Knowledge (XXG)

Stagger (aeronautics)

Source 📝

31: 20: 170:
Lift comes from having air at a lower pressure above the wing than below. In the case of aircraft with more than one wing, one above the other, the higher pressure below the upper wing and the lower pressure above the lower wing will tend to equalize and so reduce the lift available. The closer
171:
together the wings are the more dramatic is this effect. The effect can be reduced by either increasing the gap between the wings, or moving one forward of the other. As increasing the gap may introduce other undesirable effects, stagger is usually applied to reduce the loss of lift.
153:
is the distance from the leading edge of the upper wing along its chord to the point of intersection of the chord with a line drawn perpendicularly to the chord of the upper wing at the leading edge of the lower wing, all lines being drawn in a plane parallel to the plane of symmetry.
162:
As a general rule, there is a tendency for the upper wing to contribute a greater proportion of the total lift than the lower with positive stagger, and less with negative stagger. Increase in positive stagger also tends to move the
174:
Positive stagger is by far the most common, as this positioning of the upper wing(s) allows better visibility for the crew as well as increased aircraft longitudinal
167:
forward on the upper wing and backward on the lower wing. When unstaggered, the centers of pressure for upper and lower wings are almost coincidental.
164: 258: 216: 35: 343: 98: 149:
had a stagger of 0.91 m and a gap of 2.0 m, so the stagger might be written as 0.91 m, 0.455, 45.5% or 24.5°.
86: 67: 82: 24: 300: 270: 234: 321: 110: 254: 212: 81:, when the upper wing is positioned forward of the lower (bottom) wing, Examples include the 51: 175: 94: 146: 106: 337: 93:
in unusual cases where the upper wing is positioned behind the lower wing, as in the
125:
say, but it may also be written as a fraction or percentage of the 'gap' (distance
101:. An aircraft with the wings positioned directly above each other is said to have 30: 285: 289:
The Air Forces on a Systematic Series of Biplane and Triplane Cellule Models
16:
Distance one wing is positioned in front of another in a multiwing aircraft
312:
Charles Hampton Grant. Model Airplane Design and Theory of Flight (1941).
238:
Wind Tunnel Pressure Distribution Tests on a Series of Biplane Wing Models
187: 63: 43: 274:
The Distribution of Loads Between the Wings of a Biplane Having Decalage
59: 19: 55: 29: 18: 327:(September 1921), pp.1,3,4. Retrieved on 9 February 2009. 137:. It may also be presented as an angle equal to tan( 276:(November 1927), p.3. Retrieved on 9 February 2009. 240:(July 1929), p.17. Retrieved on 8 February 2009. 121:The value is sometimes expressed as a distance, 301:Biplane and triplane wing lift and efficiency 253:. (1971). London: Putnam Publishing Co. Ltd. 8: 178:, aerodynamic efficiency and maximum lift. 89:. Conversely, an aeroplane is said to have 291:(1927), p.6. Retrieved on 9 February 2009. 303:George White. Retrieved on 2nd Nov 2020. 230: 228: 211:(first ed.). Osprey. p. 250. 199: 7: 325:The Effect of Staggering a Biplane 14: 54:fore-aft positioning of stacked 36:Beechcraft Model 17 Staggerwing 1: 286:NACA technical report No.256 271:NACA technical report No.269 235:NACA technical report No.310 73:An aircraft is said to have 322:NACA technical report No.70 251:Gloster Aircraft since 1917 23:Positive wing stagger of a 360: 99:Beech Model 17 Staggerwing 209:A Dictionary of Aviation 207:Wragg, David W. (1973). 83:de Havilland Tiger Moth 25:de Havilland Tiger Moth 39: 34:Negative stagger of a 27: 129:between wings), i.e. 33: 22: 344:Wing configurations 165:center of pressure 111:Vickers Vildebeest 40: 28: 249:James, Derek N., 105:wings, as in the 351: 328: 319: 313: 310: 304: 298: 292: 283: 277: 268: 262: 247: 241: 232: 223: 222: 204: 91:negative stagger 75:positive stagger 50:is the relative 359: 358: 354: 353: 352: 350: 349: 348: 334: 333: 332: 331: 320: 316: 311: 307: 299: 295: 284: 280: 269: 265: 248: 244: 233: 226: 219: 206: 205: 201: 196: 184: 160: 119: 95:Sopwith Dolphin 17: 12: 11: 5: 357: 355: 347: 346: 336: 335: 330: 329: 314: 305: 293: 278: 263: 242: 224: 217: 198: 197: 195: 192: 191: 190: 183: 180: 159: 156: 147:Gloster TSR.38 118: 115: 107:Sopwith Cuckoo 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 356: 345: 342: 341: 339: 326: 323: 318: 315: 309: 306: 302: 297: 294: 290: 287: 282: 279: 275: 272: 267: 264: 260: 259:0-370-00084-6 256: 252: 246: 243: 239: 236: 231: 229: 225: 220: 218:9780850451634 214: 210: 203: 200: 193: 189: 186: 185: 181: 179: 177: 172: 168: 166: 157: 155: 152: 148: 144: 140: 136: 132: 128: 124: 116: 114: 112: 108: 104: 100: 96: 92: 88: 84: 80: 76: 71: 69: 65: 61: 57: 53: 49: 45: 37: 32: 26: 21: 324: 317: 308: 296: 288: 281: 273: 266: 250: 245: 237: 208: 202: 173: 169: 161: 150: 142: 138: 134: 130: 126: 122: 120: 102: 90: 78: 77:, or simply 74: 72: 47: 41: 117:Measurement 103:unstaggered 194:References 68:multiplane 52:horizontal 176:stability 38:in Alaska 338:Category 261:page 204 188:Decalage 182:See also 87:Stearman 64:triplane 48:stagger 44:aviation 158:Effects 145:). The 79:stagger 60:biplane 257:  215:  66:, or 58:in a 56:wings 255:ISBN 213:ISBN 109:or 97:or 85:or 42:In 340:: 227:^ 113:. 70:. 62:, 46:, 221:. 151:s 143:g 141:/ 139:s 135:g 133:/ 131:s 127:g 123:s

Index


de Havilland Tiger Moth

Beechcraft Model 17 Staggerwing
aviation
horizontal
wings
biplane
triplane
multiplane
de Havilland Tiger Moth
Stearman
Sopwith Dolphin
Beech Model 17 Staggerwing
Sopwith Cuckoo
Vickers Vildebeest
Gloster TSR.38
center of pressure
stability
Decalage
ISBN
9780850451634


NACA technical report No.310
ISBN
0-370-00084-6
NACA technical report No.269
NACA technical report No.256
Biplane and triplane wing lift and efficiency

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.