Knowledge (XXG)

Postage stamp separation

Source 📝

309:. The Bemrose machine was designed as a rouletting machine. As such, it proved impracticable for stamp separation but in 1856 was successfully converted to a perforating machine by George C. Howard of Toppan Carpenter, stamp printers for the American Government. Both the stroke and rotary processes have been refined since then, but are basically still the ones in use in the 21st century. The key decision for the perforator is the spacing of the holes; if too far apart, the stamps will not separate easily, and the stamps are likely to tear, but if too close, the stamps will tend to come apart in normal handling. In a few cases the size of the holes has been a factor. In the case of certain stamps produced by Australia for sale in rolls rather than sheets (coil stamps) a pattern can be seen on the stamp's short side of two small, ten large and two small holes. 293:
row to be perforated in a single operation, and this became known as "comb" perforation. Perforation trials were conducted in 1849 and 1850 under the auspices of the British Government and stamps from these trials were first issued towards the end of 1850. The Archer machine proved the viability of the process but never entered service. Archer's patent for his perforating machine (no. 12,340 of 1848, dated May 23, 1849) was purchased for £4,000 in June 1853. New machines based on Archer's principles were constructed by David Napier and Son Ltd; these were initially used in October 1853 for revenue stamps and from January 1854 for postage stamps.
414:, meaning that the stamps themselves are cut entirely apart, held together only by the backing paper. At first the backing paper was itself solid, but in a repeat of history, is now slightly rouletted so as to facilitate tearing off blocks of stamps without having to remove them from the backing. Since the diecut goes all the way through the stamp, any shape will work, and the original self-adhesives were straight-edged. However, the tradition of perforation is so strong that more recent self-adhesives have a wavy diecut 190: 138: 182: 170: 162: 248:, and had to be cut from the sheet with scissors or knife. This was time-consuming and error-prone (as mangled stamps of the era attest). Once reliable separation equipment became available, nations switched rapidly. Imperforate stamps have been issued occasionally since then, either because separation equipment was temporarily unavailable (in newborn nations for instance), to makers of automatic 33: 130: 431:
For the stamp collector, perforations matter, not only as a way to distinguish different stamps (a perf 10 may be rarer and more valuable than a perf 11 of the same design), but also as part of the condition of stamps. Short or "nibbed" perfs are undesirable and reduce value, as are bent or creased
288:
and the Inland Revenue. Two such machines were built. After experimentation both machines proved to be failures. From one machine a few stamps from Plates 70 and 71 have survived. This machine consisted of lancet-shaped blades working on a fly-press principle and piercing the paper with a series of
328:
Stamps that are perforated on one pair of opposite sides and imperforate on the other have most often been produced in coils instead of sheets, but they can sometimes come from booklet panes. Booklet panes can be associated with any combination of one, two or three imperforate sides. Sheet edges
292:
Archer then abandoned this approach in favour of perforation, a process which used rows of small round pins to punch out the holes. In 1848 Archer patented his perforation machine which worked on the "stroke" principle. The arrangement of the pins enabled the top and sides of each stamp across the
348:
uses small cuts in the paper instead of holes. It was used by a number of countries, but was rarely if ever seen on modern stamps until the die-cut serpentine roulette self-adhesive varieties appeared. Varieties, often described by philatelists in French terms, include straight cuts
422:
fibers on each tooth, while simulated perforations are smooth. From 2012 to 2016 the United States also sold small numbers of the stamps issued during this period in sheets without die cuts, thus creating imperforated varieties of them. Their issuance was very controversial.
150: 457:
meaning that they are not separated on all sides. Although it is very common to have different gauges of perforation horizontally and vertically, in rare circumstances a stamp may have different perforations on opposite sides; in the case of
336:
which are uneven, either skipping a hole or by making some holes larger. In the 1990s, Great Britain began adding large elliptical holes to the perforations on each side, as an anti-counterfeiting measure.
452:
are common, occurring when a hole is not completely punched out, as are off-center perfs that cut into the design of the stamp, sometimes very badly. Occasionally pairs or larger groups of stamps may be
185:"Bantam" stamps from South West Africa showing normal and rouletted perforations. Three stamps could be printed using the paper normally used for one. Produced during World War II as an economy measure. 193:
This pair of coil stamps clearly shows the pattern of perforation holes; also, on the left side of the pair, the stamp was torn, while on the right the perforations were cut with scissors or knife.
624: 436:, which has preprinted patterns of holes in a selection of common perforations, requiring one merely to line up the stamp's perforations with the closest match. Rare stamps are often 321:
of an individual stamp) in a 2-centimeter span. The finest gauge ever used is 18 on stamps of the Malay States in the early 1950s, and the coarsest is 2, seen on the 1891 stamps of
681: 391:. Because self-adhesive stamps contain a sticky layer, it is far easier to roulette the separations, than to actually punch out the holes for perforations. 50: 614: 737: 651: 597: 568: 280:
of the United Kingdom constructed the first (rouletting) machine, the "Archer Roulette", to separate stamps. His plan, submitted to the
97: 69: 709: 521: 281: 116: 141:
Separation of imperforate stamps by scissors, knife or tearing often leads to uneven margins on the stamp as in this 1853 stamp of
76: 777: 54: 666: 329:
can produce any one imperforate side or two adjacent imperforate sides when the stamp comes from the corner of the sheet.
83: 475: 265: 701: 513: 462:
stamps only a handful of these are known to exist. The various types of perforation errors are collectively known as
65: 418:
the perforation. It can be recognized by studying the edge of the stamp closely; true perforations will have torn
43: 437: 249: 432:
perfs. Although the collector could count the number of holes using a ruler, the usual practice is to use a
189: 748: 137: 90: 619: 142: 419: 285: 232: 181: 306: 733: 705: 647: 593: 564: 517: 433: 227: 161: 761: 257: 169: 723:
The Stamp Collector's Guidebook of Worldwide Watermarks and Perforations, from 1840 to date
643: 589: 560: 302: 536:"Stamp Perforation: The Somerset House Years 1848 to 1880 (Ray Simpson and Peter Sargent) 448:
As is inevitable for a mechanical process like perforation, many things can go wrong.
261: 545:"The Bemrose Perforating Machine", The London Philatelist, February 2009 (Ray Simpson) 771: 459: 253: 198: 174: 205:
is the means by which individual stamps are made easily detachable from each other.
407: 395: 277: 507: 317:
The standard for describing perforation is the number of holes (or the "teeth" or
410:
in 1964, and by the 1990s these stamps came into wide use. These are inevitably
213: 32: 149: 394:
A few types of stamps have combined rouletting and perforation, for instance
154: 483:– stamps perforated across the middle with letters or a pattern or monogram 17: 129: 388: 165:
Perforated and imperforate versions of the same Austrian stamp of 1920
762:
Images of different types of perforations, misperforations and errors
480: 322: 188: 180: 168: 160: 148: 136: 128: 244:
In the early years, from 1840 until 1850, all stamps were issued
157:, from Plate 70, perforated with the Archer experimental roulette 730:
Stamp Perforations with Particular Emphasis on Canadian Stamps
638:
Kloetzel, James E.; et al., eds. (2008). "South Africa".
555:
Kloetzel, James E.; et al., eds. (2008). "Introduction".
26: 325:. Modern stamp perforations tend to range from 11 to 14. 284:
on 1 October 1847, was referred to the departments of the
732:. Ottawa: British North America Philatelic Society, 2009 584:
Kloetzel, James E.; et al., eds. (2008). "Finland".
680:(Sharp Photography Publications, 2021) ASIN B091MBTGJ7 256:did this in the 1900s and 1910s), as novelties for 57:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. 725:. Racine, WI.: Whitman Publishing Co., 1966 256p. 301:Also in 1854 a "rotary process" was patented by 231:: cut paper to shape using a metal die—used for 667:USPS press sheets: more questions than answers 642:. Vol. 6 (165th ed.). Sidney, Ohio: 588:. Vol. 2 (165th ed.). Sidney, Ohio: 559:. Vol. 1 (165th ed.). Sidney, Ohio: 8: 406:The first self-adhesive stamp was issued by 381: 373: 365: 357: 350: 640:Scott 2009 Standard Postage Stamp Catalogue 586:Scott 2009 Standard Postage Stamp Catalogue 557:Scott 2009 Standard Postage Stamp Catalogue 379:), sawtooth and the serpentine roulettes ( 217:: cutting rows and columns of small holes 117:Learn how and when to remove this message 615:"Stamp separation appears in many forms" 260:(particularly when stamps are issued in 498: 678:A Sharp Eye on collecting US Classics 627:from the original on 2 February 2017. 440:in case they have been reperforated. 7: 751:, March 1954, Vol. XXCII, No. 7. 3p. 223:: small horizontal and vertical cuts 55:adding citations to reliable sources 613:Baadke, Michael (2 November 1998). 25: 31: 208:Methods of separation include: 133:The Penny Black is imperforate. 42:needs additional citations for 387:) used by the early stamps of 363:with inked cutting bar), arc ( 1: 476:Errors, freaks, and oddities 702:American Philatelic Society 514:American Philatelic Society 506:Williams, Louis N. (1990). 794: 313:Measurement and variations 173:A rouletted United States 66:"Postage stamp separation" 698:Fundamentals of Philately 509:Fundamentals of Philately 359:percée en lignes colorées 745:Centenary Of Perforation 334:syncopated perforations 250:stamp vending equipment 778:Philatelic terminology 743:Williams, L.N. and M. 696:Williams, L.N. and M. 488:References and sources 382: 374: 366: 358: 351: 194: 186: 178: 166: 158: 146: 134: 749:Gibbons Stamp Monthly 512:. State College, PA: 192: 184: 172: 164: 152: 140: 132: 644:Scott Publishing Co. 592:pp. 1119–1120. 590:Scott Publishing Co. 561:Scott Publishing Co. 402:Self-adhesive stamps 233:self-adhesive stamps 51:improve this article 455:imperforate between 371:), sewing-machine ( 332:Variations include 286:General Post Office 383:perce en serpentin 307:Henry Howe Bemrose 297:The rotary process 282:Postmaster General 195: 187: 179: 167: 159: 147: 135: 738:978-1-89739-148-8 704:, 1990) Chap. 15 653:978-0-89487-417-8 620:Linn's Stamp News 599:978-0-89487-417-8 570:978-0-89487-417-8 434:perforation gauge 153:Vertical pair of 143:Van Diemen's Land 127: 126: 119: 101: 16:(Redirected from 785: 721:Felix, Ervin J. 684: 675: 669: 664: 658: 657: 635: 629: 628: 610: 604: 603: 581: 575: 574: 552: 546: 543: 537: 534: 528: 527: 503: 385: 377: 369: 361: 354: 352:percée en lignes 258:stamp collectors 122: 115: 111: 108: 102: 100: 59: 35: 27: 21: 793: 792: 788: 787: 786: 784: 783: 782: 768: 767: 758: 718: 716:Further reading 688: 687: 676: 672: 665: 661: 654: 637: 636: 632: 612: 611: 607: 600: 583: 582: 578: 571: 554: 553: 549: 544: 540: 535: 531: 524: 516:. p. 756. 505: 504: 500: 490: 472: 446: 429: 404: 375:perce en points 343: 315: 303:William Bemrose 299: 274: 262:souvenir sheets 242: 123: 112: 106: 103: 60: 58: 48: 36: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 791: 789: 781: 780: 770: 769: 766: 765: 757: 756:External links 754: 753: 752: 741: 728:Johnson, R.A. 726: 717: 714: 713: 712: 693: 692: 686: 685: 670: 659: 652: 630: 605: 598: 576: 569: 547: 538: 529: 522: 497: 496: 495: 494: 489: 486: 485: 484: 478: 471: 468: 445: 442: 428: 425: 403: 400: 342: 339: 314: 311: 298: 295: 273: 270: 241: 238: 237: 236: 224: 218: 199:postage stamps 125: 124: 39: 37: 30: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 790: 779: 776: 775: 773: 763: 760: 759: 755: 750: 746: 742: 739: 735: 731: 727: 724: 720: 719: 715: 711: 710:0-933580-13-4 707: 703: 699: 695: 694: 690: 689: 683: 682:(read online) 679: 674: 671: 668: 663: 660: 655: 649: 645: 641: 634: 631: 626: 622: 621: 616: 609: 606: 601: 595: 591: 587: 580: 577: 572: 566: 563:p. 23A. 562: 558: 551: 548: 542: 539: 533: 530: 525: 523:0-933580-13-4 519: 515: 511: 510: 502: 499: 492: 491: 487: 482: 479: 477: 474: 473: 469: 467: 465: 461: 456: 451: 443: 441: 439: 435: 426: 424: 421: 417: 413: 409: 401: 399: 397: 392: 390: 386: 384: 378: 376: 370: 368: 367:percée en arc 362: 360: 353: 347: 340: 338: 335: 330: 326: 324: 320: 312: 310: 308: 304: 296: 294: 290: 287: 283: 279: 271: 269: 267: 263: 259: 255: 254:United States 251: 247: 239: 234: 230: 229: 225: 222: 219: 216: 215: 211: 210: 209: 206: 204: 200: 191: 183: 176: 175:revenue stamp 171: 163: 156: 151: 144: 139: 131: 121: 118: 110: 99: 96: 92: 89: 85: 82: 78: 75: 71: 68: –  67: 63: 62:Find sources: 56: 52: 46: 45: 40:This article 38: 34: 29: 28: 19: 744: 729: 722: 697: 677: 673: 662: 646:p. 37. 639: 633: 618: 608: 585: 579: 556: 550: 541: 532: 508: 501: 463: 454: 449: 447: 430: 415: 411: 408:Sierra Leone 405: 396:South Africa 393: 380: 372: 364: 356: 345: 344: 333: 331: 327: 318: 316: 300: 291: 278:Henry Archer 275: 272:Henry Archer 245: 243: 226: 220: 212: 207: 202: 196: 113: 104: 94: 87: 80: 73: 61: 49:Please help 44:verification 41: 450:Blind perfs 246:imperforate 240:Early years 214:perforation 438:expertized 427:Collecting 416:simulating 346:Rouletting 341:Rouletting 228:diecutting 221:rouletting 203:separation 107:April 2014 77:newspapers 18:Rouletting 398:in 1942. 276:In 1847, 264:), or as 772:Category 625:Archived 470:See also 464:misperfs 691:Sources 389:Finland 177:of 1898 91:scholar 747:. In: 736:  708:  650:  596:  567:  520:  481:Perfin 444:Errors 412:diecut 355:, and 323:Bhopal 289:cuts. 266:errors 155:1d red 93:  86:  79:  72:  64:  740:100p. 493:Notes 420:paper 319:perfs 252:(the 98:JSTOR 84:books 734:ISBN 706:ISBN 648:ISBN 594:ISBN 565:ISBN 518:ISBN 305:and 197:For 70:news 53:by 774:: 623:. 617:. 466:. 460:US 268:. 201:, 764:. 700:( 656:. 602:. 573:. 526:. 349:( 235:. 145:. 120:) 114:( 109:) 105:( 95:· 88:· 81:· 74:· 47:. 20:)

Index

Rouletting

verification
improve this article
adding citations to reliable sources
"Postage stamp separation"
news
newspapers
books
scholar
JSTOR
Learn how and when to remove this message


Van Diemen's Land

1d red


revenue stamp


postage stamps
perforation
diecutting
self-adhesive stamps
stamp vending equipment
United States
stamp collectors
souvenir sheets

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.