Knowledge (XXG)

Stoneridge Investment Partners v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.

Source 📝

504: 31: 127:
The private right of action under §10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 does not extend to aiders and abettors. Because the conduct of a secondary actor must therefore satisfy each of the elements for §10(b) liability, the plaintiff must prove reliance upon a material misrepresentation or
274:. Such defendants can only be held liable if their own conduct satisfies each of the elements for §10(b) liability. Therefore, the plaintiff must prove reliance, in making a decision to acquire or hold a security, upon a material misrepresentation or omission by the defendant. 314: 579: 375: 115: 82: 383: 584: 569: 564: 398: 574: 545: 511: 251: 35: 271: 259: 538: 503: 406: 236: 74: 531: 288: 267: 183: 337: 282: 263: 450: 254:
pertaining to the scope of liability of secondary actors, such as lawyers and accountants, for
483: 294: 151: 515: 437: 255: 175: 163: 187: 159: 54:
Stoneridge Investment Partners, L.L.C., Petitioner v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc., et al.
558: 300: 97: 63: 356: 195: 171: 143: 77: 470:
Walter, David (2008). "Developments in US Securities Litigation: The Decision in
441: 286:
as the "most important securities fraud case in years," and also commented by
93: 487: 89: 315:
Central Bank of Denver, N.A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N.A.
266:, the Court held that "aiders and abettors" of fraud cannot be held 455:, Primary Liability, and the Need to Properly Define Section 10(b)" 225:
Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
30: 519: 580:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court
116:
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
247:
Stoneridge Investment Partners v. Scientific-Atlanta
24:
Stoneridge Investment Partners v. Scientific-Atlanta
472:
Stoneridge Investment Partners v Scientific-Atlanta
229: 216: 208: 203: 132: 121: 110: 105: 69: 59: 49: 42: 23: 212:Kennedy, joined by Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, Alito 399:"StoneRidge Ruling Shields Third-Party Advisers" 355:Bravin, Jess; Scannel, Kara (January 16, 2008). 270:under the private right of action authorized by 539: 338:"Supreme Court Restricts Securities Lawsuits" 250:, 552 U.S. 148 (2008), was a decision by the 8: 96:1091; 76 U.S.L.W. 4039; Fed. Sec. L. Rep. ( 546: 532: 357:"Top Court Limits Shareholder Fraud Suits" 20: 262:. In a 5-3 decision authored by Justice 328: 100:) ¶ 94,556; 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 46 397:McCollam, Douglas (January 15, 2008). 336:Greenhouse, Linda (January 15, 2008). 374:Wingfield, Brian (January 15, 2008). 18:2008 United States Supreme Court case 7: 500: 498: 476:Journal of International Banking Law 220:Stevens, joined by Souter, Ginsburg 518:. You can help Knowledge (XXG) by 512:Supreme Court of the United States 36:Supreme Court of the United States 14: 585:United States Supreme Court stubs 570:United States securities case law 565:United States Supreme Court cases 428:case – much ado about nothing?". 502: 430:Journal of Investment Compliance 29: 260:Securities Exchange Act of 1934 575:2008 in United States case law 1: 510:This article related to the 424:Edison, Andrew (2008). "The 252:United States Supreme Court 601: 497: 376:"Stoneridge And The Court" 272:§10(b) of the Exchange Act 128:omission by the defendant. 449:Souza, Travis S. (2008). 442:10.1108/15285810810859243 234: 224: 137: 126: 28: 45:Decided January 15, 2008 237:Securities Exchange Act 43:Argued October 9, 2007 451:"Freedom to Defraud: 235:Section 10(b) of the 409:on January 19, 2008. 386:on January 18, 2008. 88:128 S. Ct. 761; 169 361:Wall Street Journal 289:Wall Street Journal 184:Ruth Bader Ginsburg 283:The New York Times 280:was recognized by 268:secondarily liable 264:Anthony M. Kennedy 148:Associate Justices 114:Certiorari to the 527: 526: 243: 242: 592: 548: 541: 534: 506: 499: 491: 466: 459:Duke Law Journal 445: 411: 410: 405:. Archived from 394: 388: 387: 382:. Archived from 371: 365: 364: 352: 346: 345: 333: 256:securities fraud 133:Court membership 33: 32: 21: 600: 599: 595: 594: 593: 591: 590: 589: 555: 554: 553: 552: 495: 469: 448: 423: 420: 418:Further reading 415: 414: 396: 395: 391: 373: 372: 368: 354: 353: 349: 335: 334: 330: 325: 310: 186: 176:Clarence Thomas 174: 164:Anthony Kennedy 162: 152:John P. Stevens 101: 44: 38: 19: 12: 11: 5: 598: 596: 588: 587: 582: 577: 572: 567: 557: 556: 551: 550: 543: 536: 528: 525: 524: 507: 493: 492: 482:(5): 267–270. 467: 446: 419: 416: 413: 412: 389: 366: 347: 342:New York Times 327: 326: 324: 321: 320: 319: 309: 306: 241: 240: 232: 231: 227: 226: 222: 221: 218: 214: 213: 210: 206: 205: 201: 200: 199: 198: 188:Stephen Breyer 160:Antonin Scalia 149: 146: 141: 135: 134: 130: 129: 124: 123: 119: 118: 112: 108: 107: 103: 102: 87: 71: 67: 66: 61: 57: 56: 51: 50:Full case name 47: 46: 40: 39: 34: 26: 25: 17: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 597: 586: 583: 581: 578: 576: 573: 571: 568: 566: 563: 562: 560: 549: 544: 542: 537: 535: 530: 529: 523: 521: 517: 513: 508: 505: 501: 496: 489: 485: 481: 477: 473: 468: 464: 460: 456: 454: 447: 443: 439: 435: 431: 427: 422: 421: 417: 408: 404: 400: 393: 390: 385: 381: 377: 370: 367: 362: 358: 351: 348: 343: 339: 332: 329: 322: 317: 316: 312: 311: 307: 305: 303: 302: 301:Business Week 297: 296: 291: 290: 285: 284: 279: 275: 273: 269: 265: 261: 257: 253: 249: 248: 238: 233: 228: 223: 219: 215: 211: 207: 204:Case opinions 202: 197: 193: 189: 185: 181: 177: 173: 169: 165: 161: 157: 153: 150: 147: 145: 142: 140:Chief Justice 139: 138: 136: 131: 125: 120: 117: 113: 109: 104: 99: 95: 91: 85: 84: 79: 76: 72: 68: 65: 62: 58: 55: 52: 48: 41: 37: 27: 22: 16: 520:expanding it 509: 494: 479: 475: 471: 465:: 1179–1207. 462: 458: 452: 433: 429: 425: 407:the original 403:BusinessWeek 402: 392: 384:the original 379: 369: 360: 350: 341: 331: 313: 299: 293: 287: 281: 277: 276: 246: 245: 244: 230:Laws applied 196:Samuel Alito 191: 179: 172:David Souter 167: 155: 144:John Roberts 106:Case history 81: 53: 15: 559:Categories 453:Stoneridge 436:(1): 5–9. 426:Stoneridge 323:References 278:Stoneridge 258:under the 94:U.S. LEXIS 92:627; 2008 60:Docket no. 488:0267-937X 90:L. Ed. 2d 70:Citations 308:See also 209:Majority 217:Dissent 122:Holding 486:  380:Forbes 318:(1994) 298:, and 295:Forbes 194: 192:· 190:  182: 180:· 178:  170: 168:· 166:  158: 156:· 154:  514:is a 111:Prior 64:06-43 516:stub 484:ISSN 83:more 75:U.S. 73:552 474:". 438:doi 98:CCH 78:148 561:: 480:23 478:. 463:57 461:. 457:. 432:. 401:. 378:. 359:. 340:. 304:. 292:, 547:e 540:t 533:v 522:. 490:. 444:. 440:: 434:9 363:. 344:. 239:. 86:) 80:(

Index

Supreme Court of the United States
06-43
U.S.
148
more
L. Ed. 2d
U.S. LEXIS
CCH
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
John Roberts
John P. Stevens
Antonin Scalia
Anthony Kennedy
David Souter
Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer
Samuel Alito
Securities Exchange Act
United States Supreme Court
securities fraud
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Anthony M. Kennedy
secondarily liable
§10(b) of the Exchange Act
The New York Times
Wall Street Journal
Forbes
Business Week
Central Bank of Denver, N.A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N.A.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.