articles
2105:10.1002/asi.4630280306
1767:10.1001/jama.2014.9263
1661:10.7771/2380-176x.6077
1360:10.2349/biij.2.4.e54-8
1345:Rajendra Kale (2006).
1012:Science Citation Index
905:
723:
645:methodological process
552:state of understanding
362:Inferential statistics
308:Descriptive statistics
255:Human subject research
2594:Electronic publishing
2569:Scientific literature
2346:Article-level metrics
1553:jwu-ri.libanswers.com
1469:Morgan, Randa Lopez.
1055:, sometimes called a
945:; both are a form of
903:
721:
688:Cochrane organisation
146:Philosophical schools
2637:Open-access journals
2584:Open scientific data
2391:SCImago Journal Rank
2351:Author-level metrics
2336:Acknowledgment index
1524:guides.lib.umich.edu
947:secondary literature
676:co-citation analysis
471:Reference management
421:Scientific modelling
163:Critical rationalism
2698:Academic publishing
2632:Scientific journals
2143:Academic publishing
1590:2013PLSCB...9E3149P
1331:. Cochrane Library.
925:Review articles in
921:Academic publishing
893:), review articles
821:Peer review process
451:Argument technology
2652:Copyright policies
2647:University presses
2554:Scientific writing
2422:Citation advantage
2329:Impact and ranking
2162:Scientific journal
1518:Tschirhart, Lori.
1475:guides.lib.lsu.edu
1383:mvcc.libguides.com
1266:10.1111/jpim.12365
943:systematic reviews
939:literature reviews
906:
801:Method of research
724:
627:systematic reviews
445:Tools and software
389:Secondary research
313:Discourse analysis
2680:
2679:
2657:Preprint policies
2627:Academic journals
2610:Publish or perish
2465:Version of record
2405:Reform and access
2207:Literature review
1987:(12): 1174–1185.
1859:978-1-84980-727-2
1702:978-1-003-01633-5
1648:Against the Grain
1410:(2): xiii–xxiii.
1377:Ehrlich, Claire.
1313:978-0-19-532654-3
982:quantitative data
954:academic journals
927:academic journals
856:Research articles
840:empirical studies
789:secondary sources
734:original research
684:clinical research
660:systematic review
653:original research
641:Narrative reviews
572:secondary sources
540:
539:
506:Philosophy portal
414:Systematic review
399:Literature review
357:Historical method
340:Social experiment
275:Scientific method
260:Narrative inquiry
111:Interdisciplinary
105:Research strategy
76:Research question
71:Research proposal
2725:
2599:Ingelfinger rule
2513:Semantic Scholar
2235:Technical report
2157:Academic journal
2136:
2129:
2122:
2113:
2108:
2078:
2077:
2029:
2023:
2022:
1996:
1972:
1966:
1965:
1925:
1919:
1918:
1908:
1884:
1878:
1877:
1870:
1864:
1863:
1852:. pp. 1–5.
1841:
1835:
1834:
1832:
1830:
1803:
1797:
1796:
1785:
1779:
1778:
1760:
1751:(10): 999–1000.
1740:
1734:
1733:
1728:. Archived from
1721:
1715:
1714:
1680:
1674:
1673:
1663:
1639:
1630:
1629:
1619:
1601:
1569:
1563:
1562:
1560:
1559:
1545:
1534:
1533:
1531:
1530:
1515:
1509:
1508:
1506:
1505:
1491:
1485:
1484:
1482:
1481:
1466:
1457:
1456:
1454:
1453:
1439:
1428:
1427:
1399:
1393:
1392:
1390:
1389:
1374:
1365:
1364:
1362:
1342:
1333:
1332:
1324:
1318:
1317:
1291:
1278:
1277:
1249:
1238:
1237:
1219:
1195:
1180:
1179:
1177:
1176:
1170:listserv.utk.edu
1162:
1153:
1152:
1112:
1103:
1102:
1100:
1098:
1089:. Archived from
1079:
891:research article
885:. As opposed to
692:Cochrane Reviews
664:narrative review
576:tertiary sources
564:overview article
556:secondary source
532:
525:
518:
478:Science software
377:Cultural mapping
345:Quasi-experiment
335:Field experiment
303:Content analysis
198:Critical realism
116:Multimethodology
56:
33:
2733:
2732:
2728:
2727:
2726:
2724:
2723:
2722:
2703:Review journals
2683:
2682:
2681:
2676:
2615:
2574:Learned society
2537:
2479:
2443:
2400:
2371:Journal ranking
2361:Citation impact
2324:
2259:
2217:Grey literature
2211:
2173:
2145:
2140:
2090:
2087:
2085:Further reading
2082:
2081:
2031:
2030:
2026:
1974:
1973:
1969:
1927:
1926:
1922:
1886:
1885:
1881:
1872:
1871:
1867:
1860:
1843:
1842:
1838:
1828:
1826:
1805:
1804:
1800:
1787:
1786:
1782:
1758:10.1.1.648.3777
1742:
1741:
1737:
1723:
1722:
1718:
1703:
1682:
1681:
1677:
1641:
1640:
1633:
1584:(7): e1003149.
1571:
1570:
1566:
1557:
1555:
1547:
1546:
1537:
1528:
1526:
1517:
1516:
1512:
1503:
1501:
1493:
1492:
1488:
1479:
1477:
1468:
1467:
1460:
1451:
1449:
1447:Author Services
1441:
1440:
1431:
1401:
1400:
1396:
1387:
1385:
1376:
1375:
1368:
1344:
1343:
1336:
1326:
1325:
1321:
1314:
1293:
1292:
1281:
1251:
1250:
1241:
1197:
1196:
1183:
1174:
1172:
1164:
1163:
1156:
1114:
1113:
1106:
1096:
1094:
1081:
1080:
1076:
1071:
1057:clinical review
1049:
1041:clinical trials
1025:
972:
923:
853:
836:
823:
803:
729:
680:topic modelling
635:research method
623:
602:current debates
580:tertiary review
536:
500:
499:
446:
438:
437:
384:Phenomenography
323:Autoethnography
288:
280:
279:
240:Grounded theory
235:Critical theory
230:Art methodology
225:Action research
220:
210:
209:
148:
138:
137:
106:
98:
97:
66:
64:Research design
31:
24:
17:
12:
11:
5:
2731:
2729:
2721:
2720:
2715:
2710:
2705:
2700:
2695:
2685:
2684:
2678:
2677:
2675:
2674:
2669:
2664:
2659:
2654:
2649:
2644:
2639:
2634:
2629:
2623:
2621:
2617:
2616:
2614:
2613:
2606:
2601:
2596:
2591:
2586:
2581:
2576:
2571:
2566:
2561:
2556:
2551:
2545:
2543:
2542:Related topics
2539:
2538:
2536:
2535:
2530:
2525:
2523:Web of Science
2520:
2515:
2510:
2505:
2500:
2495:
2493:Google Scholar
2489:
2487:
2481:
2480:
2478:
2477:
2472:
2467:
2462:
2457:
2451:
2449:
2445:
2444:
2442:
2441:
2436:
2431:
2429:Serials crisis
2426:
2425:
2424:
2414:
2408:
2406:
2402:
2401:
2399:
2398:
2396:Scientometrics
2393:
2388:
2383:
2378:
2373:
2368:
2366:Citation index
2363:
2358:
2353:
2348:
2343:
2338:
2332:
2330:
2326:
2325:
2323:
2322:
2317:
2315:Poster session
2312:
2311:
2310:
2305:
2295:
2294:
2293:
2288:
2278:
2273:
2267:
2265:
2261:
2260:
2258:
2257:
2252:
2247:
2242:
2237:
2232:
2227:
2221:
2219:
2213:
2212:
2210:
2209:
2204:
2202:Position paper
2199:
2197:Review article
2194:
2193:
2192:
2181:
2179:
2175:
2174:
2172:
2171:
2170:
2169:
2159:
2153:
2151:
2147:
2146:
2141:
2139:
2138:
2131:
2124:
2116:
2110:
2109:
2099:(3): 175–180.
2086:
2083:
2080:
2079:
2044:(6): 458–461.
2024:
1967:
1940:(4): 313–314.
1920:
1899:(2): 341–376.
1879:
1865:
1858:
1836:
1798:
1780:
1735:
1732:on 2013-01-28.
1716:
1701:
1675:
1631:
1564:
1535:
1510:
1486:
1458:
1429:
1394:
1366:
1334:
1319:
1312:
1279:
1260:(2): 120–121.
1239:
1181:
1154:
1127:(3): 121–122.
1104:
1093:on 4 June 2011
1073:
1072:
1070:
1067:
1066:
1065:
1060:
1048:
1045:
1024:
1021:
971:
968:
922:
919:
918:
917:
913:
910:
863:primary source
852:
849:
835:
832:
822:
819:
802:
799:
745:search engines
728:
725:
622:
619:
607:
606:
603:
600:
597:
594:
560:survey article
544:review article
538:
537:
535:
534:
527:
520:
512:
509:
508:
502:
501:
498:
497:
496:
495:
490:
485:
475:
474:
473:
468:
458:
453:
447:
444:
443:
440:
439:
436:
435:
430:
429:
428:
418:
417:
416:
411:
409:Scoping review
406:
401:
396:
386:
381:
380:
379:
369:
364:
359:
354:
352:Field research
349:
348:
347:
342:
337:
327:
326:
325:
315:
310:
305:
300:
295:
289:
286:
285:
282:
281:
278:
277:
272:
267:
262:
257:
252:
250:Historiography
247:
242:
237:
232:
227:
221:
216:
215:
212:
211:
208:
207:
206:
205:
203:Subtle realism
200:
190:
185:
183:Postpositivism
180:
175:
170:
165:
160:
158:Constructivism
155:
153:Antipositivism
149:
144:
143:
140:
139:
136:
135:
130:
129:
128:
118:
113:
107:
104:
103:
100:
99:
96:
95:
94:
93:
88:
78:
73:
67:
62:
61:
58:
57:
49:
48:
42:
41:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2730:
2719:
2716:
2714:
2711:
2709:
2706:
2704:
2701:
2699:
2696:
2694:
2693:Meta-analysis
2691:
2690:
2688:
2673:
2670:
2668:
2665:
2663:
2660:
2658:
2655:
2653:
2650:
2648:
2645:
2643:
2640:
2638:
2635:
2633:
2630:
2628:
2625:
2624:
2622:
2618:
2611:
2607:
2605:
2602:
2600:
2597:
2595:
2592:
2590:
2587:
2585:
2582:
2580:
2579:Open research
2577:
2575:
2572:
2570:
2567:
2565:
2562:
2560:
2557:
2555:
2552:
2550:
2547:
2546:
2544:
2540:
2534:
2531:
2529:
2526:
2524:
2521:
2519:
2516:
2514:
2511:
2509:
2506:
2504:
2501:
2499:
2496:
2494:
2491:
2490:
2488:
2486:
2482:
2476:
2473:
2471:
2468:
2466:
2463:
2461:
2458:
2456:
2453:
2452:
2450:
2446:
2440:
2437:
2435:
2432:
2430:
2427:
2423:
2420:
2419:
2418:
2415:
2413:
2410:
2409:
2407:
2403:
2397:
2394:
2392:
2389:
2387:
2386:Impact factor
2384:
2382:
2379:
2377:
2374:
2372:
2369:
2367:
2364:
2362:
2359:
2357:
2356:Bibliometrics
2354:
2352:
2349:
2347:
2344:
2342:
2339:
2337:
2334:
2333:
2331:
2327:
2321:
2318:
2316:
2313:
2309:
2306:
2304:
2301:
2300:
2299:
2296:
2292:
2289:
2287:
2284:
2283:
2282:
2279:
2277:
2274:
2272:
2269:
2268:
2266:
2262:
2256:
2253:
2251:
2248:
2246:
2243:
2241:
2240:Annual report
2238:
2236:
2233:
2231:
2228:
2226:
2225:Working paper
2223:
2222:
2220:
2218:
2214:
2208:
2205:
2203:
2200:
2198:
2195:
2191:
2188:
2187:
2186:
2183:
2182:
2180:
2176:
2168:
2167:Public health
2165:
2164:
2163:
2160:
2158:
2155:
2154:
2152:
2148:
2144:
2137:
2132:
2130:
2125:
2123:
2118:
2117:
2114:
2106:
2102:
2098:
2094:
2089:
2088:
2084:
2075:
2071:
2067:
2063:
2059:
2055:
2051:
2047:
2043:
2039:
2035:
2028:
2025:
2020:
2016:
2012:
2008:
2004:
2000:
1995:
1990:
1986:
1982:
1978:
1971:
1968:
1963:
1959:
1955:
1951:
1947:
1943:
1939:
1935:
1931:
1924:
1921:
1916:
1912:
1907:
1902:
1898:
1894:
1890:
1883:
1880:
1875:
1869:
1866:
1861:
1855:
1851:
1847:
1840:
1837:
1825:
1821:
1817:
1813:
1809:
1802:
1799:
1794:
1790:
1784:
1781:
1776:
1772:
1768:
1764:
1759:
1754:
1750:
1746:
1739:
1736:
1731:
1727:
1724:John Siegel.
1720:
1717:
1712:
1708:
1704:
1698:
1694:
1690:
1686:
1679:
1676:
1671:
1667:
1662:
1657:
1653:
1649:
1645:
1638:
1636:
1632:
1627:
1623:
1618:
1613:
1609:
1605:
1600:
1595:
1591:
1587:
1583:
1579:
1575:
1568:
1565:
1554:
1550:
1544:
1542:
1540:
1536:
1525:
1521:
1514:
1511:
1500:
1499:www.asbmb.org
1496:
1490:
1487:
1476:
1472:
1465:
1463:
1459:
1448:
1444:
1438:
1436:
1434:
1430:
1425:
1421:
1417:
1413:
1409:
1405:
1404:MIS Quarterly
1398:
1395:
1384:
1380:
1373:
1371:
1367:
1361:
1356:
1352:
1348:
1341:
1339:
1335:
1330:
1323:
1320:
1315:
1309:
1305:
1301:
1297:
1290:
1288:
1286:
1284:
1280:
1275:
1271:
1267:
1263:
1259:
1255:
1248:
1246:
1244:
1240:
1235:
1231:
1227:
1223:
1218:
1213:
1209:
1205:
1201:
1194:
1192:
1190:
1188:
1186:
1182:
1171:
1167:
1161:
1159:
1155:
1150:
1146:
1142:
1138:
1134:
1130:
1126:
1122:
1118:
1111:
1109:
1105:
1092:
1088:
1084:
1078:
1075:
1068:
1064:
1063:Living review
1061:
1058:
1054:
1051:
1050:
1046:
1044:
1042:
1038:
1034:
1030:
1022:
1020:
1016:
1013:
1007:
1005:
1004:
999:
998:
993:
992:
985:
983:
979:
978:
969:
967:
964:
962:
961:peer-reviewed
957:
955:
950:
948:
944:
940:
935:
932:
928:
920:
914:
911:
908:
907:
902:
898:
896:
892:
888:
884:
880:
876:
872:
868:
864:
859:
857:
850:
848:
844:
841:
833:
831:
828:
827:peer-reviewed
820:
818:
816:
812:
808:
800:
798:
797:
792:
790:
785:
784:incompetent."
779:
775:
772:
767:
765:
760:
758:
754:
750:
746:
742:
737:
735:
726:
720:
716:
714:
709:
704:
703:meta-analysis
699:
697:
693:
689:
685:
681:
677:
673:
669:
665:
661:
656:
654:
650:
646:
642:
638:
636:
632:
631:meta-analysis
628:
620:
618:
614:
612:
604:
601:
598:
595:
592:
591:
590:
587:
583:
581:
577:
573:
569:
565:
561:
557:
553:
549:
545:
533:
528:
526:
521:
519:
514:
513:
511:
510:
507:
504:
503:
494:
491:
489:
486:
484:
481:
480:
479:
476:
472:
469:
467:
466:Bibliometrics
464:
463:
462:
459:
457:
454:
452:
449:
448:
442:
441:
434:
431:
427:
424:
423:
422:
419:
415:
412:
410:
407:
405:
404:Meta-analysis
402:
400:
397:
395:
394:Bibliometrics
392:
391:
390:
387:
385:
382:
378:
375:
374:
373:
370:
368:
365:
363:
360:
358:
355:
353:
350:
346:
343:
341:
338:
336:
333:
332:
331:
328:
324:
321:
320:
319:
316:
314:
311:
309:
306:
304:
301:
299:
296:
294:
291:
290:
284:
283:
276:
273:
271:
268:
266:
265:Phenomenology
263:
261:
258:
256:
253:
251:
248:
246:
243:
241:
238:
236:
233:
231:
228:
226:
223:
222:
219:
214:
213:
204:
201:
199:
196:
195:
194:
191:
189:
186:
184:
181:
179:
176:
174:
171:
169:
166:
164:
161:
159:
156:
154:
151:
150:
147:
142:
141:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:
122:
119:
117:
114:
112:
109:
108:
102:
101:
92:
89:
87:
84:
83:
82:
79:
77:
74:
72:
69:
68:
65:
60:
59:
55:
51:
50:
47:
43:
39:
35:
34:
29:
22:
2196:
2096:
2092:
2041:
2037:
2027:
1984:
1980:
1970:
1937:
1933:
1923:
1896:
1892:
1882:
1868:
1845:
1839:
1829:21 September
1827:. Retrieved
1815:
1811:
1801:
1792:
1783:
1748:
1744:
1738:
1730:the original
1719:
1684:
1678:
1651:
1647:
1581:
1577:
1567:
1556:. Retrieved
1552:
1527:. Retrieved
1523:
1513:
1502:. Retrieved
1498:
1489:
1478:. Retrieved
1474:
1450:. Retrieved
1446:
1407:
1403:
1397:
1386:. Retrieved
1382:
1350:
1322:
1295:
1257:
1253:
1207:
1203:
1173:. Retrieved
1169:
1124:
1120:
1095:. Retrieved
1091:the original
1086:
1077:
1056:
1028:
1026:
1017:
1008:
1001:
995:
989:
986:
975:
973:
965:
958:
951:
936:
931:experimental
924:
894:
886:
878:
874:
870:
867:participants
866:
860:
854:
845:
837:
824:
804:
795:
793:
782:
780:
776:
768:
761:
738:
730:
712:
700:
691:
657:
639:
624:
615:
608:
588:
584:
563:
559:
543:
541:
245:Hermeneutics
133:Quantitative
2559:Peer review
2439:#ICanHazPDF
2417:Open access
2376:Eigenfactor
2320:Proceedings
2230:White paper
1053:Case series
916:guidelines.
668:text mining
318:Ethnography
218:Methodology
173:Fallibilism
121:Qualitative
91:Referencing
2718:Literature
2687:Categories
2475:Retraction
2448:Versioning
2341:Altmetrics
2286:Biological
1558:2022-05-10
1529:2022-05-10
1504:2022-05-10
1480:2022-05-10
1452:2022-05-10
1388:2022-05-10
1210:(1): 1–5.
1175:2022-05-10
1069:References
887:presenting
879:experiment
621:Categories
611:meta-study
493:Statistics
488:Simulation
426:Simulation
367:Interviews
330:Experiment
298:Case study
270:Pragmatism
188:Pragmatism
178:Positivism
168:Empiricism
2460:Postprint
2303:Monograph
2255:Lab notes
2058:0303-6987
2003:1530-0307
1954:0022-1554
1915:0003-1224
1753:CiteSeerX
1711:246907163
1670:2380-176X
1608:1553-7358
1416:0276-7783
1274:0737-6782
1234:168954586
1226:1552-7824
1141:0741-8329
883:empirical
771:abstract'
741:databases
126:Art-based
2713:Academia
2708:Research
2533:OpenAlex
2528:Paperity
2455:Preprint
2291:Chemical
2245:Pamphlet
2190:Abstract
2150:Journals
2074:13426464
2066:16776724
2019:19634133
2011:17952095
1962:85573154
1775:25203078
1626:23874189
1149:11163118
1047:See also
895:evaluate
875:subjects
708:journals
672:citation
293:Analysis
86:Argument
46:Research
38:a series
36:Part of
2549:Imprint
2470:Erratum
2434:Sci-Hub
2381:h-index
2308:Chapter
1617:3715443
1586:Bibcode
1424:4132319
1121:Alcohol
1033:MEDLINE
811:EndNote
749:Medline
568:primary
548:article
372:Mapping
287:Methods
193:Realism
81:Writing
2518:Scopus
2498:AMiner
2281:Patent
2271:Thesis
2178:Papers
2072:
2064:
2056:
2017:
2009:
2001:
1960:
1952:
1913:
1856:
1773:
1755:
1709:
1699:
1668:
1624:
1614:
1606:
1422:
1414:
1310:
1272:
1232:
1224:
1147:
1139:
1097:8 June
1000:, and
970:Impact
877:, and
871:sample
815:Zotero
813:, and
807:Papers
757:CINAHL
753:Embase
686:, the
678:, and
649:biased
629:, and
546:is an
433:Survey
28:Review
2620:Lists
2589:ORCID
2250:Essay
2185:Paper
2070:S2CID
2015:S2CID
1958:S2CID
1707:S2CID
1654:(1).
1420:JSTOR
1230:S2CID
952:Some
2508:CORE
2503:BASE
2298:Book
2062:PMID
2054:ISSN
2007:PMID
1999:ISSN
1950:ISSN
1911:ISSN
1854:ISBN
1831:2021
1771:PMID
1745:JAMA
1697:ISBN
1666:ISSN
1622:PMID
1604:ISSN
1412:ISSN
1308:ISBN
1270:ISSN
1222:ISSN
1145:PMID
1137:ISSN
1099:2011
755:and
743:and
570:and
2101:doi
2046:doi
1989:doi
1942:doi
1901:doi
1820:doi
1763:doi
1749:312
1689:doi
1656:doi
1612:PMC
1594:doi
1355:doi
1300:doi
1262:doi
1212:doi
1129:doi
2689::
2097:28
2095:.
2068:.
2060:.
2052:.
2042:33
2040:.
2036:.
2013:.
2005:.
1997:.
1985:87
1983:.
1979:.
1956:.
1948:.
1938:55
1936:.
1932:.
1909:.
1897:86
1895:.
1891:.
1848:.
1816:33
1814:.
1810:.
1791:.
1769:.
1761:.
1747:.
1705:.
1695:.
1664:.
1652:24
1650:.
1646:.
1634:^
1620:.
1610:.
1602:.
1592:.
1580:.
1576:.
1551:.
1538:^
1522:.
1497:.
1473:.
1461:^
1445:.
1432:^
1418:.
1408:26
1406:.
1381:.
1369:^
1349:.
1337:^
1306:.
1282:^
1268:.
1258:34
1256:.
1242:^
1228:.
1220:.
1208:46
1206:.
1202:.
1184:^
1168:.
1157:^
1143:.
1135:.
1125:22
1123:.
1119:.
1107:^
1085:.
994:,
873:,
869:,
809:,
759:.
751:,
701:A
698:.
674:,
670:,
658:A
609:A
582:.
542:A
40:on
2612:"
2608:"
2135:e
2128:t
2121:v
2107:.
2103::
2076:.
2048::
2021:.
1991::
1964:.
1944::
1917:.
1903::
1876:.
1862:.
1833:.
1822::
1795:.
1777:.
1765::
1713:.
1691::
1672:.
1658::
1628:.
1596::
1588::
1582:9
1561:.
1532:.
1507:.
1483:.
1455:.
1426:.
1391:.
1363:.
1357::
1316:.
1302::
1276:.
1264::
1236:.
1214::
1178:.
1151:.
1131::
1101:.
794:"
531:e
524:t
517:v
30:.
23:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
