262:, supra, at 243. Were we to allow the aiding and abetting action proposed in this case, the defendant could be liable without any showing that the plaintiff relied upon the aider and abettor's statement or actions. . . .". When investors relied on such statements or actions, the court extends Rule 10b-5 liability to these secondary participants. The Court stated that "any person or entity, including a lawyer, accountant, or bank, who employs a manipulative device or makes a material misstatement (or omission) on which a purchaser or seller of securities relies may be liable as a primary violator under 10b-5. . .."
420:
31:
247:
does not extend to those who do not engage in a manipulative or deceptive practice but who aid and abet such a violation of 10(b)." This distinguished between the primary liability of violators of Rule 10b-5 and non-primary defendants, who had not directly deceived investors. This was a more literal
255:
The
Supreme Court's ruling reversed a long history of court decisions and SEC enforcement actions where aiders and abettors, often banks, accountants, trustees, and attorneys, were found liable under Rule 10b-5. The case makes the distinction between primary violators, who directly misstate or omit
242:
The majority opinion in the case established that liability did not extend to "aiders or abettors" that participate in misstatements or omissions in connection with the sale of securities. The
Supreme Court held that "private civil liability under
485:
286:
256:
material facts that are relied upon by investors, and aiders and abettors. According to the court: "A plaintiff must show reliance on the defendant's misstatement or omission to recover under 10b-5.
364:
271:
72:
292:
281:
500:
249:
332:
Hanson, Randall K.; Rockness, Joanne W. (1994). "Gaining a New
Balance in the Courts: Some of the Liability Burden Has Disappeared – But a Heavy Weight Remains".
505:
490:
480:
276:
495:
461:
106:
A private plaintiff may not maintain an aiding and abetting suit under
Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act. Tenth Circuit reversed.
427:
35:
307:
Blackman, S. G. (1994). "An
Analysis of Aider and Abettor Liability Under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934:
224:
454:
419:
236:
209:
393:
258:
141:
368:
64:
447:
252:'s Rule 10b-5, which prohibit fraud or deceit in connection with the purchase or sale of securities.
375:
232:
173:
54:
Central Bank of Denver, N.A., Petitioner v. First
Interstate Bank of Denver, N.A. and Jack K. Naber
341:
320:
137:
121:
431:
165:
153:
384:
244:
149:
129:
248:
reading than hitherto of
Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
474:
161:
67:
345:
324:
228:
79:
402:
96:
Certiorari to the United States Court of
Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
361:
Central Bank of Denver, N.A. v. First
Interstate Bank of Denver, N.A.
287:
List of United States
Supreme Court cases by the Rehnquist Court
30:
309:
Central Bank of Denver v. First Interstate Bank of Denver
220:
Central Bank of Denver v. First Interstate Bank of Denver
486:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court
435:
190:
Kennedy, joined by Rehnquist, O'Connor, Scalia, Thomas
272:
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 511
293:
Stoneridge Investment Partners v. Scientific-Atlanta
282:
Lists of United States Supreme Court cases by volume
202:
194:
186:
181:
110:
100:
92:
87:
59:
49:
42:
23:
455:
223:, 511 U.S. 164 (1994), was a decision by the
198:Stevens, joined by Blackmun, Souter, Ginsburg
8:
501:Implied statutory cause of action case law
462:
448:
20:
277:List of United States Supreme Court cases
24:Central Bank v. First Interstate Bank
18:1994 United States Supreme Court case
7:
416:
414:
434:. You can help Knowledge (XXG) by
428:Supreme Court of the United States
250:Securities and Exchange Commission
36:Supreme Court of the United States
14:
506:United States Supreme Court stubs
491:United States securities case law
481:United States Supreme Court cases
371:164 (1994) is available from:
418:
29:
496:1994 in United States case law
1:
426:This article related to the
225:United States Supreme Court
522:
413:
403:Oyez (oral argument audio)
207:
115:
105:
28:
43:Argued November 30, 1993
237:Securities Exchange Act
210:Securities Exchange Act
334:Journal of Accountancy
313:Connecticut Law Review
259:Basic Inc. v. Levinson
45:Decided April 19, 1994
227:, which held private
82:119; 62 U.S.L.W. 4230
78:114 S. Ct. 1439; 128
394:Library of Congress
233:aiding and abetting
174:Ruth Bader Ginsburg
142:Sandra Day O'Connor
126:Associate Justices
443:
442:
231:may not maintain
216:
215:
208:Section 10(b) of
122:William Rehnquist
513:
464:
457:
450:
422:
415:
407:
401:
398:
392:
389:
383:
380:
374:
349:
328:
111:Court membership
33:
32:
21:
521:
520:
516:
515:
514:
512:
511:
510:
471:
470:
469:
468:
411:
405:
399:
396:
390:
387:
381:
378:
372:
356:
331:
306:
303:
301:Further reading
268:
166:Clarence Thomas
164:
154:Anthony Kennedy
152:
140:
138:John P. Stevens
83:
44:
38:
19:
12:
11:
5:
519:
517:
509:
508:
503:
498:
493:
488:
483:
473:
472:
467:
466:
459:
452:
444:
441:
440:
423:
409:
408:
376:Google Scholar
355:
354:External links
352:
351:
350:
329:
302:
299:
298:
297:
289:
284:
279:
274:
267:
264:
214:
213:
205:
204:
200:
199:
196:
192:
191:
188:
184:
183:
179:
178:
177:
176:
150:Antonin Scalia
130:Harry Blackmun
127:
124:
119:
113:
112:
108:
107:
103:
102:
98:
97:
94:
90:
89:
85:
84:
77:
61:
57:
56:
51:
50:Full case name
47:
46:
40:
39:
34:
26:
25:
17:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
518:
507:
504:
502:
499:
497:
494:
492:
489:
487:
484:
482:
479:
478:
476:
465:
460:
458:
453:
451:
446:
445:
439:
437:
433:
429:
424:
421:
417:
412:
404:
395:
386:
377:
370:
366:
362:
358:
357:
353:
347:
343:
339:
335:
330:
326:
322:
318:
314:
310:
305:
304:
300:
295:
294:
290:
288:
285:
283:
280:
278:
275:
273:
270:
269:
265:
263:
261:
260:
253:
251:
246:
240:
238:
234:
230:
226:
222:
221:
211:
206:
201:
197:
193:
189:
185:
182:Case opinions
180:
175:
171:
167:
163:
159:
155:
151:
147:
143:
139:
135:
131:
128:
125:
123:
120:
118:Chief Justice
117:
116:
114:
109:
104:
99:
95:
91:
86:
81:
75:
74:
69:
66:
62:
58:
55:
52:
48:
41:
37:
27:
22:
16:
436:expanding it
425:
410:
360:
340:(2): 40–44.
337:
333:
316:
312:
308:
291:
257:
254:
241:
235:suits under
219:
218:
217:
203:Laws applied
169:
162:David Souter
157:
145:
133:
88:Case history
71:
53:
15:
475:Categories
245:Rule 10b-5
229:plaintiffs
346:0021-8448
325:0010-6151
239:§ 10(b).
80:L. Ed. 2d
60:Citations
359:Text of
319:: 1323.
266:See also
187:Majority
195:Dissent
101:Holding
406:
400:
397:
391:
388:
385:Justia
382:
379:
373:
344:
323:
296:(2008)
172:
170:·
168:
160:
158:·
156:
148:
146:·
144:
136:
134:·
132:
430:is a
367:
93:Prior
432:stub
369:U.S.
342:ISSN
321:ISSN
73:more
65:U.S.
63:511
365:511
338:178
311:".
68:164
477::
363:,
336:.
317:27
315:.
463:e
456:t
449:v
438:.
348:.
327:.
212:.
76:)
70:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.